AbstractPoly‐γ‐methyl‐L‐glutamate was obtained by the NCA method in chloroform with the use of triethylamine, diethylamine, and n‐hexylamine as initiators. After polymerization, the solution was allowed to stand at 20 ± 2°C., and thin films cast from solvent, with short aging periods (∼1 month), no spherulites formed in the films. Aging periods of 2–6 months yielded positive spherulites; after much longer aging periods (6–10 months), negative spherulites were observed. In the positive spherulites, the helical axes oriented along the radius, but in negative spherulites the helical axes oriented along the tangential direction. These positive and negative spherulites were constructed of microfibrils about 45–67 A. in diameter. The relative viscosity of the aged solutions was also measured. The longer the aging time, the lower the viscosities of these aged solutions; the viscosities decrease sharply to 3 months of aging, and with aging times of 4–20 months the changes in viscosity are very small. However, the viscosity changes in every measurement and always increases during the measurement. Details of changes in viscosity are different depending upon the initiator used and the aging time. These results indicate that the decrease in viscosity is caused by intermolecular aggregation, while the increase during measurement is due to a breakup of the aggregates. Thus, the changes in the soluble state of the polymer in the aged solution seem to be closely related to the growth of both types of spherulites. The initiator has a significant influence on the structure of these aggregates. Polymer prepared with nHA initiator formed no spherulites, regardless of the aging time. No evidence was observed of the presence of the folding orientation of these α‐helical molecules or microfibrils, which indicates that the crystallization habits of helical molecules, such as polypeptides, are different from those of polyethylene. The crystallization mechanism of polypeptides is not by the so‐called folding mechanism, but by the side‐by‐side crystallization mechanism, as proposed by Ishiara or Flory. A difference in the mechanism of growth of positive and negative spherulite is also proposed.
Read full abstract