Spinal Procedures Research Articles

Systematic Review of Surgical Success, Complications, Revision Rates, Radiation Dosage, and Operative Time of 3D-Navigated vs. Non-Navigated Spinal Procedures.

3D navigation offers real-time guidance in surgery. However, there is limited and inconsistent data regarding the usability, safety, and efficacy. To address gaps in knowledge about 3D navigation in spinal surgery, we conducted a comprehensive review of success rates, complications, revisions, radiation exposure, and operative time associated with FDA-approved 3D surgical navigation tools. This study adhered to PRISMA guidelines and used a protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023404554). Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched using relevant keywords for 3D surgical navigation and spinal procedures from 1946 to March 02, 2023. Two independent reviewers assessed the studies using inclusion/exclusion criteria and risk of bias tools. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA, weighted-mean difference, and unpaired t-tests with Welch's correction for associations and comparisons between groups, respectively. Of the total 11,324 studies identified and 7,198 screened, 62 studies totaling 3,170 adult patients were included in this comprehensive review. Complication and surgical success rates have remained constant since 2004, with overall rates of 5.5% and 94.0%, respectively. When segmented by spinal region, complication rates may be moderately positively correlated with frequency of cervical and thoracic procedures (r = 0.25, p = 0.68). The most commonly reported complication was pedicle screw malposition or breach. A subset of 20 studies, totaling 1,554 patients, compared the performance of 3D navigation to 2D fluoroscopy or freehand navigation. There was a significant difference of 6.53% between surgical success rates of the 3D-navigated and control groups (p = 0.03). However, there was no significant difference in radiation exposure or operative time. 3D navigation in spinal procedures has higher surgical success rates than 2D fluoroscopy and freehand navigation. Included studies exhibited varying limitations, including no patient follow-up (n = 1), less than 10 patients (n = 6), various types of spinal disorders (n = 1), and varying comorbidities among participants (n = 2). Improving 3D navigation tools remains imperative to decrease operative time and radiation exposure.

Can Endovascular Repair of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Be Safely Performed in an Outpatient Setting? Lessons Learned from Spine Outcome Control Groups.

The performance of select neurosurgical procedures is being transitioned to an outpatient setting rather than an inpatient setting to increase healthcare cost-effectiveness. Despite numerous technological advancements in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), the procedures are solely performed in an inpatient setting. We aimed to compare the rate of short-term outcomes associated with inpatient endovascular treatment of UIAs with those for established outpatient neurosurgical procedures, including anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs) and lumbar discectomies. We performed a retrospective analysis on the data of healthy (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤4) adult patients undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures including endovascular repair of UIAs, ACDF, and discectomy between January 1, 2012, and August 31, 2019, at a single tertiary facility. Clinical complications and outcomes data were collected and analyzed. The primary outcome variable was the 30-day readmission rate with subgroup analyses of readmission <48 hours and 48 hours to 30 days. A total of 586 patients and a total of 606 procedures were identified, comprising 205 endovascular UIA treatments, 201 ACDFs, and 200 discectomies. Fourteen UIA procedures were excluded from analysis (n = 191) on the basis of anatomic high-risk features. For the primary outcome, there was no statistically significant difference in 30-day readmission rates among the comparison groups (P = .36). For the subgroup analyses, there were no differences in readmission rates for <48 hours (P = .06) and 48 hours to 30 days (P = .71). In addition, there was no significant difference in intraprocedural complication rates among the groups (P = .19). Inpatient elective endovascular treatment of UIAs had similarly low rates of intraprocedural complications and short-term readmissions compared with the established outpatient spine procedures. We hope that our findings may serve as the foundation for future, prospective studies assessing the safety and utility of performing endovascular procedures for UIAs in an outpatient setting.

Should We Operate on Octogenarians with Cervical Myelopathy or Radiculopathy?

Retrospective Cohort. Investigate the disparities between octogenarians and non-octogenarians undergoing cervical spine surgery regarding perioperative, and postoperative outcomes. As the population ages, the demand for elective cervical spine surgery among older, more active adults increases. However, concerns remain regarding the optimal management of older patients undergoing cervical surgery, given the potential complexities associated with advanced age, comorbidities, and physiological decline. While the safety and efficacy of cervical spine surgery in younger cohorts have been extensively studied, there is a paucity of literature specifically addressing outcomes in octogenarians. Octogenarians undergoing elective cervical spine surgery were propensity matched 3:1 to patients <80 years old by baseline neck and arm pain, surgical approach, and total instrumented levels. Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative complications, unexpected 90-day hospital readmissions and 12-month reoperation. Secondary outcomes were 12-month patient satisfaction and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 3 and 12 months, including EuroQol-5D, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association, neck disability index, and visual analog scale for neck and arm pain. There were 29 octogenarians and 87 nonoctogenarians identified. The mean age in each cohort was 82.4±2.2 vs. 59.1±11.1 years, respectively. There was no difference in postoperative complications (10.3% vs. 6.9%, P=0.548), 90-day readmission (10.3% vs. 6.9%, P=0.548), and 12-month reoperation (3.4% vs. 2.3%, P=0.736) between octogenarians and non-octogenarians. Similarly, octogenarians and nonoctogenarians experienced comparable 12-month patient satisfaction (65.2% vs. 55.3%, P=0.393), improvement in 3- and 12- month PROMs and MCID achievement. Postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation rate, patient satisfaction, and PROMs did not significantly differ between octogenarians and non-octogenarians undergoing cervical spine surgery. These findings suggest that age alone should not be a determining factor in surgical decision-making for elective cervical spine procedures, as octogenarians can achieve comparable outcomes to their younger counterparts.

Full-endoscopic spinal decompression or discectomy show benefits regarding 30-day readmission rates when compared to other spine surgery techniques: A propensity score matched analysis

Background and contextUnplanned readmission within 30 days following elective spine surgery is a key indicator of quality of care, as readmissions often signal early complications or poor recovery. The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) utilizes this metric to assess hospital and surgeon performance. PurposeHere we aim to delineate quality of care metrics for full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) compared to traditional spine surgery. DesignThe study was a retrospective multicenter analysis comparing outcomes of propensity matched cohorts. Patient sampleThe study included 908 FESS patients operated between 2014 and 2023 and a matched cohort of 73,906 non-FESS patients. Outcome measuresOur primary outcome measures were postoperative 30-day hospital readmissions and revision surgery. Furthermore, demographic data, hospitalization, surgical details and comorbidities were included. MethodsData were collected from 6 participating institutions. Patients older than 18 years undergoing non-instrumented FESS spine surgeries for degenerative lumbar spinal pathologies from 2016-2023 were included. A matched non-FESS cohort was identified in the ACS-NSQIP database (2015-2019). Propensity-score matching was used to compare the cohorts. ResultsBefore matching, the 30-day readmission rate was significantly lower in the FESS cohort (1.1% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001), which remained consistent after matching (1.1% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001). The rate of 30-day surgical revisions was similar between cohorts (1.0% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.63). Multivariate analysis indicated a significant correlation between FESS and reduced 30-day readmissions (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.57, p < 0.001). ConclusionThis study is the first to compare 30-day hospital readmissions between FESS and non-endoscopic surgeries in a large, matched multicenter cohort. FESS significantly reduces both the length of postoperative hospital stay and 30-day readmission rates compared to non-endoscopic approaches, underscoring the safety and effectiveness of outpatient FESS. Future studies are needed to define the role of FESS in more complex spine procedures.

The Rochester Model for Spinal CSF Leak Repair Simulation and Scoring.

Iatrogenic spinal durotomies occur at a rate of 1% to 17%. Surgical simulation for durotomy repair is needed to provide affordable, accessible, and validated practice. This study sought to design and validate a simple 3-dimensional printed model for spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair and to introduce the Rochester original objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) CSF leak (ROCL) repair criteria for assessment. A spinal model was designed to mimic a lumbar laminectomy with the L3-5 lamina removed and 3-dimensional printed using Vero polymers. The model was paired with a porcine collagen "dura" that was pressurized using IV saline and overlayed with gel-molded fascial, muscle, and skin layers with an opening. Participants were provided a training model with a 1.5-cm midline durotomy, surgical microinstrument set, microscope, and 6-0 prolene suture. The 25-point ROCL repair criteria were adapted from the original OSATS principles to assess proficiency in surgical repair by 2 blinded neurosurgeons not participating in the trials. Postsimulation survey data regarding model realism were collected. Six residents and 4 attendings participated. Median operative time in minutes was 13 minutes among residents and 7 minutes among attendings. Moreover, the ROCL score was a median of 19/25 for attendings and 15/25 for residents. The suture angle was statistically more consistent among senior residents and attendings compared with junior residents. Participants agreed that the model was realistic (median 4/5), useful for improving the operative technique (median 5/5), and would increase comfort in spinal CSF leak repair procedures (median 5/5). Each reusable model had a cost of $19.99 if printed with polylactic acid and each replacement dura cost <3¢. This study presents an affordable, realistic, and educational spinal CSF leak repair model and introduces ROCL for assessment.

Utilization of Neuromonitoring in Surgical Cervical Spondylosis Patients With the Presence or Absence of Myelopathy. Is it Standard?

Cross-sectional, observational study. Investigate the frequency of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) utilization among Medicare patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis (CS), both with and without myelopathy. IONM is widely used as a tool in spine surgery. However, the overall prevalence of neuromonitoring utilization among CS undergoing surgical intervention is not well characterized. This study observed neuromonitoring usage in CS patients who had cervical spinal procedures from 2012 to 2020, using a 5% random sample of Medicare data. Logistic regression compared patient characteristics between those who received neuromonitoring and those who did not. The model included age, sex, region, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, year of surgery, elective status, and procedure type. Odds ratios with a 95% CI were generated for each covariate. Of the 6224 patients who underwent cervical procedures for CS, 4053 were included in the study, with 2845 having myelopathy and 1208 without. Myelopathy patients had a higher number of hospitalizations (2884) compared with non-myelopathy patients (1229). Among myelopathy patients, the prevalence of neuromonitoring increased from 49.2% in 2012 to 56.5% in 2020. The range of utilization for each type of monitoring was: 96.4%-100% for somatosensory evoked potential, 73.2%-86.1% for electromyography, 70.0%-86.1% for motor evoked potential, and 17.6%-33.6% for other modalities. For non-myelopathy patients, neuromonitoring prevalence increased from 33.1% in 2012 to 43.3% in 2020. The range of utilization for each type of monitoring was: 93.0%-100% for somatosensory evoked potential, 68.9%-89.7% for electromyography, 55.8%-77.4% for motor evoked potential, and 17.8%-36.4% for other modalities. This study investigates the utilization of IONM during cervical spinal surgeries in Medicare patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or CS between 2012 and 2020. Although IONM is employed in cervical spine procedures, its adoption and standardization appear to vary across the country and different health care settings.

Comparison of surgical invasiveness and hidden blood loss between unilateral double portal endoscopic lumbar disc extraction and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis

BackgroundHidden blood loss (HBL) is a notable complication in spinal endoscopic procedures. This study aims to compare tissue damage and hidden blood loss between two minimally invasive spinal techniques: unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (UBE) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID). Furthermore, the study examines the risk factors contributing to hidden blood loss in each procedure.Patients and methodsA single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on 86 patients who underwent unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (UBE) and 73 patients who received percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) between January 2021 and December 2023.Demographic data, blood loss parameters, and serum levels of creatine kinase (CK) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were recorded. Pearson or Spearman correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between patient characteristics and HBL. Additionally, multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for HBL.ResultsA total of 159 consecutive patients were included in this study, consisting of 83 females and 76 males. The average hidden blood loss (HBL) was 431.00 ± 160.52 ml in the UBE group and 328.40 ± 87.71 ml in the PEID group, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis indicated that in the UBE group, HBL was associated with operation time, preoperative hematocrit (Hct), ASA classification, and paraspinal muscle thickness. In the PEID group, HBL was correlated with operation time, preoperative activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), paraspinal muscle thickness, and the presence of diabetes (P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between HBL and operation time in both groups (P < 0.05), identifying operation time as an independent risk factor for HBL. Furthermore, CRP and CK levels were generally lower in the PEID group compared to the UBE group, particularly on postoperative day 3 for CRP and postoperative day 1 for CK. Both total blood loss and hidden blood loss were significantly lower in the PEID group than in the UBE group.ConclusionCompared to UBE, PEID shows superior results regarding surgical trauma, total blood loss, hidden blood loss (HBL), and postoperative hematocrit (Hct) reduction. Consequently, PEID is recommended as the treatment of choice for younger patients or those with compromised baseline perioperative conditions.Additionally, Hidden blood loss remains a critical factor, and surgical duration presents a shared risk in both procedures.

Smoking Does Not Negatively Impact Outcomes Following Cervical Laminoplasty: A Quality Outcomes Database Study.

Retrospective cohort study. To assess the impact of smoking on outcomes following elective cervical laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). The detrimental effect of cigarette smoking on cervical spinal fusion surgery outcomes is well documented. However, the impact of smoking on outcomes following nonfusion cervical spine procedures is unknown. One commonly utilized nonfusion technique for cervical decompression is laminoplasty. Adult smokers or nonsmokers who underwent primary elective laminoplasty for DCM were included. The propensity score (PS) was constructed for being a current smoker based on covariates. Only patients contained in the PS overlapped region were included in the analysis set. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline and 12 months postoperation included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, neck disability index (NDI)%, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scores. Other outcomes included perioperative complications, 3-month readmissions/reoperations, and patient satisfaction. Wilcoxon and Pearson tests were used to compare outcomes between smokers and nonsmokers. The study included 132 patients: 30 were smokers (22.7%) and 102 were nonsmokers (77.3%). No significant differences were found at baseline between groups in demographics or medical history. Smokers had significantly worse baseline VAS neck pain (5.7±3.2 vs. 4.4±3.04, P=0.028) and arm pain (5.7±3.5 vs. 4.3±3.2, P=0.045) scores, but all other baseline PROs were not statistically different between groups. No differences were found between smokers and nonsmokers in any 12-month PRO, or in rates of perioperative complications, 3-month readmissions, or 3-month reoperations. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, smoking had no significant impact on any outcome of interest. Clinical and PROs following elective laminoplasty for DCM are not significantly different between smokers and nonsmokers. Laminoplasty should be considered a good surgical option in smokers presenting with DCM.

A Comparative Review of Spine Surgeries in Two New Neurosurgery Centres in an Urban and Rural Environment in Southeast Nigeria

Background: The Imo State University Teaching Hospital (IMSUTH) located in a rural setting commenced neurosurgical services in January 2016 with a spine procedure as the first case whereas the Imo State Specialist Hospital (IMSSH) located in an urban setting commenced neurosurgical services in April 2021 and spine procedures in August 2021. The presentation of surgically managed spine pathologies in both hospitals were compared. Aims: The study aimed to descriptively compare the number of spine procedures performed in both hospitals including the age and gender distribution of the surgically managed spine patients, the spine pathologies and their distribution. Methods: The surgical records of all spine patients who had surgical procedures at IMSUTH, Orlu, from January 2016 to May 2020 (42 months), and at IMSSH, Owerri, from August 2021 to July 2024 (36 months) were retrospectively reviewed. Results: During the study periods, in IMSUTH, Orlu, there were 27 spine surgeries, giving an average of 1 spine procedure in 2 months whereas in IMSSH, Owerri, there were 157 spine surgeries giving an average of 4 spine surgeries per month. Interestingly the distribution of spine procedures revealed that the highest frequency of spine surgeries was performed in the lumbar spine (n=7, 26% in IMSUTH; n=43, 27.3% in IMSSH) followed by lumbosacral spine (n=6, 22.2% in IMSUTH; n=42, 26.8% in IMSSH) in both hospitals. And quite interesting also is that trauma (n=15, 55.6%) accounted for the highest number of spine surgeries in the rural environment of IMSUTH, Orlu, while degenerative spine diseases (n=113, 71.9%) accounted for the highest number of spine surgeries in the urban environment of IMSSH, Owerri. Conclusion: The study revealed that spine pathologies are not uncommon in resource poor settings especially in the urban environment. There is a male preponderance for spine surgeries. Lumbar/lumbosacral spine pathologies are common in our resource poor settings but trauma related spine pathologies are more common factors for spine surgeries in rural settings. There is need to improve access to spine care in the rural environments.

Assessment of spinopelvic relationship among Turkish orthopedic surgeons in total joint replacement: a survey.

This study aims to investigate the preferences of orthopedics and traumatology specialists in evaluating the spinopelvic relationship in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Türkiye. Members of the Turkish Orthopedics and Traumatology Association (n=2485) were invited to fill out the questionnaire. The survey was created using Google Forms and distributed to participants via WhatsApp and Gmail by sharing the link. A total of 205 orthopedic surgeons responded and completed the questionnaire. The survey included 13 questions about the duration of their experience, the number of THA and spinal instrumentation procedures they performed, the dislocation rates they encountered after surgery, and the radiological assessments they performed for the spinopelvic relationship. Sixty-three percent of the participants evaluated spinopelvic parameters in patients undergoing THA. Forty-seven percent of surgeons state that in their daily practice, they determine the angle of the acetabular component according to whether the spinal deformity is rigid, flexible, balanced, or unstable. While 88% of the participants stated the rate of encountering dislocation after primary THA as less than 2%, 12% of the participants stated it as more than 2%. It was observed that 40% of the surgeons with a prosthetic dislocation rate of more than 2% evaluated the spinopelvic relationship, while 67% of the surgeons with a dislocation rate of less than 2% evaluated the spinopelvic relationship. Approximately half of the orthopedic surgeons in Türkiye plan component placement in primary THA cases by considering the spinopelvic relationship. In order to increase awareness about the spinopelvic relationship, it would be beneficial to give more space to this subject in training programs and conferences. N/A.

Key Takeaways From the ISASS Webinar Series on Current and Emerging Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery | Part 2: Polytomous Rasch Analysis of Learning Curve and Surgeon Endorsement of Biportal, Interlaminar, and Transforaminal Endoscopic Stenosis Decompression, Discectomy, and Laminectomy in Combination With Interspinous Process Spacers.

The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery hosted the second of a series of 4 webinars on endoscopic spine surgery techniques. The second webinar focused on the application of unilateral biportal endoscopy for discectomy and laminectomy in combination with interbody fusion and interspinous process spacers. This series was intended to identify current trends with contemporary modern endoscopic spine surgery techniques. To analyze the level of surgeon endorsement for the presented endoscopic spine surgery techniques before and after the webinar utilizing polytomous Rasch analysis, as well as to evaluate the potential for these insights to inform clinical guideline recommendations. A survey was available to 667 potential respondents during the Zoom webinar, collecting data on surgeon endorsements using a Likert scale. The polytomous Rasch model was employed to analyze responses while considering the complexity of decisions against surgeon expertise, developing a logarithmic measurement scale, allowing objective statistical analysis of categorical variables, highlighting incongruent or out of order items vs congruent and in order items, and driving improvement in clinical guidelines. Of the 667 surgeons who participated in the webinar, 224 accessed, 122 started, and 61 completed the prewebinar survey, achieving a 50.0% completion rate. Respondents comprised primarily orthopedic surgeons (70.5%) and neurosurgeons (24.6%), with fellows and medical students each making up 1.6%. These surgeons estimated that mastering the learning curve of endoscopic spine surgery required an average of 18.08 cases corroborated by postwebinar responses averaging 15.78 cases. Descriptive statistics revealed an acknowledgment of a learning curve in mastering endoscopic spine surgery, with a slight increase in recognition postwebinar (81.8% up from 80.3%). The data underscored the importance of cadaver courses and high-volume surgical practice before the webinar and highlighted the value of mentorship afterward, indicating a preference shift toward more interactive learning. The confidence in various endoscopic techniques saw notable changes, particularly for procedures involving interlaminar lateral canal decompression and the combined use of transforaminal endoscopic decompression with interspinous process spacers, which saw an increase in high-level endorsements postwebinar. Polytomous Rasch analysis provided insights into training methods and procedural techniques, with mentorship and cadaver courses emerging as key elements for mastering the learning curve. The analysis also highlighted a general consensus on the effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar decompression for lateral canal stenosis, reflecting evolving surgeon preferences and consensus on best practices. Infit and outfit statistics from the Rasch analysis suggested a good fit between the survey responses and the Rasch model both before and after the webinar, indicating minimal data distortion due to bias. Differential item functioning analysis showed no significant bias in item responses between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons in the prewebinar survey, but it identified potential bias for one item postwebinar-unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy for central stenosis. This webinar highlighted the importance of hands-on training methods such as cadaver courses and mentorship in mastering the complex spinal endoscopy procedures. The application of polytomous Rasch analysis provided a detailed understanding of surgeons' current preferences and perceptions, as well as the evolving consensus on best practices in endoscopic spine surgery, displaying wide acceptance of the percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic decompression for lateral canal stenosis decompression and a growing interest in integrating endoscopic techniques for more comprehensive spinal care, including wide decompression and spinal stabilization. Assessing surgeon confidence and acceptance of endoscopic spinal surgeries using polytomous Rasch analysis. Level 2 (inferential) and 3 (observational) evidence because Rasch analysis provides statistical validation of instruments rather than direct clinical outcomes.

ADVANCING PRECISION

Augmented reality (AR) technology is revolutionizing spine surgery, offering unprecedented intraoperative image guidance and enhancing patient safety, particularly in complex procedures. This presentation explores the expanding applications of AR in spinal surgery, highlighting recent technological advances that have transformed surgical practices. In addition to improving surgical precision and accuracy, AR provides real-time visualization of critical anatomical structures, aiding in navigation and decision-making during intricate spinal procedures. This presentation will delve into the benefits that AR brings compared to classical techniques, including enhanced visualization, improved spatial awareness, and reduced radiation exposure for both patients and surgical teams. By overlaying virtual information onto the surgeon’s view of the patient, AR facilitates a more intuitive understanding of complex spinal anatomy and pathology, leading to optimized surgical outcomes. Furthermore, this session will cover the diverse applications of AR in a range of spinal conditions operated in Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK - including spinal tumors, calcified disc herniation, spinal CSF-venous fistula etc. By showcasing the benefits of AR technology across various pathologies, this presentation aims to underscore its transformative potential in advancing spinal surgical care.

Advancements in Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Spinal Surgery: Innovations, Multimodal Approaches, and Implications for Patient Safety

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has become an essential component of spinal surgery, providing real-time assessment of neural function and enhancing surgical safety. Recent advancements in IONM technologies have significantly improved the ability to detect and prevent neurological complications during spinal procedures. This article reviews the latest updates in IONM, including advancements in monitoring techniques, integration of multimodal monitoring, and improvements in data interpretation. The article also discusses the impact of these innovations on surgical outcomes and patient safety, highlighting the importance of ongoing developments in this field.

Ultrasound guided procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a narrative review with illustrative examples.

Ultrasound guidance plays a pivotal role in percutaneous procedures for diagnosing and managing musculoskeletal disorders. Such procedures encompass biopsies for tumor, diagnostic aspiration and therapeutic drainage of abscesses, hematomas, cysts and fluid collections, therapeutic injections into joints, nerves, and tendons, as well as aspirations of calcium deposits and extraction of foreign bodies. This review aims to compile the most frequent ultrasound-guided procedures in the musculoskeletal system and present the state-of-the-art in current advances and evidence. We performed a literature review on interventional ultrasound in the musculoskeletal system, and included reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and clinical trials published during the last 10 years. Articles related to imaging techniques different from ultrasound, or spinal, thoracoabdominal and facial procedures were excluded. A total of 120 articles were selected and included in this review. We qualitatively synthesized the main findings and complemented the review with illustrative images from our daily practice. Most of the reviewed studies found superiority of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided procedures. Ultrasound was generally considered as a valuable tool for many specialists in diagnosing and treating many musculoskeletal pathologies, but some disparities in needle approaches, techniques, medication, and doses make it difficult to draw strong evidence in different clinical scenarios. Advances in ultrasound-guided procedures in the musculoskeletal system have enabled radiologists and other specialists to achieve high accuracy in diagnosing and treating various musculoskeletal conditions, including tumors, inflammatory and degenerative arthritis, tendinopathies, and bursal pathologies.

Hair-sparing approach versus traditional hair clipping for cerebral spinal fluid shunt procedures: a retrospective comparative study.

Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) diversion methods, including ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts, are the standard treatment for hydrocephalus. Hair clipping (HC) has been a routine neurosurgical practice of the great majority of neurosurgeons, due to the perception that this will either decrease the risk of shunt infection or allow for a faster, unimpeded opening and closing of the skin. The benefits of not cutting or clipping hair in terms of normalizing appearance and self-esteem are obvious. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the rate of shunt infection would differ between pediatric patients receiving operation via the hair-sparing (HS) approach versus HC. A retrospective single-institution study comparing HS versus HC was conducted on pediatric patients undergoing long-term CSF shunt procedures at the Montreal Children's Hospital between August 2014 and April 2021. The primary outcome measure was shunt infection at 90 days and at long-term follow-up. Inclusion criteria were having at least 18 months of follow-up after long-term CSF shunt procedures, including insertions or revisions of VP shunts, ventriculoatrial shunts, cystoperitoneal shunts, subdural-peritoneal shunts, ventriculosubgaleal shunts, and ventriculosubgaleal reservoirs. Excluded procedures were those involving external ventricular drains, externalized shunts, Omaya reservoirs, endoscopic third ventriculostomies, and lumbar shunts. There were 434 CSF shunt procedures performed in 226 unique patients; 155 (35.71%) procedures were done using the HS approach versus 279 (64.29%) procedures via HC. At 90 days postoperatively, the infection rate was 1.29% in the HS group and 2.87% in the HC group, with an absolute risk difference of 1.58% (95% CI -1.07% to 4.23%, p = 0.24). At long-term follow-up (mean follow-up: 752 days and 716 days for the HS and HC groups, respectively), the rate of shunt infection remained at 1.29% for the HS group (no new infections) but rose to 4.66% for the HC group, with an absolute risk difference of 3.37% (95% CI 0.33%-6.41%, p = 0.03). Performing CSF shunt procedures without cutting or clipping any hair has a very low risk of shunt infection, and certainly does not appear to increase the risk of infection (or malfunction) versus the hair removal approach. It is a safe alternative and should be considered due to its esthetic and psychological benefits regarding normalization of appearance and ease of resuming a normal life following shunt surgery.

Non-cadaveric spine surgery simulator training in neurosurgical residency

BackgroundSpine surgical training faces increasing challenges due to restricted working hours and greater subspecialization. Modern simulators offer a promising approach to teaching both simple and complex spinal procedures. This study evaluated the acceptance and efficacy of spine simulator training using a lumbar herniated disc model tested by 16 neurosurgical residents (PGY-1-6), and compared 3D and 2D teaching methods. MethodsSixteen residents utilized the Realists RealSpine L4/L5 disc simulator with both microscope and exoscope. A mixed-methods analysis assessed the efficacy and acceptance of the training. Six PGY-1 residents participated in a learning curve study, divided into exoscopic and microscopic cohorts. Each group watched a tutorial in either 3D or 2D, followed by three surgical sessions. Endpoints included surgical progress within 30 minutes and complication rates. Microsurgical skills and mental concepts were evaluated on a numeric Likert Scale. ResultsParticipants rated the simulator training favorably, with a median score of 8/10 across six categories. The learning curve study showed a 30% improvement in microsurgical performance. The completion rate of herniated disc removal increased from 50% at T2 to 100% at T3 and T4. Significant improvement in mental concept was observed (p=0.035), with slightly better consolidation in the exoscope group. Self-assessments revealed significantly improved skills across all participants. ConclusionSpine simulator training was well-received and resulted in improvements in both mental concept and microsurgical performance, with enhanced outcomes in the 3D teaching/exoscope group. This study supports the integration of spine simulators into spine surgical residency, particularly for early-stage training, to improve both cognitive and practical surgical skills.

Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Double-Cage Technique

Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BETLIF) is a novel spinal fusion procedure using the unilateral biportal endoscopic technique. The hydrostatic pressure of saline irrigation suppresses bleeding, enabling us to perform delicate surgery in a crystal-clear and magnified surgical field with almost no bleeding. Adequate neural decompression, disc space preparation, and bony endplate preservation can be achieved safely. The sturdy endplate reduces the incidence of cage subsidence and provides good initial stability. We use 2 interbody fusion cages and a large amount of bone graft to promote fusion. Reduction of the spondylolisthesis can also be achieved using a modern pedicle screw system. This article presents a step-by-step demonstration of the BETLIF technique in a 68-year-old patient with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis at L4-5, including his clinical presentation and treatment results. BETLIF is a safe, effective, and revolutionary minimally invasive solution for spinal fusion. Its advantages include a magnificent surgical field, direct decompression, minimum blood loss, radical discectomy, meticulous endplate preparation, cage insertion under direct visual control, and excellent treatment results with a high fusion rate and few complications.

Comparison of RVU Reimbursement in Anterior or Posterior Approach for Single- and Multilevel Cervical Spinal Fusion.

Retrospective database study. This study aims to quantify and compare mean work RVUs (wRVUs), mean operative time (OpTime), and wRVUs/min in single- and multilevel anterior and posterior cervical spine fusions performed between 2011 and 2020. Prior research has demonstrated inconsistencies in technical skill, operative time, and surgical difficulty with reimbursement in various orthopedic subspecialties. Although trends investigating physician effort and reimbursement have been investigated in lumbar spine surgery, less research has examined these relationships with respect to cervical spine procedures. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was queried for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes reflecting anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF), and the number of levels involved. The cohort was stratified into 10 groups: single-level, 2-level, 3-level, 4-level, 5+ level anterior or posterior cervical fusions. Mean operative times, mean wRVUs, and wRVU/min were calculated and compared by Student t test. A total of 100,997 patients met inclusion criteria in this study, of which 79,141 (78.36%) underwent ACDF, whereas 21,836 (21.62%) underwent PCDF. One- and 2-level fusions were most common in both ACDF and PCDF. In 1-, 3-, 4-, and 5+ level fusion, the anterior approach demonstrated significantly lower mean wRVU (P<0.001). In 1-, 2-, and 3-level fusions, the anterior approach had significantly lower operation times (P<0.001). The anterior approach demonstrated significantly higher wRVU/min in 1- and 2- levels (P<0.001) but lower wRVU/min in 3- and 4-level fusions (P<0.001). Clear discrepancies exist between surgical approach and levels of fusion in cervical spine procedures incongruous with markers of surgical difficulty, physician effort, or expertise required. These specific results suggest that the complexity of multi-level anterior cervical fusions are not effectively accounted for by existing RVU measures.

Diagnosis and management of infections related to spinal pain interventions.

Although relatively rare, infections related to spinal pain interventions pose significant risks with an increase in the frequency of these procedures. This review investigates the incidence, risk factors, and management of infections following spinal pain interventions, such as epidural steroid injections, nucleoplasty, and facet joint injections. Most of the existing literature comprises case reports and retrospective studies with limited prospective research, owing to the nature of these infections. Our analysis revealed that while the overall infection rate is low, potential complications, such as epidural abscesses and spondylodiscitis, can be severe and life-threatening. The risk factors include advanced age, diabetes, immunosuppression, and multiple spinal procedures. Early diagnosis and timely intervention are critical to prevent long-term morbidity. These findings emphasize the importance of developing standardized diagnostic algorithms and treatment guidelines to support clinicians in managing these infections effectively. Future research should focus on large-scale studies to understand the impact of these infections better and refine clinical management strategies.

The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study

BackgroundPrevious study of spinal neurotomy procedures indicates that stringent block selection improves outcomes. However, this pattern is not established for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN). Few SLBRFN studies have used stringent block selection criteria such as ≥80 % pain reduction following dual sacral lateral branch blocks (SLBB). ObjectiveEvaluate the effectiveness of SLBRFN in patients with ≥80 % pain relief following dual SLBBs. MethodsRetrospective single-arm cohort study of consecutive patients from two Canadian musculoskeletal and pain clinics who underwent first-time SLBRFN after report of ≥80 % pain relief following dual diagnostic SLBBs. Patients were identified by electronic medical record query between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with a ≥50 % reduction in the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score three months after SLBRFN. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of responders achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the pain disability quality-of-life questionnaire (PDQQ), and the duration and mean percentage of pain relief among those with recurrent symptoms after a successful SLBRFN. ResultsOf the 70 participants included, 32 (45.7 %; 95 % CI = 34.6–57.3) reported a ≥50 % reduction in NPRS, and 35 (50.0 %; 95 % CI = 38.6–61.4) achieved the MCID on the PDQQ at 3-months. Among the 17 patients who reported a return of symptoms, the mean duration of relief was 8.0 ± 3.5 months, and the mean percentage of pain relief was 77.9 % ± 16.4 %. Logistic regression models revealed that the use of multi-tined RF probes and lower patient BMI were associated with treatment success. Discussion/conclusionSLBRFN reduced pain and disability in approximately 50 % of patients at 3 months when selected using relatively restrictive selection criteria. Treatment success was associated with multi-tined RF probe type and lower patient BMI. Larger prospective studies assessing long-term outcomes are needed to further evaluate the impact of different selection criteria and techniques on SLBRFN effectiveness.