SESSION TITLE: Monday Electronic Posters 5 SESSION TYPE: Original Inv Poster Discussion PRESENTED ON: 10/21/2019 02:30 PM - 03:15 PM PURPOSE: Exercise-induced asthma is commonly encountered in clinical practice. An exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) test is an important diagnostic tool for exercise-induced asthma, especially in patients in whom routine spirometry is normal. Limited information exists in medical literature on flow rates during EIB, including small airway function parameters such as the mid expiratory flow rate during 25-75% of FVC(MEFR) and its relation to bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The objective of this study was to determine (i) the correlation between change in MEFR to change in FEV1 during EIB; (ii) the correlation between the decline in MEFR during EIB to decline in FEV1 in patients with a positive EIB. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed EIB tests performed on 79 patients in our institution from 2008-2018. Parameters reviewed included age, gender, spirometric data including FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio, MEFR25-75%, and the relative changes from baseline for FEV1 and MEFR25-75% during the EIB. Number of patients with positive and negative tests was abstracted. Per current guidelines, a positive EIB was defined as >10% decrease in FEV1, within 30 minutes post-exercise. Decline in MEFR post-exercise was also noted. Values are expressed as means+ SD. Co-relation analysis was performed to assess correlation between studied parameters and BrHR. p< 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. RESULTS: Mean age: 41+ 12.9 years; 67 % were female. Mean FEV1 was 110+17%predicted, with FEV1/FVC ratio of 80+6.2%. Fourteen percent had a positive test. Mean change in FEV1 during the test was -1+10.4% pred. Pre-test MEFR: 88+26 %predicted. Post-test MEFR: 89+30 L/sec. Change in MEFR during test was 2.25+22% predicted. Using Pearson’s correlation analysis, correlation between change in FEV1 versus (i) pre-test MEFR (r= -0.002, p< 0.98). (ii) post-test MEFR (r=0.433, p < 0.001). (ii) aggregate MEFR during test (r=0.433, p < 0.001). (iv) change in MEFR (r=0.78, p=0.005) In patients with a positive EIB, no significant correlation was noted between change in FEV1 versus pre-test MEFR or aggregate MEFR during test. However, a significant correlation was noted with post-test MEFR (r=0.72, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Change in MEFRs corelates with bronchial hyperresponsiveness in EIB. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Further studies are needed to determine if change in MEFR can be used as an adjunct parameter for diagnosing bronchial hyperresponsiveness. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Debapriya Datta, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Gaurav Manek, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Nihar Shah, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Katherine Stettmeier, source=Web Response
Read full abstract