Borderlands History in the Southwestern Historical Quarterly Omar Valerio-Jiménez (bio) Click for larger view View full resolution First page of the July 1912 issue of the Southwestern Historical Quarterly, which subtly notes the publication's name change. University of North Texas Libraries, the Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu. [End Page 408] For over a century, the Southwestern Historical Quarterly (including the time between 1897 and 1912 when it was known as the Quarterly of the Texas State Historical Association) has been a venue for borderlands scholarship on Texas and the surrounding regions. While the number of articles on borderlands topics have waxed and waned over the years, the journal has consistently promoted scholarship on the Spanish and Mexican periods of the region's history. The Quarterly has featured articles by some of the most renowned borderlands scholars, such as Herbert Bolton, who helped establish the field, but it has also been an avenue for emerging scholars whose research has appeared as journal articles before their books were published. The journal has also published articles by various non-academics whose interests in the state's early history led to contributions to the borderlands field.1 Among the first articles in what [End Page 409] would become known as borderlands history that appeared in the Quarterly were studies focused on Indigenous nations, imperial rivalries, and Spanish exploration.2 The first articles on Indigenous nations were mainly descriptive. They focused on identifying which Native groups lived in what is now Texas, their social organization, the languages spoken by each nation, and their displacement by Anglo Americans. Reflecting the attitudes of Anglo Americans in the late 1890s, these articles demonstrate a Eurocentric bias and advance pernicious stereotypes of Indigenous nations. While discussing the presence of Caddo, Alabama-Coushatta, Lipan Apaches, Comanches, Tonkawas, Karankawas, and others in the region that became Texas, Martin McHenry Kenney lauded the advances in comparative philology that allowed scholars to trace human migrations by analyzing language. Using "tribes" to refer to the Indigenous nations, Kenney discussed the "advance toward civilization" of "savage people."3 He also described alliances among various Indigenous nations and briefly explained their internal social structure of matriarchal and patriarchal groups. Kenney's perspective on "progress" and "civilization" led him to conclude, "There is no instance of a tribe, as such, adopting the political or social organization of civilization."4 But perhaps his most troubling statement is about the Karankawa Indians of the Texas Gulf Coast, when he writes, "The first and worst of these was the Carankawa, inhabiting along the coast from Galveston westward–a tribe of cannibals, noted for their gigantic stature and hideous aspect. … their language was an almost inarticulate guttural, impossible of imitation, and the lowest form of human speech."5 Some articles on Indigenous nations contain important insights despite their Eurocentric interpretations. The essay by Kenney mentioned above notes the advanced skills required to create arrowheads with "uniform construction." The author gestures to the elaborate trade networks among Indigenous nations that led Native groups in western and northwestern Texas to acquire flint rock to make arrowheads. Noting that this flint rock originated in Arkansas and Alabama, the author notes that expansive trade among non-sedentary Indigenous people brought this rock [End Page 410] material to Texas.6 The different types of materials exchanged in such trade networks are not discussed, nor is the possibility that these materials were exchanged among various Indigenous nations from their source to their ultimate destination. This article also speculates about the purpose of earthen mounds in East Texas and references Spanish colonists' accounts of them. Notwithstanding the author's acknowledgement that these mounds took considerable skill and time to complete, the author disparages Indigenous nations by arguing that it was unlikely they were descendants of the mound builders because these nations had a "habitual indisposition to labor."7 The author concludes that "prehistoric races" of Indigenous peoples became "extinct" because they had failed to develop agriculture. Other articles focused on the forced removal of the Cherokee Indians from the American Southeast to Texas and eventually to Indian Territory in present-day Oklahoma. These essays described the Cherokees' acculturation...
Read full abstract