Objective; (1) testing the effect of SSCG training with elaboration, (2) testing the effect of SSCG training with elaboration using interaction patterns, and (3) testing the difference in influence between the two, on increasing tactical action performance. Methods; using True Experimental with pretest-posttest control group design, the sample was football academy students aged 14-17 years, totaling 36 students divided into 3 groups; SSCG practice with elaboration (G1), SSCG practice with elaboration using interaction patterns (G2), and control group (G3). Using a test instrument (FUT-SAT), using only Action Outcome (AO) for the Offensive sub-category. Results; (1) There is a significant effect after SSCG training treatment with elaboration, as evidenced by the t-count of -11.118>t-table is 1.795, p0.000<α0.05. (2) There is a significant effect after SSCG training treatment with elaboration using interaction patterns, as evidenced by the t-count of -11.988>t-table is 1.795, p0.000<α0.05. (3) There is a significant difference in influence, as evidenced by the value of F(35) = 65.445;p<0.000. Tukey HSD Test Results with 95% Confident Index (CI); G1 and G2 (95%CI;[-11.51,-4.32],p<0.001), G1 and G3 (95%CI;[5.23,12.42],p<0.001), G2 and G3 (95%CI;[13.15,20.34],p<0.001), This means that G2 is better than G1 and G3, and G1 is better than G3. We predict that the effect of SSCG with work situation elaboration is able to improve existing deficiencies if SSCG is implemented separately. The interaction pattern provides the effect of ordering direction, setting dimensions, and determining tasks during the attack, so that it is more dynamic, directed, and structured. We conclude that both are worth considering and then implementing in efforts to improve tactical action performance. Keywords: Small-sided conditioned games, Interaction Patterns, Tactical Actions, Football.