The Gap: Study Versus Application Contrary to a sometimes expressed opinion, considerable research on the religious and social mission of the church, including examinations of the pastoral horizons of the U.S. Catholic Church, has long been under way. Frequently, however, much of this research effort has suffered from subsequent failures to apply its findings. Too often, moreover, the conclusions have been lodged on the dusty shelves of academe. Researchers, as if in defense of their scientific objectivity and "neutrality," have felt that it would be demeaning to interpret the significance of their findings for decision-makers. In turn, the decision-makers--especially church social actionists-unable to see much sense in the technical jargon and tentative conclusions of the research specialists, have tended to deprecate the relevance of socio-religious research to the real world of the church. To the pastoral-minded, a great deal of research knowledge seems simply irrelevant, perhaps at times because from their viewpoint, as Harris Dienstrey has said in another context, "the picture of man that emerges from it is of a stunted, inept being, not fully capable of ordering his life in a meaningful way." It appears certain in any event that, consistent with a major strand of the American cultural ethos, those in responsible church positions have not always seemed to be holding research in high esteem whether for appropriate and sound reasons or not. For the most part, in fact, decision-makers in our society, whether in ecclesiastical or other areas of life, have traditionally appeared to feel that the socio-statistical researcher was pursuing "pie-in-the-sky" and that, in consequence, little insight into the human condition was to be gained from listening to his counsels. Whatever may be the blame or reasons for their mutual sins toward each other, the fact is that for too long the researchers and the organizational churchmen have, on the surface of things, been at loggerheads, living seemingly in splendid isolation from each other, unable to appreciate, according to observers, that a little "ecumenism" might be a good thing within particular church structures themselves.
Read full abstract