Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy Research Articles

Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Hilar Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Without Greater Curvature Invasion

Splenic hilar lymphadenectomy has been recommended for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) involving the greater curvature. However, it is unclear whether laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPSHL) is associated with a long-term survival benefit for APGC without greater curvature invasion. To present the 5-year follow-up data from a randomized clinical trial that compared laparoscopic total gastrectomy (D2 group) with D2 plus LSPSHL (D2 + No. 10 group) among patients with resectable APGC. This is a post hoc secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial that enrolled 536 patients with potentially resectable APGC (cT2-4a, N0 or N+, and M0) without greater curvature invasion from January 5, 2015, to October 10, 2018. All patients were tracked for at least 5 years. The final follow-up was on October 30, 2023. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the D2 + No. 10 or D2 groups. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were measured. Recurrence patterns and causes of death were compared. A total of 526 patients (392 men [74.5%]; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [9.6] years) were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis, with 263 patients in each group. The 5-year DFS rate was 63.9% (95% CI, 58.1%-69.7%) for the D2 + No. 10 group and 55.1% (95% CI, 49.1%-61.1%) for the D2 group (log-rank P = .04). A statistically significant difference was observed in the 5-year OS between the D2 + No. 10 group and the D2 group (66.2% [95% CI, 60.4%-71.9%] vs 57.4% [95% CI, 51.4%-63.4%]; log-rank P = .03). The No. 10 lymph node exhibited a therapeutic value index (TVI) of 6.5, surpassing that of Nos. 8a (TVI, 3.0), 11 (TVI, 5.8), and 12a (TVI, 0.8). A total of 86 patients in the D2 + No. 10 group (cumulative incidence, 32.7%) and 111 patients in the D2 group (cumulative incidence, 42.2%) experienced recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95; P = .02). The multivariable competing risk regression model demonstrated that D2 + No. 10 remained an independent protective factor for a lower 5-year cumulative recurrence rate after surgery (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-1.00; P = .05). There was a significant difference in the 5-year cumulative recurrence rate at the No. 10 lymph node area between the 2 groups (D2 + No. 10 group vs D2 group: 0% vs 2.3% [n = 6]; P = .01). This post hoc secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial found that laparoscopic total gastrectomy with LSPSHL can improve the prognosis and reduce recurrence for APGC without greater curvature invasion. Future multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02333721.

Development and validation of a preoperative radiomics-based nomogram to identify patients who can benefit from splenic hilar lymphadenectomy: a pooled analysis of three prospective trials

Background: We aimed to use preoperative computed tomography images to develop a radiomic nomogram to select patients who would benefit from spleen-preserving splenic hilar (No.10) lymphadenectomy (SPSHL). Methods: A pooled analysis of three distinct prospective studies was performed. The splenic hilar lymph node (SHLN) ratio (sLNR) was established as the quotient of the number of metastatic SHLN to the total number of SHLN. Radiomic features reflecting the phenotypes of the primary tumor (RS1) and SHLN region (RS2) were extracted and used as predictive factors for sLNR. Results: This study included 733 patients: 301 in the D2 group and 432 in the D2+No.10 group. The optimal sLNR cutoff value was set at 0.4, and the D2+No.10 group was divided into three groups: sLNR=0, sLNR≤0.4, and sLNR>0.4. Patients in the D2+No. 10 group were randomly divided into the training (n=302) and validation (n=130) cohorts. The AUCs value of the nomogram, including RS1 and RS2, were 0.952 in the training cohort and 0.888 in the validation cohort. The entire cohort was divided into three groups based on the nomogram scores: low, moderate and high SHLN metastasis burden groups (LMB, MMB and HMB, respectively). A similar 5-year OS rate was found between the D2 and D2+No. 10 groups in the LMB and HMB groups. In the MMB group, the 5-year OS of the D2+No. 10 group (73.4%) was significantly higher than that of the D2 group (37.6%) (P<0.001). Conclusions: The nomogram showed good predictive ability for distinguishing patients with various SHLN metastasis burdens. It can accurately identify patients who would benefit from SPSHL.

Should the splenic hilar lymph node be dissected for the management of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction?

Splenic hilar lymphadenectomy is not recommended for advanced proximal gastric cancer that does not invade the greater curvature according to the results of the previous studies. The efficacy of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for type II and type III adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and easy spread to the greater curvature of the stomach remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy and identify the risk factors for metastasis to splenic hilar nodes. We examined patients who underwent R0/1 gastrectomy for Siewert types II and III at a single high-volume center in Japan. We analyzed the metastatic incidence, therapeutic value index, and risk factors for splenic hilar lymph node metastasis. We examined 126 patients (74, type II; 52, type III). Splenectomy was performed in 76 patients. Metastatic incidence and the therapeutic value index of splenic hilar lymph nodes in patients with type II and type III tumors were 4.5% and 0, and 21.9% and 9.4, respectively. In the patients who underwent splenectomy, we identified Siewert type III tumors (odds ratio: 6.93, 95% confidence interval: 1.24-38.8, p=0.027) and tumor location other than the lesser curvature (odds ratio: 7.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-41.1, p=0.023) to be independent risk factors. The metastatic incidence (46.2%) and therapeutic value index (15.4) were high in patients with both risk factors. Splenic hilar lymphadenectomy may contribute to the survival of patients with Siewert type III tumors, especially when the predominant location is not the lesser curvature.

Assessment of Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Hilar Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Without Invasion Into the Greater Curvature

The survival benefit of laparoscopic total gastrectomy combined with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSTG) for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) without invasion into the greater curvature remains uncertain. To compare the long-term and short-term efficacy of LSTG (D2 + No. 10 group) and conventional laparoscopic total gastrectomy (D2 group) for patients with APGC that has not invaded the greater curvature. In this open-label, prospective randomized clinical trial, a total of 536 patients with clinical stage cT2 to 4a/N0 to 3/M0 APGC without invasion into the greater curvature were enrolled from January 2015 to October 2018. The final follow-up was on October 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to February 2022. Eligible patients were randomized to the D2 + No. 10 group or the D2 group. The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes were 3-year overall survival (OS) and morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery. Of 526 included patients, 392 (74.5%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 60.6 (9.6) years. A total of 263 patients were included in the D2 + No. 10 group, and 263 were included in the D2 group. The 3-year DFS was 70.3% (95% CI, 64.8-75.8) for the D2 + No. 10 group and 64.3% (95% CI, 58.4-70.2; P = .11) for the D2 group, and the 3-year OS in the D2 + No. 10 group was better than that in the D2 group (75.7% [95% CI, 70.6-80.8] vs 66.5% [95% CI, 60.8-72.2]; P = .02). Multivariate analysis revealed that splenic hilar lymphadenectomy was not an independent protective factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63-1.16) or OS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59-1.12). Stratification analysis showed that patients with advanced posterior gastric cancer in the D2 + No. 10 group had better 3-year DFS (92.9% vs 39.3%; P < .001) and OS (92.9% vs 42.9%; P < .001) than those in the D2 group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with advanced posterior gastric cancer could have the survival benefit from No. 10 lymph node dissection (DFS: HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.46; OS: HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.52). Although LSTG could not significantly improve the 3-year DFS of patients with APGC without invasion into the greater curvature, patients with APGC located posterior gastric wall may benefit from LSTG. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02333721.

Effect of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy on locally advanced Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction with a tumor diameter ≥4 cm: a five-year survival analysis

Objective: To examine the long term outcome of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (SHL) for locally advanced Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) with a tumor diameter ≥4 cm. Methods: A total of 489 locally advanced Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG patients with a tumor diameter ≥4 cm who underwent radical resection from January 2010 to April 2016 were included. There were 383 males and 106 females. There were 225 patients aged≥65 years and 264 patients aged <65 years. SHL was conducted in 270 patients(SHL group). Wilcoxon rank-sum test or χ2 test were conducted for inter-group comparison. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to analyze the long term outcome of SHL and the prognosis factors of overall survival. Kaplan-Meier curve was drawn finally. The results of survival analysis were verified by Log-rank test. Results: Followed-up to April 2021,the median follow-up time was 78.0 months (range: 74.0 to 85.0 months), the follow-up rate was 95.5%(467/489). The splenic hilar lymphnode metastasis rate of the SHL group was 12.6% (34/270). Younger patients (<65 years old), less complications, higher proportion of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy were demonstrated in the SHL group (χ2: 5.644 to 6.744, all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that SHL was the independent prognosis factor of overall survival for patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG and a tumor diameter≥4 cm (HR=0.68, 95%CI: 0.52 to 0.88, P=0.004) along with preoperative CA19-9, pathological T stage, pathological N stage, adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative complication. Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that the SHL group had better 5-year overall survival than non-SHL group (62.4% vs. 39.2%, χ2=17.983, P=0.006) in Siewert type Ⅲ AEG rather than in Siewert type Ⅱ AEG(57.3% vs. 53.7%, χ2=3.031, P=0.805). Conclusion: In experienced center, splenic hilar lymphadenectomy can improve the prognosis of Siewert type Ⅲ AEG with a tumor diameter ≥4 cm.

Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy shows better short-term advantages: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.

Robotic surgery may be advantageous for complex surgery. We aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative short-term outcomes of spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (SPSHL) during robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy. From July 2016 to December 2020, the clinicopathological data of 115 patients who underwent robotic total gastrectomy combined with robotic SPSHL (RSPSHL) and 697 patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy combined with laparoscopic SPSHL (LSPSHL) were retrospectively analyzed. A 1:2 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the differences between the two groups to compare their outcomes. The Generic Error Rating Tool was used to evaluate the technical performance. After PSM, the baseline preoperative characteristics of the 115 patients in the RSPSHL and 230 patients in the LSPSHL groups were balanced. The dissection time of the region of the splenic artery trunk (5.4 ± 1.9min vs. 7.8 ± 3.6min, P < 0.001), the estimated blood loss during SPSHL (9.6 ± 4.8ml vs. 14.9 ± 7.8ml, P < 0.001), and the average number of intraoperative technical errors during SPSHL (15.1 ± 3.4 times/case vs. 20.7 ± 4.3 times/case, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the RSPSHL group than in the LSPSHL group. The RSPSHL group showed higher dissection rates of No. 10 (78.3% vs. 70.0%, P = 0.104) and No. 11d (54.8% vs. 40.4%, P = 0.012) lymph nodes and significantly improved postoperative recovery results in terms of times to ambulation, first flatus, and first intake (P < 0.05). The splenectomy rates of the two groups were similar (1.7% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.539), and there was no significant difference in morbidity and mortality within postoperative 30days (13.0% vs. 15.2%, P = 0.589). Compared to LSPSHL, RSPSHL has more advantages in terms of surgical qualities and postoperative recovery process with similar morbidity and mortality. For complex SPSHL, robotic surgery may be a better choice.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Combined With Spleen-Preserving Hilar Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer

The long-term survival of patients with laparoscopic total gastrectomy combined with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSTG) for advanced upper-third gastric cancer (AUTGC) and the association of splenic hilar lymph node (LN-10) metastasis with survival remain controversial. To evaluate the long-term outcomes of LSTG and the value index of LN-10 metastasis for patients with AUTGC. The Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study 4 (CLASS-04) was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial that involved 19 centers in China. A total of 251 eligible patients with clinical stage T2, T3, or T4a upper-third gastric cancer without distant metastases were enrolled from September 1, 2016, to October 31, 2017. The final follow-up was on December 31, 2020. All patients were enrolled to undergo LSTG. The main outcomes were the 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of LN-10 metastasis with survival. Among the 251 patients, 246 (98.0%; mean [SD] age, 60.1 [9.4] years; 197 [80.1%] male) underwent LSTG and completed the study. The 3-year OS was 79.1% (95% CI, 74.0%-84.2%), and the 3-year DFS was 73.1% (95% CI, 67.4%-78.8%). In addition, the 3-year therapeutic value index of LN-10 dissection was 4.5, exceeding the indexes for the partial D2 LN group (including LNs 5, 6, 11d, and 12a). Nineteen patients (7.7%) with LN-10 metastasis had significantly worse survival than the nonmetastasis group, and multivariate analysis revealed that splenic LN-10 metastasis was an independent risk factor (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; 95% CI, 1.08-5.26; P = .03; DFS: HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.12-4.63; P = .02). Moreover, patients with LN-10 metastasis were more likely to have recurrence (42.1% vs 20.7%, P = .03), especially when multiple site metastasis was present (21.1% vs 4.4%, P = .01). However, patients with LN-10 metastasis who received adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly better OS and DFS than those without adjuvant chemotherapy and achieved the same oncologic effect as those without LN-10 metastasis. This results of this study suggest that LSTG for AUTGC has feasible long-term outcomes. In addition, patients with LN-10 metastasis may have worse survival and may be more prone to recurrence.

Surgical Outcomes, Technical Performance, and Surgery Burden of Robotic Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Study.

To compare the short-term outcomes, surgery burden, and technical performance of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer (GC). The impact of robotic systems on total gastrectomy remains obscure. This prospective study included 50 patients with advanced proximal GC underwent RTG combined with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy between March 2018 and February 2020. Patients who underwent LTG in the FUGES-002, http://links.lww.com/SLA/C929 study were enrolled to compare the outcomes between RTG and LTG. After propensity score matching, 48 patients in the RTG group and 96 patients in the LTG group were included in the analysis. The RTG group had a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss than the LTG group (38.7 vs 66.4 mL, P = 0.042). Significantly more extraperigastric lymph nodes were retrieved in the RTG group than in the LTG group (20.2 vs 17.5, P = 0.039). The average number of errors was lower in the RTG group than in the LTG group (43.2 vs 53.8 times/case, P < 0.001). The RTG group had a higher technical skill score (30.2 vs 28.4, P < 0.001) and a lower surgery task load index (33.2 vs 39.8, P < 0.001) than the LTG group. No significant difference was found in terms of postoperative morbidity between the 2 groups (14.6% vs 16.7%, P = 0.748). In complex total gastrectomy for GC, compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery provides a technically superior operative environment and reduces surgeon workload at high-volume specialized institutions.

130P Reappraisal of the role of no. 10 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer in the era of minimal invasive surgery during total gastrectomy: A pooled analysis of 4 prospective trials

For patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (LAPGC), the individualized selection of patients with highly suspected splenic hilar (No. 10) lymph node (LN) metastasis to undergo splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, is a clinical dilemma. This study aimed to re-evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPSHL) and to identify the population who would benefit from it. A total of 1068 patients (D2 group=409; D2+No. 10 group=659) who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy from four prospective trials between January 2015 and July 2019 were analyzed. No significant difference in the incidence (16.9% vs. 16.4%; P = 0.837) of postoperative complications were found between the two groups. The metastasis rate of No. 10 LN among patients in the D2+No. 10 group was 10.3% (68/659). Based on the decision tree, patients with LAPGC with tumor invading the greater curvature (Gre), patients with non-Gre-invading LAPGC with a tumor size >5 cm and clinical positive locoregional LNs were defined as the high-priority No. 10 dissection group. The metastasis rate of No. 10 LNs in the high-priority group was 19.4% (41/211). In high-priority group, the 3-year overall survival of the D2+No. 10 group was better than that of the D2 group (74.4% vs. 42.1%; P = 0.005), and the therapeutic index of No. 10 was higher than the indices of most suprapancreatic stations. LSPSHL for LAPGC is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons. LSPSHL could be recommended for the high-priority group patients even without invasion of the Gre.

156P Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy during total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer: A randomized clinical trial

156P Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy during total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer: A randomized clinical trial

Reappraise role of No. 10 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer in the era of minimal invasive surgery during total gastrectomy: a pooled analysis of 4 prospective trial.

For patients with locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (LAPGC), the individualized selection of patients with highly suspected splenic hilar (No. 10) lymph node (LN) metastasis to undergo splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, is a clinical dilemma. This study aimed to re-evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPSHL) and to identify the population who would benefit from it. A total of 1068 patients (D2 group = 409; D2 + No. 10 group = 659) who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy from four prospective trials between January 2015 and July 2019 were analyzed. No significant difference in the incidence (16.9% vs. 16.4%; P = 0.837) of postoperative complications were found between the two groups. The metastasis rate of No. 10 LN among patients in the D2 + No. 10 group was 10.3% (68/659). Based on the decision tree, patients with LAPGC with tumor invading the greater curvature (Gre), patients with non-Gre-invading LAPGC with a tumor size > 5cm and clinical positive locoregional LNs were defined as the high-priority No. 10 dissection group. The metastasis rate of No. 10 LNs in the high-priority group was 19.4% (41/211). In high-priority group, the 3-year overall survival of the D2 + No. 10 group was better than that of the D2 group (74.4% vs. 42.1%; P = 0.005), and the therapeutic index of No. 10 was higher than the indices of most suprapancreatic stations. LSPSHL for LAPGC is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons. LSPSHL could be recommended for the high-priority group patients even without invasion of the Gre.

The Retropancreatic Fusion Fascia Oriented Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Approach In D2 Total Gastrectomy.

BackgroundThe retropancreatic fusion fascia is recognized as the anatomical landmark during retropancreatic mobilization. However, its role in D2 total gastrectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer (PAGC) remains unexplored. This study aimed to develop the retropancreatic fusion fascia-oriented ex vivo approach for splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (RP-SL) to avoid difficulty in using the total laparoscopic approach (TL-SL).Material/MethodsThe data for patients with PAGC who underwent D2 total gastrectomy were retrieved from our clinical database and electronic medical records (December 2016 to December 2018), with a 1:1 match ratio for balance of the 2 groups.ResultsIn sum, 84 matched patients were included in the study. There were 2360 retrieved lymph nodes (LNs), with an average of 28.10. Sixteen patients were confirmed with positive splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, and the mean harvested lymph nodes (LNs) were significantly increased in the RP-SL group compared to the TL-SL group (3.07 vs. 2.29, P<0.001), decreased operative time (193.21 min vs. 247.74 min, P<0.001), and less blood loss (96.90 mL vs. 185.24 mL, P=0.001) in the RP-SL group. Postoperative hospital stay (6.55 days vs. 7.26 days), rate of morbidity (9.50% vs. 11.91%), and overall costs (¥65255.64 vs. ¥64419.91) were comparable between the groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe landmark at the conjunction between the superior mesenteric vessels and the inferior pancreatic margin made it feasible to identify the retropancreatic areolar. The RP-SL approach was safe and efficient for splenic hilar lymphadenectomy.

Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy During Total Gastrectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: The splenic hilar lymph node (No. 10 LN) dissection is still controversial for patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) not invading the greater curvature. The present study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymphadenectomy (LSPL) for APGC not invading the greater curvature and the characteristic of No. 10 LN metastasis. Methods: This single-center, open-label, randomized, phase III clinical trial was done in the Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FMUUH). Individuals aged 18 to 75 years who had histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma in proximal stomach with clinical stage cT2-4a/N0-3/M0 not invading the greater curvature were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to receive laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with either D2 lymphadenectomy (D2 group) or D2 lymphadenectomy without No. 10 LN dissection (D2- group). The main outcomes were morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery, number of retrieved LNs, and the metastasis rate of No. 10 LN. Analysis was based on modified intention-to-treat. Findings: From Jan 5, 2015, to Dec 10, 2018, 268 participants were randomly assigned to the D2 and D2- groups respectively. The full analysis set consisted of 263 participants in the D2 and D2- groups respectively. There were no significant differences in the intraoperative and postoperative morbidity between the D2 and D2- groups (all P>0.05). And there was no mortality in either group. There were more retrieved LNs in the D2 group than in the D2- group (45.1 vs 40.6, P=0.001). The metastasis rate of the No. 10 LN was 13.3% (35/263): 4.9% (2/41) in the early stage, and 14.9% (18/223) in the advanced stage. Pathological T (pT) stage and pN stage were related to No. 10 LN metastasis. The metastasis rates of No. 10 LN in T3-4a tumors located in the lesser curvature, posterior wall or multiple parts were all higher than 10%. Interpretation: Experienced surgeons can safely perform LSPL for APGC with more retrieved LNs. For APGC located in the lesser curvature, posterior wall or multiple parts with a clinical stage cT3-4a, dissection of the No.10 LN is necessary. Trial Registration: The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02333721; the trial has ended and this report represents the final analysis. Funding Statement: This study was supported by Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province (2016Y9031; 2017Y9011). Construction Project of Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center (No. [2017]171). Fujian Science and Technology Innovation Joint Fund Project (2017Y9004). Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology of Fujian Province (2018Y9041). Special Fund for Clinical Research of Wu Jieping Medical Foundation (No: 320.6750.17511). Declaration of Interests: There are no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose from any authors. Ethics Approval Statement: The trial protocol was approved by the FMUUH Ethics Committee, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Enlightenment and reflection of splenic hilar lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer

Splenic hilar lymph node (LN) is the difficulty and focus of perigastric LN dissection during radical gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC). Although the new edition of Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines excluded the splenic hilar LN from the D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with APGC, there are still few high-level evidences. Meanwhile, the guideline recommends that splenectomy is still necessary for patients with APGC involving the greater curvature. With the support of increasing evidences, the spleen-preserving splenic hilar LN dissection has been recognized by more and more scholars. Additionally, the technique of laparoscopy provides a new method for splenic hilar LN dissection. Our center proposed a new technique named Huang′s three-step maneuver for laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, which not only reduces the difficulty of operation, but also makes the technique easier to popularize and with a significance of minimally invasive effect. During the clinical practice, the dissection of LNs behind the splenic portal vessels is also one of the controversies. Therefore, the difficult technique of splenic hilar LN dissection not only requires us to make a technical exploration, but also requires us to explore precise indications, in order to avoid unnecessary operation in patients who do not require dissection of the No.10 LNs and to avoid missing the opportunity for radical surgery in high-risk patients because of the difficult techniques. Key words: Gastric neoplasms; Surgical procedure, operative; Splenic hilar lymph node; Lymphadenectomy; Laparoscopy

Robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Robotic system may have potential advantages to facilitate the technically challenging splenic hilar lymphadenectomy during gastrectomy for gastric cancer. However, robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy is performed infrequently not only because of the limited availability of the robot but also because of its technical difficulty. In this study, we describe our technique of performing robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy in detail to facilitate wider application and present operative outcomes and the follow-up results of the procedure. From 2005 to 2015, 93 patients underwent robotic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. One patient with obvious lymph node (LN) metastasis received splenectomy and was excluded from the analysis. Intraoperative complications, operation and console time, estimated blood loss, postoperative morbidity and mortality, the number of harvested LNs in total and at the splenic hilum, and 5-year overall survival were analyzed, retrospectively. Among the 92 patients, robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy was successfully performed in 91 patients except one who experienced intraoperative splenic artery injury which demanded splenectomy to be performed simultaneously. The overall mean operation time and console time were 287.2 ± 66.0 and 180.2 ± 47.2min, respectively. Mean estimated blood loss was 141.1 ± 227.0ml. The mortality was 1.1% (1/92). The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 16.3% (15/92). There was no case of pancreatic fistula, whole splenic infarction, or the delayed aneurysm of splenic artery. The mean numbers of harvested LNs in total and at the splenic hilum were 50.8 ± 18.1 and 1.9 ± 2.6. The 5-year overall survival was 86.3% and 5-year recurrence-free survival was 87.4%. This study suggests that robotic application for spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy could be a feasible and safe method.

Effects of duodenal transection timing on clinical short-term outcomes of patients with laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer

BackgroundTo determine the optimal timing of duodenal transection in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) in combination with laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPL) for advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC).MethodsOne hundred twenty-seven patients with APGC who received LATG with duodenal transection as well as LSPL between January 2017 and July 2018 were retrospectively recruited in this study. According to the different transection timing, the patients were allocated into two groups: a conventional group (CG) who received the duodenal transection prior to the LSPL and an experimental group (EG) who were given LSPL before the duodenum was transected. Clinical short-term outcomes were compared in the two groups.ResultsAnalysis of the demographical and clinical characteristics showed that the two groups were comparable with no significant differences between CG and EG in the study patients regardless of their body mass indices (BMI). The intraoperative and postoperative indicators for clinical short-term outcomes were compared between the CG and EC, and results indicated that the EG had significant shorter mean time of LSPL and total operation time than those in the CG (P < 0.05). Of note, the numbers of patients with intraoperative injury and the volume of blood loss during the LSPL procedure were significantly reduced in the EG versus CG (P < 0.05). For the obese APGC patients, administration of LSPL prior to duodenal transection significantly increased the number of dissected No.10 lymph nodes (LNs) (P < 0.05). The other intraoperative and postoperative indicators did not show any differences between the two comparison groups.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrated that duodenal transection timing was significantly associated with clinical short-term outcomes of APGC patients. The duodenal transection prior to the LSPL is superior overall to the conventional transection timing in the treatment of APGC patients with LATG and LSPL in combination.

Is Routine Splenectomy Justified for All Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancers? Histological Reappraisal of Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy.

Although splenectomy is recommended during resection for left-sided resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to perform lymphadenectomy of station10 (splenic hilum), no level I evidence justifies this procedure. This study aims to evaluate the rate of lymph node (LN) and contiguous involvement of the splenic hilum in resectable distal PDAC. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent splenopancreatectomy for PDAC in the past 10years. Station10 LN were routinely isolated, and all corresponding microscopic slides were reinterpreted by a pathologist. The computed tomography (CT) results of patients with tumoral involvement of the spleen or splenic hilum by contiguity (TISOSH) and ≤ 10mm between the tumor and spleen on pathology were blindly reviewed by two radiologists to evaluate CT for diagnosis of TISOSH. We included 110 consecutive patients, including 104 with analyzable station 10 LN. The tumor was N+ in 58 (53%) patients. The median number of LN identified at station10 was 2.0 ± 3.0. No station10 LNs were detected in 42 (40%) patients. No patients had tumor-positive LN at station10. TISOSH was found in nine (8%) patients, and was significantly associated with tail location (p = 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.005), and multivisceral involvement (p = 0.015). For diagnosis of TISOSH, the sensitivity and specificity of CT were respectively 89% and 95% for radiologist 1 and 89% and 100% for radiologist 2. Splenic preservation during resection of distal PDAC may be an option in selected patients with body tumors and no suspected splenic or splenic hilum involvement on preoperative CT.

Randomized controlled trial comparing short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer: An interim report.

We compared the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic and open spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPL and OSPL) for gastric cancer. We performed a single-center, randomized, controlled trial to compare the short-term surgical outcomes between LSPL and OSPL. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02980861). A total of 222 patients were enrolled (114 in the LSPL group and 108 in the OSPL group). There were no significant differences between the two groups in operative time (P = 0.152), a number of harvested lymph nodes (P = 0.669) including no. 10 lymph nodes (2.1 ± 1.4 vs 2.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.713). The time taken for no. 10 lymph node dissection was similar in both groups (13.9 ± 10.4 vs 15.2 ± 9.4 minutes, P = 0.217); however, the LSPL group experienced less total blood loss (P < 0.001) and less blood loss during no. 10 lymph node dissection compared with the OSPL group (15.3 ± 37.8 vs 29.5 ± 36.4 mL, P < 0.001). The postoperative complication rates of LSPL and OSPL were 18.3% and 16.1%, respectively (P = 0.331). LSPL is a safe and feasible surgical procedure in no. 10 LN dissection for patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer. Thus, this prospective trial is continuing.

Is routine splenectomy still justified for left-sided pancreatic cancer? Histological reappraisal of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy

Is routine splenectomy still justified for left-sided pancreatic cancer? Histological reappraisal of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy

Is routine splenectomy still justified for left-sided pancreatic cancer? Histological reappraisal of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy

Is routine splenectomy still justified for left-sided pancreatic cancer? Histological reappraisal of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy