Anaphase Spindle Research Articles

Torques within and outside the human spindle balance twist at anaphase.

At each cell division, nanometer-scale motors and microtubules give rise to the micron-scale spindle. Many mitotic motors step helically around microtubules in vitro, and most are predicted to twist the spindle in a left-handed direction. However, the human spindle exhibits only slight global twist, raising the question of how these molecular torques are balanced. Here, we find that anaphase spindles in the epithelial cell line MCF10A have a high baseline twist, and we identify factors that both increase and decrease this twist. The midzone motors KIF4A and MKLP1 are together required for left-handed twist at anaphase, and we show that KIF4A generates left-handed torque in vitro. The actin cytoskeleton also contributes to left-handed twist, but dynein and its cortical recruitment factor LGN counteract it. Together, our work demonstrates that force generators regulate twist in opposite directions from both within and outside the spindle, preventing strong spindle twist during chromosome segregation.

Plasticity of the mitotic spindle in response to karyotype variation

Karyotypes, composed of chromosomes, must be accurately partitioned by the mitotic spindle for optimal cell health. However, it is unknown how underlying characteristics of karyotypes, such as chromosome number and size, govern the scaling of the mitotic spindle to ensure accurate chromosome segregation and cell proliferation. We utilize budding yeast strains engineered with fewer chromosomes, including just two "mega chromosomes," to study how spindle size and function are responsive to, and scaled by, karyotype. We determined that deletion and overexpression of spindle-related genes are detrimental to the growth of strains with two chromosomes, suggesting that mega chromosomes exert altered demands on the spindle. Using confocal microscopy, we demonstrate that cells with fewer but longer chromosomes have smaller spindle pole bodies, fewer microtubules, and longer spindles. Moreover, using electron tomography and confocal imaging, we observe elongated, bent anaphase spindles with fewer core microtubules in strains with mega chromosomes. Cells harboring mega chromosomes grow more slowly, are delayed in mitosis, and a subset struggle to complete chromosome segregation. We propose that the karyotype of the cell dictates the microtubule number, type, spindle pole body size, and spindle length, subsequently influencing the dynamics of mitosis, such as the rate of spindle elongation and the velocity of pole separation. Taken together, our results suggest that mitotic spindles are highly plastic ultrastructures that can accommodate and adjust to a variety of karyotypes, even within a species.

Dynamic localization of the chromosomal passenger complex in trypanosomes is controlled by the orphan kinesins KIN-A and KIN-B

The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) is an important regulator of cell division, which shows dynamic subcellular localization throughout mitosis, including kinetochores and the spindle midzone. In traditional model eukaryotes such as yeasts and humans, the CPC consists of the catalytic subunit Aurora B kinase, its activator INCENP, and the localization module proteins Borealin and Survivin. Intriguingly, Aurora B and INCENP as well as their localization pattern are conserved in kinetoplastids, an evolutionarily divergent group of eukaryotes that possess unique kinetochore proteins and lack homologs of Borealin or Survivin. It is not understood how the kinetoplastid CPC assembles nor how it is targeted to its subcellular destinations during the cell cycle. Here, we identify two orphan kinesins, KIN-A and KIN-B, as bona fide CPC proteins in Trypanosoma brucei, the kinetoplastid parasite that causes African sleeping sickness. KIN-A and KIN-B form a scaffold for the assembly of the remaining CPC subunits. We show that the C-terminal unstructured tail of KIN-A interacts with the KKT8 complex at kinetochores, while its N-terminal motor domain promotes CPC translocation to spindle microtubules. Thus, the KIN-A:KIN-B complex constitutes a unique ‘two-in-one’ CPC localization module, which directs the CPC to kinetochores from S phase until metaphase and to the central spindle in anaphase. Our findings highlight the evolutionary diversity of CPC proteins and raise the possibility that kinesins may have served as the original transport vehicles for Aurora kinases in early eukaryotes.

Dynamic localization of the chromosomal passenger complex in trypanosomes is controlled by the orphan kinesins KIN-A and KIN-B.

The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) is an important regulator of cell division, which shows dynamic subcellular localization throughout mitosis, including kinetochores and the spindle midzone. In traditional model eukaryotes such as yeasts and humans, the CPC consists of the catalytic subunit Aurora B kinase, its activator INCENP, and the localization module proteins Borealin and Survivin. Intriguingly, Aurora B and INCENP as well as their localization pattern are conserved in kinetoplastids, an evolutionarily divergent group of eukaryotes that possess unique kinetochore proteins and lack homologs of Borealin or Survivin. It is not understood how the kinetoplastid CPC assembles nor how it is targeted to its subcellular destinations during the cell cycle. Here, we identify two orphan kinesins, KIN-A and KIN-B, as bona fide CPC proteins in Trypanosoma brucei, the kinetoplastid parasite that causes African sleeping sickness. KIN-A and KIN-B form a scaffold for the assembly of the remaining CPC subunits. We show that the C-terminal unstructured tail of KIN-A interacts with the KKT8 complex at kinetochores, while its N-terminal motor domain promotes CPC translocation to spindle microtubules. Thus, the KIN-A:KIN-B complex constitutes a unique 'two-in-one' CPC localization module, which directs the CPC to kinetochores from S phase until metaphase and to the central spindle in anaphase. Our findings highlight the evolutionary diversity of CPC proteins and raise the possibility that kinesins may have served as the original transport vehicles for Aurora kinases in early eukaryotes.

Computational Studies Reveal How Passive Cross-Linkers Regulate Anaphase Spindle Elongation.

In eukaryotic cell division, a series of events are organized to produce two daughter cells. The spindle elongation in anaphase B is essential for providing enough space to maintain cell size and distribute sister chromatids properly, which is associated with microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins such as kinesin-5 Eg5 and the Ase1-related protein, PRC1. The available experimental data indicated that after the start of anaphase B more PRC1 proteins can bind to the antiparallel microtubule pairs in the spindle but the excess amount of PRC1 proteins can lead to the failure of cell division, indicating that PRC1 proteins can regulate the spindle elongation in a concentration-dependent manner. However, the underlying mechanism of the PRC1 proteins regulating the spindle elongation has not been explained up to now. Here, we use a simplified model, where only the two important participants (kinesin-5 Eg5 motors and PRC1 proteins) are considered, to study the spindle elongation during anaphase B. We first show that only in the appropriate range of the PRC1 concentration can the spindle elongation complete properly. Furthermore, we explore the underlying mechanism of PRC1 as a regulator for spindle elongation.

Redundant microtubule crosslinkers prevent meiotic spindle bending to ensure diploid offspring in C. elegans.

Oocyte meiotic spindles mediate the expulsion of ¾ of the genome into polar bodies to generate diploid zygotes in nearly all animal species. Failures in this process result in aneuploid or polyploid offspring that are typically inviable. Accurate meiotic chromosome segregation and polar body extrusion require the spindle to elongate while maintaining its structural integrity. Previous studies have implicated three hypothetical activities during this process, including microtubule crosslinking, microtubule sliding and microtubule polymerization. However, how these activities regulate spindle rigidity and elongation as well as the exact proteins involved in the activities remain unclear. We discovered that C. elegans meiotic anaphase spindle integrity is maintained through redundant microtubule crosslinking activities of the Kinesin-5 family motor BMK-1, the microtubule bundling protein SPD-1/PRC1, and the Kinesin-4 family motor, KLP-19. Using time-lapse imaging, we found that single depletion of KLP-19KIF4A, SPD-1PRC1 or BMK-1Eg5 had minimal effects on anaphase B spindle elongation velocity. In contrast, double depletion of SPD-1PRC1 and BMK-1Eg5 or double depletion of KLP-19KIF4A and BMK-1Eg5 resulted in spindles that elongated faster, bent in a myosin-dependent manner, and had a high rate of polar body extrusion errors. Bending spindles frequently extruded both sets of segregating chromosomes into two separate polar bodies. Normal anaphase B velocity was observed after double depletion of KLP-19KIF4A and SPD-1PRC1. These results suggest that KLP-19KIF4A and SPD-1PRC1 act in different pathways, each redundant with a separate BMK-1Eg5 pathway in regulating meiotic spindle elongation. Depletion of ZYG-8, a doublecortin-related microtubule binding protein, led to slower anaphase B spindle elongation. We found that ZYG-8DCLK1 acts by excluding SPD-1PRC1 from the spindle. Thus, three mechanistically distinct microtubule regulation modules, two based on crosslinking, and one based on exclusion of crosslinkers, power the mechanism that drives spindle elongation and structural integrity during anaphase B of C.elegans female meiosis.

MRCK activates mouse oocyte myosin II for spindle rotation and male pronucleus centration.

Asymmetric meiotic divisions in oocytes rely on spindle positioning in close vicinity to the cortex. In metaphase II mouse oocytes, eccentric spindle positioning triggers cortical polarization, including the build-up of an actin cap surrounded by a ring of activated myosin II. While the role of the actin cap in promoting polar body formation is established, ring myosin II activation mechanisms and functions have remained elusive. Here, we show that ring myosin II activation requires myotonic dystrophy kinase-related Cdc42-binding kinase (MRCK), downstream of polarized Cdc42. MRCK inhibition resulted in spindle rotation defects during anaphase II, precluding polar body extrusion. Remarkably, disengagement of segregated chromatids from the anaphase spindle could rescue rotation. We further show that the MRCK/myosin II pathway is activated in the fertilization cone and is required for male pronucleus migration toward the center of the zygote. These findings provide novel insights into the mechanism of myosin II activation in oocytes and its role in orchestrating asymmetric division and pronucleus centration.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae deficient in the early anaphase release of Cdc14 can traverse anaphase I without ribosomal DNA disjunction and successfully complete meiosis.

Eukaryotic meiosis is a specialized cell cycle of two nuclear divisions that give rise to haploid gametes. The phosphatase Cdc14 is essential for meiosis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cdc14 is sequestered in the nucleolus, a nuclear domain containing the ribosomal DNA, by its binding partner Net1, and released in two distinct waves, first in early anaphase I, then in anaphase II. Current models posit that the meiosis I release is required for ribosomal DNA disjunction, disassembly of the anaphase spindle, spindle pole re-duplication and counteraction of cyclin-dependent kinase, all of which are essential events. We examined Cdc14 release in net1-6cdk mutant cells, which lack six key Net1 CDK phosphorylation sites. Cdc14 release in early anaphase I was partially inhibited, and disjunction of the rDNA was fully inhibited. Failure to disjoin the rDNA is lethal in mitosis, and we expected the same to be true for meiosis I. However, the cells reliably completed both meiotic divisions to produce four viable spores. Therefore, segregation of the rDNA into all four meiotic products can be postponed until meiosis II without decreasing the fidelity of chromosome inheritance.

An unconventional TOG domain is required for CLASP localization

Cytoplasmic linker-associated proteins (CLASPs) form a conserved family of microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) that maintain microtubules in a growing state by promoting rescue while suppressing catastrophe.1 CLASP function involves an ordered array of tumor overexpressed gene (TOG) domains and binding to multiple protein partners via a conserved C-terminal domain (CTD).2,3 In migrating cells, CLASPs concentrate at the cortex near focal adhesions as part of cortical microtubule stabilization complexes (CMSCs), via binding of their CTD to the focal adhesion protein PHLDB2/LL5β.4,5 Cortical CLASPs also stabilize a subset of microtubules, which stimulate focal adhesion turnover and generate a polarized microtubule network toward the leading edge of migrating cells. CLASPs are also recruited to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) via an interaction between their CTD and the Golgin protein GCC185.6 This allows microtubule growth toward the leading edge of migrating cells, which is required for Golgi organization, polarized intracellular transport, and cell motility.7 In dividing cells, CLASPs are essential at kinetochores for efficient chromosome segregation and anaphase spindle integrity.8,9 Both CENP-E and ASTRIN bind and target CLASPs to kinetochores,10,11 although the CLASP domain required for this interaction is not known. Despite its high evolutionary conservation, the CTD remains structurally uncharacterized. Here, we find that the CTD can be structurally modeled as a TOG domain. We identify a surface-exposed and conserved arginine residue essential for CLASP CTD interaction with partner proteins. Together, our results provide a structural mechanism by which the CLASP CTD directs diverse sub-cellular localizations throughout the cell cycle.

Deciphering the mechanics of microtubule bundles in mitosis.

The proper organization of the mitotic spindle is required for successful chromosome segregation during cell division. This highly dynamic network consists of microtubules that are organized, bundled, and transported by motor and non-motor proteins that generate precisely balanced ‘active’ pushing and ‘passive’ frictional forces to give the spindle its mechanical robustness. How these mesoscale forces are produced and regulated by ensembles of mitotic proteins has been unclear. We are addressing this knowledge gap by directly measuring force production across reconstituted micron-scale microtubule bundles and simultaneously observing by single molecule fluorescence microscopy the localization of proteins that build these networks. Here we demonstrate that the essential microtubule crosslinking protein PRC1 performs distinct mechanical tasks in metaphase and anaphase to regulate motor protein activity. In anaphase, we have shown that PRC1 ensembles act like viscous dashpots, providing velocity-dependent resistance to microtubule separation. In metaphase, when CDK/cyclin-B activity is high, PRC1 is phosphorylated at two threonine residues near its microtubule-binding domain, while in anaphase these marks are removed. Surprisingly, we find that a phosphomimetic PRC1 construct organizes smaller bundles containing fewer filaments than the wildtype protein. In addition, this metaphase PRC1 analog produces significantly less mechanical resistance against motor-driven microtubule sliding than the anaphase analog. These changes are biochemically regulated by phosphorylation of microtubule-adjacent residues within the PRC1 protein and help explain the functional differences observed in cells between bridging fibers that connect sister kinetochore fibers in metaphase and the central spindle in anaphase that bridges the two separating spindle halves.

Coupling of microtubule bundles isolates them from local disruptions to set the structural stability of the anaphase spindle

Chromosome segregation requires load-bearing interactions across kinetochore fibers and antiparallel microtubule bundles, which constitute the spindle midzone. Mechanical properties of kinetochore fibers have been characterized during metaphase, when the mitotic spindle achieves steady state. However, it has been difficult to probe the mechanics of the spindle midzone that elongates during anaphase. Here, we combine superresolution expansion and electron microscopies, lattice light-sheet imaging, and laser microsurgery to examine how midzone organization sets its mechanics. We find that individual midzone bundles extend out to multiple positions across chromosomes and form multiple apparent microtubule-based connections with each other. Across the spindle's short axis, these microtubule bundles exhibit restricted, submicrometer-amplitude motions, which are weakly correlated on <10s timescales. Severing individual midzone bundles near their center does not substantially affect positions of neighboring bundles, nor the overall structural stability of the midzone. In contrast, severing multiple midzone bundles or individual bundles at their chromosome-proximal ends significantly displaces neighboring microtubule bundles. Together, these data suggest a model wherein multiple midzone connections both reinforce its structure and mechanically isolate individual bundles from local perturbations. This feature sets the robust midzone architecture to accommodate disruptions, including those which result from lagging chromosomes, and achieve stereotypic outputs, such as proper chromosome separation.

Evolutionary divergence of anaphase spindle mechanics in nematode embryos constrained by antagonistic pulling and viscous forces.

Cellular functions such as cell division are remarkably conserved across phyla. However, the evolutionary principles of cellular organization that drive them are less well explored. Thus, an essential question remains: to what extent do cellular parameters evolve without altering the basic functions they sustain? Here we have observed six different nematode species for which the mitotic spindle is positioned asymmetrically during the first embryonic division. Whereas the C. elegans spindle undergoes oscillations during its displacement, the spindle elongates without oscillations in other species. We asked which evolutionary changes in biophysical parameters could explain differences in spindle motion while maintaining a constant output. Using laser microsurgery of the spindle, we revealed that all species are subjected to cortical pulling forces of varying magnitudes. Using a viscoelastic model to fit the recoil trajectories and with an independent measurement of cytoplasmic viscosity, we extracted the values of cytoplasmic drag, cortical pulling forces, and spindle elasticity for all species. We found large variations in cytoplasmic viscosity, whereas cortical pulling forces and elasticity were often more constrained. In agreement with previous simulations, we found that increased viscosity correlates with decreased oscillation speeds across species. However, the absence of oscillations in some species despite low viscosity can only be explained by smaller pulling forces. Consequently, we find that spindle mobility across the species analyzed here is characterized by a tradeoff between cytoplasmic viscosity and pulling forces normalized by the size of the embryo. Our work provides a framework for understanding mechanical constraints on evolutionary diversification of spindle mobility.

Changing places: Chromosomal Passenger Complex relocation in early anaphase.

The Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) regulates a plethora of processes during multiple stages of nuclear and cytoplasmic division. Early during mitosis, the CPC is recruited to centromeres and kinetochores, and ensures that the duplicated chromosomes become properly connected to microtubules from opposite poles of the mitotic spindle. Progression into anaphase is accompanied by a striking relocation of the CPC from centromeres to the antiparallel microtubule overlaps of the anaphase spindle and to the equatorial cortex. This translocation requires direct interactions of the CPC with the kinesin-6 family member MKLP2/KIF20A, and the inactivation of cyclin B-cyclin-dependent kinase-1 (CDK1). Here, we review recent progress in the regulation of this relocation event. Furthermore, we discuss why the CPC must be relocated during early anaphase in light of recent advances in the functions of the CPC post metaphase.

Aurora B-dependent polarization of the cortical actomyosin network during mitotic exit

The isotropic metaphase actin cortex progressively polarizes as the anaphase spindle elongates during mitotic exit. This involves the loss of actomyosin cortex from opposing cell poles and the accumulation of an actomyosin belt at the cell centre. Although these spatially distinct cortical remodelling events are coordinated in time, here we show that they are independent of each other. Thus, actomyosin is lost from opposing poles in anaphase cells that lack an actomyosin ring owing to centralspindlin depletion. In examining potential regulators of this process, we identify a role for Aurora B kinase in actin clearance at cell poles. Upon combining Aurora B inhibition with centralspindlin depletion, cells exiting mitosis fail to change shape and remain completely spherical. Additionally, we demonstrate a requirement for Aurora B in the clearance of cortical actin close to anaphase chromatin in cells exiting mitosis with a bipolar spindle and in monopolar cells forced to divide while flat. Altogether, these data suggest a novel role for Aurora B activity in facilitating DNA-mediated polar relaxation at anaphase, polarization of the actomyosin cortex, and cell division.

Differential regulation of single microtubules and bundles by a three-protein module.

A remarkable feature of the microtubule cytoskeleton is co-existence of sub-populations having different dynamic properties. A prominent example is the anaphase spindle, where stable antiparallel bundles exist alongside dynamic microtubules and provide spatial cues for cytokinesis. How are dynamics of spatially proximal arrays differentially regulated? We reconstitute a minimal system of three midzone proteins: microtubule-crosslinker PRC1, and its interactors CLASP1 and Kif4A, proteins that promote and suppress microtubule elongation, respectively. We find their collective activity promotes elongation of single microtubules, while simultaneously stalling polymerization of crosslinked bundles. This differentiation arises from (i) Strong rescue activity of CLASP1, which overcomes weaker effects of Kif4A on single microtubules, (ii) Lower microtubule and PRC1-binding affinity of CLASP1, which permit dominance of Kif4A at overlaps. In addition to canonical mechanisms where antagonistic regulators set microtubule lengths, our findings illuminate design principles by which collective regulator activity creates microenvironments of arrays with distinct dynamic properties.

Differential Regulation of Single Microtubules and Cross-Linked Bundles by a Minimal Three-Protein Module

A remarkable feature of the microtubule cytoskeleton is co-existence of distinct populations having different dynamic properties. A prominent example is the anaphase spindle, where stable antiparallel bundles exist alongside dynamic microtubules and provide spatial cues for cytokinesis. How are dynamics of spatially proximal arrays differentially regulated? We reconstitute a minimal system of three midzone proteins: the microtubule-cross-linker PRC1, and its interactors CLASP1 and Kif4A, proteins that promote and suppress microtubule elongation, respectively. We find their collective activity promotes elongation of single microtubules, while simultaneously stalling polymerization of cross-linked bundles. This striking differentiation arises from (i) higher activity of CLASP1 despite lower microtubule occupancy than Kif4A, (ii) amplification of Kif4A activity on microtubule bundles through stronger PRC1-affinity. In contrast to canonical mechanisms where antagonistic regulators set microtubule lengths of single arrays, our findings illuminate design principles by which their collective activity instead creates microenvironments comprised of arrays with distinct dynamic properties.

Dynein-dynactin segregate meiotic chromosomes in C. elegans spermatocytes.

The microtubule motor cytoplasmic dynein 1 (dynein) and its essential activator dynactin have conserved roles in spindle assembly and positioning during female meiosis and mitosis, but their contribution to male meiosis remains poorly understood. Here, we characterize the G33S mutation in the C. elegans dynactin subunit DNC-1, which corresponds to G59S in human p150Glued that causes motor neuron disease. In spermatocytes, dnc-1(G33S) delays spindle assembly and penetrantly inhibits anaphase spindle elongation in meiosis I, which prevents the segregation of homologous chromosomes. By contrast, chromosomes segregate without errors in the early dnc-1(G33S) embryo. Deletion of the DNC-1 N-terminus shows that defective meiosis in dnc-1(G33S) spermatocytes is not due to the inability of DNC-1 to interact with microtubules. Instead, our results suggest that the DNC-1(G33S) protein, which is aggregation prone in vitro, is less stable in spermatocytes than the early embryo, resulting in different phenotypic severity in the two dividing tissues. Thus, the dnc-1(G33S) mutant reveals that dynein-dynactin drive meiotic chromosome segregation in spermatocytes and illustrates that the extent to which protein misfolding leads to loss of function can vary significantly between cell types.

PRC1 is a critical regulator for anaphase spindle midzone assembly and cytokinesis in mouse oocyte meiosis.

Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1 (PRC1) is a microtubule bundling protein that is involved in the regulation of the central spindle bundle and spindle orientation during mitosis. However, the functions of PRC1 during meiosis have rarely been studied. In this study, we explored the roles of PRC1 during meiosis using an oocyte model. Our results found that PRC1 was expressed at all stages of mouse oocyte meiosis, and PRC1 accumulated in the midzone/midbody during anaphase/telophase I. Moreover, depleting PRC1 caused defects in polar body extrusion during mouse oocyte maturation. Further analysis found that PRC1 knockdown did not affect meiotic spindle formation or chromosome segregation; however, deleting PRC1 prevented formation of the midzone and midbody at the anaphase/telophase stage of meiosis I, which caused cytokinesis defects and further induced the formation of two spindles in the oocytes. PRC1 knockdown increased the level of tubulin acetylation, indicating that microtubule stability was affected. Furthermore, KIF4A and PRC1 showed similar localization in the midzone/midbody of oocytes at anaphase/telophase I, while the depletion of KIF4A affected the expression and localization of PRC1. The PRC1 mRNA injection rescued the defects caused by PRC1 knockdown in oocytes. In summary, our results suggest that PRC1 is critical for midzone/midbody formation and cytokinesis under regulation of KIF4A in mouse oocytes.

Ase1 domains dynamically slow anaphase spindle elongation and recruit Bim1 to the midzone

How cells regulate microtubule cross-linking activity to control the rate and duration of spindle elongation during anaphase is poorly understood. In this study, we test the hypothesis that PRC1/Ase1 proteins use distinct microtubule-binding domains to control the spindle elongation rate. Using the budding yeast Ase1, we identify unique contributions for the spectrin and carboxy-terminal domains during different phases of spindle elongation. We show that the spectrin domain uses conserved basic residues to promote the recruitment of Ase1 to the midzone before anaphase onset and slow spindle elongation during early anaphase. In contrast, a partial Ase1 carboxy-terminal truncation fails to form a stable midzone in late anaphase, produces higher elongation rates after early anaphase, and exhibits frequent spindle collapses. We find that the carboxy-terminal domain interacts with the plus-end tracking protein EB1/Bim1 and recruits Bim1 to the midzone to maintain midzone length. Overall, our results suggest that the Ase1 domains provide cells with a modular system to tune midzone activity and control elongation rates.

Chromosome clustering by Ki-67 excludes cytoplasm during nuclear assembly.

Complex gene regulation in eukaryotes requires the effective separation of nuclear transcription and RNA processing from cytosolic translation1. This separation is achieved by the nuclear envelope, which controls the exchange of macromolecules through nuclear pores2. During mitosis, however, animal and plant cells disassemble the nuclear envelope, allowing cytoplasmic and nuclear components to intermix3. When the nuclear envelope is reformed, cytoplasmic components are removed from the nucleus by receptor-mediated transport through nuclear pores2. However, these pores have a size limit of 39 nm4–7, raising the question of how larger cytoplasmic components are cleared from the nucleus. Here, we show that large cytoplasmic components are displaced prior to nuclear envelope assembly by movement of chromosomes to a dense cluster. This clustering occurs when chromosomes approach the poles of anaphase spindles and is mediated by a microtubule-independent mechanism that involves the surfactant-like protein Ki-67. Ki-67 forms repulsive molecular brushes during the early stages of mitosis8, but during mitotic exit the brushes collapse and Ki-67 promotes chromosome clustering. We show that exclusion of mature ribosomes from the nucleus after mitosis depends on Ki-67-regulated chromosome clustering. Thus, our study reveals that chromosome mechanics help to reestablish the compartmentalization of eukaryotic cells after open mitosis.