Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Therapy Research Articles

Effects of empagliflozin on reproductive system in men without diabetes

Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 2 inhibition is a well-known target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, renal disease and chronic heart failure. The protein SGLT2 is encoded by SLC5A2 (Solute Carrier Family 5 Member 2), which is highly expressed in renal cortex, but also in the testes where glucose uptake may be essential for spermatogenesis and androgen synthesis. We postulated that in healthy males, SGLT2 inhibitor therapy may affect gonadal function. We examined the impact on gonadal and steroid hormones in a post-hoc analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled research including 26 healthy males who were given either placebo or empagliflozin 10 mg once daily for four weeks. After one month of empagliflozin, there were no discernible changes in androgen, pituitary gonadotropin hormones, or inhibin B. Regardless of BMI category, the administration of empagliflozin, a highly selective SGLT2 inhibitor, did not alter serum androgen levels in men without diabetes. While SGLT2 is present in the testes, its inhibition does not seem to affect testosterone production in Leydig cells nor inhibin B secretion by the Sertoli cells.

Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis with SGLT2 Inhibitor Therapy in a Patient Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: A Case Report

Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis with SGLT2 Inhibitor Therapy in a Patient Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: A Case Report

Ventricular arrhythmia events in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator before and after the treatment with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors

Abstract Background The role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in the treatment of chronic heart failure is expanding. However, the timing of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary prevention in relation to the use of SGLT2i remains unclear. A small case series has described appropriate shocks from ICD in two patients following the initiation of SGLT2i, but a comprehensive analysis is lacking in the literature. Methods This study aimed to investigate the rate of ventricular arrhythmic burden and appropriate anti-tachycardia therapy from ICD before and after the initiation of SGLT2i therapy. We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis, comparing ventricular events from home monitoring reports three months before and three months after SGLT2i therapy initiation. Results Seventeen patients were enrolled in the study. At baseline, clinical characteristics were as follows: 13 (76%) were male, 9 (53%) had ischemic, 2 (12%) had valvular, and 6 (35%) had idiopathic cardiomyopathy. The mean end-diastolic volume (EDV) was 203 ± 90 ml, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.36 ± 0.09. All patients were treated with beta-blockers, 14 (82%) with sacubitril-valsartan, 13 (76%) with aldosterone antagonists, 16 (94%) with furosemide, and 5 (29%) with amiodarone. SGLT2i started with dapagliflozin for 13 patients (76%), empagliflozin for 3 patients (18%), and canagliflozin for 1 patient (6%). Ten patients (59%) had single-chamber or dual-chamber ICDs, and 7 had implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillators. In the three months before SGLT2i treatment, 4/17 patients had non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), compared to 8/17 (23% vs. 47%, p-value 0.23) patients with NSVT after treatment. Seven patients (41%) experienced an increase in the rate of NSVT events, with one patient having 28 NSVT events after treatment versus none before treatment. No patients had anti-tachycardia therapy in the three months before treatment, while in the three months after SGLT2i treatment, 1 patient had ventricular tachycardia treated with anti-tachycardia pacing (110 days after the beginning of the treatment), and 2 patients had ventricular tachycardia treated with appropriate shocks (2 and 25 days after the initiation of SGLT2i treatment). Conclusion This small retrospective analysis revealed an increase in ventricular arrhythmic events in the three months following the initiation of SGLT2i. These findings highlight the need for a more extensive analysis to establish a stronger statistical correlation.

#2840 Early tolerance of SGLT2i therapy in patients with ATTR V30M amyloidosis: staging the disease to establish standard of care

Abstract Background and Aims Studies of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) therapy on ATTR cardiomyopathy are scarce and focus wild-type and V122I. In ATTRv, namely V30M, SGLT2i introduction to preserve kidney function or improve cardiorenal syndrome is not an outlined practice. Our aim was to assess the clinical evolution and difficulties with SGLT2i therapy in ATTR V30M amyloidosis, a population with neurogenic bladder, dysautonomia and prone to dehydration. Methods Patients with ATTR V30M amyloidosis and criteria for SGLT2i started standard dosages. Gillmore score (GS) for ATTR cardiomyopathy, kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) and the renal system score (RSS) of the FASTEX model (Fabry disease) were calculated. Estimation of heart amyloid load was based on Tc-99-DPD scintigraphy. Results Eight patients were followed on median of 7 months [IQR 5.6-9.4]; 7 treated with dapagliflozin, 1 with empagliflozin. 6 had type-2 diabetes. 4 were treated with tafamidis, 1 inotersen and 1 patisiran. 3/7 had positive DPD scintigraphy. Heart failure decompensation, new arrhythmias and renal adverse events were absent. Neurogenic bladder was present in 4 patients, 2 had urinary tract infections. 1 had symptomatic hypotension, leading to discontinuation of therapy. EGFR and RSS improved in 5 and 3 patients, respectively; NT-proBNP/albuminuria/proteinuria and KFRE at 2 and 5 years decreased. In terms of cardiomyopathy, 1 patient improved to GSI; 2 using CKD-EPI creatinine and none using CKD-EPI cystatin C. 1 progressed to GSII in all equations. Conclusion In this pilot study, we evidenced that ATTR V30M patients meet the criteria for SGLT2i therapy. Dysautonomia and neurogenic bladder were not an impediment for therapy. In addition to disease modifying drugs, SGLT2i may improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in ATTR V30M amyloidosis.

#2595 Evolution of hemoglobin and serum uric acid levels after SGLT2i initiation in patients with and without diabetic nephropathy

Abstract Background and Aims Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are glucose-lowering drugs that inhibit glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule, enhancing urinary glucose excretion. SGLT2i exhibit significant cardio- and renoprotective effects due to their capacity to increase diuresis and weight loss and reduce intraglomerular and blood pressure. Moreover, recent studies have described the potential of SGLT2i to improve additional cardiovascular risk factors, such as anemia or hyperuricemia. In this study, we aimed to describe the evolution of hemoglobin (Hb) and serum uric acid (SUA) levels in CKD patients with and without diabetic nephropathy before and after the initiation of SGLT2i therapy. Method CKD patients with and without diabetic nephropathy that were followed in the outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral academic hospital during January 2020 to September 2023 and that started SGLT2i therapy during that period were randomly recruited in the study. Patient characteristics, CKD staging, and levels of Hb and SUA before and after SGLT2i initiation were compared between groups. Hb and SUA levels were averaged considering all available laboratory controls during the last 12 months before treatment initiation and any available controls after treatment start. Results Demographic and clinical characteristics of enrolled patients are summarized in Fig. 1. Subjects with diabetic nephropathy were significantly older, more commonly hypertensive, presented worse kidney function, had received SGLT2i for a lengthier time and had lower hemoglobin values. We observed no change in hemoglobin levels after the initiation of SGLT2i in our sample, independently of diabetic nephropathy status or CKD stage (Fig. 2A, C). In contrast, SUA levels decreased significantly both in patients with and without diabetic nephropathy (Fig. 2B). This effect was observed across all the spectrum of CKD in our sample (Fig. 2D). Conclusion In our sample, SGLT2i initiation was associated with a significant decrease in SUA levels, both in patients with and without diabetic nephropathy and independently of CKD stage, which may help to explain its cardio- and nephroprotective effects. No change in Hb levels was observed, possibly due to a low prevalence of anaemia in our sample.

#853 Kidney-protective medication and risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: preliminary findings from DISCOVER CKD

Abstract Background and Aims Renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors (RASi) have been a foundational therapy in chronic kidney disease (CKD) for several decades. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have also emerged as a critical disease-modifying therapy in CKD, with contemporary data from trials showing SGLT2i to significantly improve kidney and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with or without diabetes. Nonetheless, several studies have revealed sub-optimal prescribing of RASi and/or SGLT2i therapy (both herein referred to as kidney-protective medication) in patients with CKD. Using prospective data from the DISCOVER CKD study, we conducted an exploratory analysis to assess the association of kidney-protective medication real-world use with mortality risk, CV events (fatal and non-fatal), and hospitalisation in patients with CKD. Method DISCOVER CKD (NCT04034992) is a multi-country, non-interventional cohort study designed to characterise the epidemiology of CKD, including describing patient characteristics, disease progression, clinical outcomes, patient journey, practice patterns, and clinical management. In the prospective phase, patients with CKD were recruited from the UK, USA, Spain, Italy, Sweden and Japan between September 2019 and June 2022. Clinical data were extracted manually from patients’ health records into a standardised case report form. The current analysis includes 12 months’ follow-up data. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the risk of all-cause mortality and CV events and a negative binomial regression model was used to compare the risk of all-cause hospitalisation between patients receiving and not receiving kidney-protective medication at baseline, with adjustments for age, sex, CKD stage, diabetes mellitus, hyperkalaemia, and heart failure. DISCOVER CKD received research ethics board approval, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Results Of the 1052 patients enrolled in DISCOVER CKD, 643 (61.1%) were receiving kidney-protective medication in the form of RASi (n = 618) and SGLT2i (n = 147) at baseline. The mean age of participants receiving and not receiving kidney-protective medication was 62.4 years and 62.7 years, respectively; 34.4% and 40.8%, respectively, were female. Most patients had CKD stage 3A (n = 332, 31.6%) or 3B (n = 308, 29.3%), and 8.4% (n = 88) had ongoing dialysis. Body mass index (30.4 vs 29.4 kg/m2) and blood pressure were similar for those receiving kidney-protective medication versus those who were not. Laboratory assessments were also generally similar, although estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; 40.9 vs 33.7 mL/min/1.73 m2) and haemoglobin (132.0 g/L vs 124.0 g/L) were higher in patients receiving kidney-protective medication versus those not. During the follow-up, patients receiving kidney-protective medication had a 67% lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12–0.80, p = 0.019), and a 20% lower risk of all-cause hospitalisation (HR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.64–0.99, p = 0.042) compared with patients not receiving kidney-protective medication. In the population without pre-existing CV disease, a trend towards a lower rate of CV events was observed in patients with kidney-protective medication (CV events rates: 2.2 vs 3.2 per 100 person-years; HR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.12–1.08, p = 0.074 (Figure). Conclusion In this multinational CKD cohort, preliminary analysis indicates that using kidney-protective medication was associated with lower risks of adverse outcomes including death. Further analysis to mitigate potential confounding will be performed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Cardiovascular outcomes associated with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundCancer patients with diabetes are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases due to common risk factors and well-documented drug-associated cardiotoxicity. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have shown cardiovascular benefits in patients with diabetes, but their effects on cancer patients remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes associated with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with concomitant diabetes and cancer.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing cardiovascular outcomes between cancer patients with diabetes receiving SGLT2 inhibitors and those not receiving SGLT2 inhibitors. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 29, 2024. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were heart failure hospitalization, and adverse events. Random-effect models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity and explore the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on mitigating cardiotoxicity.ResultsNine cohort studies involving 82,654 patients were included. SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.68, P < 0.0001; I2 = 98%) and heart failure hospitalization (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30–0.81, P = 0.006; I2 = 21%) compared to non-use. The mortality benefit remained significant in patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28–0.89, P = 0.02; I2 = 71%). SGLT2 inhibitor use was also associated with a lower risk of sepsis (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23–0.44, P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and no increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.20–2.16, P = 0.49; I2 = 0%).ConclusionsSGLT2 inhibitor therapy is associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with concomitant diabetes and cancer. These findings suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors may offer cardiovascular benefits in this high-risk population. Randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings and evaluate the safety and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in specific cancer types and treatment regimens.

Combination SGLT2 Inhibitor and Glucagon Receptor Antagonist Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

To examine the effects of insulin-adjunctive therapy with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor and a glucagon receptor antagonist (GRA) on glycemia, insulin use, and ketogenesis during insulinopenia in type 1 diabetes. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial we assessed the effects of adjunctive SGLT2 inhibitor therapy (dapagliflozin 10 mg daily) alone and in combination with the GRA volagidemab (70 mg weekly) in 12 adults with type 1 diabetes. Continuous glucose monitoring, insulin dosing, and insulin withdrawal tests (IWT) for measurement of glucose and ketogenesis during insulinopenia were completed during insulin-only (Baseline), SGLT2 inhibitor, and combination (SGLT2 inhibitor + GRA) therapy periods. Average glucose and percent time with glucose in range (70-180 mg/dL) improved with combination therapy versus Baseline and SGLT2 inhibitor (131 vs. 150 and 138 mg/dL [P < 0.001 and P = 0.01] and 86% vs. 70% and 78% [P < 0.001 and P = 0.03], respectively) without increased hypoglycemia. Total daily insulin use decreased with combination therapy versus Baseline and SGLT2 inhibitor (0.41 vs. 0.56 and 0.52 units/kg/day [P < 0.001 and P = 0.002]). Peak β-hydroxybutyrate levels during IWT were lower with combination therapy than with SGLT2 inhibitor (2.0 vs. 2.4 mmol/L; P = 0.048) and similar to levels reached during the Baseline testing period (2.1 mmol/L). Participants reported enhanced treatment acceptability and satisfaction with combination therapy. Glucagon antagonism enhances the therapeutic effects of SGLT2 inhibition in type 1 diabetes. Combination therapy improves glycemic control, reduces insulin dosing, and suggests a strategy to unlock the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors while mitigating the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis.

VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIA EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER–DEFIBRILLATOR BEFORE AND AFTER THE TREATMENT WITH SODIUM–GLUCOSE CO–TRANSPORTER 2 INHIBITORS

Abstract Background Role of sodium–glucose co–transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in the treatment of chronic heart failure is increasing. However, some case series described appropriate shocks from ICD in patients following the initiations of SGLT2i and a larger analysis is not present in the literature. Methods The aim of this study is to investigate the rate of ventricular arrhythmic burden and appropriate anti–tachycardia therapy from ICD before and after the initiation of SGLT2i therapy. A retrospective single–center analysis was performed, comparing ventricular events from home monitoring reports 3 months before and 3 months after SGLT2i therapy treatment. Results Seventeen patients were enrolled in the study. The baseline clinical e therapy characteristics of patients are shown in the table. Ten patients (59%) had mono cameral or dual cameral ICD and 7 had implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillators.During the 3 months before SGLT2i treatment, 4/17 patients had nun–sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) vs 8/17 (23% vs 47%, P value 0.23) patients with NSTV after the treatment. Seven patients (41%) had an increase in the rate of NSVT events (with a patient with 28 NSVT after treatment vs 0 before treatment). No patients had anti–tachycardia therapy in the 3 months before treatment, while during the 3 months after the SGLT2i treatment, 1 patient had a ventricular tachycardia treated with anti–tachycardia pacing (110 days after the beginning of the treatment) and 2 patients had a ventricular tachycardia treated with appropriate shock (2 and 25 days after the beginning of SGLT2i treatment). Conclusion This small retrospective analysis showed an increase in ventricular arrhythmic events in the 3 months after the initiation of SGLT2i. These data prospect the need for a larger analysis for a stronger statistical correlation.

SGLT2i IN THE REAL WORLD: DATA FROM THE PONTE (bridge) HF PROJECT (PDTA FOR INTEGRATED TERRITORY HOSPITAL FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE)

Abstract Background Over the last few years, treatment with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) dapaglifozin and empaglifozin was shown to reduce the combined risk of cardiovascular death and/or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Subsequent RCTs have demonstrated similar reduction in the combined endpoint also in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &amp;gt;40%. Nevertheless, real world data on the current state of implementation of SGLT2i therapy in HF clinical practice are scarce. The aim of the study was therefore to evaluate the impact of SGLT2i treatment in a real world population of HF patients. Methods 527 consecutive patients with HF, treated with SGLT2i and with 6 months of follow-up already enrolled in the PONTE (PDTA FOR THE INTEGRATED FOLLOW-UP IN THE HOSPITAL TERRITORY OF THE PATIENT WITH HEART FAILURE) HF project, a care model implemented in Puglia region (Italy) based on hospital-territory integration aimed at the optimized management of patient with HF after hospitalization, were considered for the study. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and instrumental characteristics, changes in NYHA class, creatinine, NT-proBNP, medications, LVEF after initiation of therapy with SGLT2i were evaluated. Results The 527 enrolled patients (mean age of 67,40 years, 75% hypertensive, 39% diabetic, 51% ischemic heart disease, 52% with ICD, 35% with atrial fibrillation) were in NYHA class I in 3,2% of cases, class II in 56,6%, class III in 38,5%, class IV in 1,7%. Mean LVEF was 34,20% (63% of patients had LVEF &amp;lt;35%), NT-proBNP 2606,86 pg/ml, creatinine 1,19 mg/dl. 95,1% of patients was on treatment with beta-blockers, 52,7% with ACE inhibitors, 55,1% with ARNI. After a follow-up of 6 months, a reduction of patients in NYHA classes III+IV from 40,2 to 19,0% as well as an increase in patients in classes I+II from 59,8 to 81,0% (NYHA I increasing from 3,2 to 14,6%) were observed. Furthermore, mean LVEF increased from 34,20 to 37,68% and patients taking loop diuretics reduced from 83,9 to 77,4%. Creatinine remained stable (1,19 vs 1,21 mg/dl), while NT-proBNP lowered from 2606,86 to 1603,32 pg/ml. Conclusions Our real world data on SGLT2i in HF patients seem to confirm the efficacy of this class of drugs in a short term follow-up, with a positive effect on symptoms (improvement in NYHA class and fewer patients taking loop diuretics), NT-proBNP and LVEF.

Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis: A case report triggered by a low larbohydrate diet and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy

Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis (euDKA) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor therapy and low carbohydrate diets. We present a case of euDKA

Cost-Effectiveness of Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction

BackgroundThree medications are now guideline-recommended treatments for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF), however, the cost-effectiveness of these agents in combination has yet to be established. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in individuals with HFmrEF/HFpEF. MethodsUsing a 3-state Markov model, we performed a cost-effectiveness study using simulated cohorts of 1,000 patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF. Treatment with 1-, 2-, and 3-drug combinations was modeled. Based on a United States health care sector perspective, outcome data was used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 United States dollars based on a 30-year time horizon. ResultsTreatment with MRA, MRA+SGLT2i, and MRA+SGLT2i+ARNI therapy resulted in an increase in life years of 1.04, 1.58, and 1.80 in the HFmrEF subgroup, respectively, and 0.99, 1.54, and 1.77 in the HFpEF subgroup, respectively, compared with placebo. At a yearly cost of $18, MRA therapy resulted in ICERs of $10,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in both subgroups. The ICER for the addition of SGLT2i therapy ($4,962 per year) was $113,000 per QALY in the HFmrEF subgroup and $141,000 in the HFpEF subgroup. The addition of ARNI therapy ($5,504 per year) resulted in ICERs >$250,000 per QALY in both subgroups. If SGLT2i and ARNI were available at generic pricing the ICERs become <$10,000 per QALY in both EF subgroups. Outcomes were highly sensitive to assumed benefit in cardiovascular death. ConclusionsFor patients with heart failure, MRA was of high value, SGLT2i was of intermediate value, and ARNI was of low value in both HFmrEF and HFpEF subgroups. For patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF increased use of MRA and SGLT2i therapies should be encouraged and be accompanied with efforts to lower the cost of SGLT2i and ARNI therapies.

Exploring the Impact of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Genitourinary Toxicities in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A Case Study and Discussion

Radiation therapy is a common treatment modality offered to patients with localized prostate cancer. It can be associated with early radiation-induced toxicities including dysuria, nocturia, frequency, urgency, spasm, and, rarely, hematuria. Early toxicities usually resolve once the treatment period has ended. Chronic toxicities are less common, and rarely, patients may experience radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis and hematuria months or years after radiation. We herein describe the case of a 65-year-old man with a past medical history of type-2 diabetes mellitus who experienced hemorrhagic cystitis for months following his radiation therapy. The patient was on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapy (empagliflozin), which we highlight as a potential risk factor for hemorrhagic cystitis. After cessation of Jardiance and initiation of semaglutide (GLP-1 agonist), his urinary symptoms significantly improved. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such case reported.

Comparative Genitourinary Safety of In-class Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors among Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cohort Study.

The American Heart Association recommended sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) for the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, little is known about their real-world in-class comparative safety in patients with HFpEF. We aimed to assess the comparative safety of SGLT2i in the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) or genital infection separately or as a composite outcome among patients with HFpEF. This cohort study using MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare supplemental databases (2012-2020) included patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of HFpEF who initiated SGLT2i therapy. Three pairwise comparison groups were established: cohort 1, dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin; cohort 2, empagliflozin versus canagliflozin; and cohort 3, dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the risk of UTI or genital infection separately or as a composite outcome in each cohort. The risk of the composite outcome did not significantly differ between canagliflozin and dapagliflozin (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-1.14) or between empagliflozin and canagliflozin (aHR 1.25; 95% CI 0.77-2.05). Similarly, there was no evidence of difference between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in this risk (aHR 0.76; 95% CI 0.48-1.21). The results of analyses separately assessing UTI or genital infection were similar. There was no significant difference in the risk of UTI or genital infection among patients with HFpEF who initiated canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or empagliflozin.

The Effect of SGLT2 Inhibitor Therapy on Endothelial Progenitor Cell Function in Patients With Heart Failure.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF or HFrEF). The mechanism for this benefit is not clear. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are bone marrow-derived cells able to differentiate into functional endothelial cells and participate in endothelial repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on the level and function of EPCs in patients with HF. We enrolled 20 patients with symptomatic HF, 12 with HFrEF and 8 with HFpEF (aged 73.3 ± 10.2 years, 95% men). Blood samples were drawn at 2 time points: baseline and ≥3 months after initiation of SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy. Circulating EPC levels were evaluated by expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), CD34, and CD133 by flow cytometry. EPC colony forming units (CFUs) were quantified after 7 days in culture. The proportion of cells that coexpressed VEGFR-2 and CD34 or VEGFR-2 and CD133 was higher following 3 months of SGLT-2 inhibitors [0.26% (interquartile range, IQR 0.10-0.33) versus 0.55% (IQR 0.28-0.91), P = 0.002; 0.12% (IQR 0.07-0.15) versus 0.24% (IQR 0.15-0.39), P = 0.001, respectively]. EPC CFUs were also increased following SGLT-2 inhibitor treatment [23 (IQR 3.7-37.8) versus 79.4 (IQR 25.1-110.25) colonies/10 6 cells, P = 0.0039]. In patients with symptomatic HF, both HFpEF and HFrEF, treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors is associated with an increase in the level and function of circulating EPCs. This augmentation in EPCs may be a contributing mechanism to the clinical benefit of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with HF.

Risk of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema with sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: a real-world data study from a global federated database

Aims/hypothesisA protective role of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-ra) in the development of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema has been described in some recent studies, which may extend beyond glycaemic control. We aimed to review the clinical impact of SGLT2i and GLP1-ra therapy on the risk of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in individuals with type 2 diabetes taking insulin.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort analysis of approximately two million people with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin across 97 healthcare organisations using a global federated health research network (TriNetX, Cambridge, USA). Two intervention cohorts (SGLT2i + insulin, n=176,409; GLP1-ra + insulin, n=207,034) were compared against a control cohort (insulin with no SGLT2i/GLP1-ra, n=1,922,312). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed and estimated HRs were reported for each outcome. Propensity score was used to 1:1 match for age, sex, ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, microvascular complications, chronic kidney disease, HbA1c, BMI and use of pioglitazone, lipid modifying agents, antilipemic agents, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II inhibitors and metformin. A sub-analysis comparing the two intervention cohorts was also performed.ResultsSGLT2i with insulin was associated with a reduced HR (95% CI) for diabetic macular oedema compared with the control cohort (0.835; 0.780, 0.893), while GLP1-ra with insulin demonstrated a lack of signal with no statistical significance to the HR (1.013; 0.960, 1.069). SGLT2i with insulin was not associated with a clinically significant increase in the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy (1.076; 1.027, 1.127), while GLP1-ra with insulin increased diabetic retinopathy risk (1.308; 1.261, 1.357). Compared with SGLT2i with insulin, GLP1-ra with insulin was associated with higher risk of diabetic retinopathy (1.205; 1.153, 1.259) and diabetic macular oedema (1.130; 1.056, 1.208).Conclusions/interpretationOur study suggests that the combination of SGLT2i and insulin is associated with lower risk of developing diabetic macular oedema. However, the use of GLP1-ra was associated with an increased risk of diabetic retinopathy in individuals with type 2 diabetes also taking insulin. A comparative analysis showed favourable outcomes with SGLT2i and insulin in the development of diabetic macular oedema and diabetic retinopathy. RCTs using dedicated retinal imaging are required to determine the causal relationship with these therapies.Graphical

Cause-Specific Health Care Costs Following Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Cost Offset With SGLT2i Therapy

BackgroundLittle is known regarding differences in cause-specific costs between heart failure (HF) with ejection fraction (EF) ≤40% vs >40%, and potential cost implications of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy. ObjectivesThis study sought to compare cause-specific health care costs following hospitalization for HF with EF ≤40% vs >40% and estimate the cost offset with implementation of SGLT2i therapy. MethodsThis study examined Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HF in the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure registry from 2016 to 2020. Mean per-patient total (excluding drug costs) and cause-specific costs from discharge through 1-year follow-up were calculated and compared between EF ≤40% vs >40%. Next, risk reductions on total all-cause and HF hospitalizations were estimated in a trial-level meta-analysis of 5 pivotal trials of SGLT2is in HF. Finally, these relative treatment effects were applied to Medicare beneficiaries eligible for SGLT2i therapy to estimate the projected cost offset with implementation of SGLT2i, excluding drug costs. ResultsAmong 146,003 patients, 50,598 (34.7%) had EF ≤40% and 95,405 (65.3%) had EF >40%. Mean total cost through 1 year was $40,557. Total costs were similar between EF groups overall but were higher for EF ≤40% among patients surviving the 1-year follow-up period. Patients with EF >40% had higher costs caused by non-HF and noncardiovascular hospitalizations, and skilled nursing facilities (all P < 0.001). Trial-level meta-analysis of the 5 SGLT2i clinical trials estimated 11% (rate ratio: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.93; P < 0.001) and 29% (rate ratio: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.66-0.76; P < 0.001) relative reductions in rates of total all-cause and HF hospitalizations, respectively, regardless of EF. Reductions in all-cause and HF hospitalizations were projected to reduce annual costs of readmission by $2,451 to $2,668 per patient with EF ≤40% and $1,439 to $2,410 per patient with EF >40%. ConclusionsIn this large cohort of older U.S. adults hospitalized for HF, cause-specific costs of care differed among patients with EF ≤40% vs >40%. SGLT2i significantly reduced the rate of HF and all-cause hospitalizations irrespective of EF in clinical trials, and implementation of SGLT2i therapy in clinical practice is projected to reduce costs by $1,439 to $2,668 per patient over the 1 year post-discharge, excluding drug costs.

Decreased risk of renal cell carcinoma in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at a higher risk of developing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) than the general population. Invitro and invivo investigations of the effects of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2I) have shown a significantly reduced risk of RCC. However, the impact of these drugs on the incidence of RCC in the human population is unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between SGLT2I use and RCC risk in patients with T2D. We undertook a nationwide retrospective cohort study using the Health and Welfare Data Science Center database (2016-2020). The primary outcome was the risk of incident RCC by estimating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multiple Cox regression modeling was applied to analyze the association between SGLT2I use and RCC risk in patients with T2D. In a cohort of 241,772 patients with T2D who were using SGLT2Is and 483,544 participants who were not, 220 and 609 RCC cases, respectively, were recorded. The mean follow-up period of the study subjects was 2 years. There was a decreased risk of RCC for SGLT2I users after adjusting for the index year, sex, age, comorbidities, and concurrent medication (adjusted HR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81). The sensitivity test for the propensity score 1:1-matched analyses showed similar results (adjusted HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.81). The subgroup analysis revealed consistent results for sex, age (<70 years), and comorbidity with chronic kidney disease. The present study indicates that SGLT2I therapy significantly decreases RCC risk in patients with T2D. This finding was also consistent among the sensitivity test and subgroup analysis for those with or without chronic kidney disease/hypertension.

Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Heart Failure on Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Undergoing Radiocontrast Agent Invasive Procedures: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

(1) Background: This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i) therapy may have a nephroprotective effect to prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing iodinated contrast medium (ICM) invasive procedures. (2) Methods: The population was stratified into SGLT2-i users and SGLT2-i non-users according to the chronic treatment with gliflozins. The primary endpoint was CI-AKI incidence during hospitalization. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and the need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). (3) Results: In total, 86 patients on SGLT2-i and 179 patients not on SGLT2-i were enrolled. The incidence of CI-AKI in the gliflozin group was lower than in the non-user group (9.3 vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001), and these results were confirmed after propensity matching analysis. Multivariable logistic regression showed that only SGLT2-i treatment was an independent preventive factor for CI-AKI (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.16-0.90, p = 0.045). The need for CRRT was reported only in five patients in the non-SGLT2-i-user group compared to zero patients in the gliflozin group (p = 0.05). (4) Conclusions: SGLT2-i therapy was associated with a lower risk of CI-AKI in patients with HF undergoing ICM invasive procedures.

Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin Therapies Favorably Alter QRS-T Angle and Cardiac Repolarization Parameters in Patients with Heart Failure.

Recent randomized clinical trials demonstrated that treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduces the risk of cardiac mortality due to sudden cardiac death and progressive pump failure in patients with heart failure (HF). Mechanisms underlying the potential anti-arrhythmic effects of SGLT2is are not well understood. We aimed to examine the effect of SGLT2i treatment on the frontal-plane QRS-T (f[QRS-T]) angle, a novel marker of myocardial repolarization and an independent predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes. The study included 106 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who received an SGLT2i, empagliflozin, or dapagliflozin. All study participants underwent screening 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) before and ∼90 days after treatment. We compared ECG repolarization parameters before and after treatment. During study enrollment, there were statistically significant decreases in the Tp-e/QT ratio (P ≤ .0001), Tp-e/corrected QT ratio (P = .0002), Tp-e interval (P < .0001), and f(QRS-T) angle (P = .04) in response to SGLT2i therapy. In addition, study participants experienced an improvement in functional capacity (2.06 ± 0.6 vs. 1.82 ± 0.6, P = .0001) and reduced N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide values. In this retrospective cohort study, SGLT2i therapy was associated with improved cardiac repolarization parameters in patients with HFrEF. More comprehensive studies are needed to evaluate the impact of SGLT2i on cardiac repolarization and its potential relation to cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death risk.