Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Research Articles

Correlation between immune-related adverse events and efficacy of PD-(L)1 inhibitors in small cell lung cancer: a multi-center retrospective study

BackgroundPatients receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors frequently encounter unusual side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, the correlation of irAEs development with clinical response in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is unknown.MethodThis retrospective study enrolled 244 stage IV SCLC patients who receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors from 3 cancer centers. The correlation of irAEs with objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.Results140 in 244 (57%) patients experienced irAEs, with 122 (87.1%) experiencing one and 18 (12.9%) experiencing two or more. Compared to patient without irAEs, those developing irAEs had higher ORR (73.6% vs. 52.9%, P < 0.001) and DCR (97.9% vs. 79.8%, P < 0.001), as well as prolonged median PFS (8.8 vs. 4.5 months, P < 0.001) and OS (23.2 vs. 21.6 months, P < 0.05). Among the different spectra of irAEs, thyroid dysfunction, rash, and pneumonitis were the most powerful indicator for improved PFS. When analyzed as a time-dependent covariate, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with significant improvement in PFS rather than in OS. Furthermore, patients experiencing multisystem irAEs displayed a longer PFS and OS compared with single-system irAEs and the irAE-free ones. IrAEs grade and steroid use did not impact the predictive value of irAEs on PFS.ConclusionThe presence of irAEs predicts superior clinical benefit in SCLC. Patients who develop multi-system irAEs may have an improved survival than those developed single-system irAEs and no-irAEs. This association persists even when systemic corticosteroids were used for irAEs management.

Spatial Transcriptome-Wide Profiling of Small Cell Lung Cancer Reveals Intra-Tumoral Molecular and Subtype Heterogeneity.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy characterized by rapid growth and early metastasis and is susceptible to treatment resistance and recurrence. Understanding the intra-tumoral spatial heterogeneity in SCLC is crucial for improving patient outcomes and clinically relevant subtyping. In this study, a spatial whole transcriptome-wide analysis of 25 SCLC patients at sub-histological resolution using GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling technology is performed. This analysis deciphered intra-tumoral multi-regional heterogeneity, characterized by distinct molecular profiles, biological functions, immune features, and molecular subtypes within spatially localized histological regions. Connections between different transcript-defined intra-tumoral phenotypes and their impact on patient survival and therapeutic response are also established. Finally, a gene signature, termed ITHtyper, based on the prevalence of intra-tumoral heterogeneity levels, which enables patient risk stratification from bulk RNA-seq profiles is identified. The prognostic value of ITHtyper is rigorously validated in independent multicenter patient cohorts. This study introduces a preliminary tumor-centric, regionally targeted spatial transcriptome resource that sheds light on previously unexplored intra-tumoral spatial heterogeneity in SCLC. These findings hold promise to improve tumor reclassification and facilitate the development of personalized treatments for SCLC patients.

Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade plus platinum-based chemotherapy for potentially resectable oncogene-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundWhether programmed cell death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockade-based neoadjuvant treatment may benefit locally advanced oncogene-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains controversial. This retrospective study was designed to observe the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 blockade plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy and corresponding tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with resectable oncogene-positive NSCLC.MethodsPatients with potential resectable NSCLC harbouring oncogene alterations who had received neoadjuvant treatment were retrospectively recruited, and an oncogene-negative cohort of patients who received neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade-based neoadjuvant treatment was reviewed for comparison during the same period. The primary aim was to observe the treatment efficacy and event-free survival (EFS) of these agents. Safety profile, molecular target, and immunologic factor data, including PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden (TMB), were also obtained.ResultsA total of 46 patients were recruited. Thirty-one of them harboured oncogene alterations, including EGFR, KRAS, ERBB2, ROS1, MET, RET, ALK, and FGFR3 alterations. Among the oncogene-positive patients, 18 patients received neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (oncogene-positive IO group), 13 patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or corresponding TKIs or TKIs alone (oncogene-positive chemo/TKIs group), and the other 15 patients were oncogene negative and received neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy (oncogene-negative IO group). The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) rates were 22.2% (4 of 18) and 44.4% (8 of 18) in the oncogene-positive IO group, 0% (P = 0.120) and 23.1% (3 of 13) (P = 0.276) in the oncogene-positive chemo/TKIs group, and 46.7% (7 of 15) (P = 0.163) and 80.0% (12 of 15) (P = 0.072) in the oncogene-negative IO group, respectively. By the last follow-up, the median EFS time had not reached in the oncogene-positive IO group, and was 29.5 months in the oncogene-positive chemo/TKIs group and 38.4 months in the oncogene-negative IO group.ConclusionCompared with chemotherapy/TKIs treatment, neoadjuvant treatment with PD-(L)1 blockade plus platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with higher pCR/MPR rates in patients with partially resectable oncogene-mutant NSCLC, while the pCR/MPR rates were lower than their oncogene-negative counterparts treated with PD-(L)1 blockade-based treatment. Specifically, oncogene alteration types and other predictors of response to immunotherapy should be taken into account in clinical practice.

Integrative analysis of blood transcriptome profiles in small-cell lung cancer patients for identification of novel chemotherapy resistance-related biomarkers.

Chemoresistance constitutes a prevalent factor that significantly impacts thesurvival of patients undergoing treatment for smal-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Chemotherapy resistance in SCLC patients is generally classified as primary or acquired resistance, each governedby distinct mechanisms that remain inadequately researched. In this study, we performed transcriptome screening of peripheral blood plasma obtainedfrom 17 patients before and after receiving combined etoposide and platinum treatment. We firs testimated pseudo-single-cell analysis using xCell and ESTIMATE and identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs), then performed network analysis to discover key hub genes involved in chemotherapy resistance. Our analysis showed a significant increase in class-switched memory B cell scores acrossboth chemotherapy resistance patterns, indicating their potential crucial role in mediatingresistance. Moreover, network analysis identifed PRICKLE3, TNFSFI0, ACSLl and EP300 as potential contributors to primary resistance, with SNWl, SENP2 and SMNDCl emerging assignificant factors in acquired resistance, providing valuable insights into chemotherapy resistancein SCLC. These findings offer valuable insights for understanding chemotherapy resistance and related gene signatures in SCLC, which could help further biological validation studies.

Analysis of postoperative recurrence-free survival in non–small cell lung cancer patients based on consensus clustering

This study aims to assess whether consensus clustering, based on computed tomography (CT) radiomics from both intratumoral and peritumoral regions, can effectively stratify the risk of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and predict their postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS). A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of surgical patients diagnosed with NSCLC between December 2014 and April 2020. After preprocessing CT images, radiomic features were extracted from a 9-mm region encompassing both the tumor and its peritumoral area. Consensus clustering was utilized to analyze the radiomics features and categorize patients into distinct clusters. A comparison of the differences in clinical pathological characteristics was conducted among the clusters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to investigate differences in survival among the clusters. A total of 266 patients were included in this study, and consensus clustering identified three clusters (Cluster 1: n=111, Cluster 2: n=61, Cluster 3: n=94). Multiple clinical risk factors, including pathological TNM staging, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression statusexhibit significant differences among the three clusters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significant variations in RFS across the clusters (P<0.001). The 3-year cumulative recurrence-free survival rates were 76.5% (95% CI: 68.6-84.4) for Cluster 1, 45.9% (95% CI: 33.4-58.4) for Cluster 2, and 41.5% (95% CI: 31.6-51.5) for Cluster 3. Consensus clustering of CT radiomics based on intratumoral and peritumoral regions can stratify the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with NSCLC.

Prediction of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Subtypes in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer From Hematoxylin and Eosin–Stained Slides Using Deep Learning

Accurate assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and subtype is critical for the treatment of non–small cell lung cancer patients. Conventional molecular testing methods for detecting EGFR mutations have limitations. In this study, an artificial intelligence–powered deep learning framework was developed for the weakly supervised prediction of EGFR mutations in non–small cell lung cancer from hematoxylin and eosin–stained histopathology whole-slide images. The study cohort was partitioned into training and validation subsets. Foreground regions containing tumor tissue were extracted from whole-slide images. A convolutional neural network employing a contrastive learning paradigm was implemented to extract patch-level morphologic features. These features were aggregated using a vision transformer-based model to predict EGFR mutation status and classify patient cases. The established prediction model was validated on unseen data sets. In internal validation with a cohort from the University of Science and Technology of China (n = 172), the model achieved patient-level areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.927 and 0.907, sensitivities of 81.6% and 83.3%, and specificities of 93.0% and 92.3%, for surgical resection and biopsy specimens, respectively, in EGFR mutation subtype prediction. External validation with cohorts from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (n = 193) yielded patient-level AUCs of 0.849 and 0.867, sensitivities of 79.2% and 80.7%, and specificities of 91.7% and 90.7% for surgical and biopsy specimens, respectively. Further validation with The Cancer Genome Atlas data set (n = 81) showed an AUC of 0.861, a sensitivity of 84.6%, and a specificity of 90.5%. Deep learning solutions demonstrate potential advantages for automated, noninvasive, fast, cost-effective, and accurate inference of EGFR alterations from histomorphology. Integration of such artificial intelligence frameworks into routine digital pathology workflows could augment existing molecular testing pipelines.

Abstract PR006: DNA repair inhibition via targeting ATR activates cGAS/STING signaling, promotes anti-tumor immunity, and is a synthetic lethal strategy to augment immunotherapy response in preclinical models and clinical samples of small cell lung cancer

Abstract Introduction: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive subtype of lung cancer. Clinical trials of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) combined with chemotherapy delivered only very modest benefits. In this study, we investigated the effect of targeting ataxia telangiectasia and rad3-related (ATR), the primary activator of the replication stress response, in SCLC. Clinical samples from treatment naïve and treated SCLC patients were analyzed by single cell and bulk RNA sequencing to ascertain the intratumoral transcriptional heterogeneity and the surrounding tumor microenvironment (TME). Methods: In this study, we investigated the effect of ATR inhibition either alone or in combination with PD-L1 blockade in multiple immunocompetent mouse models of SCLC. The downstream effects of ATR inhibition were assessed by bulk RNA sequencing, and multicolor flow cytometry. The SCLC clinical samples from treatment naïve and patients treated were analyzed by single cell and bulk RNA sequencing. Results: In multiple immunocompetent SCLC mouse models, ATR inhibition (ATRi) remarkably enhanced the anti-tumor effect of PD-L1 blockade. We next tested the ATR inhibition either alone or in combination with PD-L1 in the second-line regimen for SCLC. We observed that ATR inhibition in combination with PD-L1 blockade significantly reduced tumor volume and prolonged survival of aggressive mice models when compared to PD-L1 alone. Targeting ATR enhanced the expression of PD-L1, activated the cGAS/STING pathway, induced the expression of Type I and II interferon pathways, and caused significant infiltration of cytotoxic and memory/effector T-cells into tumors. Interestingly, ATRi also led to significant induction of MHC class I in SCLC in vitro and in vivo models. Single-cell RNA sequencing data provided a deep annotation of SCLC phenotypes and the surrounding immune TME. Treatment and subtype are associated with substantial phenotypic changes in the SCLC immune microenvironment, with greater T-cell dysfunction in SCLC-N than in SCLC-A. Moreover, a recurrent highly metastatic SCLC subset is associated with exhausted CD8+ T-cells and a pro-fibrotic, immunosuppressive monocyte/macrophage population, suggesting possible tumor-immune coordination to promote metastasis. Specifically, analysis of pre-and post-treatment clinical samples from a proof-of-concept study of a first-in-class ATR inhibitor, VX970 (berzosertib), and topotecan, in patients with relapsed SCLCs, validated the induction of MHC class I and interferon pathway genes, for the first time in this disease. Conclusion: We provide insight into tumor and immune biology in SCLC at single-cell resolution. Further, we show ATRi as a potentially transformative vulnerability of SCLC. Given the increasing importance of immunotherapy for the management of SCLC and that ATR inhibitors are already in clinical trials, combining ATR inhibitors with PD-L1-blockade offers an attractive strategy for the treatment of SCLC and contributes to the rapid translation of this combination into the clinic. Citation Format: Triparna Sen. DNA repair inhibition via targeting ATR activates cGAS/STING signaling, promotes anti-tumor immunity, and is a synthetic lethal strategy to augment immunotherapy response in preclinical models and clinical samples of small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Expanding and Translating Cancer Synthetic Vulnerabilities; 2024 Jun 10-13; Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(6 Suppl):Abstract nr PR006.

Serum albumin and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are potential predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reshaped the treatment landscape of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but only a minority of patients benefit from this therapy. Therefore, it is critical to identify potential risk factors that could predict the efficacy of ICI treatment in SCLC patients and identify patient subgroups who may benefit the most from ICI therapy. Our study included a total of 183 SCLC patients who had received at least one dose of ICI treatment. We utilized both logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression to evaluate whether various patient clinical factors and serum biomarkers could serve as predictors of patient response to treatment and overall survival (OS) during ICI therapy. Logistic regression showed that patients with a history of surgery (p=0.003, OR 9.06, 95% CI: (2.17, 37.9)) and no metastasis (p=0.008, OR 7.82, 95% CI: (1.73, 35.4)) exhibited a higher odds of response to ICI treatment. Cox regression analyses demonstrated that pretreatment blood albumin (p=0.003, HR 1.72, 95% CI: (1.21, 2.45)) and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) (p=0.003, HR 1.71, 95% CI: (1.20-2.44)) were independent predictors for OS in SCLC patients. By establishing a pre-treatment prognostic scoring system based on baseline albumin and dNLR, we found that patients with high albumin and low dNLR exhibited a significantly better prognosis than those with low albumin and high dNLR in both the full (P<.0001, HR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20-0.55) and the metastatic cohort (P<.0001, HR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.15-0.51). The better prognostic group also had younger age, higher BMI and lower systemic inflammatory biomarker values than the unfavorable group (P<.0001). Our data reveals the significant role of metastasis status and treatment history in predicting the initial response of SCLC patients to ICI treatment. However, baseline serum albumin and dNLR provide a more precise prognostic prediction for patient OS. The scoring system based on albumin and dNLR enhances the ability to stratify patient prognosis and holds the potential to guide clinical decision-making for SCLC patients undergoing ICI therapy.

The predictive value of delta-like3 and serum NSE in evaluating chemotherapy response and prognosis in patients with advanced small cell lung carcinoma: An observational study.

Lung cancer is one of the most malignant tumors with fastest morbidity and mortality. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most malignant pathological type of lung cancer with early metastasis and poor prognosis. At present, there is a lack of effective indicators to predict prognosis of SCLC patients. Delta-like 3 protein (DLL3) is selectively expressed on the surface of SCLC and is involved in proliferation and invasion. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is an enolase isoenzyme that is generally regarded as a biomarker for SCLC and may correlate with stage of SCLC, prognosis and chemotherapy response. NSE can be influenced by different types of factors. To explore the associations between expression levels of DLL3 in tumor tissues with platinum/etoposide chemotherapy response, and assess the prognostic values of DLL3, NSE and other potential prognostic factors in advanced SCLC patients were herein studied. Ninety-seven patients diagnosed with SCLC in Zhongda Hospital from 2014 to 2020 were enrolled in the study. Serum NSE levels were tested using ELISA methods before any treatment. The expression of DLL3 in tumor tissue was detected by Immunohistochemistry (IHC). We investigated the relationship of DLL3 expression with chemotherapy and survival. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression was used to identify predictors of PFS and OS. DLL3 was detected in 84.5% (82/97) of all patients' tumor samples by IHC, mainly located on the surface of SCLC cells. Lower DLL3 expression was associated with longer PFS and better chemotherapy response. OS had no significant differences. Multivariate analysis by Cox Hazard model showed that, high DLL3 expression and maximum tumor size >5 cm were independent risk factors for PFS, where NSE < 35 ng/mL and age < 70 were independent prognostic factors for OS. Early stage was independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS (P < .05 log-rank). DLL3 was expressed in the most of SCLCs. DLL3 expression level in the tumor and NSE level in the serum may be useful biomarkers to predict the prognosis of SCLC. DLL3 may be a potential therapeutic target for SCLC in the future.

Exosomal miR-1228-5p down-regulates DUSP22 to promotes cell proliferation and migration in small cell lung cancer

BackgroundExosomes play a crucial role in promoting tumor progression, dissemination, and resistance to treatment. These extracellular vesicles hold promise as valuable indicators for cancer detection. Our investigation focuses on exploring the significance and clinical relevance of exosomal miRNAs in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). MethodsSerum exosomes were isolated from both SCLC patients and healthy controls, and subjected to exosomal miRNA sequencing analysis. Mimics and inhibitors were employed to investigate the function of exosomal miR-1128-5p in cell migration and proliferation, both in vitro and in vivo. Western blot and luciferase assay were utilized to identify the interaction between miR-1228-5p and dual specificity phosphatase 22 (DUSP22). ResultsExosomal miRNA sequencing analysis revealed enrichment of specific miRNAs in SCLC compared to healthy controls. Circulating miR-1228-5p was upregulated in SCLC patients, associated with advanced stages, suggesting its potential oncogenic role. In vitro, miR-1228-5p expression was significantly higher in SCLC cells than in normal cells. SCLC cell-derived exosomes contained elevated levels of miR-1228-5p, facilitating its entry into co-cultured cells. Notably, migration and proliferation induced by SCLC exosomes were mainly mediated by miR-1228-5p. In vivo experiments confirmed these findings. Western blot analysis demonstrated miR-1228-5p's regulation of DUSP22 expression, and luciferase reporter assay validated DUSP22 as a direct target gene. Overexpressing DUSP22 counteracted miR-1228-5p's promotion of SCLC cell proliferation and migration. ConclusionsCollectively, our results suggest that exosomes play a role in facilitating cancer growth and metastasis by delivering miR-1228-5p. Moreover, circulating exosomal miR-1228-5p may serve as a potential marker for SCLC diagnosis and prognosis.

Current developments in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC), often associated with smoking, is characterized by its aggressive biology and potential for early metastasis. It accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancer patients. The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and etoposide has been used for many years in the treatment of SCLC. The prognosis for patients with SCLC who are treated as a single group is still quite poor. Recent research has provided a new perspective on the biology of SCLC. A survival benefit has been demonstrated by adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy in patients with extensive stage SCLC. The study of the molecular, biological, and immunological properties of the heterogeneous structure of SCLC is a promising area of research for the future. Identification of distinct gene expression profiles (ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1) of SCLC patients may form the basis of the most effective and individualized therapeutic treatments in disease management. More research is needed to identify SCLC subtypes and develop effective treatments for this group of patients who have a poor prognosis.

The Design for a Phase II, Randomized, Multicenter Study of CtDNA-Guided Treatment With Furmonertinib Combined Therapy or Furmonertinib Alone for Untreated Advanced EGFR Mutant Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Patients: The FOCUS-C Study

BackgroundThird-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have significant antitumor activity to advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with classic EGFR mutations. However, EGFR-TKI monotherapy shows poor efficacy in patients whose circulating tumor cell DNA (ctDNA) of EGFR mutations cannot be rapidly cleared. Materials and MethodsAs a third-generation TKI, furmonertinib has shown superior antitumor activity and minor toxicity. The FOCUS-C study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT05334277) to explore the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib plus pemetrexed-platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab versus furmonertinib monotherapy in untreated advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC patients without EGFR clearance after the induction therapy of furmonertinib. Patients with EGFR clearance will still receive furmonertinib as Arm A. Patients without ctDNA clearance will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio as Arm B1 (furmonertinib), Arm B2 (furmonertinib combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed for 4 cycles, and then furmonertinib and pemetrexed as maintenance therapy) and Arm B3 (Arm B2 regimen plus bevacizumab). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) in Arm B2/B1. Secondary endpoints include PFS in Arm B3/B1, PFS in Arm A/B1, PFS in Arm B3/B2, objective response and disease control rate, overall survival and safety in all Arms. Exploratory endpoints are focused on the efficacy based on plasma NGS at different timepoints. ConclusionThis study will evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of furmonertinib plus carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab verses furmonertinib alone in untreated patients with advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC without EGFR clearance.

BIOLUMA: A phase II trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab in lung cancer—Results from the SCLC TMBhigh cohort.

8099 Background: Therapeutic options and prognosis for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remain poor. Treatment with checkpoint inhibition can achieve remarkable responses, but this holds true for a small percentage of SCLC patients only. While tumor mutation burden (TMB) emerged as possible predictive biomarker for nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy in SCLC patients, to our knowledge, tissue-based TMB has never been evaluated prospectively in SCLC patients. Here, we present the results of the cohort 2b of the BIOLUMA trial, which evaluates efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in SCLC patients with high tumor mutation burden. Methods: BIOLUMA is an investigator initiated multicentre non-randomised phase II trial in 2nd line patients with SCLC. The initial all-comer SCLC cohort was amended for inclusion of patients with high TMB only. FFPE tumor tissue was used for TMB pre-screening by whole exome sequencing (WES) at time of first diagnosis. TMBhigh was defined as the upper tertile of total missense mutations. After progression on platinum-based therapy, patients received 4 cycles of nivolumab 1 mg/kg q3w in combination with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg q3w and subsequently nivolumab 240 mg flat dose as monotherapy. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) of the combination therapy. Additionally, exploratory analyses of sequential tumor biopsies and blood samples were performed at different time points. Results: TMB analysis was feasible for most patients without necessity of performing additional tumor biopsy. Evaluation of TMB on FFPE tumor tissue obtained at first diagnosis was sufficient for TMB analysis in 92.5% of cases. TMB status was determined for 297 patients: 45.8% belonged to the TMB high group, while 54.2% had low or medium TMB. In total, 45 TMBhigh patients were enrolled in the study with 44 subjects evaluable for primary endpoint analysis. Six patients (13.6%) showed response to therapy, of whom in 4 patients (9%) response could be confirmed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. One patient, who is not evaluable for endpoint analysis experienced a remarkably long lasting PR, which is still ongoing for more than three years. This patient received concomitant palliative radiation during induction with nivolumab and ipilimumab. Disease control rate (DCR) was 20.4% (n=9), three more patients showed unconfirmed SD. Three patients with confirmed PR or SD experienced long lasting treatment benefit, which is still ongoing at data cut-off. Conclusions: This represents the first trial to prospectively evaluate the combination therapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab in TMBhigh SCLC patients. The primary endpoint ORR was not reached. However, we observed an impressive clinical benefit in single patients, which warrants further investigation in order to get more insight into the mechanisms leading to these long-lasting tumor responses. Clinical trial information: NCT03083691 .

Results of a phase III clinical trial with anti-PDL1 treatment in combination with chemotherapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

8095 Background: In China, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for over 15% of lung cancers. The morbidity of SCLC has been continuously increasing. SCLC is invasive, fast-growing cancer that distinctly differs from other cancers. Approximately 70% of cases present with metastasis at diagnosis and the median overall survival rate is about 8 to 11 months with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Although being sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, SCLC patients are liable to relapse and often present with drug resistance. Here we study the combination of Socazolimab, an anti-PDL1 antibody, carboplatin and etoposide to treat extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Methods: The study is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter Phase III clinical trial. Patients who have extensive-stage SCLC are eligible to the trial. Patients are randomly assigned to the study group (Socazolimab + carboplatin + etoposide) or control group (placebo + carboplatin + etoposide) at 1:1 ratio, with a treatment cycle of every 3 weeks. There are 4 cycles of chemotherapy followed by Socazolimab or placebo alone until termination events occurred or for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). The major secondary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). Results: There were a total of 498 patients recruited for the study with average age of 61.9 amount which 449 patients were diagnosed with stage IV SCLC. All the analysis was based on intent-to-treat (ITT). The median baseline performance status score was 1.0. The median OS of study group and control group are 13.90 months (95% CI: 12.22-15.34) and 11.58 months (95% CI: 10.64-12.81) respectively, with a P-value of 0.0316. The 24 month survival rate of study group and control group are 20.7% (95% CI:14.8-27.3) and 5.9 %(95% CI: 0.8-18.9). The median PFS of the two groups are 5.55 months (95% CI:5.06-5.82) and 4.37 months (95% CI: 4.27-4.70) with a P-value &lt; 0.0001. The treatment related adverse event were similar in both groups. Conclusions: These results show that Socazolimab plus chemotherapy continued to provide clinically meaningful improvements in OS for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04878016 .

Lung cancer MDT quality assessment: A nationwide study.

8594 Background: This observational study evaluates concordance between lung cancer multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meetings, focusing on diagnosis, staging, and treatment recommendations, especially for curative options. Assessing MDT decisions aims to identify factors potentially affecting survival rates, promoting equal treatment access for patients nationwide. Methods: In Norway, patients with lung cancer are discussed at local MDT (without a thoracic surgeon present) and at university hospital MDT (with a thoracic surgeon present). All hospitals received 35 fictitious case reports of patients with inoperable non-small cell (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with anonymized CT and PET images for discussion at the ordinary MDT meetings. Of the 12 participating hospitals, 5 were university hospitals. Results: Of the 35 patient’s cases, 12 were assessed as having stage III NSCLC. For 10 of the 12 there were differences in stage assessment, from stage IIIA-B-C to IV, and in recommended treatment (Table). For each case, curative treatment was recommended by a varying number of MDTs, from zero to nine of 12. Treatment suggestions for the four SCLC patients were identical except for one patient with stage IV, performance status (PS) score 2-3 and stroke, for whom the recommended treatment ranged from best supportive care (BSC) to triple therapy. There was generally good consensus between recommending treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation positivity. We found that factors leading to discrepancies in MDT decisions were patients age &gt;75-80 years, comorbidities, PS 2 or lack of a stated PS, PD-L1 more than 50-75% in stage IV and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LNEC). Conclusions: MDT-recommendations regarding treatment varied between MDT sites, and this may have the greatest consequences for patients in stage III. MDT treatment recommendations varied between the sites, confirming that treatment choice can be challenging in certain type of cases like elderly, poor PS or LNEC. Shared decision-making (SDM) with patients was often recommended. As an important outcome of the study, we found no difference in treatment choice between local and university hospital MDTs. [Table: see text]

Real world outcomes of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) presenting with brain metastasis at diagnosis in a single institution health system.

e20136 Background: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is an aggressive lung cancer subtype with high propensity for brain metastases (mets). Despite this, there is no consensus on the treatment of brain mets especially in the setting of frontline chemoimmunotherapy and advanced radiation techniques like Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). Methods: In this single-institution retrospective study, we queried the Yale Tumor registry for all patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC in 1/2016-4/2023. Patients with brain mets at the time of presentation were identified and underwent manual chart review for abstraction of clinical information specifically pertaining to brain mets and treatment modalities. Survival outcomes including median progression free survival (mPFS), median central nervous system-progression free survival (mcPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) measured in months were also captured. Results: 423 ES-SCLC patients were identified. Of those, 92 (22%) had brain mets at initial presentation and were reviewed. 44 (48%) of patients with brain mets were treated with frontline chemotherapy (platinum doublet) while 42 (46%) were treated with chemoimmunotherapy (platinum doublet with atezolizumab or durvalumab). Patients treated with upfront chemotherapy had mPFS 6.4 (95% CI -1.2, 14.1), mcPFS 7.7 (95% CI -1.2, 17.1), and mOS 9.3 (95% CI -13.7, 36.4), compared to patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy, who had mPFS 4.9 (p=0.23; 95% CI -3.5, 15.4), mcPFS 6.7 (p=0.99; 95% CI 3.3, 20.8), and mOS 7.7 (p=0.89; 95% CI -11.4, 33.9). 63 (68%) of patients underwent upfront brain radiation. 44 (48%) had whole brain radiation (WBRT) while 19 (30%) underwent GKRS. Of the patients undergoing GKRS, 8 (42%) were symptomatic. 7 patients (37%) presented with 1 brain met, and 12 (63%) patients presented with 2-5 brain mets. For patients treated with GKRS, mPFS 6.8 (95% CI 2.3, 10.4), mcPFS 7.2 (95% CI 2.9, 12.6), and mOS 11.1 (95% CI -13.0, 40.9). For patients undergoing WBRT, mPFS 6.5 (p = 1.0; 95% CI -4.5, 20.2), mcPFS 6.5 (p = 0.96; 95% CI -3.9, 21.6), and mOS 8.6 (p = 0.21; 95% CI -17.7, 39.9). Conclusions: GKRS is a viable option for SCLC patients presenting with brain metastases, especially in those with a low number of mets. Further studies are required to determine the optimal ES-SCLC candidates for upfront GKRS. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads for bronchial arterial chemoembolization combined with intravenous chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

e20137 Background: We aim to explore the efficacy and tolerability of Drug-Eluting Bead Bronchial Arterial Chemotherapy Embolization (DEB-BACE) combined with intravenous chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with initially diagnosed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: We collected data from 24 patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer who received DEB-BACE combined with intravenous chemotherapy (DEB-BACE-V) and initially diagnosed at our hospital between 2013 and 2022. Among them, nine patients received BACE combined with intravenous chemotherapy from the first-line (first-line DEB-BACE-V), ten patients from the third-line (third -line DEB-BACE-V), and five patients from the second-line (second -line DEB-BACE-V). Then, the treatment response (objective response rate and rate of cancer regression) and tumor marker levels were evaluated at the first month and third month after treatment. The quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale. Overall survival (OS) was also evaluated. First, compare the first-line DEB-BACE-V group with the second-line DEB-BACE-V group. Then, compare the first-line DEB-BACE-V group with third-line DEB-BACE-V group. Lastly, compare the second-line DEB-BACE-V group with the third-line DEB-BACE-V group. Results: In initially diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC patients treated with DEB-BACE combined with intravenous chemotherapy, first and third month post treatment, the objective response rates were 58.33% and 79.17%, respectively; and the rates of cancer regression were 75% and 91.67%, respectively. In addition, the neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and progastrin-releasing peptide levels were reduced at the third and sixth month. Quality of life assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, which included subscales of general health status, functional domains, symptom domains, and single domains except for financial difficulty, was markedly improved in first and third month of post treatment. Adverse reactions were mild and manageable, the most common being chest pain and low fever. Median values of OS in first-line DEB-BACE-V, second -line DEB-BACE-V and third -line DEB-BACE-V were 15.7 (95% CI: 9.1595-20.759) months, 29.63 (95% CI: 20.5684-36.268) months 16.92 (95% CI: 10.4044-21.871) months, and respectively. Conclusions: Due to its favorable therapeutic response, quality of life, survival benefits, and safety profile, DEB-BACE combined with intravenous chemotherapy may become a treatment option for patients with extensive-stage SCLC, particularly as second-line therapy.

Trilaciclib use for prevention of hematological adverse events in chemotherapy: A meta-analysis of real-world studies and clinical trials.

e24130 Background: Trilaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-4 and -6 inhibitor, is the only FDA-approved agent that preemptively protects hematopoietic stem cells from chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM) without compromising efficacy. It transiently arrests hematopoietic stem cells in the G1 phase, thus temporarily blocking progression through the cell cycle and protecting progenitor cells from cytotoxicity. It has been approved for use in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Limited real-world evidence of its efficacy exists owing to its recent approval. We sought to enhance our understanding and evaluate the preventive effect of trilaciclib through a combined meta-analysis of clinical trials and retrospective studies. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus from inception until December 2023. Retrospective cohort studies and randomized-controlled trials with trilaciclib and non-trilaciclib arms were included. The primary outcomes of interest were CIM-related grade ≥3 hematological adverse events, and secondary outcomes included supportive care interventions to remedy CIM. Quantitative meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effects model on STATA v17. Results: The meta-analysis comprised seven studies, including four clinical trials and three real-world retrospective studies, including 6537 patients with extensive SCLC or locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Chemotherapy regimens in SCLC patients included the combination of etoposide/platinum (E/P), E/P/PD-L1 inhibitors, or topotecan, and gemcitabine/carboplatin in patients with breast cancer. The mean age of the patients was 63.28 ± 5.31 years, and 49.21% were males. Administration of trilaciclib led to a reduction in the incidence of febrile neutropenia (2.41% vs. 7.56% OR = 0.35), severe neutropenia (21.76% vs. 41.91% OR = 0.57), anemia (18.02% vs. 32.41% OR = 0.51), and thrombocytopenia (20.06% vs. 31.25% OR = 0.62). Utilization of cytopenia-supportive therapies, including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use (40.47% vs. 81.01% OR = 0.61) and RBC transfusions (16.66% vs. 18.25% OR = 0.59) were significantly lower in the trilaciclib cohort as compared to control. The overall response rate (mean difference = 1.09,95% CI = 0.74–1.60) and overall survival (OR = -0.02 95% CI = -0.95-0.92) were similar, and progression-free survival was noted to be longer in the trilaciclib group (mean difference = 1.75, 95% CI = 0.75-2.75). Conclusions: Trilaciclib use consistently demonstrated efficacy in reducing CIM, thus lowering cytopenia-related healthcare utilization without compromising treatment efficacy in trials and real-world settings. Its novel mechanism of action offers great promise, and further studies with larger sample sizes on various cancers will corroborate existing evidence.

Sex-specific Difference for Small Cell Lung Cancer from Immunotherapy Advancement

BackgroundThe treatment of lung cancer has witnessed significant progress, leading to improved survival rates among patients. It is important to assess the individual contributions of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) to overall lung-cancer incidence and mortality trends based population, especially sex difference. MethodsWe analyzed lung cancer mortality based on subtype, gender, and calendar year. The Joinpoint software was used to identify any changes in incidence and trends in mortality. ResultsIncidence and incidence-based mortality declined from 2001 to 2019 both NSCLC and SCLC annually. The most significant decrease occurred between 2016 and 2019 with annual percent change of 5.71%. From 2012 to 2016, the incidence-based mortality of SCLC in women changed by 2.7% in tandem with incidence decreased 2.84%. Remarkably, the incidence-based mortality for women declined notably by 5.23% between 2016 and 2019, even as the incidence showed a less extent of decreasing (-2.59%). The survival rate for women was 15.2% in 2001, 19.3% in 2016, it had increased to 21.3% in 2018 but similar trends not in men. The survival curve showed the change in survival outcomes over time among men and women (median overall survival: 13 vs 23months) receiving immunotherapy for SCLC. ConclusionPopulation-level mortality from NSCLC and SCLC in the United States fell sharply from 2016 to 2019 as incidence deceased, and survival improved substantially. Our analysis suggests that approval for and use of immunotherapy may explain the mortality reduction observed during this period, with significant benefits especially for SCLC patient in women.

Closing the RCT Gap-A Large Meta-Analysis on the Role of Surgery in Stage I-III Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Despite clear guideline recommendations, surgery is not consistently carried out as part of multimodal therapy in stage I small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. The role of surgery in stages II and III is even more controversial. In the absence of current randomized control trials (RCT), we performed a meta-analysis comparing surgery versus non-surgical treatment in stage I to III SCLC patients. A systematic review of the literature was conducted on 1 July 2023, focusing on studies pertaining to the impact of surgery on small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These studies were evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Statistical analyses, including I² tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests, and Egger regression, were performed to assess the data. In addition, 5-year survival rates were analyzed. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA standards. Among the 6826 records identified, 10 original studies encompassing a collective cohort of 95,323 patients were incorporated into this meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was observed across the included studies, with no discernible indication of publication bias. Analysis of patient characteristics revealed no significant differences between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). The 5-year survival rates in a combined analysis of patients in stages I-III were 39.6 ± 15.3% for the 'surgery group' and 16.7 ± 12.7% for the 'non-surgery group' (p-value < 0.0001). SCLC patients in stages II and III treated outside the guideline with surgery had a significantly better 5-year survival compared to non-surgery controls (36.3 ± 20.2% vs. 20.2 ± 17.0%; p-value = 0.043). In the absence of current RCTs, this meta-analysis provides robust suggestions that surgery might significantly improve survival in all SCLC stages. Non-surgical therapy could lead to a shortening of life. The feasibility of surgery in non-metastatic SCLC should always be evaluated as part of a multimodal treatment.