ABSTRACT This article critiques the dominant paradigm of mobility in borderland studies by foregrounding the concept of im/mobility as a crucial lens for understanding the marginalization of border regions. Employing ethnographic methods in Kargil, it posits that infrastructural development, specifically road construction, constitutes an extension of the border-making process, functioning as an instrument of state control and surveillance. These infrastructural regimes impose a distinct territoriality, disrupting established socio-spatial practices and engendering a condition of remoteness, effectively transforming the region into a ‘captive’ borderland. By enhancing connectivity to previously inaccessible areas, these road networks facilitate state surveillance and cartographic practices, rendering the region legible to state power. However, the article also acknowledges the agency of local populations in negotiating and, at times, transgressing these state-imposed structures, notably through the utilization of social media platforms.
Read full abstract