Summary. Long-term variability in solar and lunar daily variations, and its association with solar and magnetic activity, in the three geomagnetic ele- ments, H, D and 2, at Alibag is studied by an analysis of the data for each year separately during the period 1932-72. From year to year, consider- able change in amplitude, with very small change in phase, is noticed in the case of solar daily variation, whereas, for lunar daily variation, changes in both amplitude and phase are found to be large. Solar cycle influence on the solar daily variation is observed to be prominent, and a distinct influence on the lunar daily variations is also seen; the observed influence of magnetic activity on these variations appears to be merely a reflection of the strong association between solar and magnetic activities. Bartels (1932) describes a method of estimating the total variability of geomagnetic solar daily variation, S, by the use of harmonic dials. Analysing the daily data of Huancayo and Watheroo, by this method, he finds large variability in S and the assumption of normality in the distribution of the vector S to be valid. Gupta (1972) arrives at similar conclusions in his analysis of the geomagnetic data at Sodankyla. In this note, Bartels' method is applied to the harmonics of S and of lunar daily variation, L, in H, D and 2 at Alibag, computed (by B.R.A. and reported elsewhere) separately for each of the years during the 41-yr period, 1932-72. The relative contributions of the variations in solar and magnetic activities to the variability of S and L are calculated to ascertain which of the two is the larger contribu- ting factor. Harmonic dials and probable ellipses for each of the solar harmonics in each of the ele- ments are drawn (Fig. 1) by the procedure given by Bartels and also detailed by Chapman & Bartels (1940). In the case of L, only the fundamental harmonic, L2, is considered as it is generally large and well determined, especially in H. Of the 41 yearly values of L2 for each element, 30, 27 and 23 are significant in H, D and 2 respectively. A count of the points inside and outside of each of the ellipses has shown that they are nearly equal, indicating the validity of the assumption of Gaussian distribution of the cloud of points.
Read full abstract