Sleep Problems In Older Adults Research Articles

Objective assessment of sleep and sleep problems in older adults with intellectual disabilities

Little is known about sleep in older adults with intellectual disability (ID). Aim of this study was to investigate sleep and its associated factors, and to estimate the prevalence of sleep problems in this population. This study was part of the healthy aging and intellectual disabilities study. Sleep was assessed using the Actiwatch, a watch-like device that measures sleep and wakefulness based on movement activity. Participants (n=551) wore the Actiwatch at least seven days and nights continuously. Variables of interest were time in bed (TIB), sleep onset latency, total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, sleep efficiency and get-up time latency. Multivariate analyses were used to investigate factors associated with these sleep parameters. Provisional definitions were drafted to estimate the prevalence of sleep problems. Mean TIB was 630 min. Longer TIB was independently associated with higher age, more severe level of ID, living at a central facility, wheelchair dependence, female gender and depressive symptoms (adjusted R(2)=.358, F-change=8.302, p<.001). The prevalence of sleep problems was 23.9% settling problem, 63.1% night waking problem, 20.9% short sleep time, 9.3% early waking problem. 72% of the participants had at least one problem, 12.3% had three or more sleep problems. Older adults with ID lie in bed very long, and the prevalence of sleep problems is high. Further research should focus on causality of the relationships found in this study, and effects of sleep problems on health and well-being in this population.

Daily hassles, physical illness, and sleep problems in older adults with wishes to die

Factors associated with the wish to die should be investigated in order to gain more opportunities for preventive interventions targeting older adults at risk for suicide. The goal of the research was to study the prevalence and associated factors of wishes to die in older adults living in the community using the data from a survey on the prevalence of mental disorders in this population. With a representative sample of community living older adults aged 65 years and over (N = 2777), we compared individuals with the wish to die (n = 163) to those without the wish to die on the basis of the presence and severity of daily hassles, physical illness, and sleep quality. Logistic regression revealed that when depression and sociodemographic variables were held constant, self-rated physical health, number of chronic illnesses, number and intensity of daily hassles, as well as sleep problems were significantly associated with the wish to die in older adults. Painful illnesses and daytime dysfunction due to sleep problems were also associated factors with the wish to die. Since desire for death is the first step into the suicidal process, health professionals should seriously consider the important and unique contribution of these variables in order to have more opportunities for detection and intervention.

Characteristics of Chronic Pain Associated with Sleep Difficulty in Older Adults: The Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly (MOBILIZE) Boston Study

To evaluate pain severity and distribution in relation to sleep difficulty in older adults. Population-based cross-sectional study. Community within a 5-mile radius of the study center at the Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife (HSL), Boston. Seven hundred sixty-five participants of the Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly (MOBILIZE) Boston Study aged 64 and older. Pain severity was measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity Subscale. Musculoskeletal pain distribution was grouped according to no pain, single site, two or more sites, and widespread pain (upper and lower extremities and back pain). Three aspects of sleep difficulty were measured using items from the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Revised (trouble getting to sleep, sleep more than usual, and restless sleep). Prevalence of trouble getting to sleep according to BPI severity was 17.8%, 19.7%, 32.0%, and 37.0% for the lowest to highest pain severity quartiles, respectively. Similar relationships between pain and sleep were observed across sleep measures according to pain severity and distribution. Adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, chronic conditions, and health behaviors, chronic pain was strongly associated with trouble sleeping (≥ 1 d/wk) (single-site pain, odds ratio (OR)=1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.10-2.87; multisite pain, OR=2.38, 95% CI=1.48-3.83; widespread pain, OR=2.55, 95% CI=1.43-4.54, each compared with no pain). Similar associations were observed for restless sleep and sleeping more than usual. For specific pain sites alone or in combination with other sites of pain, only modest associations were observed with sleep problems. Widespread or other multisite pain and moderate to severe pain are strongly associated with sleep difficulty in older adults. Further research is needed to better understand the burden and consequences of pain-related sleep problems in older adults.

Effectiveness of strategies to manage sleep in residents of aged care facilities

Executive summaryBackground The promotion of sleep in older adults is a significant issue in high‐level residential aged care facilities, with as many as 67% of residents experiencing disruptions to their sleep patterns. Not only do health concerns such as cognitive impairment, pain and incontinence impact upon this population's sleep quality and quantity, but environmental factors including noise, light and night‐time nursing care also affect sleep of those residing in institutions. In order to address the issue of sleep disruption, assessment and diagnosis of sleep problems and implementation of interventions that are effective in promoting sleep are essential.Objectives The objective of this review was to determine the most effective tools for the assessment and diagnosis of sleep in older adults in high‐level aged care. The review also sought to determine the most effective strategies for the promotion of sleep in this population. Outcome measures for this review were: indicators of improved sleep quality and quantity, including an improvement in daytime functioning and improved night‐time sleep; reduction in use of hypnotics and sedatives; and increased satisfaction with sleep.Search strategy A literature search was performed using the following databases for the years 1993–2003: AgeLine, APAIS Health, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Current Contents, Dissertation Abstracts International, Embase, Medline, Proquest, PsycInfo, Science Citations Index. A second search stage was conducted through review of reference lists of studies retrieved during the first search stage. The search was limited to published and unpublished material in English language.Selection criteria The review was limited to papers addressing sleep diagnosis, assessment and/or management in adults aged 65 or over who were residing in high‐level aged care. The review included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and, due to the limited number of RCTs available, non‐RCTs, cohort and case control studies and qualitative research were also considered for inclusion. Research was included if it addressed the assessment, diagnosis or management of sleep using outcome measure of improved night‐time sleep or daytime function, improvements in resident satisfaction with sleep or reduction in medication use associated with sleep. The types of interventions considered by this review were alternative therapies including massage, aromatherapy and medicinal herbs; behavioural or cognitive interventions; biochemical interventions; environmental interventions; pharmacological interventions and related nocturnal interventions such as continence care. Instruments and strategies to diagnose and assess the sleep of older high‐level care residents, including objective and subjective assessment tools, were considered by this review.Data collection and analysis All retrieved papers were critically appraised for eligibility for inclusion and methodological quality independently by two reviewers, and the same reviewers collected details of eligible research. Papers were grouped according to the type of intervention or type of assessment tool used and findings were presented in a narrative summary.Findings Wrist actigraphy was found to be the most accurate objective sleep assessment tool for use in the population of interest, and issues surrounding its use are presented. Although no subjective sleep assessment tools were identified in this review, the evidence suggested that subjective reports of sleep quality are an important consideration in sleep assessment. Evidence suggested that behavioural observations may be an effective assessment strategy when conducted on a frequent basis. The review found no evidence on the effectiveness of any assessment tools for the diagnosis of specific sleep problems in older adults. The use of multidisciplinary strategies including reduction of environmental noise, reduction of night‐time nursing care that disrupts sleep and daytime activity is likely to be the most effective strategy for the promotion of sleep in older high‐level care residents. The use of sedating medications did not appear to have a substantial effect in promoting sleep, and health practitioners in high‐level aged care should consider their use cautiously.

Effectiveness of strategies to manage sleep in residents of aged care facilities.

The promotion of sleep in older adults is a significant issue in high-level residential aged care facilities, with as many as 67% of residents experiencing disruptions to their sleep patterns. Not only do health concerns such as cognitive impairment, pain and incontinence impact upon this population's sleep quality and quantity, but environmental factors including noise, light and night-time nursing care also affect sleep of those residing in institutions. In order to address the issue of sleep disruption, assessment and diagnosis of sleep problems and implementation of interventions that are effective in promoting sleep are essential. The objective of this review was to determine the most effective tools for the assessment and diagnosis of sleep in older adults in high-level aged care. The review also sought to determine the most effective strategies for the promotion of sleep in this population. Outcome measures for this review were: indicators of improved sleep quality and quantity, including an improvement in daytime functioning and improved night-time sleep; reduction in use of hypnotics and sedatives; and increased satisfaction with sleep. A literature search was performed using the following databases for the years 1993-2003: AgeLine, APAIS Health, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Current Contents, Dissertation Abstracts International, Embase, Medline, Proquest, PsycInfo, Science Citations Index. A second search stage was conducted through review of reference lists of studies retrieved during the first search stage. The search was limited to published and unpublished material in English language. The review was limited to papers addressing sleep diagnosis, assessment and/or management in adults aged 65 or over who were residing in high-level aged care. The review included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and, due to the limited number of RCTs available, non-RCTs, cohort and case control studies and qualitative research were also considered for inclusion. Research was included if it addressed the assessment, diagnosis or management of sleep using outcome measure of improved night-time sleep or daytime function, improvements in resident satisfaction with sleep or reduction in medication use associated with sleep. The types of interventions considered by this review were alternative therapies including massage, aromatherapy and medicinal herbs; behavioural or cognitive interventions; biochemical interventions; environmental interventions; pharmacological interventions and related nocturnal interventions such as continence care. Instruments and strategies to diagnose and assess the sleep of older high-level care residents, including objective and subjective assessment tools, were considered by this review. All retrieved papers were critically appraised for eligibility for inclusion and methodological quality independently by two reviewers, and the same reviewers collected details of eligible research. Papers were grouped according to the type of intervention or type of assessment tool used and findings were presented in a narrative summary. Wrist actigraphy was found to be the most accurate objective sleep assessment tool for use in the population of interest, and issues surrounding its use are presented. Although no subjective sleep assessment tools were identified in this review, the evidence suggested that subjective reports of sleep quality are an important consideration in sleep assessment. Evidence suggested that behavioural observations may be an effective assessment strategy when conducted on a frequent basis. The review found no evidence on the effectiveness of any assessment tools for the diagnosis of specific sleep problems in older adults. The use of multidisciplinary strategies including reduction of environmental noise, reduction of night-time nursing care that disrupts sleep and daytime activity is likely to be the most effective strategy for the promotion of sleep in older high-level care residents. The use of sedating medications did not appear to have a substantial effect in promoting sleep, and health practitioners in high-level aged care should consider their use cautiously.

A systematic review of non-pharmacological therapies for sleep problems in later life.

Sleep problems become more common with age, affect quality of life for individuals and their families, and can increase healthcare costs. Older people are often prescribed a range of drugs for their health problems, many of which have side effects. Side effects are just one reason why there is an argument to be made for clinical use of non-pharmacological treatments. This review considers the effectiveness of three interventions, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), bright light, and physical exercise. It considers sleep quality, duration and efficiency as primary outcome measures. Randomised controlled trials were selected where 80% or more of participants were over 60 and had a diagnosis of primary insomnia and where investigators had taken care to screen participants for dementia and/or depression. The data suggest a mild effect of CBT for sleep problems in older adults, best demonstrated for sleep maintenance insomnia. It may be that the provisions of 'top-up' or 'refresher' sessions of CBT training to improve durability of effect are worthy of investigation. Evidence of the efficacy of bright light and exercise were so limited that no conclusions about them can be reached as yet; however, in view of the promising results of bright light therapy in other populations with problems of sleep timing, further research into its effectiveness with older adults would seem justifiable. Exercise, though not appropriate for all in this population, may enhance sleep. Research involving exercise programmes designed with the elderly in mind is needed.

Cognitive behavioural interventions for sleep problems in adults aged 60+.

The prevalence of sleep problems in adulthood increases with age. While not all sleep changes are pathological in later life, severe disturbances may lead to depression, cognitive impairments, deterioration of quality of life, significant stresses for carers and increased healthcare costs. The most common treatment for sleep disorders (particularly insomnia) is pharmacological. The efficacy of non-drug interventions has been suggested to be slower than pharmacological methods, but with no risk of drug-related tolerance or dependency. Cognitive and behavioural treatments for sleep problems aim to improve sleep by changing poor sleep habits, promoting better sleep hygiene practices and by challenging negative thoughts, attitudes and beliefs about sleep. To assess the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural interventions in improving sleep quality, duration and efficiency amongst older adults (aged 60 and above). The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (1966 - October 2001); EMBASE (1980 - January 2002), CINAHL ( 1982 - January 2002; PsychINFO 1887 to 2002; The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2002); National Research Register (NRR [2002]). Bibliographies of existing reviews in the area, as well as of all trial reports obtained, were searched. Experts in the field were consulted. Randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural treatments for primary insomnia where 80% or more of participants were over 60. Participants must have been screened to exclude those with dementia and/or depression. Abstracts of studies identified in searches of electronic databases were read and assessed to determine whether they might meet the inclusion criteria. Data were analysed separately depending on whether results had been obtained subjectively or objectively. Six trials, including 282 participants with insomnia, examined the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural treatments (CBT) for sleep problems in this population. The final total of participants included in the meta-analysis was 224. The data suggest a mild effect of CBT for sleep problems in older adults, best demonstrated for sleep maintenance insomnia. When the possible side-effects of standard treatment (hypnotics) are considered, there is an argument to be made for clinical use of cognitive-behavioural treatments. Research is needed to establish the likely predictors of success with such treatments. As it may well be the case that the treatment efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy itself is not durable, the provision of "top-up" sessions of CBT training to improve durability of effect are worthy of investigation.

Ethnic Differences in Self-Reported Sleep Problems in Older Adults

To date, conflicting observations have been made regarding ethnic differences in sleep patterns. Plausibly, differing sampling strategies and disparity in the cohorts investigated might help explain discrepant findings. To our knowledge population-based studies investigating ethnic differences in sleep complaints have not addressed within-group ethnic heterogeneity, although within-group health disparities have been documented. Volunteers (n =1118) in this study were community-residing older European Americans and African Americans residing in Brooklyn, New York, which were recruited by a stratified, cluster sampling technique. Trained interviewers of the same race as the respondents gathered data during face-to-face interviews conducted either in the respondent's home or another location of their choice. Data included demographic and health risk factors, physical health, social support, and emotional experience. Relationships of demographic and health risk factors to sleep disturbances were examined in multiple linear regression analyses. Within-group differences in sleep complaints were also explored. N/A. N/A. N/A. Of the factors showing significant associations with sleep disturbance, European American ethnicity was the most significant predictor (r2 = 0.20). Worse sleep and greater reliance on sleep medicine were observed among European Americans. Caribbean Americans reported less sleep complaints than did U.S.-born African Americans, and immigrant European Americans reported greater complaints than did US-born European Americans. As expected several health risk factors were predictive of sleep disturbance among urban community-dwelling older adults, but ethnicity was the most significant predictor. The present data suggest both between-group and within-group ethnic differences in sleep complaints. Understanding of demographic and cultural differences between African Americans and European Americans may be critical in interpreting subjective health-related data.

Sleep problems in the elderly.

Sleep problems in older adults are so common that nearly half of all hypnotic prescriptions written are for persons over 65 years old. Although normal aging affects sleep, the practitioner should evaluate the many factors that cause insomnia: medical illness, psychiatric illness, dementia, alcohol and/or polypharmacy, restless legs syndrome, periodic leg movements, and sleep apnea syndrome. Nonpharmacologic treatment of sleep disorders is preferred. The nurse practitioner can assess and manage elderly patients with sleep disorders, but they need to refer those who can benefit from evaluation to a sleep disorder center.