Specific Migration Limit Research Articles

Migration from PVC cling films compared with their field of application

Samples of PVC cling films were taken at importers, wholesalers and retail shops, and their overall migration to the alternative food simulant iso‐octane was measured, after establishment of a correlation between overall migration to olive oil at 40°C in 10 days and to iso‐octane in 2 h. Results of the migration testing were compared with the recommended and/or actual use of the PVC film and the labelling discussed in relation to the relevant EEC directives on food contact plastics. The correct labelling of plasticized PVC film intended for use in retail packaging is important to avoid the risk of significant consumer intakes of the plasticizer di‐(2‐ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA) after the film has been used in contact with fatty foodstuffs. Sixty percent of the films declared for use in contact with fatty foods showed too high overall migration compared with the current interpretation of legislation at the time of sampling. In most instances DEHA made up about 80% of the total amount of plastic constituents migrating to iso‐octane. Taking into consideration a specific migration limit of 3 mg DEHA/dm2, 77% of the films used for fatty foodstuffs analysed were not acceptable. The migration of DEHA to non‐fatty foods defined as the food simulant water was at or below 0.1 mg/dm2 in all PVC‐films.

Reactions of epoxide monomers in food simulants used to test plastics for migration

The reactions of four epoxides used as monomers for food contact plastics were studied in the food simulants distilled water, 15% aqueous ethanol, 3% aqueous acetic acid and olive oil. Loss of the parent substance and formation of products was monitored to establish the transformation products to be expected in each simulant following migration testing of plastics. Each epoxide was stable in olive oil but suffered extensive loss in the three aqueous simulants. Reaction half‐lives were from <1 to 10 h in aqueous acetic acid, 25–63 h in distilled water, and 33–87 h in aqueous ethanol simulant. Hydrolysis to the diol was the main reaction pathway. Epoxide ring opening in aqueous ethanol simulant gave the diol and also the diol monoethyl ether. It is concluded that, for aqueous simulants and by implication for most foods, testing plastics against specific migration limits for epoxides is not likely to give reliable results due to their reactivity. The present EC mode of control for these reactive monomers, via compositional limits in food contact plastics, is more practical since the hydrolysis products are less toxic than the parent epoxide.

The application of a predictive migration model for evaluating the compliance of plastic materials with European food regulations†

A model for estimating the migration of organic substances from plastic materials into foodstuffs has been previously developed. The use of this model allows a shift away from expensive and time consuming migration analysis in foods to much simpler and more economic compositional analysis in the material. Starting with toxicologically-based specific migration values, like the over 400 specific migration limit values for organic substances listed in the European Union's Synoptic Document No. 7, the corresponding allowable maximum quantity limits of these substances in the plastic were calculated. The amount of migration that can occur depends on many different factors such as the natures of the plastic, substance and food, contact time and temperature conditions, material thickness and number of uses. These factors can result in a variety of situations which must be taken into account in the estimation of migration. The handling of the migration estimation model is demonstrated for several practical migration scenarios using a series of case studies.

The development of European standard (CEN) methods in support of European Directives for plastics materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuff.

CEC Directives have been implemented for plastics materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs. These introduce limits upon the overall migration from plastics into food and food simulants. In addition, specific migration limits or composition limits for free monomer in the final article, have been set for some monomers. Agreed test methods are required to allow these Directives to be respected. CEN, the European Committee for Standardization, has created a working group to develop suitable test methods. This is 'Working Group 5, Chemical Methods of Test', of CEN Technical Committee TC 194, Utensils in contact with food. This group has drafted a ten part standard for determining overall migration into aqueous and fatty food simulants by total immersion, by standard cell, by standard pouch and by filling. This draft standard has been approved by CEN TC 194 for circulation for public comment as a provisional standard, i.e. as an ENV. Further parts of this standard are in preparation for determining overall migration at high temperatures, etc. Simultaneously, Working Group 5 is cooperating with the BCR (Community Bureau of Reference) to produce reference materials with certified values of overall migration. CEN TC 194 Working Group 5 is also drafting methods for monomers subject to limitation in Directive 90/128/EEC. Good progress is being made on the monomers of highest priority but it is recognized that developing methods for all the monomers subject to limitation would take many years. Therefore, collaboration with the BCR, the Council of Europe and others is taking place to accelerate method development.

Rapid screening of migrants from food contact plastics using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

Migration from food contact plastics is currently assessed by an over-all migration test based on ‘weight-loss’ determinations. This test was introduced as an alternative to the large number of analytical tests which might be required if each ingredient had a specific migration limit. The gravimetric determination is, however, inappropriate for toxic species where very low specific migration limits are specified. Several different tests may therefore be required to demonstrate compliance with the legislation. Modern HPLC techniques may be able to separate all the individual components which constitute the over-all migration. These can be quantified to give the over-all migration value or dealt with individually if a specific migration criterion is appropriate. Identification of these components can be achieved either by chromatographic separation (retention time) or by mass spectrometry using soft ionization techniques to produce characteristic molecular ions. It is conceivable, therefore, that an automated system capable of determining several migration criteria from a single measurement could reduce analysis time and, in a situation where many samples are tested, lead to more cost-effective investigations.

Migration testing of plastics and microwave‐active materials for high‐temperature food‐use applications

Temperatures have been measured using a fluoro-optic probe at the food/container or food/packaging interfaces as appropriate, for a range of foods heated in either a microwave or a conventional oven. Reheating ready-prepared foods packaged in plastics pouches, trays or dishes in the microwave oven, according to the manufacturers' instructions, resulted in temperatures in the range 61-121 degrees C. Microwave-active materials (susceptors) in contact with ready-prepared foods frequently reached local spot temperatures above 200 degrees C. For foods cooked in a microwave oven according to published recipes, temperatures from 91 degrees C to 200 degrees C were recorded, whilst similar temperatures (92-194 degrees C) were attained in a conventional oven, but over longer periods of time. These measurements form the basis for examining compliance with specific and overall migration limits for plastics materials. The testing conditions proposed depend on the intended use of the plastic - for microwave oven use for aqueous foods, for all lidding materials, and for reheating of foods, testing would only be required with aqueous simulants for 1 h at 100 degrees C; for unspecified microwave oven use, testing with olive oil would be required for 30 min at 150 degrees C; and for unspecified use in a conventional oven testing with olive oil would be required for 2 h at 175 degrees C. For microwave-active materials, it is proposed that testing is carried out in the microwave oven using a novel semi-solid simulant comprising olive oil and water absorbed onto an inert support of diatomaceous earth. The testing in this instance is carried out with the simulant instead of food in a package and heating in the microwave oven at 600 W for 4 min for every 100 g of simulant employed. There is an option in every case to test for migration using real foods rather than simulants if it can be demonstrated that results using simulants are unrepresentative of those for foods. The proposed testing conditions were validated as being realistic by measurement of the specific migration of various components from different plastics into foods under actual conditions of use and comparing with migration into simulants. Migration of plasticizers from PVC and VC/VDC copolymer films was monitored for both microwave reheating and cooking of foods. Total oligomer concentrations were measured from poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) trays, and volatile aromatics from thermoset polyester trays, using both types of container in microwave and conventional ovens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)