Reviewed by: Upon the Altar of Work: Child Labor and the Rise of a New American Sectionalism by Betsy Wood Kevin A. Murphy (bio) Upon the Altar of Work: Child Labor and the Rise of a New American Sectionalism. By Betsy Wood. (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 2020. Pp. 266. Cloth, $110.00; paper, $28.00.) The U.S. Civil War engendered the abolition of chattel slavery but left unaddressed the status of the youngest members of the republic. In this slim, engaging book, Betsy Wood explores how debates over child labor changed between the 1850s and the 1930s. In so doing, she suggests that the continued fight over the presence of children in the workplace underscores not only the legacies of abolitionism and antislavery activism, but also continued sectional tensions between the North and the South. Previous scholarship on the decline of child labor attributes the decreasing numbers of children forced to toil in unsafe factories to mass industrialization at the end of the nineteenth century and the growing emotional value of children within increasingly smaller family units. Upon the Altar of Work offers a new interpretation by highlighting postbellum reformers' discursive invocations of free and unfree labor, concepts that heretofore have occupied the attention of scholars of slavery, abolition, Reconstruction, and postemancipation society and culture. Rather than conceptualizing the era of antebellum reform and the Progressive Era as two distinct periods separated by secession, war, and reunion, Wood sees a bridge between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries constructed out of clashing interpretations over the need for and value of juvenile work. Readers learn about the fight over child labor from five chapters. Wood first analyzes the placing out movement of the 1850s, during which the Children's Aid Society (CAS) sent primarily male children to live in the developing West. The transportation of children siphoned off the labor surplus from northeastern cities, such as New York and Boston, while simultaneously instilling free labor ideology in the emigrant children. As southern fire-eaters called for the dissolution of the Union, reformers such as Charles Loring Brace, head of the CAS, touted the value of free labor, which contrasted [End Page 571] with both wage working and, more importantly, slavery. In chapter 2, Wood presents case studies of the northern padrone system and child apprenticeship laws in the South in the contexts of the expansion of child labor within northern factories and Reconstruction. While northern reformers labeled the Italian immigrant children who performed street music as a new generation of slaves, freedpeople asserted their right to control their own progeny and to benefit from their labor in the face of planters' underhanded actions to retain control over and profit from young Black bodies. The third chapter focuses on the industrializing South during the 1880s and 1890s. Wood contends that southern manufacturers' reliance on poor, rural white children ended northern reformers' appeals to free labor ideology. In its place, advocates against child labor framed their efforts in racial terms as the United States turned its imperial ambitions abroad. Within the New South Montgomery, Alabama, minister Edgar Gardner Murphy began a campaign to eradicate child labor across the former Confederacy. While northerners pushed for national legislation, Murphy insisted on a parochial approach, one committed to white supremacy. He argued that impoverished white children could not assume their rightful place atop the South's racial hierarchy if work supplanted education. Despite his growing notoriety, including a leadership position within the National Child Labor Committee (NCLC), Murphy never wavered in his insistence that states, not the federal government, should regulate child labor. Although a similar outrage against manufacturers who relied on child labor united Murphy and northerners, a common solution to the problem failed to materialize. Chapter 4 traces southerners' vigorous defense of the use of child labor through appeals to the free market, states' rights, and the danger of outside interference in their affairs, while northern progressives sought the liberation of so-called enslaved child laborers with a religious zeal that befit the Social Gospel movement of the time. Despite southern resistance, the NCLC lobbied for a unitary, national law that prohibited child labor. The organization's leadership was pleased when Congress passed...
Read full abstract