Research on investigating spatial resolution effect on image-based wetland mapping was done, and reported finer resolution is more appropriate. But is Sentinel image more effective than Landsat image for delineating ox-bow lake, a cut-off channel of a river, and for mapping inundation frequency? Inundation frequency means regularly, water appears in a pixel. In order to obtain these answers, the present study used frequently used spectral indices like normalized difference water index (NDWI), modified NDWI (MNDWI), re-modified NDWI (RmNDWI) and ensemble vegetation inclusive aggregated water index (ViAWI). For obtaining inundation consistency character, the water presence frequency (WPF) approach was adopted. A set of accuracy matrices was applied for validating the resolution effect. Results revealed that among the used indices, MNDWI was found suitable for ox-bow lake mapping. But this index is not able to map vegetated part of the ox-bow lakes. This problem was resolved using ensemble ViAWI. Inundation frequency analysis exhibited that about 70% of the area is consistent with water presence and therefore is hydro-ecologically and economically viable, and no such major differences were recorded between Sentinel and Landsat images. The study further revealed that finer resolution Sentinel images are more effective in ox-bow lake mapping and characterising inundation frequency, but they were not significantly better. Accuracy difference between them was found at the very minimum. Therefore, the study recommended that in a Sentinel image sparse condition, Landsat images could alternatively be used without much accuracy departure, particularly on those water bodies where water appearance is not highly erratic.