AbstractThe acidity constants of twofold protonated guanosine 5′‐diphosphate, H2(GDP)−, and the stability constants of the [Cu(H;GDP)] and [Cu(GDP)]− complexes were determined in H2O as well as in 30 or 50% (v/v) 1,4‐dioxane/H2O by potentiometric pH titrations (25°; I=0.1M, NaNO3). The results showed that in H2O one of the two protons of H2(GDP)− is located mainly at the N(7) site and the other one at the terminal β‐phosphate group. In contrast, for 50% 1,4‐dioxane/H2O solutions, a micro acidity‐constant evaluation evidenced that ca. 75% of the H2(GDP)− species have both protons phosphate‐bound, because the basicity of pyridine‐type N sites decreases with decreasing solvent polarity whereas the one of phosphate groups increases. In the [Cu(H;GDP)] complex, the proton and the metal ion are in all three solvents overwhelmingly phosphate‐bound, and the release of this proton is inhibited by decreasing polarity of the solvent. Based on previously determined straight‐line plots of log K$\rm{_{Cu(R-DP)}^{Cu}}$ vs. pK$\rm{_{H(R-DP)}^{H}}$ (where R represents a non‐interacting residue in simple diphosphate monoesters ROP(O−)(O)OP(O)(O−)2, RDP3−), which were now extended to mixed solvents (based on analogies), it is concluded that, in all three solvents, the [Cu(GDP)]− complex is more stable than expected based on the basicity of the diphosphate residue. This increased stability is attributed to macrochelate formation of the phosphate‐coordinated Cu2+ with N(7) of the guanine residue. The formation degree of this macrochelate amounts in aqueous solution to ca. 75% (being thus higher than that of the Cu2+ complex of adenosine 5′‐diphosphate) and in 50% (v/v) 1,4‐dioxane/H2O to ca. 60%, i.e., the formation degree of the macrochelate is only relatively little affected by the change in solvent, though it needs to be emphasized that the overall stability of the [Cu(GDP)]− complex increases with decreasing solvent polarity. By including previously studied systems in the considerations, the biological implications are shortly discussed, and it is concluded that Nature has here a tool to alter the structure of complexes by shifting them on a protein surface from a polar to an apolar region and vice versa.