The objective of this study was to assess the variability of quantitative streaking between and within groups of laboratory professionals, students, and an automated spiral plater. In today9s clinical laboratories, advances in technology present an ever-changing landscape that mandates adaptations and the microbiology lab is no exception. Despite these advancements, one of the most quintessential manual techniques employed by laboratory professionals and taught to clinical laboratory science and technician students is quantitative streaking of bacterial cultures. Although few, there are studies detailing the accuracy of a 0.001 mL calibrated loop, perhaps the most common tool for quantitative streaking; however, there has been a lack of work addressing the variability associated with laboratory personnel9s individual techniques and inherent variability. Our study analyzed the number of bacterial colony forming units (CFU)/mL that resulted from sequential plating by our control groups and automatic spiral plater from a common sample. The sample was a dilution of bacteria in saline from an initial 0.5 McFarland standard (approximation of 1.5x108 CFU/mL). Preliminary data indicates that in most instances there were significant differences seen (via ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests; p