Residents In Specialties Research Articles

Evidenced-Based Practice Among Trainees: A Survey on Facial Trauma Wound Management

Assess whether facial trauma wound care and antibiotic use recommendations are guided by evidence-based practice (EBP) or practice patterns, and investigate strategies to improve EBP adoption among surgical trainees. We conducted a survey of all trainees who manage facial trauma (general surgery, emergency medicine, plastic surgery, otolaryngology) to assess clinical knowledge and sources of treatment recommendations. Clinical questions were based on Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Level 1 or 2 evidence. We measured internal validity of questions using Cronbach's α. Results were weight-adjusted for nonresponse and then analyzed using Welch t test and descriptive statistics. Stanford Hospital and Clinics, a Level I trauma center. Response rate was 50.3% overall (78/155). For recommendations on facial trauma wound and antibiotic use, nonspecialty junior residents most frequently relied on their own senior or specialty residents (79.1%); nonspecialty senior residents relied on specialty residents (67.9%). Specialty junior residents most often relied on their own senior residents (51.0%), the majority of whom made recommendations based on their own knowledge (73.2%). Questions assessing EBP knowledge had Cronbach's α of 0.98; response accuracy was similar between specialty and nonspecialty residents (54.6% vs 55.5%, p = 0.96). When provided recommendations that conflict with EBP, both nonspecialty and specialty residents more frequently followed recommendations rather than EBP; junior residents reported doing so to avoid conflict with superiors. Total 92.6% of surveyed residents felt cross-departmental EBP guidelines would improve patient care. Facial trauma wound care and antibiotic recommendations disseminate down seniority and from craniofacial specialty to nonspecialty residents, yet knowledge of EBP among senior specialty and nonspecialty residents was weak. EBP may be difficult to adopt in the absence of consensus society guidelines. To address this gap, we published a review of EBP for facial trauma and plan to update our trauma manual with cross-departmental guidelines to facilitate EBP adoption among trainees.

Anticipating the Impact of the USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Scoring Decision on Underrepresented-in-Medicine Students.

Three-digit United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores have assumed an outsized role in residency selection decisions, creating intense pressure for medical students to obtain a high score on this exam. In February 2020, the Federation of State Medical Boards and the National Board of Medical Examiners announced that Step 1 would transition to pass/fail scoring beginning in 2022.The authors discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of the pass/fail scoring change for underrepresented-in-medicine (UiM) trainees. UiM students may benefit from this change because it reduces the effect of an inequitable exam; helps correct for students who attend medical schools with a curriculum heavier on nontested formative elements; and decreases stress, improves quality of life, and undermines imposter syndrome. However, this change may also precipitate unforeseen challenges, such as increased discrimination toward UiM trainees, an increase in high-stakes test failures due to a reduced focus on preparing for standardized exams, or the development of new (e.g., subject exams) or overreliance on existing (e.g., school ranking) metrics that would make UiM residency candidates less competitive.To enhance UiM representation in the future health care workforce, it is imperative that national organizations (e.g., accrediting, licensing, regulatory, professional, honor, student, and faculty), hospitals, residency programs, and patient advocacy groups undertake a shared, rigorous approach in assessing the impact of the pass/fail scoring change on UiM applicants' selection to specialty and subspecialty residencies.

Assessment of hospital educational environment perceptions of obstetrics and gynecology residents in specialty and subspecialty training

Background: Data on educational hospital environment perceptions of obstetrics and gynecology residents in Turkey are limited. The present study aims to evaluate the educational environment perceptions of residents in (sub)specialty training in an obstetrics and gynecology departmentMethods: Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) was administered to all residents (n=19) in specialty and subspecialty training at an obstetrics and gynecology department of a single university hospital. Item and subscale scores of gender and postgraduate experience groups were compared using student’s t-test. The participants were classified into two groups regarding postgraduate experience as “novice” (postgraduate year 1 and 2) and “experienced” (postgraduate year 3 and above). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated to estimate score reliability.Results: The overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and mean cumulative score was 0.938 and 85.8 ± 24.8 (more positive than negative, but room for improvement), respectively. Mean subscale scores were 28.3 ± 8.2 for role of autonomy (negative view), 33.4 ± 11.0 for teaching (moving in the right direction), and 24.1 ± 6.8 for social support (more pros than cons). Cumulative and category scores did not differ regarding gender (p > 0.05 for all). Experienced group had similar mean cumulative (p=0.06), but increased social perception scores (p=0.03) compared to novice group. Mean scores of three items were extremely low (<1): (i) an informative junior doctor’s handbook is available, (ii) this hospital has good accommodation facilities for junior doctors, especially when on call, and (iii) my working hours comply with legal requirements. Conclusions: Hospital educational environment perceptions of physicians in (sub)specialty training are generally positive independent of gender in the reviewed department, while there is room for improvement of various role autonomy and social support components such as doctor’s handbook, on call accommodation, and working hours. PHEEM seems to be a relatively practical, convenient, and reliable tool to evaluate and improve postgraduate medical training.

Development of Surgical Scrubbing, Gowning and Gloving Checklist using the Delphi Method

This article was migrated. The article was not marked as recommended. Background Competency in surgical scrubbing, gowning and gloving (scrubbing-in) procedures is necessary to participate in surgery, but difficult for trainees to learn due to the fast pace of the operating room and limited availability of experts to provide training. Current methods of scrubbing-in procedures are antiquated. Simulation-based education aligns with the paradigm shift occurring in medical education as we transition from passive models. This study utilized the Delphi technique to identify necessary items to include in a scrubbing-in checklist that can be used in future simulation and assessment tools.MethodsSurgeon experts participated in three rounds of a Delphi process. The panel consisted of surgical specialty residents, fellows and attending surgeons from gynecology, urology, general surgery, plastic, orthopedic and neurosurgery.ResultsFrom January 2018 to September 2018, 39 experts from 6 different surgical subspecialties participated in three Delphi survey rounds. Of the 43 items identified during the first round, 30 (70%) resulted with an importance rating > 4.0. During the final round, a consensus of > 85% was reached for 22 total items (73%).ConclusionWe developed a 22-step checklist for scrubbing-in procedures utilizing the Delphi technique. This checklist will enhance undergraduate medical education simulation curriculums and assessments.

Admissions Is Not Enough: The Racial Achievement Gap in Medical Education.

The achievement gap is a disparity in academic and standardized test performance that exists between White and underrepresented minority (URM) students that begins as early as preschool and worsens as students progress through the educational system. Medical education is not immune to this inequality. URM medical students are more likely to experience delayed graduation and course failure, even after accounting for science grade point average and Medical College Admission Test performance. Moreover, URM students are more likely to earn lower scores on licensing examinations, which can have a significant impact on their career trajectory, including specialty choice and residency competitiveness. After the release of preliminary recommendations from the Invitational Conference on USMLE Scoring (InCUS) and public commentary on these recommendations, the National Board of Medical Examiners and Federation of State Medical Boards announced that the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 would transition from a 3-digit numeric score to pass/fail scoring. Given that another of InCUS's recommendations was to "minimize racial demographic differences that exist in USMLE performance," it is paramount to consider the impact of this scoring change on URM medical students specifically. Holistic admissions are a step in the right direction of acknowledging that URM students often travel a further distance to reach medical school. However, when residency programs emphasize USMLE performance (or any standardized test score) despite persistent test score gaps, medical education contributes to the disproportionate harm URM students face and bolsters segregation across medical specialties. This Perspective provides a brief explanation of the achievement gap, its psychological consequences, and its consequences in medical education; discusses the potential effect of the Step 1 scoring change on URM medical students; and provides a review of strategies to redress this disparity.

Professionalism among medical residents in a young second-level university in Iran: a cross-sectional study.

Professionalism is a set of behaviors that build trust in physicians’ relationships with patients and the public. The aim of this study was to assess professionalism among residents in Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 139 residents recruited through the census method. Data were collected using the American Board of Internal Medicine Professionalism Questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire was on residents’ personal characteristics, and the second part contained fifteen items in the three domains of professionalism, namely excellence, honor/integrity, and altruism/respect. The mean scores of the questionnaire and its domains were calculated and their relationships with residents’ personal characteristics were evaluated.The mean scores (± SD) of professionalism and its excellence, honor/integrity, and altruism/respect domains were 4.93 ± 2.4, 5.92 ± 1.85, 4.94 ± 3.39, and 4.35 ± 3.27, respectively (in a range of 0-10). Professionalism had significant relationships only with residents’ specialty and gender.The level of professionalism in residents was low, which requires the attention of educational authorities. Moreover, the mean score of professionalism among residents in surgical specialties was significantly lower than non-surgical specialties. Various factors can be considered in this regard and it cannot be concluded that the lower score means worse professional behavior.

The Impetus Behind Choosing a Medical Specialty

Selecting a specialty is an important step in a medical student’s education, and many believe this decision is more difficult than the decision to attend medical school. With so many changes occurring in the medical system, including the increasing reliance on electronic medical records, the merger of the AOA and ACGME residency programs, and the increasing number of women entering the field, we conducted a study to determine the impetus today behind how individuals choose their medical specialty. To determine the most significant factor influencing an individual’s choice of specialty, we created a seven-question survey that was made available to students, residents, fellows, and attendings at one medical school and one community teaching hospital system. The results of the study showed that personal experience was the most influential reason amongst those surveyed for selecting a residency specialty (p < 0.05). One limitation of the study was that the majority of responders were students who had not yet matched into a residency. A future study could explore if, upon matching in residency, the students maintained their desire for the same specialty. Another limitation of the study was that we only surveyed individuals within one hospital system and therefore had a limited number of physicians, residents, fellows, and attendings. More hospitals should be contacted to obtain results from a greater number of practicing physicians.

Quality and Safety in Healthcare, Part LXIV: Burnout Prevention and Wellness Promotion in Radiology Residents.

Burnout and other causes of a lack of well-being among radiology residents are a major problem. The American College of Radiology has developed a "Well-being Curriculum for Radiology Residency Programs," which has many suggestions that should be helpful to residents in multiple specialties. The American College of Radiology is also collecting data on well-being in order to get benchmarking data and try to find out why some programs have more problems with decreased well-being than other programs. Wellness newsletters, providing social opportunities, insisting on professional behavior for all, fairness in work distribution, night float schedules, willingness to be flexible with work schedules, and retreats have also been advocated.

Internal Medicine Residents and the Practice of Defensive Medicine: A Pilot Study Across Three Internal Medicine Residency Programs.

BackgroundDefensive medicine is becoming increasingly prevalent in the United States and is estimated to cost billions of dollars in excess healthcare spending. There is evidence that the practice of defensive medicine starts early in the medical career. Defensive medicine has been investigated among residents in high medico-legal risk specialties, but there is a paucity of information on its prevalence among internal medicine residents.Objective To examine the prevalence and patterns of defensive medical practices among internal medicine residents.MethodsWe conducted an online survey among the residents of three internal medicine residency programs in the 2018-2019 academic cycle. We invited all internal medicine residents within the selected programs to participate through email and asked them to complete an electronic survey assessing defensive medical practices.ResultsA total of 49 out of 143 residents participated in the study (response rate: 34.3%); 55% (n = 27) of the residents who participated considered the risk of being sued during residency to be low, compared to 40.8% (n = 20) who considered it to be moderate and 4.1% (n = 2) who considered it to be high. Defensive medical practices were found to be widely prevalent (40.0-91.3%) among internal medicine residents across all three clinical training stages. Assurance defensive practices were more common than avoidance practices.ConclusionDefensive medical practices, especially of the assurance type, were widely prevalent among our sample of internal medicine residents.

Residency Selection Preferences and Orthopaedic Career Perceptions: A Notable Mismatch.

Despite near-equal enrollment of males and females in medical schools, orthopaedic surgery continues to have one of the lowest percentage of female orthopaedic residents. This suggests there may be factors that specifically influence females to select other specialties. Some of these possible reasons have been explored in other studies; however, in this study, we sought to identify latent or unobserved variables that may be influencing this difference by conducting an explanatory factor analysis of male and female residency preferences. In this study, by surveying a cohort of medical students at a single institution, we asked, is there a difference between males and females (1) in their perception of orthopaedic surgery and (2) in their preferences for residency and practice? We further asked, if there are differences, (3) is there a correlation between perception and preferences for residency and practice? A 46-question survey was sent to all current medical students (n = 628) at a major urban university with near-equal enrollment of males (55%, 345 of 628) and females (45%, 283 of 628) from September 2017 to November 2017. The survey consisted of two main parts: (1) desired attributes of a residency program and (2) perceptions of orthopaedic residency and practice. The design of the survey instruments closely followed The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) checklist and went through several variations and pilot studies before release. In all, 33% (205 of 628) total medical students responded to the email survey, 55% (112 of 205) were male and 45% (93 of 205) were female. The proportion of male and female respondents matched the gender distribution of the total population surveyed, which at the time of the survey was 55% male and 45% female.The data analysis was performed using a Mann-Whitney U test and an explanatory factor analysis. The explanatory factor analysis was used to identify the correlation between survey variables among male and female students. An alpha less than 0.05 was considered significant for the Mann-Whitney U test and a factor greater than 0.5 was considered significant for the factor analysis. Both male and female students ranked "work-life balance" and "variety in specialty" among the top three most important preferences. Females ranked "range of practice options," higher than males (72% females versus 60% males, r = 0.18; p = 0.009), and males ranked "previous exposure to the specialty" higher than females (65% females versus 71% males, r = 0.03; p = 0.70). Both male and female students had similar overall perceptions of orthopaedic surgery. Both males and females indicated that orthopedics is "male dominated," has "competitive entrance requirements," and requires "long residency work hours." They differed in their perception of "requires physical strength" (60% females versus 38% males, r = 0.28; p < 0.0005), and by how much orthopaedics is "male dominated" (95% females versus 77% males, r = 0.26; p < 0.0005). The factor analysis recognized that, although male and female students do have some similar residency preferences, the influence or weighing of those preferences is different for male and female students. In a manner similar to a personality assessment, the factor analysis produced four latent factors that can help explain variation seen in responses and helped identify influential factors that were not directly tested by the survey. The first such latent factor for females consisted of "work-life balance," "residency length," 'residency work hours," and "family-friendly specialty." Although the first latent factor for males consisted of "prestige," "income potential," "grade or step scores," and "competitiveness of residency program." The three subsequent latent factors also displayed variation in the make-up of the latent factors between males and female students. This study of medical students at an urban medical school found that male and female students shared many preferences for residency specialties and held many of the same perceptions regarding orthopaedic surgery. The explanatory factor analysis indicated that male and female students weight preferences differently when selecting a specialty; this difference may account for the large differences in proportion between males and females in orthopaedic residency. Attracting talented residents and attending physicians is important for the success of any medical department. Although orthopaedics attracts some of the most talented students, these students are predominantly male. By identifying the multifactorial areas that may be inadvertently discouraging females from applying, orthopaedic residency programs may be able to better address those issues and attract the best talent of both genders.

Personal Health Practices and Perceptions of Lifestyle Counseling and Preventive Services Among Residents.

Background. Primary care residents are expected to provide lifestyle counseling and preventive services for patients with chronic diseases; also, physicians' personal lifestyle practice impacts patient care. The purpose of this article is to assess healthy lifestyle behaviors and attitudes to engage in lifestyle counseling and preventive services among residents and fellows in different training levels and specialty. Methods. A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted on medical residents and fellows (n = 57). Surveys collected information on lifestyle behaviors and perceptions of lifestyle counseling and preventive services. Comparisons of study measures were made across residents' specialty and training levels. Fisher's exact and analysis of variance tests were used for statistical analysis. Results. There were several significant differences in perceptions of counseling and screening by specialty and training level. There were no significant differences in personal lifestyle behaviors between all resident specialties and training levels. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that there are opportunities to improve healthy lifestyle behaviors and perceptions of lifestyle counseling and preventive services among residents in different specialties and training levels. This knowledge can inform development of training programs in lifestyle and preventive medicine practice during residency and fellowship.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on European Residency Training Programs in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a global public health emergency. The demand for services has altered the organization of medical services resulting in significant changes that have altered dramatically the education of residents in various medical specialties including physical and rehabilitation medicine. In this rapid communication, we summarize the impact of COVID-19 on residency training programs in five European countries. Open interviews were conducted with Country Ambassadors of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine World Youth Forum. The most common changes were closing of rehabilitation units and outpatient clinics, redeployment of residents to acute care services, and the increase use of technology for patient care and educational purposes.

Evaluation of knowledge and awareness of invasive fungal infections amongst resident doctors in Nigeria.

Introductionit has been estimated that about 11.8% of the Nigerians suffer serious fungal infections annually. A high index of suspicion with early diagnosis and institution of appropriate therapy significantly impacts on the morbidity and mortality of invasive fungal infections (IFIs).Methodswe conducted a cross-sectional multicentre survey across 7 tertiary hospitals in 5 geopolitical zones of Nigeria between June 2013 and March 2015. Knowledge, awareness and practice of Nigerian resident doctors about the diagnosis and management of invasive fungal infections were evaluated using a semi-structured, self-administered questionnaire. Assessment was categorized as poor, fair and good.Results834(79.7%) of the 1046 participants had some knowledge of IFIs, 338(32.3%) from undergraduate medical training and 191(18.3%) during post-graduate (specialty) residency training. Number of years spent in clinical practice was positively related to knowledge of management of IFIs, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Only 2 (0.002%) out of the 1046 respondents had a good level of awareness of IFIs. Only 4(0.4%) of respondents had seen > 10 cases of IFIs; while 10(1%) had seen between 5-10 cases, 180(17.2%) less than 5 cases and the rest had never seen or managed any cases of IFIs. There were statistically significant differences in knowledge about IFIs among the various cadres of doctors (p < 0.001) as level of knowledge increased with rank/seniority.Conclusionknowledge gaps exist that could militate against optimal management of IFIs in Nigeria. Targeted continuing medical education (CME) programmes and a revision of the postgraduate medical education curriculum is recommended.

Operating Room Educational Climate Scale for Surgical Specialty Residents: Scale Development and Validation.

To develop a scale in Turkish language for evaluating the surgical specialty residents? perceptions of educational climate in the operating room, with an emphasis on learning in the operating suite and planning the relevant change for improved and standardized training. Three surgeons from different disciplines provided expert opinions and a focus group meeting was held on the necessity, scope, and specificity of the items. The 5-point Likert type draft scale consisted of 28 items including ten negative statements scored reversely and having total scores ranging between 28-140 points. There were 5 subscales: educational process, teamwork, communication, operating room infrastructure, and surgical skills education. For assessing the validity and reliability, 172 surgical specialty residents from three hospitals in different locations were asked to answer the paper-based scale items anonymously. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test validity, whereas Cronbach?s alpha reliability coefficients were calculated for internal consistency. CFA revealed a chi-square, standard deviation, chi-square/standard deviation, and a p-value of 783.73, 340, 2.27, and 0.001, respectively. Cronbach?s alpha coefficient for educational process, teamwork, communication, operating room infrastructure, and surgical skills education subscales were calculated to be 0.61, 0.61, 0.63, 0.70, and 0.72, respectively. Cronbach?s alpha coefficient for all items was 0.89. Results indicated acceptable construct validity and internal consistency of the scale. The newly developed scale was proven as a reliable and valid measurement instrument that can be used within the Turkish health system setting for assessing and improving the educational climate in the operating room.

Transition to Practice: Onboarding Components for Establishing and Sustaining Healthy Work Environments.

Transition to Practice: Onboarding Components for Establishing and Sustaining Healthy Work Environments.

The state of diversity based on race, ethnicity, and sex in otolaryngology in 2016.

To compare the representation of women and racial minorities among otolaryngology residents and faculty to other surgical specialties. Information from 2016 regarding female and minority representation among medical school graduates, otolaryngology applicants, otolaryngology residents, otolaryngology faculty and residents, and faculty in other surgical specialties was obtained from the publicly available registries from the American Medical Association and the American Association of Medical Colleges. The data obtained was used to explore the differences between the various stages of training in otolaryngology and to compare the female and minority diversity of otolaryngology residents with residents in other surgical specialties. Women and African Americans were underrepresented at the resident level compared with their level of representation as medical school graduates. Women were underrepresented in otolaryngology resident applicants (P < .001), but equally represented between otolaryngology residency applicants and residents (P = .582). African Americans were equally represented between medical school graduates and otolaryngology resident applicants (P = .871), but underrepresented in otolaryngology residents (P < .001). Asian Americans and Hispanics were underrepresented among otolaryngology faculty compared with their representation in otolaryngology residency programs (P < .001, P < .001, respectively). Otolaryngology has the lowest percentage of African-American residents and faculty compared to other surgical specialties. The representation of women in otolaryngology residencies is higher than most surgical specialties but worse than general surgery, integrated plastics, and medical school graduates. Otolaryngology lags behind other surgical specialties in representation of minorities and women. Continued efforts should be made to increase diversity in the field of otolaryngology, especially in regard to underrepresented minorities. 3 Laryngoscope, 2019.

Using Didactics and Simulation to Enhance Comfort, Knowledge, and Skills of Nonsurgical Trainees Caring for Patients With Tracheostomy and Laryngectomy.

Management of tracheostomy and laryngectomy is an important skill for physicians who often care for patients with multiple, comorbid, chronic medical conditions. There is little published literature on training for tracheostomy and laryngectomy care during nonsurgical specialty residencies. This project was designed to assess and improve comfort with, knowledge of, proficiency in tracheostomy and laryngectomy care. This prospective observational study comprised 122 physician trainees from internal medicine, emergency medicine, and anesthesia training programs at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences participating in a simulation-based curriculum from April 2016 to December 2016. The curriculum included didactic session, hands-on experience performing a tracheostomy change, and practicing emergency scenarios on interactive, high-fidelity simulation mannequins. Preintervention and postintervention assessments of self-perceived comfort, objective knowledge, and tracheostomy change proficiency were performed and results compared. Self-perceived comfort improved from a mean Likert score from 2.12 to 4.43 (P = 0.009). Knowledge mean scores improved from 57% to 82% (P < 0.001) on multiple-choice testing. Tracheostomy change proficiency mean scores improved from 41% to 84% (P < 0.001) of proficiencies correctly performed. Six-month follow-up assessment of comfort and knowledge showed statistically significant retention of comfort (P = 0.002) and knowledge (P = 0.026). Comprehensive tracheostomy and laryngectomy education, which combines enhancement of knowledge with simulation of both routine and emergent aspects of care, is an effective strategy in improving confidence with, knowledge of, proficiency in tracheostomy and laryngectomy care. Retention of confidence and knowledge was demonstrated 6 months later.

Influence of Student Loan Debt on General Surgery Resident Career and Lifestyle Decision-Making

The average medical school debt in 2011 was $170,000, and by 2017 it increased to $190,000. High debt burden has been shown to affect career choices for residents in primary care specialties; however, it has not been well studied among surgical residents. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to assess the amount of debt among general surgery residents and its effects on their career and lifestyle decisions. Surveys were distributed to 607 categorical general surgery residents at 19 different residency programs. Degree of debt was assessed and responses compared. Overall, 427 (70.3%) residents completed the survey, 317 (74.2%) of whom reported having student loan debt. Of those with debt, 262 (82.6%) believed that repaying debt was a significant financial burden in residency, 248 (78.3%) thought it would remain a burden after residency, 210 (66.2%) believed their debt would influence their future job choice, and 225 (71%) thought their debt would delay their ability to buy a home. Debt did not affect decisions to get married or have children. There were 109 (25.6%) residents with no debt, 131 (30.8%) with <$200,000, 103 (24.2%) with $200,000 to $300,000, and 83 (19.5%) with >$300,000. Residents with high debt were less likely to feel financially secure now (p < 0.0001) and when thinking about their future (p < 0.0001). They also had higher minimum starting salary goals (p= 0.002) and were less likely to have had assistance paying for their education (p= 0.0001). Surgical residents believe their debt is a significant financial burden. Furthermore, high debt significantly influences their financial security, practice location, and salary goals.

The decline in attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration from medical school to residency

ABSTRACTWhile interprofessional collaboration is a critical aspect of optimal patient care, practicing physicians often have sub-optimal attitudes regarding the importance of collaboration with their nursing colleagues. The impact of clinical training on medical students’ and residents’ attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration has not been investigated. The primary goal of our study was to examine if learners at different stages in their medical training had more or less favorable attitudes regarding interprofessional collaboration (IPC). A secondary goal was to compare residents in procedural versus non-procedural specialties to determine if attitudes toward IPC varied by specialty type. Third-year medical students and residents at a large public university completed the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration. Student (n = 129) and resident (n = 292) scores were compared using Student’s t-tests. Resident responses were further analyzed by specialty type. Students’ perceptions of the physician-nurse relationship were significantly more favorable than the views of residents, particularly in the “Authority” and “Responsibility” domains. Residents in procedural specialties had less favorable attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration than those in non-procedural specialties. Our findings highlight the importance of developing effective interventions for improving interprofessional collaboration during medical training.

Are there differences between those doctors who apply for a training post in Foundation Year 2 and those who take time out of the training pathway? A UK multicohort study

IntroductionKnowledge about the career decisions of doctors in relation to specialty (residency) training is essential in terms of UK workforce planning. However, little is known about which doctors elect to...