Duration Of Sorafenib Treatment Research Articles

Sorafenib treatment duration in desmoid tumors.

11585 Background: Desmoid tumors are soft-tissue neoplasms, which, although unable to metastasize, can cause significant morbidity due to local invasion. Currently, the first-line approach is active surveillance. For tumors that progress during surveillance, systemic therapies can be used, including nirogacestat, sorafenib, pazopanib, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, their optimal duration is unknown. Here, we aim to assess the risk of treatment failure after discontinuing sorafenib before one year. Methods: We analyzed all patients with desmoid tumors treated with sorafenib at three academic centers from 01/01/2000-12/01/2021. We included patients who discontinued sorafenib not due to radiological or clinical progression and had documented no intention to start the next line of therapy at the time of discontinuation. The primary endpoint was 2-year treatment-free survival between patients who stopped sorafenib before and after 1 year. The secondary endpoint was the rate of toxic effects recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events during treatment. We calculated treatment-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method with the Log-Rank Test to estimate the 95% confidence interval. All patients were censored at the 2-year mark. Fischer’s Exact T-test was performed to assess between-group differences. Results: 40 patients received sorafenib and discontinued it with no intention to start a next line of therapy. The main reasons for discontinuation were side effects (n=21, 52%) and physician-patient preference (n=10, 25%). 27 (67%)were women, and median age at diagnosis was 36.Regarding race and ethnicity,27 (47%)were White, 8 (20%)were Black, and 16 (40%) were Latino. The tumor was in the lower extremity in 10 (25%) cases, trunk in 3 (7%) cases, abdominal wall in 10 (25%), intra-abdominal in 5 (12%), upper extremity in 5 (12%) head-neck in 1 and breast in 1. 20 patients stopped treatment before one year and 20 after one year, with 7 and 3 patients requiring a next line of therapy in each group, respectively. The 2-year treatment-free survival was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.85) in the prior to 1-year group and 87.5% (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.0) in the post-1-year group (P = 0.046). The most frequently reported adverse events while on sorafenib were grade 1 or 2 events of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (40%) and diarrhea (40%), with no difference between groups on therapy discontinuation due to side effects (p=0.1). Conclusions: Discontinuing sorafenib prior to 1 year was associated with a higher risk of requiring further therapy within the following two years. Still, most patients did not require additional therapy. This finding underscores the complexity of determining the optimal duration for sorafenib therapy, and multiple features should be considered, including side effects, symptom improvement, fertility planning, tumor cellularity (evaluated by T2 MRI signal), and physician-patient shared decision.

Anti-miR-518d-5p overcomes liver tumor cell death resistance through mitochondrial activity

Dysregulation of miRNAs is a hallmark of cancer, modulating oncogenes, tumor suppressors, and drug responsiveness. The multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib is one of the first-line drugs for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although the outcome for treated patients is heterogeneous. The identification of predictive biomarkers and targets of sorafenib efficacy are sorely needed. Thus, selected top upregulated miRNAs from the C19MC cluster were analyzed in different hepatoma cell lines compared to immortalized liver human cells, THLE-2 as control. MiR-518d-5p showed the most consistent upregulation among them. Thus, miR-518d-5p was measured in liver tumor/non-tumor samples of two distinct cohorts of HCC patients (n = 16 and n = 20, respectively). Circulating miR-518d-5p was measured in an independent cohort of HCC patients receiving sorafenib treatment (n = 100), where miR-518d-5p was analyzed in relation to treatment duration and patient’s overall survival. In vitro and in vivo studies were performed in human hepatoma BCLC3 and Huh7 cells to analyze the effect of miR-518d-5p inhibition/overexpression during the response to sorafenib. Compared with healthy individuals, miR-518d-5p levels were higher in hepatic and serum samples from HCC patients (n = 16) and in an additional cohort of tumor/non-tumor paired samples (n = 20). MiR-518d-5p, through the inhibition of c-Jun and its mitochondrial target PUMA, desensitized human hepatoma cells and mouse xenograft to sorafenib-induced apoptosis. Finally, serum miR-518d-5p was assessed in 100 patients with HCC of different etiologies and BCLC-stage treated with sorafenib. In BCLC-C patients, higher serum miR-518d-5p at diagnosis was associated with shorter sorafenib treatment duration and survival. Hence, hepatic miR-518d-5p modulates sorafenib resistance in HCC through inhibition of c-Jun/PUMA-induced apoptosis. Circulating miR-518d-5p emerges as a potential lack of response biomarker to sorafenib in BCLC-C HCC patients.

Real-world experience of regorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter United Kingdom study.

499 Background: Regorafenib was the first treatment to demonstrate a survival benefit in patients with HCC after progression on sorafenib. The RESORCE trial found that regorafenib improved overall survival with acceptable toxicity, in patients with disease progression on sorafenib who tolerated ≥400mg sorafenib daily and had Child-Pugh A liver function. Methods: We performed a multicentre, retrospective, observational study of patients with HCC receiving regorafenib in the UK, following its availability in April 2018. Results: Data on a total of 104 patients were included from April 2018–August 2019, and 80.8% were male. Age was collected in 85 patients, with a median of 68 years (range 22–86). 23.5% had NAFLD, 21.2% had ALD, 12.9% had HBV, and 3.5% had HCV. Prior management included sorafenib (100%), TACE (30.8%), resection (12.9%). Duration of sorafenib treatment was evaluable in 99/104 patients, and reported a median of 8.7 months (range 1.8–76.6). Duration of regorafenib treatment was evaluable in 92/104 patients, and reported a median of 3.9 months (range 0.0–15.7). Following treatment with regorafenib, 6 patients (5.8%) achieved partial response, 37 (35.6%) achieved stable disease and 45 (43.3%) had progressive disease as the best response. 15 (14.4%) were not assessed and 1 (1.1%) had mixed response. Survival data is immature with 62/101 (61.4%) patients alive at the time of census with median survival currently 6.5 months. Fatigue was the most frequent AE, with 69/88 patients (85.2%) for all grades. 12/88 patients (14.8%) had Grade 3 fatigue. Other significant AEs include hand-foot syndrome (6/85 patients [7.3%] had Grade 3) and diarrhoea (4/83 patients [4.9%] had Grade 3). Conclusions: The population in our real-world experience of regorafenib for HCC had a similar duration of prior sorafenib to those in the RESORCE trial. However, there was different balance of aetiologies with a lower proportion of patients with HBV and HCV. The rate of partial response is similar to the RESORCE trial with fewer patients achieving stable disease. The incidence of fatigue was higher, but the incidence of hand-foot syndrome and diarrhoea were lower. Further expansion and follow-up of this population is warranted.

Sequential therapy with sorafenib and regorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.

Background Conversion from sorafenib to regorafenib is primarily an evidence-based treatment strategy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of sequential therapy with sorafenib and regorafenib in patients with advanced HCC by analysis of outcomes in clinical practice with the aim to complement phase III findings. Methods The medical records of patients with advanced HCC receiving regorafenib were retrieved to collect data on sorafenib administration at seven Japanese institutions. Radiological responses and adverse events were evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, respectively. Results Before March 2018, 44 patients were administered regorafenib for advanced HCC. The median sorafenib treatment duration was 8.4months. The most common adverse events were similar to those reported by the RESORCE trial. The median overall survival (OS) was 17.3months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.4-22.9), and 17 of 37 patients (45.9%) discontinued regorafenib and received sequential systemic therapy after regorafenib. These patients had significantly longer OS than those who were treated by the best supportive care or sub-optimal therapy (not reached versus 8.7months [95% CI 5.8-11.7]; P < 0.001). Conclusion The results based on Japanese clinical practices verified the tolerability of regorafenib in advanced HCC. Major regorafenib-associated adverse events were similar to those related to sorafenib. OS was significantly longer than expected, which might be associated with the sequential systemic therapies after regorafenib, mainly lenvatinib.

Sorafenib alone vs. sorafenib plus GEMOX as 1st-line treatment for advanced HCC: the phase II randomised PRODIGE 10 trial

BackgroundSorafenib remains one major first-line therapeutic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC), with modest efficacy. We investigated the addition of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) to sorafenib in aHCC patients.MethodsOur multicentre phase II trial randomised aHCC first-line patients to sorafenib (400 mg BID) or sorafenib-GEMOX every 2 weeks (1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine; 100 mg/m2 oxaliplatin). Primary endpoint was the 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate.ResultsNinety-four patients were randomised (sorafenib-GEMOX: n = 48; sorafenib: n = 46). Median age was 64 years, PS 0 (69%) or 1 (31%), 63% patients had cirrhosis, 29% portal vein thrombosis and 70% extra-hepatic disease. Median duration of sorafenib treatment was 4 months (1–51); median number of GEMOX cycles was 7 (1–16). The 4-month PFS rates were 64% and 61% in the sorafenib-GEMOX and sorafenib arms, respectively; median PFS and OS were 6.2 (95% CI: 3.8–6.8) and 13.5 (7.5–16.2) months, and 4.6 (3.9–6.2) months and 14.8 (12.2–22.2), respectively. The ORR/DCR were 9%/70% and 15%/77% in the sorafenib-GEMOX and sorafenib alone arms, respectively. Main toxicities were (sorafenib-GEMOX/sorafenib) neutropenia (23%/0), thrombocytopenia (33%/0), diarrhoea (18%/9), peripheral neuropathy (5%/0) and hand–foot syndrome (5%/18).ConclusionsAddition of GEMOX had an inpact on ORR and was well-tolerated as frontline systemic therapy. The benefit on PFS seems moderate; no subsequent study was planned.

Skeletal muscle mass is associated with toxicity, treatment tolerability, and additional or subsequent therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving sorafenib treatment.

Background and AimSeveral reports have demonstrated that skeletal muscle mass influences mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving sorafenib treatment; however, there is still controversy with regard to whether skeletal muscle and adipose tissue are associated with the prognosis in HCC patients. We examined the relationship between body composition and prognosis in HCC patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 82 patients with unresectable HCC receiving sorafenib treatment. The skeletal muscle area and adipose tissue area were measured by computed tomography. Patients with low skeletal muscle index (male ≤36.2 cm2/m2, female ≤29.6 cm2/m2) and high visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR) (male ≥ 1.33, female ≥ 0.93) were diagnosed as low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) and high VSR, respectively.ResultsA total of 16 and 34 patients were classified as LSMM and high VSR, respectively. LSMM patients frequently experienced serious adverse events (SAEs) and thus had a shorter duration of sorafenib treatment than non‐LSMM patients. High VSR was a significant factor for progression‐free survival. LSMM patients less frequently received additional/subsequent therapies combined with sorafenib than non‐LSMM patients. Multivariate Cox hazard analysis demonstrated that LSMM was a significant factor for the duration of sorafenib treatment. The treatment duration and receiving of additional/subsequent therapies were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) but not with LSMM or high VSR.ConclusionLSMM was associated with the frequency of SAEs, treatment tolerability, and treatment duration. LSMM patients were less likely to receive additional/subsequent therapies than non‐LSMM patients. Thus, LSMM could identify a subgroup of patients with poor OS.

Efficacy of on-demand intrahepatic arterial therapy in combination with sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of “on-demand” combination therapy with sorafenib and hepatic arterial treatments, such as transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Patients and methodsEighty consecutive patients with advanced HCC, 58 administered sorafenib monotherapy and 22 administered on-demand combination therapy, were retrospectively evaluated.ResultsThe disease control rate was significantly higher in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (86.3% vs 51.7%, p=0.01). Elevated alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly more frequent in the combination group (40.9% vs 12.1%, p=0.01), but it was tolerable. Progression-free survival (180 vs 45 days, p=0.045) and overall survival (983 vs 452 days, p=0.004) were significantly longer in the combination group, as was the duration of sorafenib treatment (367 vs 66 days, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that hepatitis C virus infection, disease control, and combination therapy were positive independent prognostic factors for survival, whereas alpha-fetoprotein >400 ng/mL was negatively prognostic. In patients receiving combination therapy, male sex, hepatitis B virus infection, performance status deterioration, Barcelona clinic liver cancer-B, and major vascular invasion were prognostic of survival.ConclusionOn-demand combination therapy was tolerated and may be a therapeutic option for patients with advanced HCC.

Increased Expression of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 in Infiltrating Immune Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tissues after Sorafenib Treatment

Objective: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in the tumor microenvironment (TME) has been reported to be related to prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. The impact of sorafenib on PD-L1 expression in the TME of advanced HCC is unclear. Patients and Methods: Patients with HCC who received sorafenib for advanced disease at National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, and who had paired HCC tissues obtained before and after sorafenib treatment were included in the study group. HCC patients not treated with sorafenib who had paired primary and recurrent or metastatic tissues were identified as the reference group. The membrane PD-L1 staining, detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using SP142 antibody, was semiquantitatively scored in tumor cells (TCs) or tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs). Additional IHC assays were employed to characterize the PD-L1-expressing ICs. Results: Twenty-three advanced HCC patients with pre- and post-sorafenib paired HCC tissues were included in the study group. The median duration of sorafenib treatment was 4.3 months (range: 1.3–18.7). PD-L1 expression in ICs was significantly higher in post-sorafenib HCC tissues than in pre-sorafenib HCC tissues (pre-sorafenib vs. post-sorafenib IHC 0/1/2/3: 11/5/5/2 vs. 5/5/2/11, p = 0.016). However, PD-L1 expression in TCs was not significantly different between pre- and post-sorafenib tissues (IHC 0/1/2/3: 19/2/0/2 vs. 14/5/0/4, p = 0.094). In the reference group of 44 patients not treated with sorafenib, PD-L1 expression in ICs and TCs was not significantly different between the paired primary and metastatic HCC tissues. By performing IHC double staining with PD-L1 and CD68, we found the PD-L1-expressing ICs were mainly CD68-positive macrophages. PD-L1 expression levels of pre- and post-sorafenib tissues were not associated with patients’ overall survival or duration of sorafenib treatment. Conclusions: PD-L1 expression in ICs was significantly increased in post-sorafenib HCC tissues. The mechanisms and clinical significance of this observation warrants further investigation.

Prognostic Factors for Survival After Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Sorafenib in the Treatment of BCLC Stage B and C Hepatocellular Carcinomas

The objective of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for survival after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages B and C. Clinical data of 198 patients with BCLC stage B and C HCCs who underwent TACE combined with sorafenib between June 2012 and January 2017 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Survival curves were detected using log-rank test. Univariate analysis was performed using log-rank test with respect to 11 prognostic factors potentially affecting survival. All statistically significant prognostic factors identified by univariate analysis were entered into a Cox proportion hazards regression model to identify independent predictors of survival. P values were two-sided and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. By the end of this study, the median follow-up duration was 43.6 months. The median overall survival (OS) of the patients was 21.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.94-25.05), and the 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 72%, 43%, 28%, and 4%, respectively. Tumor size (χ2 = 33.607, P < 0.0001), tumor number (χ2 = 4.084, P = 0.043), Child-Pugh class (χ2 = 33.187, P < 0.0001), BCLC stage (χ2 = 50.224, P < 0.0001), portal vein tumor thrombus (χ2 = 88.905, P < 0.0001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (χ2 = 98.007, P < 0.0001), extrahepatic spread (χ2 = 34.980, P < 0.0001), TACE times (χ2 = 8.350, P = 0.015), and sorafenib treatment strategy (χ2 = 81.593, P < 0.0001) were found to be significantly associated with OS by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that BCLC stage (95% CI: 1.133-3.982, P = 0.019), extrahepatic spread (95% CI: 1.136-2.774, P = 0.012), and sorafenib treatment duration (95% CI: 0.352-0.574, P = 0.000) were independent prognostic factors associated with OS. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events. This study showed that extrahepatic spread was a risk factor, and sorafenib treatment and superior BCLC stage were protective factors. Therefore, the study indicated that TACE combined with sorafenib was an effective and safe treatment for patients with BCLC stage B HCC without extrahepatic spread.

Abstract 1636: Increased expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on infiltrating immune cells of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues after sorafenib treatment

Abstract Background: PD-L1 expression in tumor microenvironment of HCC was reported to associate with tumor aggressiveness and recurrence. The impact of sorafenib treatment on PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TC) or tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) of HCC has been unclear. Patients and Methods: We reviewed patients with HCC who had received sorafenib for advanced diseases at National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Patients with paired HCC tissues, obtained before and after sorafenib treatment, were included. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay with clone SP142 antibody (Spring Bioscience, Pleasanton, CA, USA) was performed to analyze PD-L1 expression on TC and IC in paired specimens obtained before and after sorafenib. PD-L1 expression was scored as IHC 0, 1, 2, or 3 if &amp;lt;1%, ≥1% but &amp;lt;5%, ≥5% but &amp;lt;10%, or ≥10% of cells were PD-L1 positive, respectively. Further IHC assay was employed to characterize the PD-L1-positive IC. Associations between the PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) or duration of sorafenib treatment of the patients were analyzed. Results: Twenty-three advanced HCC patients (Male: Female= 20: 3, median age of 64 years) with paired HCC tissues were included. All of the post-sorafenib HCC tissues were obtained after disease progression. The median duration of sorafenib treatment was 4.3 months (range: 1.3 to 18.7). The PD-L1 expression on IC was significantly increased in post-sorafenib HCC tissues, compared with tissues obtained before sorafenib (pre-sorafenib vs post-sorafenib IHC 0/1/2/3: 10/5/5/3 vs 5/5/2/11, p=0.046). However, the PD-L1 expression on TC was not significantly different between pre- and post-sorafenib tissues (IHC 0/1/2/3: 19/2/0/2 vs 14/5/0/4, p=0.065). By using IHC staining of CD68, CD66b, CD11b, and CD3 on the consecutive slides, we found the PD-L1-expressing IC were mainly CD68-positive macrophages, but not neutrophils or T lymphocytes. Neither the PD-L1 expression levels on IC of pre-sorafenib or those of post-sorafenib tissues were associated with OS or duration of sorafenib treatment. Conclusions: The PD-L1 expression on IC, especially on macrophages, in tumor microenvironment was significantly increased in post-sorafenib progression HCC tissues. Whether this increased PD-L1 expression contributes to treatment failure of sorafenib warrants further investigation (This work was supported by the grants of NTUH 105-M3232 and MOST 105-2314-B-002-180). Citation Format: Li-Chun Lu, Yi-Hsuan Lee, Chun-Jung Chang, Yu-Yun Shao, Tsung-hao Liu, Ann-Lii Cheng, Chih-Hung Hsu. Increased expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on infiltrating immune cells of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues after sorafenib treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1636. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1636

Retrospective analysis of transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib in Chinese patients with unresectable and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

We explored the hypothesis that sorafenib may improve the effect of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and that longer sorafenib duration was associated with additional survival benefits. In this retrospective, nested case-controlled study, 1126 cases of unresectable HCC were collected. Patients with unresectable disease treated with TACE+sorafenib (n=245) and TACE alone (n=245) and those with recurrence after surgery treated with TACE+sorafenib (n=127) and TACE alone (n=127) were identified and matched according to sex, age, and lesion size and number. The clinicopathological factors associated with survival were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. The mean duration of sorafenib treatment was 10.8±10.51 months. Sorafenib significantly increased the median survival time as compared to TACE alone (unresectable HCC: 20.23 vs. 13.97 months, respectively; p=0.013 and recurrent HCC: 30.7 and 18.22 months, respectively; p=0.003). The survival of patients with unresectable HCC was associated with the presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (HR=1.47, p=0.004) and treatment method (TACE+sorafenib combination therapy; HR=0.72, p=0.003). For patients with recurrent HCC, the presence of extrahepatic metastasis (HR=1.71, p=0.012) and treatment method (TACE+sorafenib therapy; HR=0.60, p=0.002) also was associated with survival. For patients treated with TACE+sorafenib, multivariate analysis showed decreased hazard of death with longer duration of sorafenib treatment (HR=0.9, p<0.001). Thus, sorafenib plus TACE may provide survival benefits, which may be related with sorafenib treatment duration, particularly for patients with HCC recurrence. Further clinical studies are required to confirm these results and identify which patients are most likely to benefit from this therapeutic strategy.

Evaluation of dose-efficacy of sorafenib and effect of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a retrospective study.

BackgroundTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib are the therapeutic standard for intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients respectively. High costs with adverse events (AE) of sorafenib might limit sorafenib dosage, further affecting therapeutic response. To attain greatest benefit, we evaluated the efficacy of different doses and effect of TACE during and after sorafenib discontinuation in patients representing Child-Pugh Classification Class A with venous or extra-hepatic invasion.MethodsA total 156 patients met the criteria and were divided into Groups I (n = 52) accepting 800 mg/day; II (n = 58) accepting 800 mg/day and reduced to 400 mg/day owing to AE; and III (n = 46) accepting 400 mg/day. TACE was performed during and after sorafenib discontinuation and therapeutic response bimonthly to four-monthly was rated thereafter.ResultsMedian duration of sorafenib treatment and patients’ survival were 4.00 ± 0.45 and 7.50 ± 1.44 months in all cases; 2.50 ± 0.90 and 5.00 ± 1.10 months in Group I; 5.50 ± 1.27 and 16.50 ± 1.86 months in Group II; 4.00 ± 0.94 and 6.50 ± 2.49 months in Group III. Group II presented the best response and survival benefit (p = 0.010 and p = 0.011 respectively). Child-Pugh Classification score 5 (Hazard Ratio = 0.492, p = 0.049), absent AE (3.423, p = 0.015), tumor numbers ≤ 3 (0.313, p = 0.009), sorafenib duration ≤ 1 cycle (3.694, p = 0.004), and absent TACE (3.197, p = 0.008) significantly correlated with patient survival. TACE benefit appeared in separate and total cases during (p = 0.002, p = 0.595, p = 0.074, p = 0.002 respectively) and after discontinuation of sorafenib administration (p = 0.001, p = 0.034, p = 0.647, p = 0.001 respectively).ConclusionsLow-dosage sorafenib not only appeared tolerable and lowered economic pressure but also provided satisfactory results. TACE benefited patient’s survival during and after sorafenib discontinuation.

Synergistic effect of sorafenib and cGvHD in patients with high-risk FLT3-ITD+AML allows long-term disease control after allogeneic transplantation.

The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib has shown a strong anti-leukemic effect in FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, remission is often transient. To better understand the role of sorafenib, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who received sorafenib in combination with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at our center. Seventeen patients with FLT3-ITD positive AML were treated with sorafenib in combination with allogeneic HSCT. Seven patients received sorafenib therapy pre- and posttransplant, and 10 patients were given sorafenib only posttransplant. Median duration of sorafenib treatment was 13months (range 1-42); median dose was 600mg (range 100-1200). Fourteen patients (82%) achieved a complete remission (CR), while 5 patients (29%) eventually developed progressive disease. Developing chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) had a strong protective influence on the risk of sorafenib resistance (p = 0.028, HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.76). In a total of 8 patients, sorafenib had to be stopped, paused or dose-reduced due to toxicity. In 5 patients with pronounced toxicity, we switched to an alternating dosing schedule with 1month on/1month off sorafenib. These patients subsequently remained in sustained complete molecular remission, with a median follow-up of 20months. Our data indicate that sorafenib can achieve high rates of sustained remission in high-risk patients treated in combination with HSCT.

Clinical outcomes of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: a retrospective study of routine clinical practice in multi-institutions.

BackgroundSorafenib is an orally administered multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic and antiproliferative properties. The results of large clinical trials demonstrate that sorafenib prolongs survival and the time to progression of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of the present study was to determine the outcomes of such patients who were routinely treated with sorafenib at multi-institutions in Korea, in contrast to formal clinical trials.MethodsBetween August 2007 and March 2012, patients with advanced HCC in seven referral medical centers in Daejeon-Chungcheong Province of Korea were retrospectively enrolled to evaluate treatment response, survival, and tolerability following administration of sorafenib. The treatment response was assessed in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor 1.1 guidelines.ResultsAmong 116 patients, 66 (57%) had undergone treatment for HCC, and 77 (66%) were accompanied with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. The median duration of sorafenib treatment was 67 days (range 14–452 days). Median overall survival and median time to progression were 141 days and 90 days, respectively. Complete response, partial response, and stable disease were achieved for 0%, 2%, and 29% of patients, respectively. Overall median survival, but not the median time to progression, was significantly shorter for patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis compared with those with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis (64 days vs 168 days, P = 0.004). Child-Pugh B cirrhosis (P = 0.024) and a high level of serum alpha-fetoprotein (P = 0.039) were independent risk factors for poor overall survival. Thirty-nine (34%) patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events such as hand-foot skin reactions and diarrhea that required dose adjustment.ConclusionsThe clinical outcomes of sorafenib-treated patients with advanced HCC were comparable to those reported by formal clinical trial conducted in the Asia-Pacific region. Underlying hepatic dysfunction was the most important risk factor for shorter survival.

Effectiveness of medical supportive team for outpatients treated with sorafenib: a retrospective study.

BackgroundIt is well known that molecular-targeted drugs, of which sorafenib (Nexavar®) is one, differ from previous anticancer drugs and cause various unusual adverse drug reactions. Treatment with sorafenib causes adverse drug reactions such as hand-foot skin reactions, hypertension, and diarrhea. Physicians spend a lot of time monitoring adverse drug reactions to sorafenib in outpatients. As such, at Okayama University Hospital, pharmacists and nurses have organized a medical supportive team to help physicians in this regard. However, the effectiveness of interventions for sorafenib-treated outpatients by this medical supportive team remains unclear. The purpose of this study was thus to clarify the effectiveness of interventions for sorafenib-treated outpatients by this medical supportive team.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 70 outpatients treated with sorafenib between May 2009 and December 2012 at Okayama University Hospital. These outpatients were classified into two groups, an intervention group (31 outpatients) and a non-intervention group (39 outpatients). We compared the duration of sorafenib treatment between these groups.ResultsThe duration of treatment with sorafenib was significantly longer in the intervention group than in the non-intervention group. No outpatients in the intervention group discontinued sorafenib due to adverse drug reactions such as hand-foot skin reactions or diarrhea.ConclusionThe duration of sorafenib treatment was significantly longer in the intervention group than in the non-intervention group. Our findings suggest that interventions by the medical supportive team consisting of health care professionals were effective in preventing the discontinuation of sorafenib.

Monitoring Serum Levels of Sorafenib and Its &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;-Oxide Is Essential for Long-Term Sorafenib Treatment of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Sorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, is the final therapy prior to palliative care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, due to its adverse effects, 20% of patients must discontinue sorafenib within 1 month after first administration. To identify ways to predict the adverse effects and administer the drug for longer periods, we explored the relationship between the duration of sorafenib treatment and the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib and its major metabolite, sorafenib N-oxide. Twenty-five subjects enrolled in the study were divided into two groups: patients with dosage reduced or withdrawn due to adverse effects (n = 8), and patients with dosage maintained for 1 month after initial administration (n = 17). We evaluated early sorafenib accumulation as the area under the curve of sorafenib and sorafenib N-oxide concentrations during days 1-7 (AUC(sorafenib) and AUC(N-oxide), respectively). Inter-group comparison revealed that AUC(N-oxide) and AUC ratio (AUC(N-oxide)/AUC(sorafenib)) were significantly higher in the dosage reduction/withdrawal group (P = 0.031 and P = 0.0022, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that AUC(N-oxide) and AUC ratio were reliable predictors of adverse effects. When patients were classified by cut-off points (AUC(N-oxide:) 2.0 μg ∙ day/mL, AUC ratio: 0.13), progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients with AUC(N-oxide) ≤ 2.0 μg ∙ day/mL (P = 0.0048, log-rank test). In conclusion, we recommend to simultaneously monitor serum levels of sorafenib and its N-oxide during the early stage after the first administration, which enables us to provide safe and long-term therapy for each HCC patient with sorafenib.

Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio affects survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

Sorafenib is the first systemic therapy to demonstrate survival benefit in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in randomized controlled trials with rigorous patient selection. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be associated with poor survival in various solid tumors. Our aim is to evaluate the prognostic role of NLR in HCC patients treated with sorafenib. A total of 105 advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib were retrospectively reviewed, and relevant data from the clinical records were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were carried out to identify factors associated with survival. The median age of the cohort was 59.7 years, and 84.8 % were Child-Pugh class A, and 86.7 % had ECOG performance status 0 or 1. Median duration of sorafenib treatment was 100 days. Median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 8.03 months. Median OS was 5.23 months (95 % CI 2.96-7.50 months) and 10.05 months (95 % IC 2.52-18.47 months) for patients with NLR > 3.5 and NLR ≤ 3.5, respectively (p = 0.002). Alpha-fetoprotein >1,030 ng/mL and serum albumin ≤3.8 g/dL were also associated with worse prognosis (p = 0.006 and p = 0.042, respectively). The subgroup of patients with high alpha-fetoprotein, low albumin and NLR > 3.5 had median OS of 1.7 months, whereas the subgroup with none of these parameters had median OS of 16.5 months (p < 0.001). NLR affects survival in advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib. Selecting HCC patients based on the laboratorial features may improve the therapeutic effectiveness of sorafenib.

Alternative Response Criteria (Choi, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) Versus RECIST 1.1 in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Sorafenib

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), may underestimate activity and does not predict survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib. This study assessed the value of alternative radiological criteria to evaluate response in HCC patients treated with sorafenib. A retrospective blinded central analysis was performed of computed tomography (CT) scans from baseline and the first tumor evaluation in consecutive patients treated with sorafenib over a 2-year period in a single institution. Four different evaluation criteria were used: Choi, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and RECIST 1.1. Among 82 HCC patients, 64 with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B-C were evaluable with a median follow-up of 22 months. Median duration of sorafenib treatment was 5.7 months, and median overall survival was 12.8 months. At the time of the first CT scan, performed after a median of 2.1 months, Choi, EASL, mRECIST, and RECIST 1.1 identified 51%, 28%, 28%, and 3% objective responses, respectively. Responders by all criteria showed consistent overall survival >20 months. Among patients with stable disease according to RECIST 1.1, those identified as responders by Choi had significantly better overall survival than Choi nonresponders (22.4 vs. 10.6 months; hazard ratio: 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.86, p = .0097). Choi, EASL, and mRECIST criteria appear more appropriate than RECIST 1.1 to identify responders with long survival among advanced HCC patients benefiting from sorafenib.

Sorafenib in patients with progressive epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

There is no standard treatment for progressive epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE). To investigate the significant vascularization of EHE, the activity/toxicity of sorafenib in patients with progressive EHE was explored. In this multicenter, 1-stage, phase 2 trial of sorafenib (800 mg daily), the primary endpoint, which was chosen by default, was the 9-month progression-free rate. All patients had documented progressive disease at the time of study entry. Fifteen patients were enrolled between June 2009 and February 2011. The median age was 57 years (range, 31-76 years), and the ratio of men to women was 9:6. The performance status was zero in 10 patients and 1 in 5 patients. Twelve patients had metastases, mainly in the lung (12 patients), liver (5 patients), and bone (3 patients). Five patients had received prior chemotherapy (doxorubicin in 5 patients and taxane in 3 patients). The median sorafenib treatment duration was 124 days (range, from 27 to >271 days). Seven patients required dose reductions or transient treatment discontinuation. The 9-month progression-free rate was 30.7% (4 of 13 patients). The 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month progression-free rate was 84.6% (11 of 13 patients), 46.4% (6 of 13 patients), and 38.4% (5 of 13 patients), respectively. Two partial responses were observed that lasted 2 months and 9 months. Further clinical trials exploring sorafenib as treatment of progressive EHE are needed.

8:40 AM Abstract No. 133 - Sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose Data on the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are limited, particularly for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We evaluated the outcome of the combination therapy in advanced HCC patients with preserved liver function, determined the predictors of survival, and proposed a new prognostic score to stratify the advanced HCC. Materials and Methods In the multicenter retrospective single-arm study, 222 consecutive HCC patients receiving the combination therapy were enrolled between June 2008 and July 2011. Results Chronic hepatitis B was the predominant cause of HCC (86%). 80% patients were in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C and 86% patients were at Child-Pugh (CP) A class. The median number of TACE procedure was 2 (range 1-8); and the median duration of sorafenib treatment was 8.1 months (range 0.1-33.9). After a median follow-up of 10.4 months, 148 patients had died. The overall median survival was 12 months (95% CI 10.1-13.9); and it was 13.1 months in CP-A patients and 7.6 months in CP-B patients. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 87%; and the most common AEs were diarrhea (50%), hand-foot-skin reaction (40%), rash (39%), and fatigue (33%). In 177 BCLC-C patients, performance status, the number of HCC nodules, Child-Pugh score and macrovascular invasion were significantly associated with overall survival and were included in the final score. Risk scores (R)= 5*(Vascular invasion: 0 if no, 1 yes) + 6*(CP: 0 if A, 1 if B) + 7*(No. of lesions: 0 if 1-2, 1 ≥3) + 8*(ECOG: 0 if 0, 1 ≥1). Conclusion Sorafenib in combination with TACE should be considered a safe and effective therapy for advanced HCC with well-preserved liver function. It is necessary to stratify the BCLC stage C to achieve the individualized optimal treatment. Further validation of the new subgroup of BCLC-C stage is warranted in an independent patient cohort.