SOFA Score Research Articles

High-dose colistin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy

BackgroundColistin, administered as intravenous colistimethate (CMS), is still used in the critical care setting and current guidelines recommend high dosage CMS in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Due to the paucity of real-life data, we aimed to describe colistin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile in a cohort of critically ill patients with infections due to carbapenem-resistant (CR) bacteria undergoing CRRT.ResultsAll consecutive patients admitted to three Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of a large metropolitan University Hospital, treated with colistin for at least 48 h at the dosage of 6.75 MUI q12, after 9 MIU loading dose, and undergoing CRRT were included. After the seventh dose, patients underwent blood serial sampling during a time frame of 24 h. We included 20 patients, who had CR-Acinetobacter baumannii ventilator-associated pneumonia and were characterized by a median SAPS II and SOFA score of 41 [34.5–59.3] and 9 [6.7–11], respectively. Fifteen patients died during ICU stay and six recovered renal function. Median peak and trough colistin concentrations were 16.6 mcg/mL [14.8–20.6] and 3.9 mcg/mL [3.3–4.4], respectively. Median area under the time–concentration curve (AUC0 − 24) and average steady-state concentration (Css, avg) were 193.9 mcg h/mL [170.6–208.6] and 8.07 mcg/mL [7.1–8.7]. Probability of target attainment of colistin pharmacodynamics according to the fAUC0 − 24/MIC target ≥ 12 was 100% for MIC ≤ 2 mcg/mL and 85% for MIC = 4 mcg/ML, although exceeding the toxicity limit of Css, avg 3–4 mcg/mL.ConclusionsIn critically ill patients with CR infections undergoing CRRT, recommended CMS dosage resulted in colistin plasmatic levels above bacterial MIC90, but exceeding the safety Css, avg. limit.Trial registrationThis trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on 23/07/2021 with the ID NCT04995133 (https//clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04995133).

Mortality Impact of Severe COVID-19 in the ICU: A Study from the Târgu Mureș Support Unit.

(1) Background: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been recognized that a considerable proportion of critically ill patients may die of this disease. The current study aims to assess the overall 1-year outcomes within the UMFST COVID-19 Unit, providing valuable insights into the efficacy of specialized care facilities in managing severe cases of COVID-19. (2) Methods: This is a retrospective monocentric observational study including 294 patients confirmed to have SARS-CoV-2 infection. Demographic data and clinical and paraclinical parameters were assessed. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. (3) Results: Overall, the 1-year mortality was 89.4%. All deaths occurred in-hospital, with two patients dying after 28 days. Diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney failure, cerebrovascular disease, and atrial fibrillation were more prevalent in deceased patients. Thirty percent of patients needed endotracheal intubation during the first 24 h. The incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia was higher among deceased patients. The SOFA score was significantly different between deceased vs. survivors. The survival analysis showed that the use of noradrenaline increased the likelihood of surviving COVID-19. (4) Conclusions: The severe comorbidities of the patients were the primary factors contributing to the increased mortality rate in the COVID-19 unit.

Markers of systemic inflammation in hemorrhagic stroke with effective and ineffective cerebral blood flow

Neuroinflammation during intracerebral hemorrhage is initiated by blood breakdown products in the subarachnoid space and/or brain parenchyma. In this case, neuroinflammation can cause the development of systemic inflammation. In some cases, intracerebral hemorrhage is accompanied by the appearance of the phenomenon of ineffective cerebral blood flow and clinical manifestations of brain death. The purpose of the study is to identify markers of systemic inflammation in severe hemorrhagic stroke with or without effective cerebral blood flow. The study included patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and the presence of multiple organ failure syndrome, as well as coma on the first day of manifestation, to determine markers of systemic inflammation. A total of 3 groups were analyzed: patients with ineffective cerebral blood flow (Group 2); with effective cerebral blood flow (Group 3); and control group (Group 1) – healthy blood donors. Criteria for non-inclusion in the study: the presence in patients with hemorrhagic stroke of septic complications during hospitalization and acute infectious diseases during the manifestation of intracerebral hemorrhage. In frozen blood plasma samples (anticoagulant – citrate), the levels of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFá, procalcitonin, neuron-specific enolase, cortisol, myoglobin, troponin I and D-dimers were determined. Enzyme immunoassay was carried out on an automatic analyzer “Dynex Lazurite” (Dynex Technologies, VA, USA). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to confirm the normality of data distribution. Further comparison of quantitative data was carried out using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. All results were considered statistically significant at p 0.05. In patients with effective and ineffective cerebral blood flow, statistically significant differences were observed in almost all studied markers of systemic inflammation, except for troponin I. However, in the presence of effective cerebral blood flow, significantly higher values of a number of indicators were noted, which may indicate a more rapidly occurring acute systemic inflammatory response in case of effective cerebral blood flow. At the same time, 28 day mortality and SOFA scores in the group with effective blood flow were lower than in the group with ineffective blood flow. This discrepancy may indicate a greater contribution to 28 day mortality and patient severity from direct loss of brain function than from systemic inflammation in patients with ineffective blood flow. On the other hand, the lack of severity of systemic inflammation in this category of patients is most likely due to impaired blood outflow from the damaged brain and the entry of tissue breakdown products and other pro-inflammatory factors into the systemic circulation. That is, intracerebral hemorrhage is accompanied by the development of neuroinflammation, which may be an important component of systemic inflammation. However, disruption of the inflow and outflow of blood in the main great vessels of the brain reduces the likelihood and severity of the development of systemic inflammation.

Acute kidney injury in coronavirus disease: a comparative study of the two waves in Brazil.

Magalhães et al. demonstrated that the incidence of acute kidney injury was high in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and that the second wave was associated with greater severity; however, the mortality rates were similar between the two periods. This may reflect both the effectiveness of vaccines and the constant learning that frontline professionals gained throughout the pandemic to provide greater support to their patients. ◼ Renal involvement was frequent in patients with COVID-19 and related to worse outcomes. ◼ Diuretic use, mechanical ventilation, proteinuria, hematuria, age, and creatine phosphokinase and D-dimer levels were risk factors for acute kidney injury. ◼ Acute kidney injury, mechanical ventilation, elevated SOFA Score, and elevated ATN-ISS were associated with mortality. ◼ The second wave was associated with greater severity; however, the mortality rates were similar between the two periods. ◼ This may reflect the effectiveness of vaccines and the constant learning that frontline professionals gained throughout the pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of acute kidney injury in hospitalized Brazilian patients with COVID-19 and identify the risk factors associated with its development and prognosis during the two waves of the disease. We performed a prospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at a public university hospital in São Paulo from March 2020 to May 2021. Of 887 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 54.6% were admitted to the intensive care unit. The incidence of acute kidney injury was 48.1%, and the overall mortality rate was 38.9%. Acute kidney replacement therapy was indicated for 58.8% of the patients. The factors associated with acute kidney injury were diuretic use (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95%CI= 1.2-4.1, p=0.01), mechanical ventilation (OR= 12.9, 95%CI= 4.3-38.2, p<0.0001), hematuria(OR= 2.02, 95%CI= 1.1-3.5, p<0.0001), chronic kidney disease (OR= 2.6, 95%CI= 1.2-5.5, p=0.009), age (OR= 1.03, 95%CI= 1.01-1.07, p=0.02), and elevated creatine phosphokinase (OR= 1.02, 95%CI= 1.01-1.07, p=0.02) and D-dimer levels (OR= 1.01, 95%CI= 1.01-1.09, p<0.0001). Mortality was higher among those with acute kidney injury (OR= 1.12, 95%CI= 1.02-2.05, p=0.01), elevated Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores (OR= 1.35, 95%CI= 1.1-1.6, p=0.007), elevated Acute Tubular Necrosis-Injury Severity Score (ATN-ISS; (OR= 96.4, 95%CI= 4.8-203.1, p<0.0001), and who received mechanical ventilation (OR= 12.9, 95%CI= 4.3-38.2, p<0.0001). During the second wave, the number of cases requiring mechanical ventilation (OR= 1.57, 95%CI= 1.01-2.3, p=0.026), with proteinuria (OR= 1.44, 95%CI= 1.01-2.1, p=0.04), and with higher ATN-ISS Scores (OR= 40.9, 95%CI= 1.7-48.1, p=0.04) was higher than that during the first wave. Acute kidney injury was frequent in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and the second wave was associated with greater severity. However, mortality rates were similar between the two periods, which may reflect both the effectiveness of vaccines and the constant learning that frontline professionals gained throughout the pandemic to provide greater support to their patients. RBR-62y3h7.

The Role of Monocyte Distribution Width in the Early Prediction of Sepsis in Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background and Objectives: This is the first study to examine the role of monocyte distribution width (MDW) in predicting sepsis after cardiovascular surgery. Methods: This study included 43 consecutive patients who had undergone cardiovascular surgery between July 2021 and July 2022. All patients were examined at the following three time points (TPs): preoperative period (TP1), postoperative at 24 h (TP2), and discharge (TP3). SOFA score, leukocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), MDW, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT) levels were tested at each TPs. The Sepsis-3 criteria were used to diagnose patients with sepsis. Results: The mean values of all variables (leukocyte count, NLR, MDW, CRP, and PCT levels) were significantly higher at TP2 and TP3 than at TP1 (p < 0.05). All these values were significantly higher at TP2 than at TP3 (p < 0.05). Patients with sepsis had significantly higher mean values for leukocyte count, NLR, MDW, CRP, and PCT levels than those without sepsis (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between MDW and inflammatory markers (CRP, PCT, and NLR) during the three time periods (p < 0.05). According to the ROC analysis, the optimal MDW cutoff value with the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting sepsis in the postoperative period was 20.5. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that elevated MDW levels may be a valuable predictor of sepsis in patients following cardiovascular surgery.

Lactate/Pyruvate Ratio as an Early Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Sepsis: A Cohort Study.

Background: The lactate/pyruvate (LP) ratio has been studied as an alternative to serum lactate to determine clinical prognosis. Despite its clinical utility, there is a paucity of evidence evaluating the role of the L/P ratio in patients with sepsis. Methods: We assessed the clinical utility of the L/P ratio in patients with sepsis. The L/P ratio was measured at baseline, 4 and 8 h after admission. Our primary outcome was to determine the prognostic utility of the L/P ratio on the 15-day mortality risk. Our secondary outcomes were to compare the L/P ratio across time and its prognostic utility against standard risk calculators such as APACHE-II and SOFA scores. Results: We had a total of 80 patients, with 18 (22.5%) survivors and 62 (77.5%) non-survivors. While we found that patients having higher L/P ratios at 8 h had an increased 30-mortality risk (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.18), the model's performance showed no difference when compared to other measurements of the L/P ratio that showed no association with mortality (p-value: 0.45). For our secondary outcome, we found that the APACHE-II and SOFA scores have better performance and predictability than the L/P ratio (AUC 0.83 and AUC 0.80, respectively), but showed no association with mortality (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.17 and OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.18). Conclusions: Based on our findings, the L/P ratio appears to function more effectively as an early predictor of mortality when used as an adjuvant biomarker with other clinical parameters.

Acute kidney injury and mortality in patients with critical COVID-19 in Mexico: case-control study.

We aimed to test the association between acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality in critically ill patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a single-center case-control study at the intensive care unit (ICU) of a second-level hospital in Mexico. We included 100 patients with critical COVID-19 from January to December 2021, and collected demographic characteristics, comorbidities, APACHE II, SOFA, NEWS2, and CO-RADS scores at admission, incidence of intrahospital complications, length of hospital and ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation, among others. The median survival of deceased patients was 20 days. After multivariable logistic regression, the following variables were significantly associated to mortality: AKI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 6.64, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 2.1-20.6, p = 0.001), age > 55 years (AOR 5.3, 95% CI = 1.5-18.1, p = 0.007), and arrhythmias (AOR 5.15, 95% CI = 1.3-19.2, p = 0.015). Median survival was shorter in patients with AKI (15 vs. 22 days, p = 0.043), as well as in patients with overweight/obesity (15 vs. 25 days, p = 0.026). Our findings show that the development of AKI was the main risk factor associated with mortality in critical COVID-19 patients, while other factors such as older age and cardiac arrhythmias were also associated with this outcome. The management of patients with COVID-19 should include renal function screening and staging on admission to the Emergency Department.

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Nutrition at the Molecular Level in Patients with Sepsis

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare inflammatory and anti-inflammatory molecule levels in sepsis patients receiving normal (1.3 mg/kg/day) and high (2 mg/kg/day) protein supplementation. Methods: Two groups of patients were compared based on protein supplementation: normal (1.3 mg/kg/day) and high (2 mg/kg/day). Levels of kallistatin, nesfatin-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and high mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1) were measured. Disease severity was assessed using APACHE II, SAPS, and SOFA scores. Results: Demographic characteristics and intensive care scores were similar between groups (p&gt;0.05). Group 1 had significantly higher 0-hour levels of HMGB-1, kallistatin, PAI-1, and nesfatin-1 compared to 24 and 48 hours (p&lt;0.001). Group 2 had higher 0-hour levels, but changes were not significant (p&gt;0.05) Conclusions: High-dose protein feeding in sepsis patients may not suppress inflammation-related protein synthesis despite the presence of oxidative damage and muscle catabolism.

Prognostic significance of the estimated pulse wave velocity in critically ill patients with coronary heart disease: analysis from the MIMIC‑IV database.

There are currently no specialized risk-scoring systems for critically ill patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Arterial stiffness, as measured by estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV), has emerged as a potential indicator of mortality or adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with CHD. This study aimed to evaluate the association between ePWV and all-cause mortality among critically ill patients with CHD beyond traditional risk scores. This study included 11 001 participants with CHD from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV, with a one-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was one-year all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Elevated ePWV was significantly associated with higher risks of in-hospital (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.12-1.17, p<0.001) and one-year (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.20-1.23, p<0.001) mortality. These associations remained consistent when adjusted for traditional risk scores and potential confounders. When ePWV was integrated into traditional risk scoring models (OASIS, SOFA score, APSIII, SIRS score, SAPS II, and LODS score), the predictive accuracy (area under the curve: 64.55 to 70.56, 64.32 to 72.51, 72.35 to 75.80, 55.58 to 67.68, 71.27 to 73.53, 67.24 to 73.40, p<0.001) and reclassification (net reclassification index: 0.230, 0.268, 0.257, 0.255, 0.221, 0.254; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.049, 0.072, 0.054, 0.068, 0.037, 0.061, p<0.001) of these models significantly improved for one-year mortality. Similar results were also found for in-hospital mortality. ePWV is a strong independent predictor of both short- and long-term mortality in critically ill patients with CHD. Importantly, integrating ePWV into traditional risk scores significantly boosts the predictive accuracy for one-year and in-hospital all-cause mortality.

Impact of extracorporeal hemadsorption on mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit.

The consequences of COVID-19, such as respiratory failure and mortality, require the search for fast and effective solutions. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the effect of extracorporeal hemadsorption on mortality in severe COVID-19 cases hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our study is retrospective, single-center, and observational. The study included ICU patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who received extracorporeal hemadsorption treatment between March 2020 and December 2020. Effects on mortality were examined by comparing pre- and post-hemadsorption values. Seventeen patients were included in the study. The mortality rate in the study was 64.7%. After hemadsorption, an increase was observed in the lymphocyte numbers, APACHE-II, and SOFA values of the patients (p = 0.026, 0.043, and 0.033; respectively). A significant decrease was observed in CRP and fibrinogen levels (p = 0.003 and 0.005; respectively). In the non-surviving patient group, APACHE-II, SOFA, and procalcitonin values were found to be high before and after the procedure (p = 0.002, 0.048, and 0.06; respectively). In COVID-19 patients, APACHE-II and SOFA scores may be useful in predicting the effectiveness of extracorporeal hemadsorption. Our study found that patients with higher APACHE-II and SOFA scores at baseline had a higher mortality rate after hemadsorption. These findings show that the use of intensive care scoring systems may be useful in determining which patients should receive extracorporeal hemadsorption and that hemadsorption should be performed in the early stages of the disease.

Damage control surgery in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies: prognostic value of SOFA, APACHEII, and Mannheim peritonitis index.

This study aimed to analyze the prognostic value of the SOFA, APACHE II, and MPI (Mannheim Peritonitis Index) scores in the indication for Damage Control Surgery (DCS) in non-trauma. Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing DCS between 2014 and 2019. SOFA and APACHE II scores were calculated using parameters preceding DCS, while MPI was based on surgical descriptions. Statistical analysis: Qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, and quantitative variables using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The Student's T test was employed for mean comparisons. The sample comprised 104 patients (59 males), with a median age of 63.5years, of whom 52 (50%) were ASA IV. Operative findings leading to DCS included peritonitis (54; 51.9%), intestinal ischemia (39; 37.5%), inability to close the abdomen (8; 7.6%), and bleeding (3; 2.9%). The mortality rate was 75% (78/104). Thirty patients (28.8%) died after DCS; the remainder underwent one (35; 33.6%), two (21; 20.2%); three (8; 7.7%), and four or more (10;9.7%) revision procedures. The median lengths of ICU and hospital stays were 12.5 and 20.5days, respectively. The median score values were as follows: SOFA: 12 (0-38), APACHE II: 25 (2-47), and MPI: 26 (8-43). Besides ASA classification (p = 0.03), mortality risk was influenced by: age (≤ 65years vs. > 65years; p = 0.04), SOFA (≤ 10 vs. > 10; p = 0.03), APACHE II (≤ 25 vs. > 25; p = 0.04), and MPI (≤ 25 vs. > 25; p = 0.003). The SOFA, APACHE II, and MPI scores proved to be valuable tools in the prognostic assessment of patients undergoing DCS in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies.

Exploration of different statistical approaches in the comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock: SOAP II

BackgroundExploring clinical trial data using alternative methods may enhance original study’s findings and provide new insights. The SOAP II trial has been published more than 10 years ago; but there is still some speculation that some patients may benefit from dopamine administration for shock management. We aimed to reanalyse the trial under different approaches and evaluate for heterogeneity in treatment effect (HTE).MethodsAll patients enrolled in SOAP II were eligible for reanalysis. We used a variety of methods including the win-ratio (WR), a Bayesian reanalysis stratified according to shock type, and both a risk-based and effect-based explorations for HTE. The methods were applied to different endpoints, including a hierarchy of death, new use of renal-replacement therapy (RRT), and new-onset arrhythmia; 28-day mortality; a composite endpoint (mortality, new use of RRT, and new-onset arrhythmia), and days alive and free of ICU at 28-days (DAFICU28).ResultsA total of 1679 patients were included (average age was 64.9 years, 57% male, 62% with septic and 17% with cardiogenic shock). All analysis favoured norepinephrine over dopamine. Under the WR approach, dopamine had fewer wins compared to norepinephrine (WR 0.79; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.68–0.92; p = 0.003), evident in both cardiogenic and septic shock subgroups. The Bayesian reanalysis for type of shock showed, for dopamine, a probability of harm of 0.95 for mortality, > 0.99 probability of harm for composite endpoint, and 0.91 probability of harm for DAFICU28. The fewer DAFICU28 with dopamine was more apparent in those with cardiogenic shock (0.92). Under the risk-based HTE, there was a high probability that dopamine resulted fewer DAFICU28 in the highest quartile of predicted mortality risk. The effect-based HTE assessment model did not recommended dopamine over norepinephrine for any combination of possible modifiers including age, type of shock, presence of cardiomyopathy, and SOFA score. Receiving dopamine when the effect-based model recommended norepinephrine was associated with an absolute increase in composite endpoint of 6%.ConclusionThe harm associated with the use of dopamine for the management of shock appears to be present in both septic and cardiogenic shock patients. There was no suggestion of any subgroup in which dopamine was found to be favourable over norepinephrine.

Efficacy of Adjunct Hemoperfusion Compared to Standard Medical Therapy on 28-Day Mortality in Leptospirosis Patients with Renal Failure and Shock: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hemoperfusion is a novel adjunct therapy that targets the dysregulated inflammatory events in severe sepsis. Previous studies have reported conflicting results on its efficacy and safety. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of hemoperfusion among leptospirosis patients in septic shock and renal failure in terms of improvement in 28-day mortality, SOFA score, level of inflammatory markers, hemodynamics, and renal and pulmonary function. A total of 37 severe leptospirosis patients were enrolled and randomized into either standard medical therapy (SMT) alone, n = 20, or with hemoperfusion (HP), n = 17. Vital signs, urine output, vasopressor dose, PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, and biochemical parameters of patients from each treatment arm were compared. The hemoperfusion group showed a 36.84% (p = 0.017) risk reduction in 28-day mortality. Levels of procalcitonin, IL6, and lactate significantly decreased from baseline to day 7 in both groups. Statistically significant improvements in serum creatinine (p = 0.04) and PF ratio (p = 0.045) were observed in the hemoperfusion cohort. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches showed that hemoperfusion increased the survival rate and decreased the mortality risk. This benefit for survival persisted even when patients were also receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), showing that hemoperfusion's benefits are independent of ECMO use. Hemoperfusion is a safe and effective adjunct therapy for managing severe sepsis. It promotes earlier renal and pulmonary function recovery and improves the survival of septic shock patients.

Effects of Spirulina platensis Supplementation on COVID-19 Severity in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Spirulina is a functional food with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiviral, and immunomodulatory potential may improve certain clinical conditions in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effects of Spirulina supplementation on clinical conditions in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Methods: A double-blind clinical trial randomized patients admitted to an ICU to receive either Spirulina platensis supplementation (5g/day, n = 97) or to a control group (n = 95). The severity of COVID-19 was assessed using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), National Early Warning Score (NEWS) 2, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA). The study also evaluated the length of stay in the hospital and ICU, respiratory support at discharge, and 28-day mortality. In the survival analysis, 126 participants were evaluated (58 in the control group and 68 in the Spirulina group). Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in 28-day mortality (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.57 - 1.97) or NEWS2 (P = 0.76). However, the SOFA score significantly decreased in the Spirulina group compared to the control group (P = 0.03). The Spirulina group had a shorter ICU length of stay (7.43 ± 3.98 days) compared to the control group (10.00 ± 4.69 days, P = 0.007). The hospital length of stay was also shorter in the Spirulina group compared to the control group (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Spirulina supplementation reduced disease severity (as measured by the SOFA score) and shortened hospital and ICU length of stay in critically ill COVID-19 patients, but it did not reduce mortality.

The Effect of Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb on Severe COVID-19 Complications

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb on the inflammatory response, respiratory failure, and mortality in patients with severe novel coronavirus infection.Materials and methods. A retrospective single-center cohort comparative study of hemoadsorbtion using the CytoSorb therapy included data from 124 COVID-19 ICU patients. Patients were divided into two groups: the study arm with hemoadsorption (group 1, N=93) and the control arm without hemoadsorption (group 2, N=31). Patients in group 1 had more severe respiratory failure at baseline, but were otherwise comparable to patients in group 2 in terms of clinical and demographic parameters.Results. After hemoadsorption, group 1 patients showed significant improvement in 9 of 13 monitored clinical, instrumental, and laboratory parameters: fever (P=0.005), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P&lt;0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (P&lt;0.001), and IL-6 (P&lt;0.001) levels, as well as an increase in SpO₂/FiO₂ ratio (P=0.041), leukocyte count (P&lt;0.001) and lymphocyte count (P=0.003), as well as no significant changes in SOFA score (P=0.068). The only improvement seen in group 2 patients was a reduction in fever (P=0.003). Other significant changes in group 2 were unfavorable, such as a decrease in SpO₂/FiO₂ ratio (P=0.002), an increase in inspiratory oxygen fraction FiO₂ (P=0.001), leukocyte count (P&lt;0.05), LDH (P=0.038), procalcitonin (P&lt;0.001), and IL-6 (P=0.005), as well as an increase in SOFA score from 3.0 to 7.0 (95%CI, 3.0–9.0) (P=0.001). The all-cause hospital mortality rate was 37,63% in group 1 and 74.20% in group 2.Conclusion. The use of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb as a pathogenetic therapy targeting the hyperinflammatory response in the management algorithm of ICU patients with severe COVID-19 complications resulted in resolution of the inflammatory response and respiratory failure, as well as a significant reduction in mortality.

Predicting Mortality in Sepsis: The Role of Dynamic Biomarker Changes and Clinical Scores-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The prognostic value of baseline inflammatory markers in sepsis remains controversial, with conflicting evidence regarding their association with mortality. The dynamic changes in these markers over time might offer additional insights into disease progression and patient outcomes. This retrospective observational study included 138 patients with severe infections. The inflammatory biomarkers procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate (LAC) were measured at three time points: upon hospital admission (baseline), approximately 24-48 h after admission (second measurement; M2), and 48-72 h after admission (third measurement; M3). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the biomarker levels between the survivors and non-survivors. A Spearman's correlation was used to assess the relationships between the baseline parameters. A logistic regression and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were employed to evaluate the prognostic value of the baseline markers and their dynamic changes. The baseline LAC and SOFA score were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. The percentage decrease in PCT, CRP, and LAC from the baseline to M3 emerged as strong predictors of survival, with the ROC curve analysis demonstrating superior discriminatory ability compared to the baseline values. CRP_Delta exhibited the highest AUC (0.903), followed by PCT_Delta (0.843) and LAC_Delta (0.703). The dynamic changes in these inflammatory biomarkers, particularly PCT, CRP, and LAC, offer valuable prognostic information beyond their baseline levels in predicting 30-day mortality in severe infections. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring biomarker trends for early risk stratification and potential treatment guidance.

Effect of Change in Sodium after Slow Low-Efficiency Dialysis in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

Introduction: The effect of sodium (Na) correction by slow low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) in dysnatremic (135 mEq/L <Na >145 mEq/L) critically ill patients is unclear. Methods: Prospective observational study enrolled dysnatremic critically ill adult patients with acute kidney injury undergoing the first SLED as cases and normonatremic patients as controls. Baseline and SLED-related parameters and 30-day mortality were noted. Results: 100 dysnatremic and 51 normonatremic patients were included, with a median age of 31 (25–52) years and median admission SOFA scores of 10 (9–12). Patients with dysnatremia at study inclusion had a mortality of 53%, with the highest mortality in severe hypernatremia (Na >160 mEq/L) (75%), followed by those with severe hyponatremia (Na <120 mEq/L) (68.6%). SLED-associated natremia change >10 mEq/L was significantly associated with mortality, in patients with mild dysnatremia and normonatremia (Na: 130–150) (p < 0.001), and not in those with moderate to severe dysnatremia (Na <130 and Na >150) (p = 0.72). Upon multivariate logistic regression analysis, a model with pre-SLED pH, dialyzate-pre-SLED Na difference, and duration of SLED significantly predicted SLED-associated natremia change (R2 0.18, p = 0.001). Conclusions: SLED can be safely and effectively performed in critically ill adults with dysnatremia requiring renal replacement therapy with mortality comparable to normonatremic controls.

Factors influencing mortality in intracranial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae

It remains that intracranial infection has an alarming mortality and morbidity. Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) have increasingly been isolated in ventriculitis and meningitis episodes. Intracranial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) account for high mortality. To understand its clinical impact and related risk factors accurately are crucial in the management of bacterial intracranial infection. The retrospective study aimed to delineate the clinical risk of death from intracranial infection and analyze the risk factors. A total of 176 Klebsiella pneumoniae intracranial infectious patients were available to divide into CRKP group and carbapenem-susceptive Klebsiella Pneumoniae (CSKP) group. We performed survival analysis and estimate the time-varying effects of CRKP and CSKP infection on 30-day mortality. Infectious patients caused by CSKP was associated with lower mortality than CRKP group. The risk factors associated with death from intracranial infection caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae included SOFA scores, ventilator therapy, CRKP, and heart failure. Longer hospital stays are independently associated with lower mortality rates. Intracranial infection caused by CRKP was associated with excess mortality. Complex comorbidities mean higher mortality. Active supportive treatment is required for complicated patients with intracranial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Frequency of cefiderocol heteroresistance among patients treated with cefiderocol for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections.

Cefiderocol exhibits potent in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb), but this activity has not consistently translated to improved outcomes among patients. Cefiderocol heteroresistance, or the presence of a resistant subpopulation, has been proposed as one possible explanation. The objective of this study was to explore associations between heteroresistance and outcomes of patients with CRAb infections. Baseline CRAb isolates were collected from 27 consecutive patients in the USA and Italy. Cefiderocol susceptibility was tested by broth microdilutions in triplicate. Heteroresistance was defined by population analysis profiling in duplicate. Resistance mechanisms and strain relatedness were evaluated through comparative genomic analysis. Overall, 59% of infecting CRAb isolates were identified as cefiderocol-heteroresistant; rates were higher among isolates from Italy (79%) than the USA (38%). The median Charlson Comorbidity and SOFA scores were 4 and 5, respectively; 44% of patients had pneumonia, which was the most common infection type. Rates of 28-day clinical success and survival were 30% and 73%, respectively. By broth microdilution, cefiderocol MICs ≥1 mg/L were associated with higher failure rates than MICs ≤0.5 mg/L (81% versus 55%). Rates of clinical failure were numerically higher among patients infected by cefiderocol-heteroresistant compared with susceptible CRAb (81% versus 55%). Whole-genome sequencing identified a premature stop codon in the TonB-dependent receptor gene piuA in six isolates, all of which were heteroresistant. This pilot study supports the hypothesis that cefiderocol treatment failure may be associated with higher MICs and/or the presence of heteroresistance. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome in sepsis patients: A meta-analysis

BackgroundAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a critical complication of sepsis, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Identifying risk factors for ARDS among sepsis patients is essential for early intervention and improving outcomes. MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis, reviewing studies that examined the association between various risk factors and ARDS development in sepsis patients. Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched up to January 2024, without language restrictions. Eligible studies included observational cohorts and case-control studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed through I2 statistics, and publication bias was evaluated via the Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index. Results15 studies with more than 40,000 participants were analyzed. Significant risk factors for ARDS included pulmonary infection (OR: 2.696, 95 % CI: 1.655 to 4.390), septic shock (OR: 2.627, 95 % CI: 1.850 to 3.731), and pancreatitis (OR: 3.734, 95 % CI: 2.958 to 4.712). No significant associations were found between the development of ARDS in septic patients and the following risk factors: sex (OR: 1.106, 95%CI: 0.957–1.279), smoking status (OR: 1.214, 95%CI: 0.835–1.765), or steroid use (OR: 0.901, 95%CI: 0.617–1.314). APACHE-II and SOFA scores were predictive of ARDS development, emphasizing their utility in clinical assessments. ConclusionPulmonary infection, septic shock, and pancreatitis significantly increase ARDS risk in sepsis patients. Our findings advocate for targeted management of these risk factors to mitigate ARDS development, emphasizing the importance of personalized care in sepsis management.