Introduction/Background Historically, respiratory therapists (RT), speech language pathologists (SLP) and nurses (RN) are trained separately and function independently. Collaboration among these disciplines is essential for optimized patient care and patient communication, particularly for management of tracheostomy patients who need speaking valves. Students learning through interprofessional education (IPE) absorb more than the content, including developing an understanding of professional roles and backgrounds while practicing multi-disciplinary communication.1 Systemic reviews of IPE reflect that it fosters positive interactions and improves attitudes; however, findings are difficult to interpret because projects are diverse, measurement of findings varies, and data is lacking.2 The purpose of this study is to implement an IPE simulation involving RT, SLP and RN students to enhance content mastery related to the interdisciplinary care of tracheostomy patients with speaking valves. Interdisciplinary care is essential for this patient population because optimal levels of patient communication must be balanced with adequate physiologic stability. The following research question is guiding this study: Is there a difference in role understanding and knowledge of clinical indications related to speaking valves, as measured by a pre-test/post-test, after an interprofessional simulation experience with nursing, respiratory therapy and speech language-pathology students? The hypothesis is that there is enhanced understanding of roles and clinical knowledge after an IPE approach using simulation. Upon completion of this simulation, students were able to: 1) understand the roles of RTs, SLPs, and RNs in caring for patients with speaking valves, 2) explain the clinical indications and benefits of speaking valves, 3) demonstrate clinical skills using high fidelity patient simulation and 4) evaluate interdisciplinary collaboration and teamwork. Methods Participants included 90 traditional undergraduate RN students, 22 graduate SLP students and 24 undergraduate RT students. The IPE experience consisted of 3 phases: training, simulation, and debriefing. In the training phase, each class of students viewed a one hour video training module created and presented by Passy-Muir, Inc. Training included anatomical structures, tracheostomy care and indications, benefits and application of speaking valves. For the simulation phase, students were presented with a realistic acute care environment containing a high-fidelity simulator as the patient and standardized patient as the family member. Small groups comprised of students from each discipline worked together in a scenario that included evaluation of patient, tracheostomy care and speaking valve placement, with an emphasis on interprofessional teamwork and patient communication. For the debriefing phase, faculty facilitated student group discussion of their simulation experience. Students were asked to provide reflective evaluation of clinical performance and collaborative care. To measure student understanding of the roles of the disciplines, procedures for speaking valve initiation, and benefits of speaking valves, a pre and post-test was given. An attitudinal survey was used to measure students’ feelings and perceptions toward IPE and IPE using simulation. Results One hundred eleven students participated in the simulation project. An overall net increase of 18% was attained on the knowledge pre and post-test scores with p.<.000. Qualitative statements made by the students indicate the students: increased the value of collaboration within the healthcare system; improved interdisciplinary collaboration/communication skills; increased understanding of the roles of the various healthcare disciplines; and increased knowledge/comfort related to managing a patient with a tracheostomy and speaking valve. Ninety-seven percent of the students wanted to participate in additional interdisciplinary simulations. Conclusion Results of this study support the hypothesis that there is enhanced understanding of roles and knowledge of clinical indications for speaking valves. An implication of this study is that it supports the integration of IPE in health professions education. Qualitative data and Results of the attitudinal survey indicate that students appreciate IPE and support the idea of additional simulations with other disciplines.
Read full abstract