SESSION TITLE: Tuesday Abstract Posters SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/22/2019 01:00 PM - 02:00 PM PURPOSE: Pulmonary aspiration is the diversion of food or liquid into the trachea and potentially the lower respiratory tract. An acute response to aspiration may include pneumonia or alveolitis; chronic aspiration response includes diffuse alveolar damage and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. (Raghu Eur Respir J. 2006; 27:136–42) Diagnosis of aspiration is difficult and low sensitivity (50%) has been documented for screening tests (Zhou Eur J Phys Rehab Med 2011; 47:441-6). Ultimately, lung tissue examination confirms pulmonary aspiration; however, a lack of standardization of the histologic definition of aspiration exists. We separated the specimens into categories of confirmed aspiration, possible aspiration and unconfirmed aspiration and define the criterion for each category. METHODS: A retrospective electronic query was performed on all 798 lung specimens obtained between January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018 to identify lung histology with an interpretation of aspiration. A total of 24 specimens were identified (18 lung transplant recipients and 6 non-transplant recipients) and reviewed by two pulmonary pathologists. Specimens were subsequently separated into categories of confirmed aspiration based on the presence of vegetable matter or skeletal muscle in the lung parenchyma, possible aspiration if multinucleated giant cells with intracytoplasmic lipids were present and unconfirmed aspiration if these specific criteria were not present. RESULTS: Confirmed aspiration was defined in 8/24 (33%) specimens, possible aspiration was present in 5/24 (21%), and unconfirmed aspiration was identified in 11/24 (46%) specimens. All (8/8, 100%) of the confirmed aspiration and possible aspiration (5/5; 100%) specimens were obtained from lung transplant recipients. Of the 11 unconfirmed aspiration specimens, 5 were obtained from transplant recipients and 6 obtained from non-transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Confirmed aspiration was present in 8/24 (33%) specimens, possible aspiration was present in 5/24 (21%), and unconfirmed aspiration was identified in 11/24 (46%) specimens. All (8/8, 100%) of the confirmed aspiration and possible aspiration (5/5; 100%) specimens were obtained from lung transplant recipients. Of the 11 unconfirmed aspiration specimens, 5 were obtained from transplant recipients and 6 obtained from non-transplant recipients. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Aspiration has been linked with acute and chronic lung disease; however diagnostic histologic criteria have not been established. The absence of specific histologic criteria may prevent the identification of a cohort of patients with confirmed aspiration. As a result, elucidation of the pathophysiology of this disorder may be confounded. Establishing specific diagnostic criteria may identify a more precise cohort of patients for pathophysiologic evaluation. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Hermona Abera, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Vijayalakshmi Ananthanarayanan, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Josefina Corral, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by James Gagermeier, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Rizwan Mahmood, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Swati Mehrotra, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Mukund Venu, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Krishnan Warrior, source=Web Response