Speech Intelligibility Outcomes Research Articles

Speech Intelligibility Outcomes Associated With Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: Magnitude of Change and Stability of Measurement.

The purpose of this investigation was to examine single-word speech intelligibility outcomes following sound production treatment in a group of 22 speakers with chronic acquired apraxia of speech (AOS) and aphasia. Also, the stability of repeated posttreatment intelligibility measures was examined for two scoring methods. The Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech was administered twice to each participant at pretreatment and twice at 8 weeks posttreatment. The test-retest reliability of the pretreatment samples was evaluated in a prior study; repeated samples were found to be stable over sampling times. For the current study, the three expert listeners who had rated the pretreatment samples scored the posttreatment samples using transcription and multiple-choice scoring formats. An additional expert listener, blinded to sampling time, scored pre- and posttreatment samples. The posttreatment samples were found to be stable over sampling times for the group. Posttreatment intelligibility scores were statistically significantly higher than the pretreatment scores for both scoring methods (i.e., increases of 9%-10%). Scores derived from the two scoring methods were strongly, positively correlated, with multiple-choice scores being significantly higher than transcription. The scoring methods did not differ significantly in the amount of change found from pre- to posttreatment. There were no statistically significant correlations between AOS severity and changes in pre- to posttreatment intelligibility scores. Performance for most participants was similar to group performance. Stability of posttreatment intelligibility samples supports use of intelligibility scores as outcome measures. This group of speakers demonstrated statistically significant increases in single-word speech intelligibility following sound production treatment. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.26972425.

Speech-Language Outcomes in the COVID-19 Milieu for Multilingual Jamaican Preschoolers and Considerations for Telepractice Assessments.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the communicative participation and functional speech intelligibility (i.e., how children use communication and how well they are understood across everyday life) of typically developing (TD) bilingual Jamaican preschoolers and those with functionally defined speech sound disorders (fSSDs) in the COVID-19 milieu. Findings were also compared to an existing corpus of baseline data to document and explore differences in children's speech-language outcomes secondary to pandemic-related social restrictions. Thirty bilingual Jamaican preschoolers, 21 TD and nine with fSSDs, were assessed during the pandemic via telepractice. Association and univariate mean testing were completed to characterize children's communicative participation and functional speech intelligibility. Data were then compared to an existing corpus of baseline data (collected in person between 2013 and 2019), which included direct child assessment and parent reports and consisted of TD (n = 226) Jamaican Creole-English-speaking preschoolers and those with fSSDs (n = 39) to compare performance profiles across data sets. All participants attended schools in Kingston, Jamaica. Measures of communicative participation remained stable in the context of the COVID-19 milieu for children in the TD and fSSD groups, but functional speech intelligibility outcomes for children with fSSDs deviated between in-person findings collected from children pre-pandemic. Between-groups differences were also found on measures of speech production accuracy but were no longer significant when considering telepractice as a covariate. Findings from this investigation serve to characterize the communicative participation and functional speech intelligibility of TD bilingual Jamaican preschoolers and those with fSSDs in the COVID-19 milieu. By extension, the results comparing data from preschoolers collected during the pandemic to an existing corpus of baseline data from a different group of preschoolers provide critical insights about multilingual children's speech-language outcomes in the context of acutely changing environmental circumstances. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25461505.

Delta-band neural envelope tracking predicts speech intelligibility in noise in preschoolers

Behavioral tests are currently the gold standard in measuring speech intelligibility. However, these tests can be difficult to administer in young children due to factors such as motivation, linguistic knowledge and cognitive skills. It has been shown that measures of neural envelope tracking can be used to predict speech intelligibility and overcome these issues. However, its potential as an objective measure for speech intelligibility in noise remains to be investigated in preschool children. Here, we evaluated neural envelope tracking as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in 14 5-year-old children. We examined EEG responses to natural, continuous speech presented at different SNRs ranging from −8 (very difficult) to 8 dB SNR (very easy). As expected delta band (0.5-4 Hz) tracking increased with increasing stimulus SNR. However, this increase was not strictly monotonic as neural tracking reached a plateau between 0 and 4 dB SNR, similarly to the behavioral speech intelligibility outcomes. These findings indicate that neural tracking in the delta band remains stable, as long as the acoustical degradation of the speech signal does not reflect significant changes in speech intelligibility. Theta band tracking (4-8 Hz), on the other hand, was found to be drastically reduced and more easily affected by noise in children, making it less reliable as a measure of speech intelligibility. By contrast, neural envelope tracking in the delta band was directly associated with behavioral measures of speech intelligibility. This suggests that neural envelope tracking in the delta band is a valuable tool for evaluating speech-in-noise intelligibility in preschoolers, highlighting its potential as an objective measure of speech in difficult-to-test populations.

Auditory perception in pediatric cochlear implant users with cochlear nerve hypoplasia

ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to assess auditory perception and speech intelligibility outcomes in children with cochlear nerve (CN) hypoplasia who received cochlear implants (CIs) using Categories of Auditory Performance II (CAP II) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales. MethodsIn total, 40 children who received CI and who were aged between 3 and 18 years were included in this study. The study group included 20 children with CN hypoplasia at least one ear, while the control group included 20 children with normal cochleas and cochlear nerve structures. All children in the study and control groups who participated were evaluated using the CAP II and the SIR scale. Demographic data were collected. ResultsSignificant differences were found between the study and control groups’ CAP II and SIR scores (p < 0.001). It was found that CAP II scores were positively correlated with SIR scores in the study (r = 0.743, p < 0.001) and control (r = 0.601, p < 0.001) groups. In the study group, significant negative correlations were found between SIR scores and age at implantation (r = −0.674, p = 0.004) and between CAP II scores and age at implantation (r = 0.751, p = 0.003). In the control group, a significant negative correlation was found between age at implantation and CAP II scores (r = −0.805, p = 0.001). Similarly, a significant negative correlation was found between age at implantation and SIR scores (r = −0.702, p = 0.007). ConclusionEven for children with severe inner ear malformation and CN hypoplasia, CI is an effective treatment modality for auditory perception and speech production. However, it should be noted that CN hypoplasia affects auditory performance negatively in children with CI.

Effect of Test Realism on Speech-in-noise Outcomes in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

First, to evaluate the effect of laboratory-based test realism on speech intelligibility outcomes of cochlear implant users. Second, to conduct an exploratory investigation of speech intelligibility of cochlear implant users, including bilateral benefit, under realistic laboratory conditions. For the first goal, the authors measured speech intelligibility scores of 15 bilateral cochlear implant recipients under three different test realism levels at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). The levels included (1) standard Bamford-Kowal-Bench-like sentences with spatially separated standard babble noise; (2) standard Bamford-Kowal-Bench-like sentences with three-dimensional recordings of actual situations; and (3) a variation of the second realism level where the sentences were obtained from natural effortful conversations. For the second goal, speech intelligibility of the realistic speech material was measured in six different acoustic scenes with realistic signal-to-noise ratios ranging from -5.8 dB to 3.2 dB. Speech intelligibility was consistently highest in the most artificial (standard) test and lowest in the most realistic test. The effect of the realistic noise and that of the realistic speech material resulted in distinct SNR-dependent performance shifts with respect to their baselines. Speech intelligibility in realistic laboratory conditions was in general low, with mean scores around 60% at the highest SNR. Bilateral benefit provided on average a 7% benefit over unilateral speech understanding in the better-performing ear. The results obtained here suggest that standard speech-in-noise tests overestimate the performance of cochlear implant recipients in the real world. To address this limitation, future assessments need to improve the realism over current tests by considering the realism of both, the speech and the noise materials. Likewise, speech intelligibility data under realistic conditions suggest that, insofar as these results can be considered representative of real-life performance, conversational speech and noise levels common to cochlear implant recipients are challenging in terms of speech intelligibility, with average scores around 60%. The findings and limitations are discussed alongside the factors affecting speech intelligibility.

Effects of Finding the Speech-Language Pathologist Likeable on Postlaryngectomy Speech Intelligibility Outcomes

Introduction: Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) work with patients after total laryngectomy (TL) to regain verbal communication. The influence of the quality of the therapeutic relationship on the success of TL voice rehabilitation in terms of speech intelligibility is not known. Finding each other likeable is an important factor in establishing and maintaining interpersonal relationships in everyday life. The fit of therapist and client is relevant to the therapeutic relationship. The purpose of this study therefore was to assess the association between the degree of SLPs’ likeability ratings and postlaryngectomy speech intelligibility. Methods: In a multicentre prospective cohort study, participants rated their SLPs’ likeability after finishing TL rehabilitation. Speech intelligibility was measured objectively with the Post-Laryngectomy Telephone Intelligibility Test and subjectively with the Questionnaire for Adjustment after Laryngectomy. The association of SLPs’ likeability with speech intelligibility was analysed using hierarchical logistic regression, expressed with odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Altogether 124 patients from 13 institutions participated. The degree of finding the SLP likeable was not significantly associated with objective speech intelligibility (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.78–2.18; p = 0.32) or subjective speech intelligibility (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.60–1.72; p = 0.96) after controlling for age, sex and education factors. Discussion/Conclusion: In this patient cohort, there was no evidence for an association between ratings of SLPs’ likeability and speech intelligibility outcomes after rehabilitation. Future studies could consider the use of alternative instruments for measuring likeability.

Intraoperative Estimation of the Coupling Efficiency and Clinical Outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge Active Middle Ear Implant Using Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements.

Purpose This study intraoperatively measured the coupling efficiency of the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB), with the aim of avoiding revision surgery due to insufficient outcome. This method can also be used to test the integrity of the implant at the end of the implantation surgery and to evaluate aided thresholds. In addition, this method makes it possible to objectively test how well the VSB has been fitted, provide assistance in fitting handicapped patients or children, evaluate hearing degradation, or test for a drop in coupling efficiency before revision surgeries. In order to analyze the feasibility of these new VSB-aided auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds, they were compared to behavioral thresholds from the Vibrogram and the preoperative bone conduction thresholds. Method The study included 30 patients with mild-to-severe hearing loss implanted with a VSB (VORP503). Intraoperative ABR thresholds during the VSB implantation were recorded using a VSB-optimized chirp stimulus. The new method is compared to the bone conduction threshold of the study sample and the aided Vibrogram thresholds. Speech intelligibility results up to 24 months after surgery are also presented. Results A reliable correlation between the bone conduction thresholds and the intraoperative ABRs was found and was higher in comparison to the Vibrogram. Furthermore, speech intelligibility outcomes were stable over time. Conclusion ABR measurements can be used intraoperatively to estimate the coupling efficiency of the VSB and test the integrity of the implant at the end of surgery.

Longitudinal Growth in Single Word Intelligibility Among Children With Cerebral Palsy From 24 to 96 Months of Age: Predicting Later Outcomes From Early Speech Production.

Purpose Children with cerebral palsy (CP) are at risk for significant communication problems. Reduced speech intelligibility is common, even for those who do not have speech motor deficits. Development of intelligibility has not been comprehensively quantified in children with CP; as a result, we are currently unable to predict later speech outcomes. Such information would advance treatment decision making. We sought to examine growth in speech intelligibility among children with CP using a prospective longitudinal design, with a focus on age of crossing target intelligibility thresholds, age of greatest intelligibility growth, and how well intelligibility at 36 months predicted intelligibility at 96 months. Method Sixty-nine children with CP were followed longitudinally between 24 and 96 months of age. A total of 566 time points were examined across children ( M = 8.2 time points per child, SD = 2.6). We fitted a nonlinear random effects model for longitudinal observations and then used the fitted model trajectories to generate descriptive analyses of growth. We used results of the model to generate a set of simulations, which we analyzed to determine how well 36-month intelligibility data predicted 96-month data. Results Half of children crossed 25% and 50% intelligibility thresholds at 36 and 49 months of age, respectively. Slightly more than half of children did not reach 75% intelligibility by 96 months of age. Age of crossing 25%, 50%, and 75% intelligibility thresholds was highly negatively correlated with intelligibly at 96 months. Children had the steepest intelligibility growth at 36 months, followed by 48 and 60 months. Intelligibility at 36 months was highly predictive of intelligibility at 96 months. Conclusions The developmental window from 3 to 5 years constitutes a time of rapid growth in speech intelligibility in children with CP. Children who cross intelligibility thresholds of 25%, 50%, and 75% at earlier ages have better outcomes when they are older; early performance is highly predictive of later speech intelligibility outcomes. Children with CP as a group have delayed speech intelligibility development but are still growing through 96 months of age.

The impact of noise power estimation on speech intelligibility in cochlear-implant speech coding strategies

The advanced combination encoder (ACE™) is an established speech-coding strategy in cochlear-implant processing that selects a number of frequency channels based on amplitudes. However, speech intelligibility outcomes with this strategy are limited in noisy conditions. To improve speech intelligibility, either noise-dominant channels can be attenuated prior to ACE™ with noise reduction or, alternatively, channels can be selected based on estimated signal-to-noise ratios. A noise power estimation stage is, therefore, required. This study investigated the impact of noise power estimation in noise-reduction and channel-selection strategies. Results imply that estimation with improved noise-tracking capabilities does not necessarily translate into increased speech intelligibility.

Is explicit formant encoding useful for speech perception with cochlear implants?

Earlier generations of cochlear implant (CI) sound processing strategies incorporated explicit encoding of formant frequencies. Many of these CI strategies have yielded higher intelligibility outcomes for CI users due to the pure spectral-based approaches used in contemporary processor today, such as: CIS, ACE, Hi-Res, etc. The aim of the study has been to assess intelligibility due to possible loss in formant frequency encoding and its influence on channel selection in diverse acoustic conditions. Formant accuracy from four computer-aided estimation techniques are compared against hand-marked frequencies derived from phoneme-level transcription with sentences from the IEEE and AzBio databases in three noise types at different SNRs: (a) babble, (b) speech-shaped, and (c) noise and reverb combination. CI speech intelligibility outcomes of the proposed strategy using explicit formant frequency encoding was compared to ACE, the standard energy-based ‘n-of-m’ approach. A relationship between the estimation techniques and differences in channel selection was systematically assessed. Results suggest that minor loss of formant precision does not yield statistically significant differences in resulting speech intelligibility. However, availability of accurate formant cues may help with intelligibility gains in challenging noise such as babble.

A clinical assessment of cochlear implant recipient performance: implications for individualized map settings in specific environments.

Individual speech intelligibility was measured in quiet and noise for cochlear Implant recipients upgrading from the Freedom to the CP900 series sound processor. The postlingually deafened participants (n = 23) used either Nucleus CI24RE or CI512 cochlear implant, and currently wore a Freedom sound processor. A significant group mean improvement in speech intelligibility was found in quiet (Freiburg monosyllabic words at 50 dBSPL) and in noise (adaptive Oldenburger sentences in noise) for the two CP900 series SmartSound programs compared to the Freedom program. Further analysis was carried out on individual’s speech intelligibility outcomes in quiet and in noise. Results showed a significant improvement or decrement for some recipients when upgrading to the new programs. To further increase speech intelligibility outcomes when upgrading, an enhanced upgrade procedure is proposed that includes additional testing with different signal-processing schemes. Implications of this research are that future automated scene analysis and switching technologies could provide additional performance improvements by introducing individualized scene-dependent settings.

On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study

There is a high degree of variability in speech intelligibility outcomes across cochlear-implant (CI) users. To better understand how auditory cognition affects speech intelligibility with the CI, we performed an electroencephalography study in which we examined the relationship between central auditory processing, cognitive abilities, and speech intelligibility. Postlingually deafened CI users (N=13) and matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners (N=13) performed an oddball task with words presented in different background conditions (quiet, stationary noise, modulated noise). Participants had to categorize words as living (targets) or non-living entities (standards). We also assessed participants' working memory (WM) capacity and verbal abilities. For the oddball task, we found lower hit rates and prolonged response times in CI users when compared with NH listeners. Noise-related prolongation of the N1 amplitude was found for all participants. Further, we observed group-specific modulation effects of event-related potentials (ERPs) as a function of background noise. While NH listeners showed stronger noise-related modulation of the N1 latency, CI users revealed enhanced modulation effects of the N2/N4 latency. In general, higher-order processing (N2/N4, P3) was prolonged in CI users in all background conditions when compared with NH listeners. Longer N2/N4 latency in CI users suggests that these individuals have difficulties to map acoustic-phonetic features to lexical representations. These difficulties seem to be increased for speech-in-noise conditions when compared with speech in quiet background. Correlation analyses showed that shorter ERP latencies were related to enhanced speech intelligibility (N1, N2/N4), better lexical fluency (N1), and lower ratings of listening effort (N2/N4) in CI users. In sum, our findings suggest that CI users and NH listeners differ with regards to both the sensory and the higher-order processing of speech in quiet as well as in noisy background conditions. Our results also revealed that verbal abilities are related to speech processing and speech intelligibility in CI users, confirming the view that auditory cognition plays an important role for CI outcome. We conclude that differences in auditory-cognitive processing contribute to the variability in speech performance outcomes observed in CI users.

Cochlear implant speech intelligibility outcomes with structured and unstructured binary mask errors.

It has been shown that intelligibility can be improved for cochlear implant (CI) recipients with the ideal binary mask (IBM). In realistic scenarios where prior information is unavailable, however, the IBM must be estimated, and these estimations will inevitably contain errors. Although the effects of both unstructured and structured binary mask errors have been investigated with normal-hearing (NH) listeners, they have not been investigated with CI recipients. This study assesses these effects with CI recipients using masks that have been generated systematically with a statistical model. The results demonstrate that clustering of mask errors substantially decreases the tolerance of errors, that incorrectly removing target-dominated regions can be as detrimental to intelligibility as incorrectly adding interferer-dominated regions, and that the individual tolerances of the different types of errors can change when both are present. These trends follow those of NH listeners. However, analysis with a mixed effects model suggests that CI recipients tend to be less tolerant than NH listeners to mask errors in most conditions, at least with respect to the testing methods in each of the studies. This study clearly demonstrates that structure influences the tolerance of errors and therefore should be considered when analyzing binary-masking algorithms.

The Relationship Between EABR and Auditory Performance and Speech Intelligibility Outcomes in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

The primary purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between postimplant electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) measures (wave V threshold, wave V latency, input-output functions) and auditory performance and speech intelligibility outcomes measured using parental rating scales, such as Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP; Archbold, Lutman, & Marshall, 1995) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating scale (SIR; Allen, Nikolopoulos, Dyar, & O'Donoghue, 2001), respectively. The secondary purpose was to evaluate the relationship between age at implantation and ratings on the CAP and SIR. Forty children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss participated. Preimplant parental ratings on the CAP and SIR were obtained, and all the children underwent cochlear implantation. Intracochlear EABRs were recorded postimplantation. Postimplant parental ratings on the CAP and SIR were obtained. The relationships between EABR parameters and auditory performance and speech intelligibility outcomes were studied. The effect of age at implantation on auditory performance and speech intelligibility outcomes was also investigated. A significant negative correlation was found between EABR wave V thresholds and SIR growth (r = -.415, p = .016). Children with better CAP growths tended to have lower wave V thresholds than those with poorer CAP growths. Age at implantation had an effect on the auditory performance as measured using the CAP. The present study provides evidence for the relationship between wave V thresholds of the intracochlear EABR and auditory performance and speech intelligibility outcomes measured using parental rating scales in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Data also indicate that early intervention has a positive impact on auditory performance outcomes.

Impact of cochlear nerve deficiency determined using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging on hearing outcome in children with cochlear implants.

1) To review the radiologic and audiologic data of 656 children with sensorineural hearing impairment who underwent 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in our cochlear implant (CI) center to understand the incidence of cochlear nerve deficiency (CND); and 2) to compare postimplant auditory and speech intelligibility outcomes in implantees with cochlear nerve (CN) aplasia, CN hypoplasia, and normal CN. A retrospective cohort study. A tertiary medical center. A total of 656 patients (aged 0-18 yr; mean, 4.5 ± 4.3 yr) who underwent MRI in our center during May 2000 to December 2012. The radiologic/audiologic data were reviewed. The postimplant outcomes of 13 implantees with CND (7 aplasia and 6 hypoplasia) were compared with 50 non-CND implantees using the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales. Upon MRI, 139 patients (21.2%) exhibited CND. Bilateral CN aplasia occurred in 4.3% of the patients with severe-to-profound deafness (588 cases) and in one-fifth of patients with CND. The aplasia group showed significantly worse postimplant CAP (p = 0.002) and SIR (p = 0.009) scores than the non-CND group. No significant difference was noted between the hypoplasia group and the non-CND group. Although the audiologic and radiologic results may be incompatible, the majority of patients with CND may be well delineated preoperatively using MRI. The type of CND (aplasia/hypoplasia) may affect CI outcomes. Patients implanted on the side with CN hypoplasia are more likely to exhibit favorable results compared with patients implanted on the side with CN aplasia.

Speech intelligibility in deaf children after long-term cochlear implant use.

This study investigated long-term speech intelligibility outcomes in 63 prelingually deaf children, adolescents, and young adults who received cochlear implants (CIs) before age 7 (M = 2;11 [years;months], range = 0;8-6;3) and used their implants for at least 7 years (M = 12;1, range = 7;0-22;5). Speech intelligibility was assessed using playback methods with naïve, normal-hearing listeners. Mean intelligibility scores were lower than scores obtained from an age- and nonverbal IQ-matched, normal-hearing control sample, although the majority of CI users scored within the range of the control sample. Our sample allowed us to investigate the contribution of several demographic and cognitive factors to speech intelligibility. CI users who used their implant for longer periods of time exhibited poorer speech intelligibility scores. Crucially, results from a hierarchical regression model suggested that this difference was due to more conservative candidacy criteria in CI users with more years of use. No other demographic variables accounted for significant variance in speech intelligibility scores beyond age of implantation and amount of spoken language experience (assessed by communication mode and family income measures). Many factors that have been found to contribute to individual differences in language outcomes in normal-hearing children also contribute to long-term CI users' ability to produce intelligible speech.

Speech perception outcomes after cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf infants: The Western Sicily experience

ObjectivesTo describe audiometric characteristics and speech perception performances of prelingually deaf Sicilian children after cochlear implantation; to identify the influence of cochlear implant (CI) user and family's characteristics on speech recognition and intelligibility outcomes. MethodsTwenty-eight infants with a congenital or acquired hearing impairment and implanted before the 3rd year of life were studied; all children suffered from bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) with evidence of lack of hearing aids benefit and no evidence of intellectual disability. The study of the main characteristics associated with CI user and family's profile was performed with a clinical assessment including pre-implant and post-implant (1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months) behavioural audiometry (evaluating average threshold for the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2 and 4KHz) and speech recognition tests (IT-MAIS, MUSS, CAP and SIR). ResultsOur cohort was characterized by an early diagnosis of SNHL (5.77 and 12.17 months for congenital and acquired HL respectively), a short length of deafness (average=6.78 months) and an implantation before the 3rd year of life (mean=24.25 months; range from 10 to 36). Analysis of audiometric threshold revealed a significantly improved capacity to detect sounds within the conversational speech spectrum after 12 months from implantation (r=0.99; p<0.001). The main speech recognition test evidenced speech perception and speech intelligibility performances (CAP median value of 3; SIR category=3 in 46.42%) equal to those children with same characteristics reported by literature. With the exception of ‘daily CI use’ (p<0.001), none of the variables associated with CI user and family's profile resulted significant predictor of speech perception improvement. ConclusionsThis work demonstrates that all children of our cohort, with an early diagnosis of SNHL and a CI surgery performed before the 3rd year of life, presented a progressive audiometric and speech improvement through the first 12–18 months after cochlear implantation. The study also highlights that, differently from the others variables studied, a continuous CI use influences significantly speech perception and recognition outcomes.

Seeking to Better Understand Factors That Influence Postlaryngectomy Speech Rehabilitation

In this article, we seek to re-examine traditional treatment outcomes related to communicative success after total laryngectomy. Specifically, the three most common alaryngeal speech methods are presented in relation to typical speech intelligibility outcomes. Factors that interact with intelligibility highlight how formal measures of intelligibility are necessary, but insufficient, for determining communicative success. A multidimensional context in which the communicative dyad is presented as an additional factor must be considered. In this paper, we outline several clinical examples that highlight the importance of this factor and its implications for rehabilitation.

Use of a revised children's implant profile (GOSHChIP) in candidacy for paediatric cochlear implantation and in predicting outcome

The aims of this study were to investigate statistically the way a revised version of the children's implant profile (GOSHChIP) is used to inform candidacy decisions and explore its utility in predicting outcomes in the first three years of implant use. A retrospective case series analysis design was employed. Data were collated for 127 children with a mean age of 4.7 years at implantation. Concerns in a number of areas of the child's pre-implant functioning as rated on the GOSHChIP (spoken or manual communication skills, cognitive abilities, family structure and support, and use of hearing aids) were associated with speech perception and intelligibility outcomes following implantation. In terms of non-verbal cognitive abilities, the score on tests of fluid reasoning skills (sequencing), that contributes to the cognitive factor on the GOSHChIP, was found to significantly predict speech perception and speech intelligibility post implant. The GOSHChIP is a useful tool in making paediatric cochlear implant candidacy decisions, and in forming a guide for counselling parents about the potential benefit their child may receive from an implant.

The effects of age at implantation on speech intelligibility in pediatric cochlear implant users: Clinical outcomes and sensitive periods

This study assessed the effects of age at implantation on the speech intelligibility of congenitally, profoundly deaf pediatric cochlear implant users. The children received implants during the first eight years of life and were divided into subgroups based on their age at implantation. The children's tape recordings of standard sentences were digitized and played back to normal-hearing listeners who were unfamiliar with deaf speech. Intelligibility was measured as the number of words correctly identified averaged across all listeners. The data showed that earlier implantation had a positive and significant effect on the speech intelligibility of cochlear implant users. The results also suggested that a gradual decline in the ability to acquire spoken language skills may occur over time and, furthermore, cochlear implantation before the age of two years may yield significantly better speech intelligibility outcomes than later implantation.