Abstract The protein kinase BRAF is mutated in about 50% of human melanomas and the small G-protein NRAS is mutated in another 20% of cases. We have developed mouse models of melanoma driven by oncogenic BRAF, NRAS and KRAS. These studies have established that acquisition of BRAF, NRAS or KRAS mutations can be founder events in melanomagenesis and we are currently using these models to investigate gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in cutaneous melanoma. We are also investigating other targets of BRAF in melanoma cells and have shown that BRAF drives melanoma cell migration and invasion by down-regulating expression of the cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase PDE5A. 2011 was a landmark year in melanoma research with the registration of vemurafenib and ipilimumab, drugs that show clinical benefit in patients with advanced disease. Critically, BRAF inhibitory drugs achieve objective clinical responses in about 80% of melanomas that harbour mutations in BRAF. Surprisingly however, these drugs also drive paradoxical activation of CRAF in melanoma cells that harbour mutations in NRAS, or in cells in which RAS is activated due to increased upstream signalling. This is due to the induction of BRAF/CRAF heterodimers and CRAF homodimers and importantly, activation of the pathway by this paradox can drive tumourigenesis in some circumstances. We have used a two-stage skin carcinogenesis model to show that BRAF inhibitors are not tumour promoters pre se, but rather that they work by accelerating the growth of tumours carrying pre-existing mutations in HRAS. Thus, we conclude that BRAF inhibitors appear to accelerate the inevitable in susceptible patients, but do not induce these lesions de novo. Notably, concurrent administration of a MEK inhibitor with a BRAF drug blocks the development of these skin lesions, providing a rationale for combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors in melanoma patients. Unexpectedly, we have also found that the ABL/CKIT inhibitor nilotinib also drives paradoxical activation of the RAF pathway because it possesses weak off-target activity against BRAF and CRAF. The consequence of this paradoxical activation is that nilotinib provides a survival advantage to chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) cells that are resistant to nilotinib, but also provides an Achilles heel to these cells because they become dependent on MEK signalling in the presence of nilotinib. Thus, MEK inhibitors cooperate with nilotinib to drive synthetic lethality in nilotinib-resistant CML cells. Thus, paradoxical activation of the RAF proteins by small molecular weight drugs can have important consequences to patient responses, creating specific clinical problems in some circumstances, but therapeutic opportunities in others. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr PL04-02. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-PL04-02
Read full abstract