Dear Editor: A 63-year-old male visited our hospital with a chief complaint of an anal protruding mass. On rectal examination, there were grade III hemorrhoids with partial mucosal prolapse. Anorectal manometry (ARM) was performed in order to inspect the anorectal function. ARM was done with using an eight-channel water-perfused system (TA 6000 Micropulsing®, Gould, Valley View, OH, USA) and a balloon-attached catheter (Zinetics Manometric Catheter®, Medtronic, Copenhagen, Denmark). The manometry results showed paradoxical contraction of the anal sphincter when straining but no other unusual features. During the examination, the patient only expressed a slight discomfort in the lower abdomen. When he arrived at home, he felt lower abdominal pain and had a large amount of hematochezia. The frequency and amount of hematochezia decreased, and at first, he observed this symptom without informing the clinician of it. He visited hospital after 2 days and complained of abdominal distension and nausea. His vital signs were as follows: a blood pressure of 129/ 108, a heart rate of 127 beats per minute, a respiratory rate of 22 breaths per minute, and a temperature of 36.5°C. The abdominal examination was notable for diffuse abdominal tenderness with guarding. The laboratory studies showed a white blood cell count of 13,580/mm, a hemoglobin level of 16.6 g/dl, and a platelet count of 188,000/mm. The plain abdominal films showed distended small bowel loops with air-fluid levels. A computed tomography showed a short segment of wall disruption on the sigmoid colon and a collection of fluid and extraluminal air surrounding the sigmoid colon. He was taken to the operation room for exploration. Exploratory laparotomy through a lower midline incision showed a severely distended small bowel. However, there was no fecal or purulent material throughout the peritoneal cavity. Examination of the sigmoid colon and rectum showed a full-thickness perforation at the level of the rectosigmoid junction. We performed a Hartmann’s procedure, with resection of the sigmoid colon and upper rectum, closure of the rectum beneath the site of perforation, and sigmoid end colostomy. A perforation of about 8 cm in length was measured in the resected specimen. Gas was passed through the stoma on the fourth postoperative day, and the postoperative course was uneventful. Manometry is an objective method of assessing anal sphincter function and it is an important tool for managing defecatory disorders. Manometry has been widely used for investigating patients with fecal incontinence to identify the presence of sensory or muscular defects, as well as to define functional weakness of the internal and/or external anal sphincter. Manometry is also used before performing procedures to document those sphincter functions that may affect continence or require optimizing continence. In addition, manometry has been regard as a safe procedure because there have been no reports on complications or problems while performing manometry. Lee et al. reported that they experienced two cases of colorectal rupture during the measuring the maximum tolerable volume [Lee et al. (1998) Colorectal rupture: an unusual complication of anorectal manometry. Korean J Gastrointest Motil 4:118–122]. Both patients were in their Int J Colorectal Dis (2008) 32:219–220 DOI 10.1007/s00384-007-0312-0