AbstractDespite artificial rainfall simulation proves invaluable for the study of soil erosion processes and model construction, it still fails to fully replicate the characteristics of natural rainfall. Currently, most artificial rainfall experiments have carried out a large number of continuous high‐intensity rainfall due to the focus on the characteristics of short duration and high intensity of natural rainstorm but have ignored the erosion effects caused by intermittent rainstorm with low intensity and long duration. In this study, two sets of artificial rainfall simulation experiments of intermittent low‐intensity rainstorm (RR1) and continuous high‐intensity rainstorm (RR2) were conducted to evaluate the effects of rainfall characteristics on erosion morphology, runoff generation and soil loss. The evolution morphology monitored by a digital close‐range photogrammetry technology demonstrated the difference between the two rainstorm regimes. The soil surface was damaged more seriously under rainfall of RR2, and the rill morphological indicators of RR1 were all less than that of RR2. As rainfall proceeded, morphological indicators except for rill width‐depth ratio gradually increased. As a result, the runoff rate and sediment yield between two regimes were distinct. The segmented and total soil loss, average runoff rate and sediment concentration of RR1 were all less than that of RR2, with the total soil loss of the two rainstorm regimes being 275 and 683 kg, respectively. Water infiltration, rainfall intensity, duration and frequency may be the main factors leading to the difference in soil loss and erosion morphology between two rainstorm regimes. The inconsistency of these factors can easily cause the deviation of understanding of soil erosion mechanism. Therefore, the comparison of erosion effects under different rainstorm regimes has important implications for the improvement of natural rainstorm simulation and the comprehensive understanding of erosion mechanism.
Read full abstract