The current economic crisis casts a shadow over this engaging edited volume, which provides a multi-dimensional set of accounts of the contemporary economic geography of the UK. Through the 16 chapters and two contributions by the editors, which introduce and conclude the collection, readers are offered a series of thematic windows that can be read in order or alternatively treated as discrete papers. The book is written in an accessible form both organizationally and stylistically. Individual chapters, while offering the intellectual depth of an academic journal article, are careful to explain terminology and benefit from bulleted aims at the start of each contribution allowing readers to gain a quick grasp of its focus. Such thoughtful presentation eases undergraduate students into serious academic engagement and potentially provides a springboard for further exploration into the recommended reading at the end of each chapter. The editors opt for a division of the volume into four sections. The first part—Setting the Scene: Uneven Economic Geographies—starts with a thoughtful and reflective introduction to the volume by Neil Coe and Andrew Jones who set the book within a historical context and identify thematic foci for the volume including globalization; financialization; tertiarization; flexibilization; immigration and neoliberalization. There then follows two chapters likely to be extensively used in introducing undergraduate students to the uneven geography of UK economic wealth and activity. First, Danny Dorling explores the north–south divide in terms of life expectancy, poverty, education, wealth and employment in a highly graphical and digestible manner. Such findings obviously have considerable implications for social justice and government policy and should therefore engage readers across the social sciences. Second, Ron Martin's analysis of the unevenness of regional growth under New Labour complements Dorling's contribution, noting that despite suggestions to the contrary, there has been ‘no marked closing of the growth gaps between the regions’ (p. 44) as the nature of the so-called ‘long boom’ over the lifetime of the Labour administration has been manifestly spatially uneven.
Read full abstract