Spine Surgery Patients Research Articles

Psychological distress does not predict decisional regret in patients undergoing spinal reconstruction for adult spinal deformity

PurposeThe study aimed to assess the link between preoperative psychological distress and postoperative decisional regret in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery patients. We hypothesized that greater pre-surgery distress would correlate with higher post-surgery regret. This evaluation was based on a retrospective case series from an institution with standardized surgical guidelines for ASD.MethodsThis IRB-approved retrospective study analyzed our institution’s ASD database from 2014 to 2020. Eligible patients had a minimum two-year post-op follow-up and preoperative psychological distress assessment. Patients were grouped based on psychological distress levels: green, yellow, and yellow minus. Regret post-surgery was assessed using the Decision Regret Scale and SRS-22 Question 22. Logistic regression evaluated the impact of distress levels on regret, controlling for age and sex.ResultsOut of 167 eligible patients, 112 responded and were analyzed. No significant demographic differences were observed between responders and non-responders. Using the Decision Regret Scale, 41% expressed no regret, while 63% expressed no regret with the SRS-22 questionnaire’s Single-Item scale. Only the yellow minus group showed significant regret difference based on osteotomy, with non-recipients more likely to express regret.ConclusionThis study found no significant link between psychological distress and post-operative regret in adult spinal deformity surgery after a minimum 2-year follow-up. Although nearly 60% exhibited some post-surgery regret, predicting regret based on psychological burden or demographics remains challenging. Further research is essential to identify factors contributing to post-operative regret in spinal deformity surgery patients.

Safety considerations for spinal surgery in patients with deep brain stimulation devices

PurposeDeep brain stimulation (DBS) has been performed for various brain disorders. However, spinal surgery in patients with DBS was been approached with cautious trepidation due to risk of thermal brain injury and device damage from coagulation devices during surgery. This study presents the cases of successful spinal surgery performed after DBS implantation. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the patients who received spinal surgery after DBS implantation between April 2001 and November 2022. We reviewed their demographic data, preoperative evaluations, and surgical strategies employed. ResultsAmong 348 patients who underwent DBS implantation, eight patients received spinal surgery. The methods used for diagnosing their spinal conditions varied: two cases of computed tomography (CT) myelogram, one case of CT scan with pre-DBS magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), one case of CT scan only, and four cases of post-DBS MRI. The location of the spinal surgery were one case of cervical spinal surgery, three cases of thoracolumbar spinal surgery, and four cases of lumbar spinal surgery. We followed diagnostic study guidelines and safety considerations tailored to each surgical step. Monopolar and bipolar coagulation devices were used when necessary. There were no cases of complications caused by spine surgery regarding DBS function or DBS implanted site. ConclusionCareful execution of surgical procedures, adherence to safety guidelines, and the use of MRI for diagnosis can ensure safe and successful spinal surgery in patients with DBS implants, minimizing the risk of damage to the DBS system and the brain.

Evaluating the Success of Revision Spine Surgery in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Prospective Study

Background: Failed Back Surgery Syndrome poses a significant challenge due to persistent pain following spinal surgery, greatly affecting patient quality of life and healthcare resources. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of revision spine surgery in FBSS patients, identifying key predictors for improved clinical outcomes. Method: A prospective study was conducted at a tertiary-level hospital in Bangladesh, involving 98 FBSS patients undergoing revision spine surgery from June 2020 to June 2023. Outcome measures included pain reduction (Visual Analog Scale), functional improvement (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient-reported quality of life. Result: Six months post-surgery, 74% of patients experienced clinically significant pain reduction (>50% on VAS), while 63% showed notable functional improvement with a reduction in ODI scores of over 40%. Quality of life improved for 68% of patients, with 25% reporting a complete return to daily activities. Among surgical types, decompression led to a 58% improvement in mobility, while fusion procedures resulted in a 70% pain reduction. However, 12% of patients reported little to no improvement, and 5% experienced worsened symptoms, underscoring the variability in outcomes. Predictive success factors included shorter intervals between surgeries and lower initial pain levels (p < 0.05). Overall, revision surgery was beneficial for the majority, but not all patients achieved desired outcomes. Conclusion: Revision spine surgery in FBSS patients can lead to significant improvements, though outcomes vary. Identifying predictive factors is essential to guide surgical planning and enhance patient selection.

The Safety of Spinal Surgery in Patients over 80 Years of Age: Propensity Score Matching Study.

Retrospective cohort study. Using propensity match score to remove those confounding bias and focuses on age factor to compare clinical outcomes and perioperative complications following spinal surgery in cohort of Korean octogenarians treated at a single tertiary hospital. We classified patients of 80s as the octogenarian group (group O), those 65 and older, and under 80 as the elderly group (group E). We strategically employed the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis as a method to counteract potential confounding variables. 1: 1 nearest-neighbor PSM for fusion level, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion, body mass index (BMI), American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) surgical method and operation time was performed. After PSM, 98 patients are categorized each group evenly (group O, n = 49 vs group E, n = 49). Demographics, clinical, radiologic and postoperative complications were analyzed. The clinical outcomes showed no significant differences in the VAS and ODI preoperatively or postoperatively. And most of hospitalization related factors shows no differences between 2 groups. However, follow-up period was longer in group E (1053.37 ± 684.14 days) than group O (640.29 ± 496.68, P = 0.001) and group O has higher incidences of medical complication (38.77% vs 16.32%, P = 0.013), especially in delirium (34.69% vs 6.12%, P = 0.001) than group E. With the preparation for the prevention and treatment of postoperative delirium, age itself should not be a reason to hesitate in performing the spinal surgery.

Intraoperative Burst Suppression by Analysis of Raw Electroencephalogram Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Postoperative delirium is a common complication in older adults, associated with poor outcomes, morbidity, mortality, and higher health care costs. Older age is a strong predictor of delirium. Intraoperative burst suppression on the electroencephalogram (EEG) has also been linked to postoperative delirium and poor neurocognitive outcomes. In this a secondary analysis of data from the Perioperative Anesthesia Neurocognitive Disorder Assessment-Geriatric (PANDA-G) observational study, the raw EEGs of 239 spine surgery patients were evaluated. Associations between delirium and age, device-generated burst suppression ratio, and visual detection of the raw EEG were compared. Demographics and anesthesia durations were similar in patients with and without delirium. There was a higher incidence of burst suppression identified by analysis of the raw EEG in the delirium group than in the no delirium group (73.45% vs. 50.9%; P=0.001) which appeared to be driven largely by a higher incidence of burst suppression during maintenance of anesthesia (67.2% vs. 46.3%; P=0.004). Burst suppression was more strongly associated with delirium than with age; estimated linear regression coefficient for burst suppression 0.182 (SE: 0.057; P=0.002) and for age 0.009 (SE: 0.005; P=0.082). There was no significant interaction between burst suppression and age (-0.512; SE: 0.390; P=0.190). Compared with visual detection of burst suppression, the burst suppression ratio overestimated burst suppression at low values, and underestimated burst suppression at high values. Intraoperative burst suppression identified by visual analysis of the EEG was more strongly associated with delirium than age in older adults undergoing spine surgery. Further research is needed to determine the clinical importance of these findings.

Delirium risk profiles in a population-based study of United States older adults undergoing common noncardiac surgeries.

Older adults often require surgical care and are at elevated risk of delirium. We explored delirium risk profiles across the population of U.S. older adults who underwent one of 10 common noncardiac surgeries. We analyzed Health and Retirement Study (HRS) participants linked with Medicare billing data who underwent the following 10 noncardiac surgeries from 2000 to 2018 at age 65 or more: total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), spine surgery, cholecystectomy, colorectal surgery, hernia repair (ventral, umbilical, or incisional), endarterectomy, prostatectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and hysterectomy. Demographic and health covariates were obtained from the HRS dataset. Latent cognitive ability was calculated from cognitive testing, proxy reports, and demographics at the preoperative HRS interview. We compared standardized differences for delirium risk factors across the 10 surgeries and qualitatively clustered them into phenotypical subgroups. We analyzed 7424 older adults (mean age 76 ± 6 years, 45% male). Endarterectomy patients presented with the highest burden of nearly all health and cognitive factors, implying higher delirium risk (e.g., stroke, 22%; depressive symptoms, 30%; high school or less education, 73%; frailty, 42%; lowest latent cognitive ability). A second "general surgery" phenotype, including cholecystectomy, colorectal, and hernia surgery patients, experienced more frailty (29%-32%) and depressive symptoms (24%-26%), with moderate comorbidity burden. A third "pain" phenotype, which included TKA, THA, and spine surgery patients, commonly reported moderate or severe pain (47%-53%) and impairment in activities of daily living (ADL, 23%-30%), but fewer comorbid medical conditions. The remaining surgery types (hysterectomy, prostatectomy, TURP) were not phenotypically grouped and generally had lower risk features for delirium. In an epidemiological cohort of US older adults, we identified clinically meaningful heterogeneity in delirium risk profiles across different surgical types, which may have implications for delirium risk stratification and delirium prevention or treatment.

Risk factors for postoperative ileus after corrective spinal surgery: association with reduction in the retrocrural space area.

The objective of this study was to determine whether a reduction in the retrocrural space (RCS) area is a risk factor for postoperative ileus (POI) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) treated with spinal corrective surgery. In total, 100 patients (mean age 67.5 ± 8.3 years, 9 males and 91 females) with ASD treated with spinal corrective surgery were included in this study. Spinal parameters, including thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and RCS area were measured pre- and postoperatively. The change (Δ) in spinal parameters was calculated. The percent change between pre- and postoperative RCS areas was calculated as ΔRCS. Patients were identified as having POI if they exhibited both gastrointestinal symptoms and radiographic findings. Each parameter was compared between patients with and without POI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with development of POI as the dependent variable. The incidence of POI was 11.0%. The RCS area was significantly smaller in the POI group than in the non-POI group (p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that ΔTLK and ΔRCS were risk factors for POI (p = 0.029 and p = 0.033, respectively). A reduction in the RCS area is a risk factor for the development of POI after corrective spinal surgery in patients with ASD. Overcorrection of the thoracolumbar junction should be avoided to prevent POI.

Intraoperative Methadone in Spine Surgery ERAS Protocols: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Systematic review. To systematically review the use of intraoperative methadone in spine surgery and examine its effects on postoperative opioid use, pain, length of stay, and operative time. Spine surgery patients commonly have a history of chronic pain and opioid use, and as a result, they are at an increased risk of severe postoperative pain. While pure mu opioids remain the standard for acute surgical pain management, they are associated with significant short-term and long-term adverse events. Methadone presents an alternative to pure mu opioids which may improve postoperative management of pain following intraoperative use. A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to review existing literature detailing operating time, postoperative pain, opioid usage, and hospital length of stay (LOS) following intraoperative methadone administration in spine surgery. Following screening of 994 articles and application of inclusion criteria, 8 articles were included, 4 of which were retrospective. Conventional spine surgery intraoperative analgesic strategies used as comparators for intraoperative methadone included hydromorphone, ketamine, and sufentanil. Considering patient outcomes, included studies observed that patients treated with intraoperative methadone had statistically similar or significantly reduced pain scores, opioid usage, and LOS compared with comparator analgesics. However, one study observed that intraoperative methadone used in a multimodal analgesia regimen strategy with ketamine resulted in a shortened LOS compared with the use of intraoperative methadone alone. Differences in operating time between cases that used intraoperative methadone and cases that used comparator analgesics were not statistically significant among included studies. Methadone may present an alternative option for both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in spine surgery recovery protocols and may reduce postoperative pain, opioid use, and LOS while maintaining consistent operating time and reduced side effects of pure mu opioids. Level II.

Impact of Antidepressant Use on Intraoperative Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates in Lumbar Fusion Surgery

A quarter of spine surgery patients take antidepressants. Basic science research has suggested serotonergic antidepressants impair platelet function. This has been supported by only a small number of works in the setting of spine surgery. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of antidepressants on intraoperative bleeding risk during lumbar fusion. Patients who underwent elective 1-3 level lumbar fusion at a single, academic, tertiary center (2017-2021) were identified. Antidepressant use and class, demographic and surgical data were evaluated. Bleeding risk was assessed by total intraoperative blood loss (mL), calculated using the formula by Gross et al, and by postoperative transfusion. Patients prescribed versus not prescribed an antidepressant were matched 1:1 by age, sex, BMI, Elixhauser, smoking status, and levels fused. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed (Alpha was set at 0.05). 420 patients with, and 420 patients without an antidepressant prescription at the time of lumbar fusion were identified. Patients without an antidepressant prescription had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (0.91 ± 1.09 vs. 0.76 ± 1.1; p = 0.048), but otherwise the groups were demographically similar, and underwent similar surgeries. Antidepressant use was not associated with increased intraoperative bleeding or postoperative transfusion rate, regardless of sub-analysis by procedure type or antidepressant class. Antidepressant use was not associated with increased intraoperative blood loss or increased postoperative transfusion requirement, regardless of sub-analysis by fusion type or antidepressant class. The current findings do not support discontinuing antidepressants prior to lumbar fusion.

Cerebrovascular pulsatility indicates preoperative subcortical cognitive impairment and an increased risk for postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing elective spine surgery.

Advances in spine surgery enable safe interventions in elderly patients, but perioperative neurocognitive disorders (pNCD), such as post-operative delirium (POD) and cognitive dysfunction (POCD), remain a serious concern. Pre-operative cognitive impairment is a major risk factor for pNCD. Comprehensive pre-operative cognitive assessments are not feasible in clinical practice, making effective screening methods desirable. This study investigates whether pre-operative cerebrovascular duplex sonography can assess subcortical (vascular) cognitive impairment and the risk for POD. This prospective single-center study recruited patients aged ≥60 years scheduled for elective spine surgery at a German university hospital. Patients underwent pre-operative assessments including cognitive abilities (CERAD test battery), structural MRI, and cerebrovascular duplex sonography. POD screening was conducted three times daily for at least 3 days. The primary hypothesis, that the mean pulsatility index (PI) of both internal carotid arteries (ICA) predicts POD risk, was tested using logistic regression. Secondary analyses examined the association between POD risk and ICA flow (time-averaged peak velocities, TAPV) and correlations with cognitive profiles and MRI characteristics. POD occurred in 22% of patients (n = 22/99) within three postoperative days. Patients with POD were significantly older (75.9 ± 5.4 vs. 70.0 ± 6.9 years, p < 0.01) but did not differ by gender (p = 0.51). ICA PI significantly predicted POD risk (OR = 5.46 [95%CI: 1.81-16.49], p = 0.003), which remained significant after adjustment for age and duration of surgery (ORadj = 6.38 [95% CI: 1.77-23.03], p = 0.005). TAPV did not inform the POD risk (p = 0.68). ICA PI Pre-operative cognitive scores were significantly associated with ICA PI (mean CERAD score: r = -0.32, p < 0.001). ICA PI was also significantly associated with total white matter lesion volume (τ = 0.19, p = 0.012) and periventricular white matter lesion volume (τ = 0.21, p = 0.007). This is the first study to demonstrate that cerebrovascular duplex sonography can assess the risk for POD in elderly spine surgery patients. Increased ICA PI may indicate subcortical impairment, larger white matter lesion load, and lower white matter volume, predisposing factors for POD. Pre-operative cerebrovascular duplex sonography of the ICA is widely available, easy-to-use, and efficient, offering a promising screening method for POD risk. Increased ICA PI could supplement established predictors like age to adjust surgical and peri-operative procedures to individual risk profiles.

Electrolyte Disturbances and Repletion in Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery Patients.

Electrolyte derangement, defined as disorders of clinically impactful physiologic ions such as potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, and phosphate, has a variety of clinical manifestations. These electrolytes have narrow windows of normal in vivo concentration before neurologic, cardiac, renal, or gastrointestinal consequences occur. Perioperative disturbances in electrolyte concentration can lead to increased morbidity and mortality, longer length of stay, and higher rates of short and medium-term readmission in orthopaedic and spine surgery postoperatively. To prevent electrolyte related complications, careful monitoring and repletion of at-risk patients must be undertaken. A systematic approach to repletion allows for a safe and efficacious treatment of these disorders.

Postoperative Delirium Following Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Associated Complications

Postoperative delirium (POD) is frequently reported in the elderly after major surgery. Several risk factors have been identified, including age, surgical complexity, and comorbidities. Posterior lumbar fusion patients were identified using PearlDiver and filtered into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of POD within 7days of surgery. Epidemiological analyses were performed to examine trends in POD by age and year. Comparative analyses were performed on patient demographics and baseline cognitive status. After matching by age, sex, and comorbidities, electrolyte disturbances and 90-day postoperative complications were analyzed. Among 476,482 no POD and 2591 POD patients, the mean age was 60.90years, 57.6% were female, and the mean Charlson comorbidity index was 1.78. POD patients frequently had baseline cognitive impairment (P < 0.001). Incidence of POD decreased from 0.7% in 2010 to 0.4% in 2022 (P < 0.001) and increased with increasing patient age (P<0.001). POD patients had higher length of stay (12 vs. 6days, P < 0.001) and 90-day costs ($20,605 vs. $17,849, P<0.001). After matching, POD patients had higher hypernatremia (5.8% vs. 3.5%, P= 0.001) and hypocalcemia (5.0% vs. 3.5%, P= 0.026). POD patients had higher 90-day postoperative complications (P < 0.05) than no POD patients. Nearly 0.5% of patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2010 and 2022 developed delirium, although incidence rates have decreased over time. POD was common in elderly patients with electrolyte disturbances who underwent multilevel fusions. Patients suffering from POD had higher rates of 90-day postoperative complications. Ongoing efforts to deliver interventions to mitigate the consequences of POD among spine surgery patients are warranted.

Opportunistic use of lumbar computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for osteoporosis screening.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the opportunistic use of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is effective for identifying spine surgical patients with OP. We retrospectively evaluated 109 lumbar spine surgery patients who received lumbar quantitative CT (QCT) and MRI. Using the area under the curve, the CT-based HU value and MRI-based VBQ score were calculated. Then, based on the QCT results, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the diagnostic performance of the HU value and VBQ score. The HU value was significantly lower in the OP group, and the VBQ score was significantly higher in the OP group. Using the area under the curve, the diagnostic performance of the HU value and VBQ score for OP were 0.959 and 0.880, respectively. The diagnostic threshold values determined with optimal sensitivity and specificity were an HU value of 97.06 and a VBQ score of 3.08. Opportunistic use of CT and MRI can simply distinguish patients with OP, which are expected to be potential alternatives to T-score for the osteoporosis screening.

Safety in spinal surgery-Empowering clinicians to report concerns in motor function.

Timely identification of neurological deterioration in patients with spinal disorders, through spinal motor assessment, is paramount in achieving early intervention to reduce the risk of permanent deficits. This project was initiated to meet the requirement for safe, timely spinal motor assessment through establishing and addressing clinician's educational needs. Mixed methods study conducted through online survey and concurrent focus groups June 2022-April 2023. Pre-intervention online survey and focus groups identified insufficient provision of education targeted at identifying changes in motor function and as a result, clinicians lacked confidence and competence in completing assessments and caring for patients with spinal disorders. An e-learning package was created and shared widely along with additional interventions to support assessment completion. To establish the success of the project a post-intervention online survey was distributed. Survey respondents reported that the e-learning package has influenced their practice to either some extent or to a great extent with 91% reporting increased confidence in completing a spinal motor assessment. Post-intervention results also demonstrated an increase in confidence in caring for spinal surgery patients. Through engaging with clinicians to establish and address educational needs, this quality improvement project has successfully increased competence and confidence in this area of spinal care. This study highlights the importance of targeted education to ensure that clinicians are appropriately skilled to identify neurological deterioration and demonstrates the effectiveness of digital education in providing this. This study addressed concerns around timely identification of deterioration of spinal patients. Study findings were the success in utilizing digital education to increase clinician's confidence and competence and thus enhance patient safety. This research will have an impact on clinical areas caring for patients with spinal disorders. SQUIRE guidelines. No patient or public contribution.

P92. Is there an optimal time for tracheostomy after anterior cervical spine surgery in patients with cervical fracture?

P92. Is there an optimal time for tracheostomy after anterior cervical spine surgery in patients with cervical fracture?

P120. The influence of patient activation on spine surgery patient reported outcomes: short-term results from a prospective study

P120. The influence of patient activation on spine surgery patient reported outcomes: short-term results from a prospective study

Combined nefopam-fentanyl use in PCA for postoperative analgesia in spinal surgery patients: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial

Background &amp; objective: The use of fentanyl to manage postoperative pain in spinal surgery patients is common, although there have been concerns about potential of drug abuse and dependence. We investigated the effects of the combined administration of nefopam and fentanyl through intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) on early postoperative pain and possible side effects in patients undergoing spinal surgeries. Methodology: In this randomized, controlled study, 70 patients were allocated to receive either fentanyl 10 µg/mL (Group F) or fentanyl 10 µg/mL with nefopam 1.2 mg/mL (Group FN), with a total PCA volume of 100 mL per infusion bag. Patients received a background dose of 0.25 µg/kg/h and bolus dose of 0.5 mL SOS (fentanyl 5 µg). The lockout interval was set at 10 min and upper limit was set at 15 mL/4 h. The PCA parameters were set according to the body weight of each patient. Results: The cumulative postoperative fentanyl consumptions after 48 h for Group F and Group NF were reported as 744.6 ± 94.2 µg and 631 ± 62.5 µg (P &lt; 0.05) respectively. The average number of bolus doses requested by the patients in Group F and FN were 20.8 ± 11.0, and NF 11.4± 7.6). The A/D ratio of both groups for the bolus doses were 70%. Group NF consistently scored a lower VAS and VAS-D score during the 48-hour postoperative period. However, the VAS scores significantly differ statistically between groups at 1, 6, 9, and 12 hours. Within group differences, the VAS score differed significantly statistically during the 0-1, 1-2, and 2-3 hours for Group F, while 24-36 hours for Group NF. Conclusion: The inclusion of nefopam in patient-controlled analgesia for spine surgery patients significantly reduced total use of fentanyl within the 48 hours postoperatively after the surgery. Patients receiving fentanyl with nefopam consistently had lower VAS scores at different time points. Abbreviations: PCA - patient-controlled analgesia; VAS - Visual Analogue Scale Keywords: postoperative pain, fentanyl, nefopam, patient-controlled analgesia Citation: Le XD, Nguyen ML, Nguyen DT, Do TH, Nguyen HG. Combined nefopam-fentanyl use in PCA for postoperative analgesia in spinal surgery patients: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):687−691; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2370 Received: January 06, 2024; Reviewed: April 14, 2024; Accepted: April 14, 2024

Frequency and Associated Factors of Venous Thromboembolism in Cervical Spine Surgery.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication after spine surgery. As many cases of cervical spine disease result in severe gait disturbance due to myelopathy, it may harbor a higher risk of VTE than other spinal disorders. However, few studies have focused primarily on cervical spine surgery to date. This investigation sought to determine the prevalence of VTE after cervical spine surgery and identify patient-based risk factors. The medical data of 341 consecutive patients (240 men and 101 women; mean age, 68.1 years) who underwent cervical spine surgery were retrospectively examined. Logistic regression models were employed to examine the prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors of postoperative VTE. In this study, 2.6% of cervical spine surgery patients experienced postoperative VTE. In comparisons of VTE and non-VTE groups, significant differences were found for age (79.6 years vs 67.7 years, P < 0.01), 1-week postoperative D-dimer level (10.6 μg/mL vs 2.7 μg/mL, P < 0.01), and cardiovascular disease (44.4% vs 11.1%, P = 0.011). Multivariate analysis identified elevated postoperative D-dimer level and cardiovascular disease as significantly associated with postsurgical VTE with respective odds ratios of 1.54 and 9.52. Postoperative VTE in cervical spine surgery was seen in 2.6% of cases. Patients with elevated postoperative D-dimer level and cardiovascular disease may be at increased risk of VTE and may require additional observation. Spine surgeons should take into account that patients with elevated postoperative D-dimer levels and cardiovascular disease may be at increased risk for VTE.

Exploring Health Inequalities and Presurgical Attitudes on Postsurgical Outcomes in Spine Surgery

The influence of social determinants of health on health disparities is substantial. However, their impact on postsurgical outcomes in spine can be challenging to ascertain at the community level. This study aims to explore the interplay between presurgical attitudes, area deprivation index (ADI), income, employment status, and body mass index (BMI) on postsurgical outcomes at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after elective spine surgery. The study involved 127 patients who underwent elective spine surgery between August 2021 and August 2022 at a large academic institution. The main objective involved a prospective analysis of presurgical attitudes, coupled with a retrospective assessment of ADI, income, employment status, and BMI over 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following elective spine surgery using a univariate analysis. Utilizing the univariate analyses, ADI displayed a significant correlation with increased Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and Visual Analog Scale scores both before surgery and at the 3-, 6-, and 9-month postsurgical intervals (P < 0.05). One year after surgery, patients in the lowest income group (annual income under $25,000) consistently demonstrated the highest Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain (8.00, P= 0.022). Patients who were not employed had significantly lower levels of social support (P= 0.042) and confidence in the health care system (P= 0.009). Individuals who were unemployed were most likely to be readmitted six weeks after surgery (P < 0.001). Presurgical attitudes, ADI, income, employment status, and BMI were important factors associated with improved surgical outcome measurements, indicating potential focal points for combating health disparities in spinal surgery patients.

Comparison of Surgical Site Infection After Instrumented Spine Surgery in Patients With High Risk of Infection According to Different Antibiotic Prophylaxis Protocols: A Cohort Study of 132 Patients With a Minimum Follow-Up of 1 year.

Observational Study. Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the major complications in spine surgery. Numerous factors that increase the risk of SSI have been widely described. However, clinical guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis are usually common for all patients. There are no specific guidelines for patients with a high risk of infection. The aim of this paper is to create a specific protocol for patients at high risk of SSI. This is a three-cohort study using a prospective database. Risk patients are those who meet at least two of the following criteria: obesity, diabetes, reoperation and immunosuppression. Between October 2021 and April 2023, 132 patients were recruited.They were divided into three cohorts: cohort A, 46 patients, standard prophylaxis with cefazolin 2g/8h for 24h; cohort B, 46 patients, cefazolin 2g/8h and amikacin 500mg/12h for 24h; cohort C, 40 patients, cefazolin 2g/8h and amikacin 500mg/12h for 72h. There was a significant decrease in the infection rate depending on the prophylaxis (23.9% in cohort A, 8.7% in cohort B, and 2.5% in cohort C). When logistic regression models were applied and cohorts B and C were compared with A, the following results were obtained: OR of 0.30 (CI: 0.08 - 0.97; P = 0.057) and 0.08 (IC: 0.00 - 0.45; P = 0.019), respectively. Prophylaxis with prolonged double antibiotic therapy with cefazolin and amikacin is associated with a statistically significant decrease in the rate of SSI in patients with a high risk of infection.