Event Abstract Back to Event Song patterning, output, and function in the grasshopper sparrow. Bernard Lohr1* 1 University of Maryland Baltimore County, Department of Biological Sciences, United States Grasshopper sparrows (Ammodramus savannarum) produce two distinct classes of song. The type I song, also known as the “buzz song,” is the principal advertisement song. This species also produces a secondary or type II song class, the “warble song.” Each male grasshopper sparrow sings a single buzz song and a single warble song. Warble song is less commonly produced than the buzz song. Typically, males produce buzz song immediately upon arrival on the breeding grounds in late April, and it can be heard throughout the summer until early August. Within a week to 10 days, if paired, males often begin appending warble song to the end of the buzz song, producing a double song. By the latter part of each month-long breeding cycle, males may switch to singing the warble song by itself. Figure 1 shows spectrograms of the buzz and warble songs of two individuals. I measured the patterning of buzz and warble song production, as well as total song output, using long-term autonomous recording units in male grasshopper sparrow territories at the Chester River Field Research Center during the summer of 2011. Eight of these recording units, operating from 05:00–11:00 EDT (6 hours/day), were deployed in the approximate center of grasshopper sparrow territories. An additional four units were operated in the same habitat from 05:00–23:00 EDT (18 hours/day). We found an expected singing peak from 05:00–08:00, a long period of relatively little singing from 08:00–20:00, and a smaller, though substantial singing peak around 20:30 (sunset). Slightly over 50% of each day’s song was produced in the first 6 hours of the day. Male singing patterns during the course of a breeding cycle were less stereotyped than originally thought, but showed a consistent increase in the proportion of warble song after egg-laying by the female, and a consistent increase in the proportion of buzz song following fledging and the initiation of a new breeding cycle. To investigate potential functions of the two song classes I used a song playback experiment with targeted males known to be singing either the buzz song, or double/warble song. Males singing the buzz song responded to playbacks of both buzz and warble song exclusively with buzz song. Responses by males singing double or warble song were mixed, but these males responded to playbacks of both song classes with buzz song at greater levels than chance. These results suggest that the buzz song is the principal class of song used in interactions between territorial males. The function of the warble song class remains unclear. It may have predominantly intersexual functions such as social cohesion or reproductive synchrony within the pair. Another intriguing possibility is that extra-pair matings may be a consequence of female choice based on the warble song rather than buzz song. Future tests will look for possible associations between the timing of extra-pair mating and the song class being sung by extra-pair mates. Figure 1 Acknowledgements This work was funded, in part, by the Chester River Field Research Center, and the UMBC Department of Biological Sciences. Keywords: birdsong, grasshopper sparrow, Sexual selection, song discrimination, vocalization Conference: Tenth International Congress of Neuroethology, College Park. Maryland USA, United States, 5 Aug - 10 Aug, 2012. Presentation Type: Poster Presentation (see alternatives below as well) Topic: Communication Citation: Lohr B (2012). Song patterning, output, and function in the grasshopper sparrow.. Conference Abstract: Tenth International Congress of Neuroethology. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnbeh.2012.27.00386 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 01 May 2012; Published Online: 07 Jul 2012. * Correspondence: Dr. Bernard Lohr, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Department of Biological Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, 21250, United States, blohr@umbc.edu Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Bernard Lohr Google Bernard Lohr Google Scholar Bernard Lohr PubMed Bernard Lohr Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.