Spacer Acquisition Research Articles

Mucin induces CRISPR-Cas defense in an opportunistic pathogen

Parasitism by bacteriophages has led to the evolution of a variety of defense mechanisms in their host bacteria. However, it is unclear what factors lead to specific defenses being deployed upon phage infection. To explore this question, we co-evolved the bacterial fish pathogen Flavobacterium columnare and its virulent phage V156 in presence and absence of a eukaryotic host signal (mucin) for sixteen weeks. The presence of mucin leads to a dramatic increase in CRISPR spacer acquisition, especially in low nutrient conditions where over 60% of colonies obtain at least one new spacer. Additionally, we show that the presence of a competitor bacterium further increases CRISPR spacer acquisition in F. columnare. These results suggest that ecological factors are important in determining defense strategies against phages, and that the phage-bacterium interactions on mucosal surfaces may select for the diversification of bacterial immune systems.

Genome Mining Approach Reveals the Occurrence and Diversity Pattern of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-Associated Systems in Lactobacillus brevis Strains.

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) together with their CRISPR-associated (Cas) genes are widely distributed in prokaryotes that provide an adaptive defense mechanism against foreign invasive DNA. There is relatively little knowledge about the CRISPR-Cas diversity and evolution in Lactobacillus brevis strains. Therefore, in this study, a genome-mining approach was employed to investigate the diversity and occurrence of the CRISPR-Cas system in 83 L. brevis strains. Moreover, trans-activating CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA) and protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) as pivotal elements for the successful targeting and inference of phages by the subtype II CRISPR-Cas systems were surveyed. Finally, evolutionary paths of L. brevis strains under selective pressure from foreign invasive DNA such as plasmids and phages of studied strains were surveyed using acquisition and deletion events analysis of spacers. A total of 127 confirmed CRISPRs were identified, which were distributed in 69 strains. Among strains with confirmed CRISPRs, 35 strains only contained one CRISPR locus, 23 strains contained two CRISPR loci, and 12 strains contained three to six CRISPR loci. L. brevis strains frequently harbor more than one CRISPR system. Analysis of confirmed CRISPR arrays showed that 31 out of 127 confirmed CRISPRs included Cas genes which were categorized as one of the II-A, II-C, and I-E subtypes. Analysis of subtype II-A spacers reflected divergent evolution for 18 strains into 16 unique groups. Additional analysis of spacer sequences also confirmed the implication of characterizing CRISPR-Cas systems in targeting of phages and plasmids. The current study highlighted the potential of utilizing CRISPR spacer polymorphism in genotyping lactobacillus strains. Moreover, it provides deep insights into the occurrence, diversity, and functional impacts of the CRISPR-Cas system in L. brevis strains.

A truncated anti-CRISPR protein prevents spacer acquisition but not interference

CRISPR-Cas systems in prokaryotic cells provide an adaptive immunity against invading nucleic acids. For example, phage infection leads to addition of new immunity (spacer acquisition) and DNA cleavage (interference) in the bacterial model species Streptococcus thermophilus, which primarily relies on Cas9-containing CRISPR-Cas systems. Phages can counteract this defense system through mutations in the targeted protospacers or by encoding anti-CRISPR proteins (ACRs) that block Cas9 interference activity. Here, we show that S. thermophilus can block ACR-containing phages when the CRISPR immunity specifically targets the acr gene. This in turn selects for phage mutants carrying a deletion within the acr gene. Remarkably, a truncated acrIIA allele, found in a wild-type virulent streptococcal phage, does not block the interference activity of Cas9 but still prevents the acquisition of new immunities, thereby providing an example of an ACR specifically inhibiting spacer acquisition.

Noninvasive assessment of gut function using transcriptional recording sentinel cells.

Transcriptional recording by CRISPR spacer acquisition from RNA endows engineered Escherichia coli with synthetic memory, which through Record-seq reveals transcriptome-scale records. Microbial sentinels that traverse the gastrointestinal tract capture a wide range of genes and pathways that describe interactions with the host, including quantitative shifts in the molecular environment that result from alterations in the host diet, induced inflammation, and microbiome complexity. We demonstrate multiplexed recording using barcoded CRISPR arrays, enabling the reconstruction of transcriptional histories of isogenic bacterial strains in vivo. Record-seq therefore provides a scalable, noninvasive platform for interrogating intestinal and microbial physiology throughout the length of the intestine without manipulations to host physiology and can determine how single microbial genetic differences alter the way in which the microbe adapts to the host intestinal environment.

Recent doctoral theses (biochemistry, biology, biophysics, ecology and environmental) in Lithuania

The research objective of this work was to investigate and study details of the CRISPR adaptation process in several different CRISPR-Cas systems as well as use genome-wide CRISPR screening to elucidate cell-intermedilysin interactions. The results of this study showed that Cas1-Cas2 complex from S. thermophilus CRISPR4-Cas system forms a complex that integrates prespacers into the CRISPR array. DnaQ domain fused to Cas2 in this system is a 3’–5’ DNA exonuclease. DnaQ domain is dispensable for spacer integration; however, it serves to trim back overextended 3’ overhangs of the prespacer. Cas1, Cas2, and Csn2 proteins from S. thermophilus CRISPR3-Cas system form at least three different complexes, which interact with Cas9 from the same system via the DNA tether. The identified complexes from CRISPR3-Cas system represent a spacer capture step of the new spacer acquisition process, as they harbour spacer length DNA in their assemblies. Genome-wide CRISPR screening can reveal novel fundamental biological pathways in the membrane composition and lipid metabolism when used in concert with membrane targeting toxins. Intermedilysin has many more dependency factors than previously known CD59 and cholesterol. Among them are heparan sulfates, glucosylceramides, and many other protein or lipid glycosylation factors. ILY can be inhibited by heparin or the removal of heparan sulfates from cells using bacterial heparinases.

Different modes of spacer acquisition by the Staphylococcus epidermidis type III-A CRISPR-Cas system.

CRISPR-Cas systems provide prokaryotic organisms with an adaptive defense mechanism that acquires immunological memories of infections. This is accomplished by integration of short fragments from the genome of invaders such as phages and plasmids, called ‘spacers’, into the CRISPR locus of the host. Depending on their genetic composition, CRISPR-Cas systems can be classified into six types, I-VI, however spacer acquisition has been extensively studied only in type I and II systems. Here, we used an inducible spacer acquisition assay to study this process in the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system of Staphylococcus epidermidis, in the absence of phage selection. Similarly to type I and II spacer acquisition, this type III system uses Cas1 and Cas2 to preferentially integrate spacers from the chromosomal terminus and free dsDNA ends produced after DNA breaks, in a manner that is enhanced by the AddAB DNA repair complex. Surprisingly, a different mode of spacer acquisition from rRNA and tRNA loci, which spans only the transcribed sequences of these genes and is not enhanced by AddAB, was also detected. Therefore, our findings reveal both common mechanistic principles that may be conserved in all CRISPR-Cas systems, as well as unique and intriguing features of type III spacer acquisition.

High-MOI induces rapid CRISPR spacer acquisition in Sulfolobus from an acr deficient virus.

Spacer acquisition, the first step in CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity, plays a critical role in establishing and strengthening host defense against mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Here we present a host-virus system, where an increase in the multiplicity of infection (MOI), of a CRISPR-Cas susceptible virus, forces rapid spacer acquisition in the Sulfolobus islandicus LAL14/1 CRISPR arrays. Spacer acquisition was observed as early as 30 minutes post infection, with the newly acquired spacers uniformly distributed across the genome of the virus. Although the newly acquired spacers were predominantly effective only against the CRISPR-Cas susceptible mutant virus, we were able to isolate a host mutant with a novel spacer which provides immunity against the multiple Acr encoding wildtype virus, Sulfolobus islandicus rod-shaped virus 2 (SIRV2).

Investigating the Genomic Background of CRISPR-Cas Genomes for CRISPR-Based Antimicrobials.

CRISPR-Cas systems are an adaptive immunity that protects prokaryotes against foreign genetic elements. Genetic templates acquired during past infection events enable DNA-interacting enzymes to recognize foreign DNA for destruction. Due to the programmability and specificity of these genetic templates, CRISPR-Cas systems are potential alternative antibiotics that can be engineered to self-target antimicrobial resistance genes on the chromosome or plasmid. However, several fundamental questions remain to repurpose these tools against drug-resistant bacteria. For endogenous CRISPR-Cas self-targeting, antimicrobial resistance genes and functional CRISPR-Cas systems have to co-occur in the target cell. Furthermore, these tools have to outplay DNA repair pathways that respond to the nuclease activities of Cas proteins, even for exogenous CRISPR-Cas delivery. Here, we conduct a comprehensive survey of CRISPR-Cas genomes. First, we address the co-occurrence of CRISPR-Cas systems and antimicrobial resistance genes in the CRISPR-Cas genomes. We show that the average number of these genes varies greatly by the CRISPR-Cas type, and some CRISPR-Cas types (IE and IIIA) have over 20 genes per genome. Next, we investigate the DNA repair pathways of these CRISPR-Cas genomes, revealing that the diversity and frequency of these pathways differ by the CRISPR-Cas type. The interplay between CRISPR-Cas systems and DNA repair pathways is essential for the acquisition of new spacers in CRISPR arrays. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate that the efficiency of these DNA repair pathways may be inferred from the time-series patterns in the RNA structure of CRISPR repeats. This bioinformatic survey of CRISPR-Cas genomes elucidates the necessity to consider multifaceted interactions between different genes and systems, to design effective CRISPR-based antimicrobials that can specifically target drug-resistant bacteria in natural microbial communities.

Bacteriostatic antibiotics promote CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity by enabling increased spacer acquisition

Phages impose strong selection on bacteria to evolve resistance against viral predation. Bacteria can rapidly evolve phage resistance via receptor mutation or using their CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems. Acquisition of CRISPR immunity relies on the insertion of a phage-derived sequence into CRISPR arrays in the bacterial genome. Using Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its phage DMS3vir as a model, we demonstrate that conditions that reduce bacterial growth rates, such as exposure to bacteriostatic antibiotics (which inhibit cell growth without killing), promote the evolution of CRISPR immunity. We demonstrate that this is due to slower phage development under these conditions, which provides more time for cells to acquire phage-derived sequences and mount an immune response. Our data reveal that the speed of phage development is a key determinant of the evolution of CRISPR immunity and suggest that use of bacteriostatic antibiotics can trigger elevated levels of CRISPR immunity in human-associated and natural environments.

Identification and classification of reverse transcriptases in bacterial genomes and metagenomes.

Reverse transcriptases (RTs) are found in different systems including group II introns, Diversity Generating Retroelements (DGRs), retrons, CRISPR-Cas systems, and Abortive Infection (Abi) systems in prokaryotes. Different classes of RTs can play different roles, such as template switching and mobility in group II introns, spacer acquisition in CRISPR-Cas systems, mutagenic retrohoming in DGRs, programmed cell suicide in Abi systems, and recently discovered phage defense in retrons. While some classes of RTs have been studied extensively, others remain to be characterized. There is a lack of computational tools for identifying and characterizing various classes of RTs. In this study, we built a tool (called myRT) for identification and classification of prokaryotic RTs. In addition, our tool provides information about the genomic neighborhood of each RT, providing potential functional clues. We applied our tool to predict RTs in all complete and draft bacterial genomes, and created a collection that can be used for exploration of putative RTs and their associated protein domains. Application of myRT to metagenomes showed that gut metagenomes encode proportionally more RTs related to DGRs, outnumbering retron-related RTs, as compared to the collection of reference genomes. MyRT is both available as a standalone software (https://github.com/mgtools/myRT) and also through a website (https://omics.informatics.indiana.edu/myRT/).

Unique properties of spacer acquisition by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system.

Type III CRISPR-Cas systems have a unique mode of interference, involving crRNA-guided recognition of nascent RNA and leading to DNA and RNA degradation. How type III systems acquire new CRISPR spacers is currently not well understood. Here, we characterize CRISPR spacer uptake by a type III-A system within its native host, Streptococcus thermophilus. Adaptation by the type II-A system in the same host provided a basis for comparison. Cas1 and Cas2 proteins were critical for type III adaptation but deletion of genes responsible for crRNA biogenesis or interference did not detectably change spacer uptake patterns, except those related to host counter-selection. Unlike the type II-A system, type III spacers are acquired in a PAM- and orientation-independent manner. Interestingly, certain regions of plasmids and the host genome were particularly well-sampled during type III-A, but not type II-A, spacer uptake. These regions included the single-stranded origins of rolling-circle replicating plasmids, rRNA and tRNA encoding gene clusters, promoter regions of expressed genes and 5′ UTR regions involved in transcription attenuation. These features share the potential to form DNA secondary structures, suggesting a preferred substrate for type III adaptation. Lastly, the type III-A system adapted to and protected host cells from lytic phage infection.

Potential Use of CRISPR/Cas13 Machinery in Understanding Virus-Host Interaction.

Prokaryotes have evolutionarily acquired an immune system to fend off invading mobile genetic elements, including viral phages and plasmids. Through recognizing specific sequences of the invading nucleic acid, prokaryotes mediate a subsequent degradation process collectively referred to as the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR-associated (Cas) (CRISPR–Cas) system. The CRISPR–Cas systems are divided into two main classes depending on the structure of the effector Cas proteins. Class I systems have effector modules consisting of multiple proteins, while class II systems have a single multidomain effector. Additionally, the CRISPR–Cas systems can also be categorized into types depending on the spacer acquisition components and their evolutionary features, namely, types I–VI. Among CRISPR/Cas systems, Cas9 is one of the most common multidomain nucleases that identify, degrade, and modulate DNA. Importantly, variants of Cas proteins have recently been found to target RNA, especially the single-effector Cas13 nucleases. The Cas13 has revolutionized our ability to study and perturb RNAs in endogenous microenvironments. The Cas13 effectors offer an excellent candidate for developing novel research tools in virological and biotechnological fields. Herein, in this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive summary of the recent advances of Cas13s for targeting viral RNA for either RNA-mediated degradation or CRISPR–Cas13-based diagnostics. Additionally, we aim to provide an overview of the proposed applications that could revolutionize our understanding of viral–host interactions using Cas13-mediated approaches.

Mechanism for Cas4-assisted directional spacer acquisition in CRISPR-Cas.

Prokaryotes adapt to challenges from mobile genetic elements by integrating spacers derived from foreign DNA in the CRISPR array1. Spacer insertion is carried out by the Cas1-Cas2 integrase complex2-4. A substantial fraction of CRISPR-Cas systems use a Fe-S cluster containing Cas4 nuclease to ensure that spacers are acquired from DNA flanked by a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)5,6 and inserted into the CRISPR array unidirectionally, so that the transcribed CRISPR RNA can guide target searching in a PAM-dependent manner. Here we provide a high-resolution mechanistic explanation for the Cas4-assisted PAM selection, spacer biogenesis and directional integration by type I-G CRISPR in Geobacter sulfurreducens, in which Cas4 is naturally fused with Cas1, forming Cas4/Cas1. During biogenesis, only DNA duplexes possessing a PAM-embedded 3'-overhang trigger Cas4/Cas1-Cas2 assembly. During this process, the PAM overhang is specifically recognized and sequestered, but is not cleaved by Cas4. This 'molecular constipation' prevents the PAM-side prespacer from participating in integration. Lacking such sequestration, the non-PAM overhang is trimmed by host nucleases and integrated to the leader-side CRISPR repeat. Half-integration subsequently triggers PAM cleavage and Cas4 dissociation, allowing spacer-side integration. Overall, the intricate molecular interaction between Cas4 and Cas1-Cas2 selects PAM-containing prespacers for integration and couples the timing of PAM processing with the stepwise integration to establish directionality.

Analysis of Probiotic Bacteria Genomes: Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Systems and Spacer Acquisition Diversity.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12088-021-00971-1.

Cas4-Cas1 Is a Protospacer Adjacent Motif-Processing Factor Mediating Half-Site Spacer Integration During CRISPR Adaptation.

The immunization of bacteria and archaea against invading viruses via CRISPR adaptation is critically reliant on the efficient capture, accurate processing, and integration of CRISPR spacers into the host genome. The adaptation proteins Cas1 and Cas2 are sufficient for successful spacer acquisition in some CRISPR-Cas systems. However, many CRISPR-Cas systems additionally require the Cas4 protein for efficient adaptation. Cas4 has been implied in the selection and processing of spacer precursors, but the detailed mechanistic understanding of how Cas4 contributes to CRISPR adaptation is lacking. Here, we biochemically reconstitute the CRISPR-Cas type I-D adaptation system and show two functionally distinct adaptation complexes: Cas4-Cas1 and Cas1-Cas2. The Cas4-Cas1 complex recognizes and cleaves protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences in 3' overhangs in a sequence-specific manner, while the Cas1-Cas2 complex defines the cleavage of non-PAM sites via host-factor nucleases. Both sub-complexes are capable of mediating half-site integration, facilitating the integration of processed spacers in the correct interference-proficient orientation. We provide a model in which an asymmetric adaptation complex differentially acts on PAM- and non-PAM-containing overhangs, providing cues for the correct orientation of spacer integration.

Prespacers formed during primed adaptation associate with the Cas1–Cas2 adaptation complex and the Cas3 interference nuclease–helicase

For Type I CRISPR-Cas systems, a mode of CRISPR adaptation named priming has been described. Priming allows specific and highly efficient acquisition of new spacers from DNA recognized (primed) by the Cascade-crRNA (CRISPR RNA) effector complex. Recognition of the priming protospacer by Cascade-crRNA serves as a signal for engaging the Cas3 nuclease-helicase required for both interference and primed adaptation, suggesting the existence of a primed adaptation complex (PAC) containing the Cas1-Cas2 adaptation integrase and Cas3. To detect this complex in vivo, we here performed chromatin immunoprecipitation with Cas3-specific and Cas1-specific antibodies using cells undergoing primed adaptation. We found that prespacers are bound by both Cas1 (presumably, as part of the Cas1-Cas2 integrase) and Cas3, implying direct physical association of the interference and adaptation machineries as part of PAC.

Primed CRISPR-Cas Adaptation and Impaired Phage Adsorption in Streptococcus mutans.

ABSTRACTStreptococcus mutans strain P42S possesses a type II-A CRISPR-Cas system that protects against phage infection and plasmid transformation. The analysis of 293 bacteriophage-insensitive mutants (BIMs) obtained upon exposure to the virulent phage M102AD revealed the acquisition of 399 unique spacers, including several ectopic spacer acquisitions and a few cases of native spacer deletions. The acquisition of multiple spacers was also observed and appears to be mostly due to priming, which has been rarely reported for type II-A systems. Analyses of the acquired spacers indicated that 88% of them are identical to a region of the phage M102AD genome. The remaining 12% of spacers had mismatches with the phage genome, primarily at the 5′ end of the spacer, leaving the seed sequence at the 3′ end largely intact. When a high multiplicity of infection (MOI) was used in the phage challenge assays, we also observed the emergence of CRISPR BIMs that, in addition to the acquisition of new spacers, displayed a reduced phage adsorption phenotype. While CRISPR-Cas and adsorption resistance work in tandem to protect S. mutans P42S against phage M102AD, nonidentified antiviral mechanisms are also likely at play in this strain.IMPORTANCE Bacteria are under the constant threat of viral predation and have therefore developed several defense mechanisms, including CRISPR-Cas systems. While studies on the mode of action of CRISPR-Cas systems have already provided great insights into phage-bacterium interactions, still more information is needed on the biology of these systems. The additional characterization of the type II-A CRISPR-Cas system of Streptococcus mutans P42S in this study provides novel information on the spacer acquisition step, especially regarding protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) recognition, multiple-spacer acquisition, and priming.

Understanding the role of Cas4 during adaptation in CRISPR‐Cas immune systems

CRISPR-Cas systems (Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and associated proteins) are adaptive immune systems that protect bacteria and archaea against invading phages. Spacer sequences derived from invader genome are arranged between repeat sequences in the CRISPR array. Upgrading the CRISPR array with new spacers is a crucial step to ensure bacterial systems are at pace with rapidly evolving phages. This is carried out by Cas1 and Cas2 proteins, universally present in most CRISPR systems. Many systems require proteins in addition to Cas1 and Cas2 to maintain the efficiency and fidelity of adaptation. Cas4 is one such protein and is part of the core family of Cas proteins in over half of known CRISPR systems. Cas4 carries a RecB like nuclease domain and initial studies on Cas4 characterized its function as a 5’ to 3’ exonuclease. Recent in-vivo and in-vitro studies have shown that Cas4 plays a role in selection, processing, and integration of functional spacers. Our lab has shown that Cas4 performs endonucleolytic processing of 3’ overhangs of prespacers in the presence of Cas1 and Cas2. Using negative stain EM, we have shown that Cas4 forms a complex with Cas1 and Cas2 in the presence of a potential spacer substrate. However, the exact mechanistic steps in Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 mediated integration remain unknown. Moreover, some systems encode Cas4-1 fusion proteins that provide an increased efficiency of spacer acquisition observed in-vivo. These fusions remain to be characterized biochemically. With this work, we aim to determine the sequence of events in integration in systems that have Cas4 and understand the structure function relationship of Cas4 in fusion with Cas1 and complex with Cas1-Cas2.

CRISPR-Cas systems in Proteus mirabilis.

The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) is a bacterial defense mechanism against bacteriophages composed of two different parts: the CRISPR array and the Cas genes. The spacer acquisition is done by the adaptation module consisting of the hallmark Cas1 Cas2 proteins, which inserts new spacers into the CRISPR array. Here we aimed to describe the CRISPR-Cas system in Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis) isolates. CRISPR loci was observed in 30 genomic contents of 109 P. mirabilis isolates that each locus was consisted of two CRISPR arrays and each array had a different preserved leader sequences. Only the type I-E CRISPR-Cas system was common in these isolates. The source of the spacers was identified, including phages and prophages. CRISPR spacer origin analysis also identified a conserved PAM sequence of 5'-AAG-3' nucleotide stretch. Through collecting spacers, CRISPR arrays of P. mirabilis isolates were expanded mostly by integration of bacteriophageal source of spacers. This study shows novel findings in the area of the P-mirabilis CRISPR-Cas system. In this regard, among analyzed genome of P. mirabilis isolates, Class I CRISR-Cas systems were dominant, and all belonged to type I-E. In the flanks of the CRISPR, some other elements with regulatory role were also found. A motif of 11nt size was found to be preserved among the analyzed genome. We believe that it might has a CRISPR-Cas system transcription facilitator by targeting the Rho element.

A distinct structure of Cas1–Cas2 complex provides insights into the mechanism for the longer spacer acquisition in Pyrococcus furiosus

In the adaptation stage of CRISPR-Cas systems, the Cas1–Cas2 integrase captures and integrates new invader-derived spacers into the CRISPR locus, serving as a molecular memory of prior infection. As of yet, the structural information of Cas1–Cas2 complex is available only for two species. Here we present the crystal structure of Cas1–Cas2 complex of Pyrococcus furiosus, which showed a distinct architecture from the known Cas1–Cas2 complexes. The shorter C-terminal tail of Pfu Cas2 directs the Cas1 dimers go in the opposite direction, resulting in a different prespacer binding mode. Based on our structural and mutagenesis results, we modeled a prespacer with a shorter duplex and longer 3′ overhangs to bind Pfu Cas1–Cas2 complex. The prespacer preference was confirmed by EMSA, fluorescence polarization, and in vitro integration assays. This model provides a potential explanation for the longer spacer acquisition observed in P. furiosus when deleting both cas4 genes. Our study highlights the diversity of the CRISPR adaptation module.