Abstract

Background and contextUnplanned readmission within 30 days following elective spine surgery is a key indicator of quality of care, as readmissions often signal early complications or poor recovery. The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) utilizes this metric to assess hospital and surgeon performance. PurposeHere we aim to delineate quality of care metrics for full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) compared to traditional spine surgery. DesignThe study was a retrospective multicenter analysis comparing outcomes of propensity matched cohorts. Patient sampleThe study included 908 FESS patients operated between 2014 and 2023 and a matched cohort of 73,906 non-FESS patients. Outcome measuresOur primary outcome measures were postoperative 30-day hospital readmissions and revision surgery. Furthermore, demographic data, hospitalization, surgical details and comorbidities were included. MethodsData were collected from 6 participating institutions. Patients older than 18 years undergoing non-instrumented FESS spine surgeries for degenerative lumbar spinal pathologies from 2016-2023 were included. A matched non-FESS cohort was identified in the ACS-NSQIP database (2015-2019). Propensity-score matching was used to compare the cohorts. ResultsBefore matching, the 30-day readmission rate was significantly lower in the FESS cohort (1.1% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001), which remained consistent after matching (1.1% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001). The rate of 30-day surgical revisions was similar between cohorts (1.0% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.63). Multivariate analysis indicated a significant correlation between FESS and reduced 30-day readmissions (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.57, p < 0.001). ConclusionThis study is the first to compare 30-day hospital readmissions between FESS and non-endoscopic surgeries in a large, matched multicenter cohort. FESS significantly reduces both the length of postoperative hospital stay and 30-day readmission rates compared to non-endoscopic approaches, underscoring the safety and effectiveness of outpatient FESS. Future studies are needed to define the role of FESS in more complex spine procedures.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.