ABSTRACT This article investigates how journalists perceive the role of inclusion and objectivity in their coverage of social justice topics. Theoretically, this article engages with the concept of objectivity through the feminist lens of standpoint theory. Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with journalists covering LGBTI topics, nine of whom identified as non-heterosexual, from five prominent Flemish newspapers. The findings reveal three distinct approaches to covering social justice issues, based on how journalists conceptualize objectivity and inclusion in their work: the objectivity model, the inclusivity model, and the advocacy model. Additionally, this article identifies three key challenges to achieving more inclusive coverage that go beyond the traditional notion of objectivity: implementing clear guidelines, fostering reflexivity, and addressing intersectional shortcomings. Newsrooms can tackle these challenges by creating opportunities for reflection, both in terms of time and physical space, and by openly communicating their value frameworks to both audiences and staff. This is particularly crucial in an era marked by deliberate provocations against LGBTI rights.
Read full abstract