Specialty Mental Health Providers Research Articles

Referral Patterns and Sociodemographic Predictors of Adult and Pediatric Behavioral Health Referrals in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) provide comprehensive care to medically underserved populations whose access to behavioral health services may be limited. The goal of the current study was to examine referral patterns to specialty mental health and subsequent treatment initiation in an FQHC. In a 13-month period from March 2017 to March 2018, 1201 patients received a specialty mental healthcare referral. Of these patients, 37% reported scheduling an appointment with this referral, 44% refused the referral, 4% reported improvement in symptoms and not needing a referral, and 5% were not able to be reached due to a contact number being out of service. Common referral reasons among adults were depression, anxiety, and stress, and the most prevalent pediatric referral reasons were behavioral problems, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and anxiety. These data suggest that of the patients who received a specialty mental health referral, only one-third scheduled an appointment. The study also suggested that anxiety problems may be underrecognized in both adult and pediatric patients. Although significant attention has been put on increasing access to behavioral health services, there is still an unmet need. Universal mental health screening and increased coordination with specialty mental health providers in the community may better address this need.

A clinician/researcher partnership to understand patterns and predictors of trauma-focused psychotherapy and nontrauma-focused psychotherapy use among veterans with PTSD.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common in veterans, and trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapies (TF-EBP) have the strongest evidence for reducing PTSD and improving functioning. However, most veterans with PTSD do not receive TF-EBP. Extensive research focuses on why this gap between scientific recommendations and clinician practice exists. This study adds an unique perspective by reporting on a program evaluation that was jointly designed and implemented by Veterans Affairs researchers and PTSD Clinic providers to increase shared understanding about patterns and predictors of TF-EBP and non-TF-EBP use and interpret results in light of clinic contextual factors. The evaluation describes the psychotherapy utilization patterns of 242 veterans' who were referred to the PTSD clinic and investigates what patient characteristics predict psychotherapy use over the next year. Most veterans (87%) received psychotherapy: 27% received at least one session of TF-EBP and 14% received an adequate dose of TF-EBP. Veterans who started TF-EBP were significantly more likely to receive eight sessions compared to veterans getting non-TF-EBP. Core PTSD symptoms predicted more psychotherapy use, while negative beliefs about oneself/the world predicted less psychotherapy use. Clinicians were more likely to recommend TF-EBP when veterans endorsed feeling guilt/shame in reaction to their emotions. Referral from integrated primary care-mental health providers rather than specialty mental health providers predicted more overall psychotherapy sessions. Clinicians interpret results in line with contextual factors that promote delivery of non-TF-EBP. More clinician engagement in the research process can improve the clinical relevance of research and help bridge the gap between scientific and practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The REACH (Resiliency, Engagement, and Accessibility for Comorbid HIV/PTSD/SUD populations) Protocol: Using a Universal Screener to Improve Mental Health and Enhance HIV Care Outcomes.

Among people living with HIV (PLWH), 50% report substance use disorders (SUDs), and 30-61% report posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Comorbid PTSD/SUD/HIV has been linked to faster HIV progression and twice the rate of death, lower medical adherence and retention, and increased viral load compared to PLWH without co-occurring PTSD or SUD. A critical first step in establishing comprehensive mental health services for PLWH is the implementation of an evidence-based screening protocol for PTSD and SUDs to facilitate referrals to specialty mental health providers. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, this mixed-methods study aimed to examine the feasibility of delivering the REACH (Resiliency, Engagement, and Accessibility for Comorbid HIV/PTSD/SUD populations) Screening protocol. Three case managers were instructed to provide the REACH screening electronically to all patients that they saw for enrollment or re-enrollment appointments over 3 months (n=102). Of the 70 patients who completed the screener, 27% had clinically significant PTSD symptoms and 48.6% had SUD concerns. Qualitative feedback revealed themes related to beliefs about SU and PTSD, attitudes toward screening, comfort in the discussion of SU and PTSD, and referral and treatment considerations. Discussion includes lessons learned for implementation of this assessment of PTSD/SUD in PLWH as a novel approach to increase mental health engagement and promote health equity, with the potential long-term impact of improving HIV care outcomes via ameliorating mental health/SUD, and implications for prevention of HIV transmission. Implementation science can be leveraged to understand the gap in the utilization of existing evidence-based screening tools in HIV care settings.

Rural and frontier access to mental health prescribers and nonprescribers: A geospatial analysis in Oregon Medicaid.

Medicaid enrollees in rural and frontier areas face inadequate access to mental health services, but the extent to which access varies for different provider types is unknown. We assessed access to Medicaid-participating prescribing and nonprescribing mental health clinicians, focusing on Oregon, which has a substantial rural population. Using 2018 Medicaid claims data, we identified enrollees aged 18-64 with psychiatric diagnoses and specialty mental health providers who billed Medicaid at least once during the study period. We measured both 30- and 60-minute drive time to a mental health provider, and a spatial access score derived from the enhanced 2-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) approach at the level of Zip Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs). Results were stratified for prescribers and nonprescribers, across urban, rural, and frontier areas. Overall, a majority of ZCTAs (68.6%) had at least 1 mental health prescriber and nonprescriber within a 30-minute drive. E2SFCA measures demonstrated that while frontier ZCTAs had the lowest access to prescribers (84.3% in the lowest quintile of access) compared to other regions, some frontier ZCTAs had relatively high access to nonprescribers (34.3% in the third and fourth quartiles of access). Some frontier areas with relatively poor access to Medicaid-participating mental health prescribers demonstrated relatively high access to nonprescribers, suggesting reliance on nonprescribing clinicians for mental health care delivery amid rural workforce constraints. Efforts to monitor network adequacy should consider differential access to different provider types, and incorporate methods, such as E2SFCA, to better account for service demand and supply.

Characteristics of Specialty Mental Health Provider Networks in Oregon Medicaid.

Provider networks for mental health are narrower than for other medical specialties. Providers' influence on access to care is potentially greater in Medicaid because enrollees are generally limited to contracted providers, without out-of-network options for nonemergency mental health care. The authors used claims-based metrics to examine variation in specialty mental health provider networks. In a cross-sectional analysis of 2018 Oregon Medicaid claims data, claims from adults ages 18-64 years (N=100,515) with a psychiatric diagnosis were identified. In-network providers were identified as those associated with any medical claims filed for at least five unique Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in a health plan (coordinated care organization [CCO]) during the study period. Specialty mental health providers were categorized as prescribers (psychiatrists and mental health nurse practitioners) and nonprescribers (therapists, counselors, clinical nurse specialists, psychologists, and social workers). Measures of network composition, provider-to-population ratio, continuity, and concentration of care were calculated at the CCO level; the correlation between these measures was estimated to describe the degree to which they capture unique dimensions of provider networks. Across 15 CCOs, the number of prescribing providers per 1,000 patients was relatively stable. CCOs that expanded their networks did so by increasing the number of nonprescribing providers. Moderately negative correlations were found between the nonprescriber provider-to-population ratio and proportions of visits with prescribers as well as with usual provider continuity. This analysis advances future research and policy applications by offering a more nuanced view of provider network measurement and describing empirical variation across networks.

Providers must step up to meet mental health needs of new mothers

Wide socioeconomic and racial disparities remain in new mothers’ access to mental health care, and both specialty mental health and primary care providers can help remedy the problem, says a leading health scientist with the federal government.

Adapting the Comprehensive Unit Safety Program (CUSP) implementation strategy to increase delivery of evidence-based cardiovascular risk factor care in community mental health organizations: protocol for a pilot study

BackgroundPeople with serious mental illnesses (SMI) such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder experience excess mortality driven in large part by high rates of poorly controlled and under-treated cardiovascular risk factors. In the USA, integrated “behavioral health home” models in which specialty mental health organizations coordinate and manage physical health care for people with SMI are designed to improve guideline-concordant cardiovascular care for this group. Such models have been shown to improve cardiovascular care for clients with SMI in randomized clinical trials, but real-world implementation has fallen short. Key implementation barriers include lack of alignment of specialty mental health program culture and physical health care coordination and management for clients with SMI and lack of structured protocols for conducting effective physical health care coordination and management in the specialty mental health program context. This protocol describes a pilot study of an implementation intervention designed to overcome these barriers.MethodsThis pilot study uses a single-group, pre/post-study design to examine the effects of an adapted Comprehensive Unit Safety Program (CUSP) implementation strategy designed to support behavioral health home programs in conducting effective cardiovascular care coordination and management for clients with SMI. The CUSP strategy, which was originally designed to improve inpatient safety, includes provider training, expert facilitation, and implementation of a five-step quality improvement process. We will examine the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the implementation strategy and how this strategy influences mental health organization culture; specialty mental health providers’ self-efficacy to conduct evidence-based cardiovascular care coordination and management; and receipt of guideline-concordant care for hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus among people with SMI.DiscussionWhile we apply CUSP to the implementation of evidence-based hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes care, this implementation strategy could be used in the future to support the delivery of other types of evidence-based care, such as smoking cessation treatment, in behavioral health home programs. CUSP is designed to be fully integrated into organizations, sustained indefinitely, and used to continually improve evidence-based practice delivery.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04696653. Registered on January 6, 2021

National Trends in Outpatient Mental Health Service Use Among Adults Between 2008 and 2015.

This study sought to characterize recent trends in mental health visits of adult outpatients to primary care physicians (PCPs), specialty mental health providers (SMHPs), and other providers (non-primary care physicians, specialists other than SMHPs, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants). Trends determined by degree of patients' psychological distress and in the types of treatments received within different settings were also examined. Data were from the household component of the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for the 2008-2011 and 2012-2015 periods for adults ages ≥18 years (N=13,111) who had a mental health outpatient visit. Bivariate logistic regression was used to compare means between the two periods. The percentage of adults having mental health outpatient visits increased between the two periods, largely driven by an increase in visits with providers other than SMHPs and PCPs, which rose from 11.9% (N=667) to 15.5% (N=1,048). Outpatient mental health visits with PCPs decreased from 29.0% (N=1,802) to 26.8% (N=1,945). The proportion of respondents with mental health outpatient visits increased both among those with high psychological distress and among those with low or no psychological distress (from 30.7% [N=1,332] to 36.2% [N=1,491] and from 6.0% [N=4,516] to 6.9% [N=5,772], respectively). The percentage of respondents receiving only psychotropic medication decreased over the two periods. Mental health outpatient visits for adults increased between 2008 and 2015, and visits with SMHPs remained relatively stable during that time. A greater understanding of recent trends in types of outpatient mental health services may help identify targets for future mental health workforce studies.

Provider perspectives on a clinical demonstration project to transition patients with stable mental health conditions to primary care.

Research to improve access to mental healthcare often focuses on increasing timely referrals from primary care (PC) to specialty mental health (SMH). However, timely and appropriate transitions back to PC are indispensable for increasing access to SMH for new patients. We developed and implemented a formalized process to identify patients eligible for transition from SMH to PC. The FLOW intervention was piloted at a Veterans Health Administration community-based outpatient clinic. Qualitatively examine provider perspectives regarding patient transitions at initiation and termination of the FLOW project. Sixteen mental health providers and three PC staff completed qualitative interviews about the benefits and drawbacks of FLOW at initiation. Ten mental health providers and one PC staff completed interviews at 12-month follow-up. Primary benefits anticipated at initiation were that FLOW would increase access to SMH, provide acknowledgment of veterans' recovery, and differentiate between higher and lower intensity mental health services. SMH providers reported additional perceived benefits at 12-month follow-up, including decreased stress over their caseloads and increased ability to deliver efficient, effective treatment. Anticipated drawbacks at initiation were that veterans would get inconsistent care, PC could not offer the same level of care as SMH, and veterans might view transition as a rejection by their SMH provider. Perceived drawbacks were similar at 12-month follow-up, but there was less frequent endorsement. Findings highlight need for sustained and frequent provider education regarding (i) the appropriate characteristics of individuals eligible for transition and (ii) established procedures to ensure care coordination during and after transition.

Implementation of Off-Site Integrated Care for Children: A Scoping Review.

As an alternative to co-located integrated care, off-site integration (partnerships between primary care and non-embedded specialty mental health providers) can address the growing need for pediatric mental health services. Our goal is to review the existing literature on implementing off-site pediatric integrated care. We systematically searched the literature for peer-reviewed publications on off-site pediatric integrated care interventions. We included studies that involved systematic data collection and analysis, both qualitative and quantitative, of implementation outcomes (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability). We found 39 original articles from 24 off-site programs with a variety of study designs, most with secondary implementation outcomes. Models of off-site integration varied primarily along two dimensions: direct vs. indirect, and in-person vs. remote. Overall, off-site models were acceptable to providers, particularly when the following were present: strong interdisciplinary communication, timely availability and reliability of services, additional support beyond one-time consultation, and standardized care algorithms. Adoption and penetration were facilitated by enhanced program visibility, including on-site champions. Certain clinical populations (e.g., school-age, less complicated ADHD) seemed more amenable to off-site integrated models than others (e.g., preschool-age, conduct disorders). Lack of funding and inadequate reimbursement limited sustainability in all models. Off-site interventions are feasible, acceptable, and often adopted widely with adequate planning, administrative support, and interprofessional communication. Studies that focus primarily on implementation and that consider the perspectives of specialty providers and patients are needed.

Prescribing Practices of Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants Waivered to Prescribe Buprenorphine and the Barriers They Experience Prescribing Buprenorphine.

In 2016, the Comprehensive Addiction Recovery Act permitted nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) to obtain a waiver to prescribe buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), with the goal of increasing access to this treatment. This study's purpose was to describe the buprenorphine prescribing practices of NPs and PAs and compare the barriers rural and urban providers face delivering treatment. From the October 2018 Drug Enforcement Administration list of providers with the waiver to prescribe buprenorphine, all rural NPs and PAs (1,057) and a random sample of 500 urban NPs and PAs were surveyed. The questionnaire queried respondents about demographics, prescribing practices, practice characteristics, reimbursement policies, and barriers to prescribing buprenorphine to treat OUD. Of the waivered NPs and PAs, 80.3% reported having prescribed buprenorphine and 71.1% said they were currently accepting new patients with OUD. Providers with the 30-patient waiver were treating, on average, 13.2 patients; 37.0% were not treating any patients. The most common barrier, cited by half of providers, was concerns about diversion/medication misuse. More rural providers indicated lack of specialty backup and mental health providers as a barrier than urban providers. Never-prescribers and former-prescribers reported 6 barriers at significantly higher rates than did current prescribers. More rural providers accepted Medicaid and cash reimbursement than urban providers. NPs and PAs face many of the same barriers to providing buprenorphine as physicians have reported. Interventions to address these barriers have the potential to benefit all providers with the waiver to prescribe buprenorphine.

A Clinical Care Monitoring and Data Collection Tool (H3 Tracker) to Assess Uptake and Engagement in Mental Health Care Services in a Community-Based Pediatric Integrated Care Model: Longitudinal Cohort Study.

BackgroundNational recommendations for pediatric integrated care models include improved capacity for care coordination and communication across primary care and specialty mental health providers using technology, yet few practical, short-term solutions are available for low-resource, community-based pediatric integrated care clinics.ObjectiveThe goal of the paper is to describe the development and features of a Web-based tool designed for program evaluation and clinician monitoring of embedded pediatric mental health care using a community-partnered approach. In addition, a longitudinal study design was used to assess the implementation of the tool in program evaluation, including clinical monitoring and data collection.MethodsBiweekly meetings of the partnered evaluation team (clinic, academic, and funding partners) were convened over the course of 12 months to specify tool features using a participatory framework, followed by usability testing and further refinement during implementation.ResultsA data collection tool was developed to collect clinic population characteristics as well as collect and display patient mental health outcomes and clinical care services from 277 eligible caregiver/child participants. Despite outreach, there was little uptake of the tool by either the behavioral health team or primary care provider.ConclusionsDevelopment of the H3 Tracker (Healthy Minds, Healthy Children, Healthy Chicago Tracker) in two community-based pediatric clinics with embedded mental health teams serving predominantly minority children is feasible and promising for on-site program evaluation data collection. Future research is needed to understand ways to improve clinic integration and examine whether promotion of primary care/mental health communication drives sustained use.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02699814; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02699814 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/772pV5rWW)

Adoption of Mobile Apps for Depression and Anxiety: Cross-Sectional Survey Study on Patient Interest and Barriers to Engagement.

BackgroundEmerging research suggests that mobile apps can be used to effectively treat common mental illnesses like depression and anxiety. Despite promising efficacy results and ease of access to these interventions, adoption of mobile health (mHealth; mobile device–delivered) interventions for mental illness has been limited. More insight into patients’ perspectives on mHealth interventions is required to create effective implementation strategies and to adapt existing interventions to facilitate higher rates of adoption.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine, from the patient perspective, current use and factors that may impact the use of mHealth interventions for mental illness.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional survey study of veterans who had attended an appointment at a single Veterans Health Administration facility in early 2016 that was associated with one of the following mental health concerns: unipolar depression, any anxiety disorder, or posttraumatic stress disorder. We used the Veteran Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse to create subsets of eligible participants demographically stratified by gender (male or female) and minority status (white or nonwhite). From each subset, 100 participants were selected at random and mailed a paper survey with items addressing the demographics, overall health, mental health, technology ownership or use, interest in mobile app interventions for mental illness, reasons for use or nonuse, and interest in specific features of mobile apps for mental illness.ResultsOf the 400 potential participants, 149 (37.3%, 149/400) completed and returned a survey. Most participants (79.9%, 119/149) reported that they owned a smart device and that they use apps in general (71.1%, 106/149). Most participants (73.1%, 87/149) reported interest in using an app for mental illness, but only 10.7% (16/149) had done so. Paired samples t tests indicated that ratings of interest in using an app recommended by a clinician were significantly greater than general interest ratings and even greater when the recommending clinician was a specialty mental health provider. The most frequent concerns related to using an app for mental illness were lacking proof of efficacy (71.8%, 107/149), concerns about data privacy (59.1%, 88/149), and not knowing where to find such an app (51.0%, 76/149). Participants expressed interest in a number of app features with particularly high-interest ratings for context-sensitive apps (85.2%, 127/149), and apps focused on the following areas: increasing exercise (75.8%, 113/149), improving sleep (73.2%, 109/149), changing negative thinking (70.5%, 105/149), and increasing involvement in activities (67.1%, 100/149).ConclusionsMost respondents had access to devices to use mobile apps for mental illness, already used apps for other purposes, and were interested in mobile apps for mental illness. Key factors that may improve adoption include provider endorsement, greater publicity of efficacious apps, and clear messaging about efficacy and privacy of information. Finally, multifaceted apps that address a range of concerns, from sleep to negative thought patterns, may be best received.

Racial, Ethnic, and Nativity Differences in Mental Health Visits to Primary Care and Specialty Mental Health Providers: Analysis of the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, 2010-2015.

Background. Black and Latino minorities have traditionally had poorer access to primary care than non-Latino Whites, but these patterns could change with the Affordable Care Act (ACA). To guide post-ACA efforts to address mental health service disparities, we used a nationally representative sample to characterize baseline race-, ethnicity-, and nativity-associated differences in mental health services in the context of primary care. Methods. Data were obtained from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS), a two-year panel study of healthcare use, satisfaction with care, and costs of services in the United States (US). We pooled data from six waves (14–19) of participants with serious psychological distress to examine racial, ethnic, and nativity disparities in medical and mental health visits to primary care (PC) and specialty mental health (SMH) providers around the time of ACA reforms, 2010–2015. Results. Of the 2747 respondents with serious psychological distress, 1316 were non-Latino White, 632 non-Latino Black, 532 identified as Latino with Mexican, Central American, or South American (MCS) origins, and 267 as Latino with Caribbean island origins; 525 were foreign/island born. All racial/ethnic groups were less likely than non-Latino Whites to have any PC visit. Of those who used PC, non-Latino Blacks were less likely than Whites to have a PC mental health visit, while foreign born MCS Latinos were less likely to visit an SMH provider. Conditional on any mental health visit, Latinos from the Caribbean were more likely than non-Latino Whites to visit SMH providers versus PC providers only, while non-Latino Blacks and US born MCS Latinos received fewer PC mental health visits than non-Latino Whites. Conclusion. Racial-, ethnic-, and nativity-associated disparities persist in PC provided mental health services.

Expanding Use of Brief Behavioral Interventions in Collaborative Care

Expanding Use of Brief Behavioral Interventions in Collaborative Care

Approaches to the Management of Young Children’s Externalizing Behavior Problems in the Primary Care Setting

The current review summarizes the management of early-childhood externalizing behavior problems (ages 2–5) within the primary care setting. The review highlights factors pediatricians should consider when addressing externalizing behavior problems and summarizes general principles, opportunities for prevention and health promotion, parent-training interventions, integrated models, and therapies to consider when referring families to a specialty mental health provider. Pediatricians have an important role in addressing early-childhood externalizing behavior problems in the primary care setting, and practices can take a range of meaningful steps to address these issues both universally and for children with higher levels of impairment. In particular, integrated approaches offer the opportunity to increase access to behavioral health services while also providing the chance to build medical providers’ skills in managing early-childhood externalizing behavior problems in the primary care setting. Pediatricians have a range of options to consider and can use the literature regarding evidence-based programs to guide their decisions on the best interventions to implement in their settings. Further dissemination work is needed to better understand which programs are most effective when implemented in community settings.

A hybrid type I trial to increase Veterans\u2019 access to insomnia care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundChronic insomnia is among the most reported complaints of Veterans and military personnel referred for mental health services. It is highly comorbid with medical and psychiatric disorders, and is associated with significantly increased healthcare utilization and costs. Evidence-based psychotherapy, namely Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBTI), is an effective treatment and recommended over prescription sleep medications. While CBTI is part of a nationwide rollout in the Veterans Health Administration to train hundreds of providers, access to treatment is still limited for many Veterans due to limited treatment availability, low patient and provider knowledge about treatment options, and Veteran barriers such as distance and travel, work schedules, and childcare. Uptake of a briefer, more primary-care-friendly treatment into routine clinical care in Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care settings, where insomnia is typically first recognized and diagnosed, may effectively and efficiently increase access to effective insomnia interventions and help decrease the risks and burdens related to chronic insomnia.MethodsThis hybrid type I trial is composed of two aims. The first preliminarily tests the clinical non-inferiority of Brief Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia (BBTI) versus the current “gold standard” treatment, CBTI. The second is a qualitative needs assessment, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to identify potential factors that may affect successful implementation and integration of behavioral treatments for insomnia in the primary care setting. To identify potential implementation factors, individual interviews are conducted with the Veterans who participate in the clinical trial, as well as VA primary care providers and nursing staff.DiscussionIt is increasingly important to better understand barriers to, and facilitators of, implementing insomnia interventions in order to ensure that Veterans have the best access to care. Furthermore, it is important to evaluate the potential for new avenues of treatment delivery, like BBTI in the primary care setting, which can benefit Veterans who may not have adequate access to specialty mental health providers trained in CBTI.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02724800. Registered on 31 March 2016.

Outcomes of mental health pharmacist-managed electronic consults at a Veterans Affairs health care system

The demand for mental health services has increased as more veterans have been diagnosed with-and sought care for-one or more mental health conditions. Within the South Texas Veterans Health Care System (STVHCS), providers may submit electronic consults (e-consults) to mental health clinical pharmacy specialists for medication review and recommendations. These consults aim to manage veterans with uncomplicated mental health conditions in primary care, making specialty mental health providers more available for those who need such services. Pharmacists have improved outcomes and access to care for conditions such as diabetes and hypertension, but currently, there is limited evidence demonstrating the impact of pharmacists in mental health. This quality improvement project assessed the effectiveness of the e-consult service. Information was collected through a retrospective chart review of STVHCS veterans with the corresponding consult note placed in their chart from May 2014 through December 2015. Numbers of recommendations implemented and veterans maintained in primary care were analyzed as markers of effectiveness. Time and cost savings were secondarily explored. A total of 361 consults were submitted for 353 unique patients. Of the 322 patients included in analyses, a total of 301 unique patients (93.5%) were maintained in primary care for at least 3 months. Of the 21 not maintained in primary care, 15 recommendations were implemented; of those maintained in primary care, 271 recommendations were implemented. This service improves mental health care-and patient access-by promoting successful management and maintenance of less complicated patients in primary care.

Depression care among adults with co-occurring major depressive episodes and substance use disorders in the United States

ObjectiveWe examined 12-month prevalence and correlates of receiving depression care and perceiving helpfulness of depression care among U.S. adults with major depressive episodes (MDE) and substance use disorders (SUD). MethodData were from 325,800 adults who participated in the 2008–2014 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Descriptive analyses and bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were applied. ResultsIn the U.S., 3.3 million adults (1.4% of the adult population) had co-occurring MDE and SUD in the past year. Among adults with both disorders, 55.4% reported receiving past-year depression care. Among those with past-year depression care, 36.1% perceived it as helpful. Compared with adults who did not receive substance use treatment in the past year, those who received substance use treatment were significantly more likely to receive depression care, and those who received treatment of both disorders were more likely to perceive their depression care as helpful (adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) = 1.5–1.6). Compared with adults who received depression care only from general medical providers, those who received depression care from specialty mental health providers were more likely to report that their care was helpful (ARRs = 1.4–1.6). Receipt of prescription medication for MDE was associated with perceived helpfulness of depression care (ARR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.05–1.73). ConclusionsAlmost half of adults with co-occurring MDE and SUD did not receive past-year depression care. Among those who received depression care, most did not perceive it as helpful. Substance use treatment, specialty mental health treatment, and antidepressant medications were perceived as helpful aspects of depression care.

Usual Care for Rural Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) provide primary-care-based mental health services to rural veterans who live long distances from Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals. Characterizing the composition of usual care will highlight the need and potential strategies to improve access to and engagement in evidence-based psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Veterans (N = 132) with PTSD recruited from 5 large- (5,000-10,000 patients) and 6 medium-sized (1,500-4,999) CBOCs were enrolled in the usual care arm of a randomized control trial for a PTSD collaborative care study. Chart review procedures classified all mental health encounters during the 1-year study period into 10 mutually exclusive categories (7 psychotherapy and 3 medication management). Seventy-two percent of participants received at least 1 medication management encounter with 30% of encounters being delivered via interactive video. More than half of veterans (58.3%) received at least 1 session of psychotherapy. Only 12.1% received a session of therapy classified as an evidence-based psychotherapy for PTSD. The vast majority of psychotherapy encounters were delivered in group format and only a small proportion were delivered via interactive video. Findings suggest that veterans diagnosed with PTSD who receive their mental health treatment in large and medium CBOCs are likely to receive medication management, and very few veterans received evidence-based psychotherapy. There may be ways to increase access to evidence-based psychotherapy by expanding the use of interactive video to connect specialty mental health providers with patients, hosted either in CBOCs or in home-based care, and to offer more group-based therapies.