INFALLIBILITY AND SPECIFIC MORAL NORMS: A REVIEW DISCUSSION 1 FRANCIS A. SULLIVAN, S.J., who for many years ha.s been professor of ecclesiology at the Gregorian University in Rome, has written an important book on the magisterium. In it he explains and defends the teaching of Vatican I and Vatican II on apostolicity, infallibility, and unalterable dogmatic truths. Because Sullivan engages in authentic Catholic theological reflection, his work must be taken seriously . I wish to make it clear that I agree with much of Sullivan's theology of magisterium and admire his fidelity to the Catholic theologian's vocation. Here, however, I must take issue with certain aspects of his argument in chapter six: "The Infallibility of the Ordinary Universal Magisterium and the Limits of the Object of Infallibility." Sullivan criticizes a position John C. Ford, S.J., and I defended : that the received Catholic teaching on contraception (and, by implication, on many other questions about sex, marriage , and innocent life) has been taught infallibly by the ordinary magisterium. Sullivan maintains that no specific moral norm can be taught infallibly. In what follows, I try to show that he has neither refuted our position nor established his. I During the controversy following Humanae vitae, it was widely assumed that since the encyclical contains no solemn definition, the teaching it reaffirms is not proposed infallibly and could be mistaken. That assumption simply ignored the entire category of teachings infallibly proposed by the ordi1 . Francis A. Sullivan, S.J., Magisterium: Teaching Authority in the Catholic Church (New York: Paulist Press, 1983). HS INFALLIBILITY AND SPECIFIC MORAL NORMS 249 nary magisterium.2 However, in Dei filius, Vatican I definitively teaches that there is such a category: "Further, all those things are to be believed with divine and Catholic faith which are contained in the word of God, written or handed down, and which the Church either by a solemn judgment or by her ordinary and universal magisterium proposes for belief as divinely revealed." 8 Because Dei filius concerns revelation, its teaching is limited to revealed truths. Still, it shows the unsoundness of the assumption that only what is defined is infallibly taught. Vatican II articulates criteria for the infallibility of the ordinary magisterium: "Although the bishops individually do not enjoy the prerogative of infallibility, they nevertheless proclaim the teaching of Christ infallibly, even when they are dispersed throughout the world, provided that they remain in communion with each other and with the successor of Peter and that in authoritatively teaching on a matter of faith and morals they agree in one judgment as that to be held definitively ." 4 Vatican II's formulation is not limited to revealed truths. It allows for a secondary object of infallibility: truths required for revelation's safeguarding and development.5 Reflecting on Vatican H's formulation, Ford and I became convinced that the received teaching on contraception meets the criteria. In an article, we clarified the conditions for the infallible exercise of the ordinary magisterium by tracing the development of Vatican H's text in the conciliar proceedings. We then argued that the facts show that the received Catholic teaching on contraception has met these conditions.6 In making our case, we did not try to show that the norm concerning contraception pertains to revelation, because Vati2 See John C. Ford, S.J., and Germain Grisez, "Contraception and the Infallibility of the Ordinary Magisterium," Theological Studies, 39 (1978), 25961 . s DS 3011/1792; my translation. 4 Lumen gentium, 25; my translation. s See Ford-Grisez, 265-69; Sullivan, 131-36. s Ford-Grisez, 263-86. 250 GERMAIN GRISEZ can II does not include that among the criteria by which infallible teachings of the ordinary magisterium are to be recognized . However, in specifying the limits of infallibility in defining , the Council states: "Now this infallibility, with which the divine Redeemer willed his Church to be endowed in defining a doctrine of faith or morals, extends as far as extends the deposit of divine revelation, which must be guarded as inviolable and expounded with fidelity." 7 This statement of the limits of infallibility makes it clear that if anything is taught infallibly, it must pertain to revelation, at...