Spinal Malperfusion Research Articles

Analysis of factors affecting outcome in acute type A aortic dissection complicated by preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) aggravates the pre-existing dismal prognosis of patients suffering from acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). We aimed to identify factors affecting survival and outcome in ATAAD patients requiring CPR at presentation at 2 European aortic centres. Data on 112 surgical candidates and undergoing preoperative CPR were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to 30-day mortality. A multivariable model identified predictors for 30-day mortality. Preoperative death occurred in 23 patients (20.5%). In the remaining 89 surgical patients (79.5%) circulatory arrest time (41 ± 20 min in 30-day non-survivors vs 30 ± 13 min in 30-day survivor, P = 0.003) as well as cardiopulmonary bypass time (320 ± 132 min in 30-day non-survivors vs 252 ± 140 min in 30-day survivor, P = 0.020) time was significantly longer in patients with worse outcome. Thirty-day mortality of the total cohort was 61.6% (n = 69) with cardiac failure in 48% and aortic rupture or haemorrhagic shock (28%) as predominant reasons of death. Age [odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.09, P = 0.034], preoperative coronary (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.34-9.26, p = 0.012) and spinal malperfusion (OR 12.49, 95% CI 1.83-225.02, P = 0.028) emerged as independent predictors for 30-day mortality while CPR due to tamponade was associated with improved early survival (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.091-0.81, P = 0.023). Assessment of underlying cause for CPR is mandatory. Pericardial tamponade, rapidly resolved with pericardial drainage, is a predictor for improved survival, while age and presence of coronary and spinal malperfusion are associated with dismal outcome in this high-risk patient group.

Malperfusion in type A aortic dissection: results of emergency central aortic repair.

Although outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) have improved, malperfusion remains associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, and its optimal therapeutic treatment is unknown. Emergency central repair has been performed as our first-line approach for malperfusion. Here, we analyzed outcomes of ATAAD with malperfusion and reassessed emergency central repair. In total, 1026 ATAAD patients underwent emergency surgery within 48h of symptom onset, of whom 318 (30.9%) patients complicated with any preoperative malperfusion were included. Pathophysiology of malperfusion and surgical outcomes were analyzed. The in-hospital mortality rate was 12.9% for patients with malperfusion and 4.8% for patients without malperfusion (p < 0.0001). Coronary malperfusion was complicated in 7.5% of patients (% dead per group, 19.5%), mesenteric malperfusion in 3.6% (24.3%), renal malperfusion in 8.8% (14.4%), lower leg malperfusion in 12.6% (13.7%), brain malperfusion in 9.7% (12.0%), and spinal malperfusion in 1.1% (18.2%). Mortality rates varied substantially according to the number of affected organ systems (none, 4.8%; one system, 10.4%; two systems, 14.5%; three systems, 30.0%, and four systems; 30.3%; p < 0.0001). In malperfused patients, logistic regression analysis revealed that obesity (body mass index > 30kg/m2), preoperative shock (systolic blood pressure < 80mmHg), and visceral ischemia were independent predictors for hospital death. Malperfusion of more organ systems and mesenteric malperfusion resulted in unfavorable prognosis, and effects of central repair were limited in such severe/complex malperfusion. To further improve outcomes of ATAAD with malperfusion, emergency reperfusion of affected organs followed by central repair might be considered.

Association of preoperative spinal drain placement with spinal cord ischemia among patients undergoing thoracic and thoracoabdominal endovascular aortic repair

ObjectiveSpinal cord ischemia (SCI) is among the most devastating complications of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Spinal fluid drainage has been proposed as a viable means to reduce SCI, but few data exist to support its routine use. This study investigated the association of preoperative spinal fluid drainage with the risk of SCI after TEVAR. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative TEVAR module was queried for adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing TEVAR (coverage of zones 0-5) between September 2014 and March 2018 (inclusive). Patients with preoperative spinal malperfusion, aortic rupture on presentation, and connective tissue disorders were excluded. One-to-one propensity matching was used to balance patients on 44 separate dimensions by the nearest neighbor principle to compare those with vs those without preoperative spinal drainage. The primary end point was SCI still present at the time of discharge. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and prolonged intensive care unit stay (>7 days). ResultsAmong 4287 patients who underwent TEVAR (mean age, 67.1 [standard deviation, 13.7] years; 1665 [38.8%] women and 2622 [61.2%] men), 2076 had a spinal drain placed. Propensity matching yielded 1292 pairs with adequate covariate balance (all 44 absolute standardized differences <0.1). In the 2584 propensity-matched patients, spinal drain placement was associated with a reduced risk of SCI (1.5% vs 2.5%; risk-adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.89; P = .02). The rates of 30-day mortality (4.5% vs 5.0%; risk-adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.44-1.01; P = .05) and prolonged intensive care unit stay (7.0% vs 5.7%; risk-adjusted OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.84-1.45; P = .48) did not differ on the basis of spinal drain placement. The crossover rate was 10% (127/1292), and those with postoperative drain placement had a 20% (26/127) SCI rate on discharge. ConclusionsAmong patients undergoing thoracic and thoracoabdominal endovascular aortic repair, preoperative placement of a spinal drain, compared with no drain, was associated with reduced risk of SCI. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage as a rescue measure does not provide the same protection offered by routine preoperative placement. Further investigation, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to more definitively determine the role for spinal drainage in TEVAR.

Editor's Choice – Current Options and Recommendations for the Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Pathologies Involving the Aortic Arch: An Expert Consensus Document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) & the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS)

Editor's Choice – Current Options and Recommendations for the Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Pathologies Involving the Aortic Arch: An Expert Consensus Document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) & the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS)

Risk of Mortality After Resolution of Spinal Malperfusion in Acute Dissection

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) may develop in patients presenting with acute aortic dissection. We sought to determine how SCI and its recovery affect outcomes. We reviewed patients with SCI in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) from September 1999 to May 2014. SCI was defined as paraplegia or paraparesis present on admission. Monoparesis/plegia, paraesthesia, or numbness was defined as ischemic neuropathy. All ATBAD patients were managed with antiimpulse therapy, with selective intervention for rupture, rapid aortic expansion, malperfusion, or intractable pain. ATAAD patients were managed with urgent proximal aortic replacement. Neurologic symptoms were present in 178 (18.2%) of 978 acute dissections (482 ATAAD and 496 ATBAD). Of these 178 patients, SCI presented in 52 patients (29.2%; 80.1% male; mean age, 57 years). On admission paraplegia was present in 24 (46.2%), paraparesis in 10 (19.2%), paresthesia/numbness in 27 (51.9%), and leg ischemia in 25 (48.1%). Aortic operations were performed in 27 SCI patients (51.9%). Symptom resolution was seen in 30 (57.7%). The 30-day mortality was 19.2% and was significantly less in those with resolution of SCI (6.7% vs 36.4%, p= 0.012). When surgical intervention was required in ATBAD with SCI, mortality was 50% (p= 0.039). SCI and symptom resolution significantly affected overall survival. SCI is associated with significantly increased risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio, 2.9; p < 0.001), and SCI resolution completely offsets this risk (hazard ratio, 0.28; p= 0.003). These effects were consistent between ATAAD and ATBAD (p= 0.554). SCI in acute aortic dissection portends a poor prognosis. However, reversal of deficits is associated with a long-term survival outcome comparable to patients unaffected with SCI.

The Impact of Pre-Operative Malperfusion on Outcome in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Results From the GERAADA Registry

BackgroundMalperfusion adversely affects outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection, but reliable quantitative data are lacking. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to analyze the impact of various forms of malperfusion on early outcome. MethodsA total of 2,137 consecutive patients enrolled in GERAADA (German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A) who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2010, of whom 717 (33.6%) had any kind of pre-operative malperfusion, were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsAll-cause 30-day mortality was 16.9% and varied substantially according to the number of organ systems affected by malperfusion (none, 12.6%; 1 system, 21.3%; 2 systems, 30.9%; 3 systems, 43.4%; p < 0.001). Pre-operative cerebral malperfusion, comatose state, peripheral malperfusion, visceral malperfusion, involvement of supra-aortic branches, coronary malperfusion, and renal malperfusion were all independent predictors of developing any post-operative malperfusion syndrome. When survival was considered, age, peripheral malperfusion, involvement of supra-aortic branches, coronary malperfusion, spinal malperfusion, a primary entry in the descending aorta, and pre-operative comatose state were independent predictors, again with increasing significance. ConclusionsMalperfusion remains a severe clinical condition with strong potential for adverse outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. The GERAADA registry suggests that the impact of the number of organs involved and the type of malperfusion on outcome differs substantially. Introducing an appropriate classification system, such as “complicated” and uncomplicated” acute type A aortic dissection, might help predict individual risk as well as select a surgical strategy that may quickly resolve malperfusion.

47. Monitoring of motor evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Spinal cord ischemia is one of the most serious complications of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Hypotermia, cerebrospinal fluid drainage and pressure monitoring, reimplantation of segmental arteries and staged clamping are usual methods of spinal cord protection. We use electrophysiological monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to measure a functional status of the thoracolumbar spinal cord during thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Between May 2011 and May 2013, MEPs monitoring-assisted thoracoabdominal repair was performed in 14 patients. Stable MEPs were reproducible in 10 of 14 patients (71%). Nine of them displayed no neurological deficit after postoperative awakening. One patient suffered light hemiparesis due to brain ischemia. Bilateral MEPs loss occurred in 4 of 14 patients. Two of them recovered after spinal-cord protecting interventions with no neurological deficit. One patient died early after surgical intervention in the ICU and it was not possible to assess neurological functions in this patient. The remaining patient suffered left-sided hemiparesis, which improved to a very light deficit within several days after the procedure. There was no case with paraparesis or paraplegia in our group. Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function is necessary to detect spinal cord ischemia. An advantage of MEPs comparing to the somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) is rapid response to spinal malperfusion and corrective steps to prevent or reduce the extent of paraplegia and paraparesis can be taken with little delay. False positive results, detected in two patients of our group, are well known and described in literature and were not detrimental for the patients.

Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Interplay of Spinal Cord Protecting Modalities

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the complementary use of different methods of measuring spinal cord perfusion during thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. MethodsThe spinal cords of 28 patients undergoing surgery on the thoracoabdominal aorta were monitored with transcranial electrical stimulation (tcMEP) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP). Available approaches of spinal cord-protection included: Moderate systemic hypothermia, constant cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage and pressure monitoring, reimplantation of segmental arteries, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and staged clamping. ResultsFourteen of 19 patients (75%) undergoing open surgical treatment (Group I) exhibited loss of tcMEP after proximal aortic clamping. In nine cases (47%), we observed recovery of tcMEP after intraoperative interventions, while two patients subsequently developed paraplegia and three died. Seventeen of 19 patients showed loss of SSEP, with recovery in 12 cases (63%). During stent-graft implantation (Group II), one of nine patients (11%) demonstrated tcMEP loss with intraoperative, intervention-related recovery. The SSEP-recording course remained stable. ConclusionstcMEP/SSEP monitoring has proved to be an excellent means of detecting spinal cord ischaemia during surgery on thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The prognostic value of tcMEP monitoring should be considered superior to that of SSEP measurements, because of its direct and rapid response to spinal malperfusion. Through combined neurophysiological monitoring, vital parameter balancing and intraoperative interventions, spinal cord perfusion improves and recovery of tcMEP and SSEP is achievable, reducing the prevalence of postoperative paraplegia.