Cleaning up brownfields such as Superfund sites is expected to catalyze neighborhood change in the vicinity. Several previous studies have estimated changes in housing prices associated with Superfund sites, with mixed results. This paper provides new estimates of price effects associated with cleanups of these brownfields and assesses alternative explanations for previous results. Issues such as stigma, sorting and Tiebout bias, and housing supply conditions motivate the analysis. Prominent models of housing market responses to brownfield cleanups (e.g., Greenstone and Gallagher 2008) raise important issues of how timing and location are handled in the research design. This analysis shows the sensitivity of results to alternative specifications using different (and arguably more robust) definitions of neighborhoods and different milestones in the cleanup process. Housing price effects are estimated using first-differenced models with Census data aggregated at the block-group level for all metro areas in the nation (from 1990 to 2000). The remediation treatment variable is defined based on three different phases in Superfund cleanup process, and proximity is defined based on alternative spatial proximity measures. An instrumental variables estimator, where lagged geographic and political factors instrument for Superfund site cleanups is used. The results show substantial policy endogeneity and significant variation across alternative proximity definitions, as expected. The variation in results by cleanup phase offer insights into the timing of market responses to amenity improvements. The initial results show a generally positive causal impact of progress towards cleaning up Superfund sites, although completion of the high-visibility “construction” phase attenuates some of that positive effect. The presence of significant indirect price effects would suggest that Superfund site cleanups can trigger changes in other aspects of the neighborhood – transforming the composition of the housing stock and neighbor mix in the area. Our results point to a small indirect effect of improved environmental quality, indicating that these brownfield cleanups catalyze minimal neighborhood change. Thus, policy endogeneity, timing, and spatial definitions matter greatly to identifying price impacts of brownfield cleanups. Transforming neighborhoods more generally, however, does not appear to play an important role in brownfield redevelopment.