Spinal Fusion Patients Research Articles

Risk of spinal surgery among individuals who have been re-vascularized for coronary artery disease

HypothesisRevascularization is a more effective intervention to reduce future postop complications. MethodsPatients undergoing elective spine fusion surgery were isolated in the PearlDiver database. Patients were stratified by having previous history of vascular stenting (Stent), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and no previous heart procedure (No-HP). Means comparison tests (chi-squared and independent samples t-tests, as appropriate) compared differences in demographics, diagnoses, and comorbidities. Binary logistic regression assessed the odds of 30-day and 90-day postoperative (postop) complications associated with each heart procedure (Odds Ratio [95 % confidence interval]). Statistical significance was set p < 0.05. Results731,173 elective spine fusion patients included. Overall, 8,401 pts underwent a CABG, 24,037 pts Stent, and 698,735 had No-HP prior to spine fusion surgery. Compared to Stent and No-HP patients, CABG patients had higher rates of morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes (p < 0.001 for all). Meanwhile, stent patients had higher rates of PVD, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia (all p < 0.001). 30-days post-op, CABG patients had significantly higher complication rates including pneumonia, CVA, MI, sepsis, and death compared to No-HP (all p < 0.001). Stent patients vs. No-HF had higher 30-day post-op complication rates including pneumonia, CVA, MI, sepsis, and death. Furthermore, adjusting for age, comorbidities, and sex Stent was significantly predictive of a MI 30-days post-op (OR: 1.90 [1.53–2.34], P < 0.001). Additionally, controlling for levels fused, stent patients compared to CABG patients had 1.99x greater odds of a MI within 30-days (OR: 1.99 [1.26–3.31], p = 0.005) and 2.02x odds within 90-days postop (OR: 2.2 [1.53–2.71, p < 0.001). ConclusionWith regards to spine surgery, coronary artery bypass graft remains the gold standard for risk reduction. Stenting does not appear to minimize risk of experiencing a post-procedure cardiac event as dramatically as CABG.

Development and Validation of a Risk-Prediction Nomogram for Preoperative Blood Type and Antibody Testing in Spinal Fusion Surgery.

With advancements in minimally invasive techniques, the use of spinal fusion surgery is rapidly increasing and transfusion rates are decreasing. Routine preoperative ABO/Rh blood type and antibody screening (T&S) laboratory tests may not be appropriate for all spinal fusion patients. Herein, we constructed a nomogram to assess patient transfusion risk based on various risk factors in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery, so that preoperative T&S testing can be selectively scheduled in appropriate patients to reduce healthcare and patient costs. Patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery between 01/2020 and 03/2023 were retrospectively examined and classified into the training (n = 3533, 70%) and validation (n = 1515, 30%) datasets. LASSO and multivariable logistic regression were used to analyze risk factors for blood transfusion. Nomogram predictive model was built according to the independent predictors and mode predictive power was validated using consistency index (C-index), Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, calibration curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Bootstrap resampling was used for internal validation. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to evaluate the model's performance in the clinic. Being female, age, BMI, admission route, critical patient, operative time, heart failure, end-stage renal disease or chronic kidney disease (ESRD or CKD), anemia, and coagulation defect were predictors of blood transfusion for spinal fusion. A prediction nomogram was developed according to a multivariate model with good discriminatory power (C-index = 0.887); Bootstrap resampling internal validation C-index was 0.883. Calibration curves showed strong matching between the predicted and actual probabilities of the training and validation sets. HL tests for the training and validation sets had p-values of 0.327 and 0.179, respectively, indicating good calibration. When applied to the training set, the following parameters were found: AUC: 0.895, 95% CI: 0.871-0.919, sensitivity 78.2%, specificity 86.7%, positive predictive value 29.4% and negative predictive value 98.2%. If the model were applied in the training set, 2911 T&S tests (82.4%) would be eliminated, equaling a RMB349,320 cost reduction. The AUC in the internal validation was: 0.879, 95% CI: 0.839-0.927, sensitivity 75.2%, specificity 88.8%, positive predictive value 34.3%, negative predictive value 97.9%, would eliminate 1276 T&S tests (84.2%), saving RMB 153,120. The DCA curve indicated good clinical application value. The nomogram based on 10 independent factors can help healthcare professionals predict the risk of transfusion for patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery to target preoperative T&S testing to appropriate patients and reduce healthcare costs.

Impact of Surgical Resection Without Spinal Fusion for Thoracic Dumbbell Tumors on Postoperative Global Spinal Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes.

A retrospective comparative study. This study investigated radiographical changes in global spinal sagittal alignment (GSSA) and clinical outcomes after tumor resection without spinal fusion in patients with thoracic dumbbell tumors. Thirty patients with thoracic dumbbell tumors who were followed up for at least 3 years were included in this study. Variations in the outcome variables were analyzed using individual GSSA parameters measured on radiography. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified McCormick scale (MMCS), Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analog scale (VAS). To assess the impact of the affected levels on these outcomes, we divided the patients into three groups according to the location of the tumor (upper [T1-4], middle [T5-8], or lower [T9-12] thoracic spine). The GSSA parameters (cervical lordosis, T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis [global, upper, middle, and lower], thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt) of all the patients did not change significantly after surgery. Eleven of thirty patients had preoperative gait disturbances but they could walk without support (MMCS grade I or II) at the final follow-up. The JOA score and VAS showed significant postoperative improvements. No statistically significant differences were observed in each postoperative sagittal profile or clinical outcome between the upper, middle, and lower groups. Tumor resection without spinal fusion did not affect the various GSSA parameters and resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes, indicating that spinal fusion may not always be necessary when resecting thoracic dumbbell tumors.

Predicting postoperative outcomes in lumbar spinal fusion: development of a machine learning model

BACKGROUND CONTEXTDegenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) is a prevalent spinal disorder, often requiring surgical intervention. Accurately predicting surgical outcomes is crucial to guide clinical decision-making, but this is challenging due to the multifactorial nature of postoperative results. Traditional risk assessment tools have limitations, and with the advent of machine learning, there is potential to enhance the precision and comprehensiveness of preoperative evaluations. PURPOSEWe aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm to predict surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) undergoing spinal fusion surgery, only using preoperative data. STUDY DESIGNRetrospective cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients with DLS undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. OUTCOME MEASURESThis study aimed to predict the occurrence of lower back pain (LBP) ≥4 on the numeric analogue scale (NAS) 2 years after surgery. LBP was evaluated as the average pain patients experienced at rest in the week before questioning. NAS ranges from 0 to 10, 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. METHODSWe conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively enrolled patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolistheses at our institution in the United States between January 2016 and December 2018. The initial patient characteristics to be included in the training of the model were chosen by clinical expertise and through a literature review and included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and radiologic features. The data was split into a training and validation datasets using a 60/40 split. Four different machine learning models were trained, including the modern XGBoost model, logistic regression, random-forest, and support vector machine (SVM). The models were evaluated according to the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. An AUC of 0.7 to 0.8 was considered fair, 0.8 to 0.9 good, and ≥ 0.9 excellent. Additionally, a calibration plot and the Brier score were calculated for each model. RESULTSA total of 135 patients (66% female) were included. A total of 38 (28%) patients reported LBP ≥ 4 after 2 years, representing the positive class. The XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance in the validation set with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67–0.95). The other machine learning models performed significantly worse: with an AUC of 0.52 (95% CI 0.37–0.68) for the SVM, 0.56 (95% CI 0.37–0.76) for the logistic regression and an AUC of 0.56 (95% CI 0.37–0.78) for the random forest. In the XGBoost model age, composition of the erector spinae, and severity of lumbar spinal stenosis as were identified as the most important features. CONCLUSIONSThis study represents a novel approach to predicting surgical outcomes in spinal fusion patients. The XGBoost demonstrated a better performance compared with classical models and highlighted the potential contributions of age and paraspinal musculature atrophy as significant factors. These findings have important implications for enhancing patient care through the identification of high-risk individuals and modifiable risk factors. As the incorporation of machine learning algorithms into clinical decision-making continues to gain traction in research and clinical practice, our insights reinforce this trajectory by showcasing the potential of these techniques in forecasting surgical results.

A Pilot Study of the Gut Microbiota in Spine Fusion Surgery Patients

Background: The microbiome has been identified as a contributor to bone quality. As skeletal health is critical to success of orthopedic surgery, the gut microbiome may be a modifiable factor associated with postoperative outcomes. For spine fusion surgery in particular, de novo bone formation and sufficient bone mineral density are essential for successful outcomes. Given the prevalence and complexity of these procedures, the identification of novel factors that may be related to operative success is important. Questions/purposes: We sought to investigate how the composition of the microbiota related to bone health in a focused spinal fusion surgery cohort. Methods: We investigated the composition of the microbiome in a cohort of 31 patients prior to spinal fusion surgery, as well as changes in the microbiome over 6 weeks postoperatively. Preoperative areal bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: Composition of gut microbiota differed among spinal fusion patients with low bone mass ( T-score ≤ −1.0) and those with normal BMD ( P = .03). There was no significant change in composition of the gut microbiota between preoperative evaluation and 6 weeks postoperatively. Conclusions: Our findings in this small sample suggest there may be a relationship between BMD and composition of the gut microbiome in patients who undergo spinal fusion surgery. Further work is needed to investigate these relationships as well as potential interventions to foster a favorable microbial composition in spinal fusion surgery patients.

198. Bone modulus has value beyond that of bone mineral density and Houndsfield units for prediction of postoperative complications in spinal fusion patients

198. Bone modulus has value beyond that of bone mineral density and Houndsfield units for prediction of postoperative complications in spinal fusion patients

P119. Adjunctive use of bone growth stimulation in cervical spine fusion patients at risk for pseudarthrosis

P119. Adjunctive use of bone growth stimulation in cervical spine fusion patients at risk for pseudarthrosis

Spinal Fusion in Patients With Classic Amyoplasia and General Arthrogryposis.

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita is a group of conditions characterized by joint contractures affecting 2 or more joints. This study describes results of spinal fusion in patients with classic amyoplasia and general arthrogryposis. IRB approved retrospective review of patients with a diagnosis of classic amyoplasia and general arthrogryposis who had a primary definitive posterior spinal fusion between 1990 and 2017 at a single pediatric institution. Patients with distal and syndromic arthrogryposis were excluded as well as patients treated with growth-sparing spinal instrumentation. The Modified Clavien-Dindo-sink (MCDS) classification system was used to describe postoperative complications. Over the 28-year period, 342 patients were diagnosed with amyoplasia and general arthrogryposis. Among the 342 patients, 60 (18%) had scoliosis, and 22 (6% of the cohort and 37% of those with scoliosis) were treated surgically. Six patients had growth-sparing techniques, initial fusion elsewhere, or ˂1 year of follow-up, leaving 15 patients. Of the 15, 9 (60%) had a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and 6 (40%) had a combined anterior spinal fusion (ASF)/PSF. The ASF/PSF group was significantly younger at surgery, had a greater American Society of Anesthesiologists status, longer surgery duration, and lower implant density. The average preoperative major coronal deformity in ASF/PSF patients (108 degrees) was greater than patients treated with PSF alone (88 deg). There were 11 complications in 7 patients, with the most common being deep infection requiring reoperation (5/11, 45%). There was 1 instance (1/11, 9%) of each: prolonged intensive care unit admission (>72 h), superficial wound dehiscence, symptomatic implants requiring removal/revision, coronal plane progression requiring extension of fusion, recurrent pneumothorax requiring return to OR, and pseudoarthrosis leading to implant failure (without revision). Complications occurred in 1/9 (11%) PSF-only patients and 6/6 (100%) ASF/PSF patients with all 6 ASF/PSF patients requiring at least 1 reoperation. The average coronal correction was 48% in the PSF-only group and 28% in the ASF/PSF group. Complication rates after spinal fusion for scoliosis in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita patients are high, especially in patients undergoing ASF/PSF, deep infection is common, and major coronal plane curve correction is modest. II Retrospective Study.

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering for Skeletally Immature Patients with AIS: Indication for Spinal Fusion at Skeletal Maturity Is Not Obviated in 60% of Cases.

The role of anterior vertebral body tethering (aVBT) in obviating the need for spinal fusion in patients with AIS remains unclear, and a large amount of variation exists in the data among different studies. The present study aims to investigate and analyze what factors have a potential influence on aVBT outcome. Skeletally immature patients with AIS who underwent aVBT for scoliosis correction were followed up until skeletal maturity. The mean age at the time of surgery was 13.4 ± 1.1, and the mean follow-up time was 2.5 ± 0.5 years. The Cobb angle of the main curve was 46.6 ± 9° at the time of surgery and was significantly corrected to 17.7 ± 10.4° (p < 0.001) immediately postoperatively. A significant loss of correction was observed during the latest follow-up (Cobb angle 33.8 ± 18.7°; p < 0.001). An indication for spinal fusion at skeletal maturity was not obviated in 60% of the patients. The factors identified as having an influence on the outcome were preoperative bone age and the magnitude of the major curve. Patients with advanced bone age and larger curves were more likely to reach an indication for spinal fusion at skeletal maturity. In conclusion, no general recommendation for aVBT can be made for AIS patients. The method can be discussed as a treatment option in skeletally very immature preadolescent patients (Sanders Stadium ≤ 2) with a moderate Cobb angle (≤50°) who failed previous brace therapy.

Implementation of a Private Payer Bundled Payment Model while Maintaining High Value Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

Retrospective single-institution cohort. To evaluate implementation of a commercial bundled payment model in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. BPCI-A caused significant losses for many physician practices, prompting private payers to establish their own bundled payment models. The feasibility of these private bundles has yet to be evaluated in spine fusion. Patients undergoing lumbar fusion from October-December 2018 in BPCI-A prior to our institution's departure were included for BPCI-A analysis. Private bundle data was collected from 2018-2020. Analysis of the transition was conducted among Medicare-aged beneficiaries. Private bundles were grouped by calendar year (Y1, Y2, Y3). Stepwise multivariate linear regression was performed to measure independent predictors of net deficit. Net surplus was lowest in Y1 ($2,395, P=0.03) but did not differ between our final year in BPCI-A and subsequent years in private bundles (all, P>0.05). AIR and SNF patient discharges decreased significantly in all private bundle years compared to BPCI. Readmissions fell from 10.7% (N=37) in BPCI-A to 4.4% (N=6) in Y2 and 4.5% (N=3) Y3 of private bundles (P<0.001). Being in Y2 or Y3 was independently associated with a net surplus in comparison to the Y1 (β: $11,728, P=0.001; β: $11,643, P=0.002). Post-operatively, length of stay in days (β: $-2,982, P<0.001), any readmission (β: -$18,825, P=0.001), and discharge to AIR (β: $-61,256, P<0.001) or SNF (β: $-10,497, P=0.058) were all associated with a net deficit. Non-governmental bundled payment models can be successfully implemented in lumbar spinal fusion patients. Constant price adjustment is necessary so bundled payments remain financially beneficial to both parties and systems overcome early losses. Private insurers who have more competition than the government may be more willing to provide mutually beneficial situations where cost is reduced for payers and health systems.

Posterior spinal fusion in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: a surgical technique to allow intrathecally inject nusinersen.

Nusinersen, the recently approved medical therapy in the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), has revolutionized the natural history of this disease. Until now, surgical treatment of scoliosis in SMA patients was an exclusion criterion for drug therapy. In fact, the bone graft positioned posteriorly during surgery, in order to obtain a solid fusion, prevented the lumbar puncture necessary for the intrathecal administration of the drug. The aim is to describe a surgical technique that allows for safe and easy intrathecal administration of nusinersen. We present a single-center, single-surgeon case series descriptive study. From 2019 to 2021 seven consecutive patients affected by genetically confirmed SMA suitable for treatment with nusinersen and suffered from neuromuscular scoliosis needing posterior spinal fusion surgery were included in the present study. During posterior spinal fusion surgery a L3-L4 or L2-L3 laminectomy was performed to provide safer access to intrathecal injection. The drainage scar was used as a skin landmark so as to facilitate future procedures. The median of operative time was 250 min (range: 200-370 min). The median correction rate was 57% (range: 43.5-68). The median of intraoperative blood loss was 650 mL (range 320-940 mL). The median value of the correction loss at the last follow-up was 10% (range: 4.5-15%). The surgical procedure allowed all patients to receive nusinersen therapy without complications. The procedure described is simple and effective in providing safe intrathecal access to make these patients suitable for undertaking or continuing the protocol of treatment with nusinersen.

High Failure Rates in Prisoners Undergoing Spine Fusion Surgery.

The medical literature on prisoner health care is limited, despite data showing that prisoners experience high rates of physical and mental health challenges. We compared clinical outcomes for prisoners undergoing spine fusion with comparable nonincarcerated patients and determined what factors were implicated in differences in outcomes. Prisoners who underwent spinal fusion in 2011-2021 were retrospectively compared with an age-, sex-, and procedure-matched 3:1 control group of nonincarcerated spinal fusion patients. Fusion failure was confirmed by lack of bridging bone between vertebrae on CT or radiographic images >1year postoperatively or evidence of instrumentation failure with resultant >2mm of translation on flexion/extension radiographs. Twenty-seven identified prisoners were compared with 81 nonincarcerated controls. Ten prisoners and 6 controls experienced nonunion (37% vs. 7%, P < 0.01). Rates of risk factors for nonunion, such as smoking history, elevated body mass index, chronic steroid use, diabetes mellitus, previous spine surgery, and levels fused, were not significantly different between prisoners and controls. Among prisoners, those with nonunion were younger (45 vs. 53years, P= 0.03), had greater body mass index (34 vs. 29, P= 0.02), and were more likely to undergo reoperation (30% vs. 0%, P= 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that prisoners carry a 9.62 increased odds of nonunion compared with controls. This is one of few studies investigating health care outcomes in prisoners. We found they had a significantly higher rate of nonunion than matched control patients from the general population treated at the same hospital, suggesting additional measures may be necessary postoperatively to support fusion in prisoners.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Prone Lateral Single-Position Approach to Same-Day Circumferential Spine Surgery.

Retrospective study. Evaluate surgical characteristics and postoperative 2-year results of the PL approach to spinal fusion. Prone-lateral(PL) single positioning has recently gained popularity in spine surgery due to lower blood loss and operative time but has yet to be examined for other notable outcomes, including realignment and patient-reported measures. We included circumferential spine fusion patients with a minimum one-year follow-up. Patients were stratified into groups based on undergoing PL approach versus same-day staged (Staged). Mean comparison tests identified differences in baseline parameters. Multivariable logistic regression, controlling for age, levels fused, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were used to determine the influence of the approach on complication rates, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes up to two years. One hundred twenty-two patients were included of which 72(59%) were same-day staged and 50(41%) were PL. PL patients were older with lower body mass index (both P <0.05). Patients undergoing PL procedures had lower estimated blood loss and operative time (both P <0.001), along with fewer osteotomies (63% vs. 91%, P <0.001). This translated to a shorter length of stay (3.8d vs. 4.9, P =0.041). PL procedures demonstrated better correction in both PT (4.0 vs. -0.2, P =0.033 and pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (-3.7 vs. 3.1, P =0.012). PL procedures were more likely to improve in GAP relative pelvic version (OR: 2.3, [1.5-8.8]; P =0.003]. PL patients suffered lesser complications during the perioperative period and greater improvement in NRS-Back (-6.0 vs. -3.3, P =0.031), with less reoperations (0.0% vs. 4.8%, P =0.040) by two years. Patients undergoing PL single-position procedures received less invasive procedures with better correction of pelvic compensation, as well as earlier discharge. The prone lateral cohort also demonstrated greater clinical improvement and a lower rate of reoperations by two years following spinal corrective surgery. Level-III.

Early Complications After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Patients With Rett Syndrome.

Neuromuscular scoliosis in Rett syndrome (RS) is common, progressive, and often requires posterior spinal fusion (PSF). While PSF is associated with improved overall outcomes, there is a paucity of information describing complications. We aimed to report the postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperations for patients with RS undergoing PSF. Female pediatric patients with RS treated by PSF with segmental instrumentation, with or without concurrent pelvis fixation, during January 2012 to August 2022 were included. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative data (estimated blood loss, cell saver, packed red blood cells transfused), postoperative complications according to the Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink classification within 90 days, unplanned readmissions within 30 days, and unplanned reoperations within 90 days were recorded. A total of 25 females were included. The mean (SD) age at surgery was 12.9 (1.8) years and the mean follow-up of 38.6 (24.9) months. The mean preoperative major coronal curve was 79 degrees (23 degrees) which decreased to 32 degrees (15 degrees) by the last follow-up ( P <0.001). The median estimated blood loss was 600mL and length of stay was 7 days. There were 81 total postoperative complications (3.2 complications/patient). Eight (32%) had grade IVa complications (disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, hypotensive shock, respiratory failure, chronic urosepsis). Five (20%) patients experienced seizures, 48% had pulmonary complications, and 56% had gastrointestinal complications. There were 3 readmissions (12%) within 30 days for pneumonia and 2 (8%) reoperations (an incision and drainage and C2-T2 fusion for significant kyphosis) within 90 days. One patient also had their fusion extended to the pelvis 1 year later. There were more nonambulatory patients in the group fused to the pelvis, but otherwise no differences between those fused and unfused to the pelvis. This is the largest review of early postoperative complications for patients with RS who underwent PSF. PSF effectively reduced the major coronal curve, but surgeons and families should be aware of a high postoperative seizure and respiratory complication rate, as well as 8% having reoperations within 90 days and 12% being readmitted within 30 days. Level IV-therapeutic study.

Management of severe scoliosis in patients with Turner's syndrome: A case series

Aims and objectivesThe prevalence and treatment of severe scoliosis and other spinal anomalies in patients with Turner's syndrome (TS) is not well reported. This is the largest case series to date regarding the treatment course and outcomes of severely scoliotic TS patients. MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients with TS seen at a single center academic pediatric institution from 2007 to 2021. Of these, the presence of concomitant severe scoliosis or other spinal anomalies was determined, defined by a major coronal curve measuring 45° or greater. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiologic data was collected at both pre- and post-intervention time points. ResultsA retrospective chart review identified 306 patients with TS. Of those, six were identified to have severe scoliosis or other severe spinal anomalies requiring fusion. All four posterior spinal fusion (PSF) patients demonstrated improvement of their spinal curvature. One patient who electively pursued only bracing demonstrated minimal improvement and surgery was subsequently recommended, but not pursued. One patient expired from a pre-existing heart condition prior to intervention. All postoperative complications resolved with no further complications. The only brace-related complication was an allergic rash related to the brace material. ConclusionAll four patients who underwent PSF demonstrated significant improvement of their spinal curvature with few post-surgical complications. None of the patients in the bracing cohort demonstrated stabilization of their spinal curvature. Therefore, these data corroborate with prior studies, suggesting that operative management consisting of spinal fusion with instrumentation provides optimal clinical outcomes, compared to bracing only.

Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Chronic Steroid Use.

Perioperative steroids have traditionally been administered during lumbar spine surgery in order to decrease local inflammation and prevent scar tissue formation, which can otherwise contribute to significant, long-lasting postoperative pain due to the formation of epidural fibrosis around lumbar nerve roots. However, the use of steroids in lumbar spine patients has raised concerns of postoperative wound complications caused by corticosteroid-induced immunomodulatory effects and changes in collagen synthesis. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing spine surgery are at a particularly elevated risk of various complications due to chronic CKD-related systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. It is currently uncertain whether chronic steroid use in CKD patients exerts a protective effect postoperatively due to decreased systemic inflammation or instead is correlated with increased rates of wound complications. Using adjusted odds ratios to control for CKD-related comorbidities, our study of lumbar spine fusion patients who were chronic steroid users vs nonusers found no significant differences in rates of postoperative wound infections in later stage CKD patients. However, we also did not observe statistically significant reductions in hospital length of stay or rates of 30-day mortality, sepsis, or cardiac, pulmonary, and renal events. Our results indicate chronic steroid use neither contributes significantly to rates of wound infections nor exerts a protective effect against postoperative inflammatory complications in lumbar spine patients with CKD. Our findings do not support the practice of holding steroids in chronic users prior to lumbar spine surgery. Perioperative steroids do not appear to increase the risk of postoperative complications, but neither do they improve lumbar spine patient outcomes.

Failure to Normalize Risk Profile of Spine Fusion Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Previously Treated With Percutaneous Stent Revascularization.

The impact of an initially less invasive cardiac intervention on outcomes of future surgical spine procedures has been understudied; therefore, we sought to investigate the effect of coronary stents on postoperative outcomes in an elective spine fusion cohort. Elective spine fusion patients were isolated with International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Edition and current procedural terminology procedure codes in the PearlDiver database. Patients were stratified by number of coronary stents: (1) 1 to 2 stents (ST12); (2) 3 to 4 stents (ST34); (3) no stents. Mean comparison tests compared differences in demographics, diagnoses, comorbidities, and 30-day and 90-day complication outcomes. Logistic regression assessed the odds of complications associated with coronary stents, controlling for levels fused, age, sex, and comorbidities (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]). Statistical significance was P < 0.05. A total of 726,061 elective spine fusion patients were isolated. Of those patients, 707,396 patients had no stent, 17,087 ST12, and 1578 ST34. At baseline (BL), ST12 patients had higher rates of morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus compared with no stent and ST34 patients (all P < 0.001). Relative to no stent patients, ST12 patients had a longer length of stay and, at 30 days, significantly higher complication rates, including pneumonia, myocardial infarction (MI), sepsis, acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection (UTI), wound complications, transfusions, and 30-day readmissions (P < 0.05). Controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, and levels fused, ST12 was a significant predictor of MI within 30 days (OR 2.15 [95% CI 1.7-2.7], P < 0.001) and 90 days postoperatively (OR 1.87 [95% CI 1.6-2.2], P < 0.001). ST34 patients compared with no stent patients at 30 days presented with increased rates of complication, including pneumonia, MI, sepsis, UTI, wound complications, and 30-day readmissions. Regression analysis showed no significant differences in complications between ST12 vs ST34 at 30 days, but at 90 days, ST34 was associated with significantly increased rate and odds of death (1.1% vs 0.3%, P = 0.021; OR 1.94 [95% CI 1.13-3.13], P = 0.01). Cardiac stents failed to normalize risk profile of patients with coronary artery disease. Postoperatively at 90 days, elective spine fusion patients with 3 or more stents were significantly at risk of mortality compared with patients with fewer or no stents.

A dedicated surgical team for posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis improves OR efficiency.

Standardized care pathways for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing PSF improve clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that having dedicated spine personnel would decrease surgical time and improve clinical outcomes. 367 patients with AIS had a PSF within a standardized perioperative care pathway. Cases with 1-3 dedicated spine team members (any combination of circulating nurse, surgical technologist, and anesthesiologist) were compared to teams with none. The impact of individual members was also analyzed. Parametric or non-parametric tests were used for each outcome based on the distribution of the data points. These included one-way ANOVA models, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Fisher's exact tests. Surgical time and total OR time were significantly decreased with the participation of each additional dedicated team member resulting in 43.86min less surgical time and 50.8min less total OR time when three team members were present compared to no team members. If the nurse was a spine member, the surgical time was lower (p = 0.037). If the technologist was a team member, the surgical time and total OR time were lower (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). Lastly, if the anesthesiologist was a member of the team, the anesthesia time was lower (p = 0.003). No significant clinical differences were observed. Having dedicated surgical team members decreases surgical and total OR time for AIS patients undergoing PSF, and this OR efficiency improves as the dedicated team is more robust. OR surgical teams did not influence clinical outcomes. Hospitals should strongly consider developing surgical teams to improve OR efficiency of PSF cases.

Bone Substitute Options for Spine Fusion in Patients With Spine Trauma-Part I: Fusion Biology, Autografts, Allografts, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Ceramics.

Spinal trauma accounts for a large portion of injuries to the spine area, particularly as societies are entering an era of aging populations. Consequently, spine fractures accompanied by osteoporosis are becoming more prevalent. Achieving successful fusion surgery in patients with spine fractures associated with osteoporosis is even more challenging. Pseudarthrosis in the spine does not yield clinically favorable results; however, considerable effort has been made to achieve successful fusion, and the advancement of bone graft substitutes has been particularly crucial in this regard. Autograft bone is considered the best fusion material but is limited in use due to the quantity that can be harvested during surgery and associated complications. Accordingly, various bone graft substitutes are currently being used, although no specific guidelines are available and this mainly depends on the surgeon's choice. Therefore, the purpose of this review, across part I/II, is to summarize bone graft substitutes commonly used in spine surgery for spine fusion in patients with spine trauma and to update the latest knowledge on the role of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.

Spinal Fusion in Patients with Osteopetrosis and Other Disorders of High Bone Mineral Density: A Report of Two Cases

Spinal Fusion in Patients with Osteopetrosis and Other Disorders of High Bone Mineral Density: A Report of Two Cases