Combined cycle gas turbine power plants (CCGTs) are a combined cycle consisting of a gas turbine and a steam turbine to generate electricity. Sometimes CCGTs incorporate cogeneration to produce both heat and power. After the gas fuel combustion in the gas turbine combustion chamber, the flue gases are passed through the Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) to extract heat and generate additional electrical power using the steam turbine. The CCGT technology is recognized for its highest efficiency of 58% in electricity production among the power production technology. A highly efficient CCGT power plant with 60% efficiency produces even 2.5 times less CO2 than a modern coal power plant with an efficiency of 45% because of the use of gas fuel and electrical efficiency. The CO2 emission can be reduced further when the post-combustion CO2 capture methods are applied. To perform CO2 capture and to reduce the CO2 emission from power plants, the CO2 mass fraction in flue gas is the crucial parameter for the operation of the Post-combustion Carbon Capture and Storage (PCCS) technology. The PCCS technology uses solvents, which is the aqueous solution of amine that reacts with flue gas and absorbs the CO2, which is treated and separated later. The paper presents the results of the energy analysis of a post-combustion carbon capture process when integrated with a combined cycle gas power plant. The study considered two different gas fuels such as methane and syngas. Syngas composition was determined from the sewage sludge gasification process and can be treated as zero-emission CO2 gas fuel. When the flue gas produced from the syngas is used in PCCS at more than 50% of load conditions, the negative CO2 emission level in large-scale CCGT power plants can be reached. The paper presents the results of mass and energy balance analysis of HRSG of a CCGT integrated with PCCS to perform CO2 capture. The analysis of HRSG using flue gases from methane and syngas is performed by calculating the enthalpy of flue gas, rate of heat exchange, and temperature distribution of each component of HRSG. The comparison of the result shows slight differences due to the different composition and flow rates of flue gases. The flue gas at the outlet of two HRSG is used in the PCCS at different load conditions. An aqueous solution of 30 wt% Monoethanolamine (MEA) with rich loading of 0.5 mol-CO2/mol-MEA and a mixture of 16 wt% 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) – 14 wt% Piperazine (PZ) with rich loading of 0.62 and 0.86 mol-CO2/mol-amine respectively are used in the PCCS. Due to the reboiler duty of amines, the steam consumed by the PCCS for AMP-PZ regeneration is less compared to MEA. Depending upon the flue gas and solvent used in the PCCS, the power consumed by the PCCS from CCGT power plant is measured from 9.6% to 11.6%. For the given operating condition of the CCGT and PCCS at more than 50% load condition, the negative CO2 emission level can be achieved.
Read full abstract