Sleep-disordered Breathing In Heart Failure Research Articles

Sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure patients with different etiologies.

BackgroundThe prevalence of sleep‐disordered breathing (SDB) is closely related to the severity of heart failure (HF), and the severity of HF is different in patients with HF of different etiologies. Hypothesis: This study aimed to explore the prevalence of SDB in patients with HFof different etiologies.MethodsHospitalized HF patients were consecutively enrolled. All patients underwent portable overnight cardiorespiratory polygraphy. Patients were divided into five groups according to the etiology of HF: ischemic, hypertensive, myocardial, valvular, and arrhythmic. The prevalence of SDB and clinical data was compared among the five groups.ResultsIn total, 248 patients were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of SDB in HF was 70.6%, with the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) at 47.6% and central sleep apnea (CSA) at 23.0%. Patients were divided into five groups: ischemic, hypertensive, myocardial, valvular, and arrhythmic. The prevalence of SDB among the five groups was 75.3%, 81.4%, 77.8%, 51.9%, and 58.5% (p = .014), respectively. The prevalence of OSA among the five groups was 42.7%, 72.1%, 36.1%, 37.0%, and 49.1% (p = .009), whereas the CSA was 32.6%, 9.3%, 41.7%, 14.8%, and 9.4% (p < .001), respectively.ConclusionsSDB is common in HF patients. The prevalence and types of SDB varied in HF with different etiologies, which may be related to the different severities of HF. SDB was highly prevalent in patients with ischemic, hypertensive, and myocardial HF. Hypertensive HF patients were mainly complicated with OSA, while myocardial HF patients were mainly complicated with CSA. Both conditions were highly prevalent in ischemic HF patients. The prevalence of SDB was relatively low in valvular and arrhythmic HF patients, and OSA was the main type.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of sleep-disordered breathing in patients with heart failure of different left ventricular ejection fractions.

The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is high in patients with heart failure (HF), while the prevalence of SDB in HF with different left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) has rarely been reported. We aimed to explore the prevalence and clinical characteristics of SDB in patients withHF having different LVEF. Patients with stable HF were consecutively enrolled. All patients underwent portable overnight cardiorespiratory polygraphy and echocardiography. According to their LVEF, the patients were divided into the HFrEF (HF with reduced EF, EF < 40%), HFmrEF (HF with mid-range EF, 40 ≤ EF < 50), and HFpEF groups (HF with preserved EF, EF ≥ 50%). The prevalence and clinical data of SDB among the 3 groups were then compared. A total of 252 patients, including 134 men, were enrolled in the study. The prevalence of SDB inpatients with HF was 70%. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was diagnosed in48% and central sleep apnea (CSA) in 22%. The prevalence of SDB in the HFrEE, HFmrEF, and HFpEF groups was 86%, 86%, and 62%, respectively (P = 0.001). The prevalence of OSA among the 3 groups was 42%, 47%, and 49%, respectively (P = 0.708), while the prevalence of CSA among the 3 groups was 44%, 40%, and 13% (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age and BMI were independent risk factors for OSA in patientswith HF, while LVEF and smoking were independent risk factors for CSA in patientswith HF. Correlational analyses revealed that LVEF was negatively correlated with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (r = -0.309, P < 0.001) and central apnea index (CAI) ( r = -0.558, P < 0.001), while there was no significant correlation with obstructive apnea index (OAI). The ROC curve revealed that LVEF could predict the occurrence of CSA and SDB, with AUC = 0.683 (95%CI 0.600-0.767, P < 0.001) and AUC = 0.630 (95%CI 0.559-0.702, P = 0.001), but not of OSA. SDB was highly common in HF, and the prevalence of SDB was different in HF with different LVEF, mainly due to the difference in cardiac functions. The prevalence and severity of SDB in HFrEF and HFmrEF were significantly higher than those in HFpEF, which was mainly related to the increase in CSA. When HFmrEF was similar to HFrEF in cardiac functions, the prevalence, type, and severity of SDB were similar between the two groups. Changes in LVEF had a significant impact on CAI, but not on OAI. LVEF can predict the occurrence of CSA and SDB to a certain extent.

Sleep apnoea and heart failure

Heart failure and sleep disordered breathing (SDB) are two common conditions that frequently overlap and have been studied extensively in the past three decades. Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) may result in myocardial damage due to intermittent hypoxia that leads to increased sympathetic activity and transmural pressures, low-grade vascular inflammation, and oxidative stress. On the other hand, central sleep apnoea and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSA-CSR) occurs in heart failure, irrespective of ejection fraction, either reduced (HFrEF), preserved (HFpEF) or mildly reduced (HFmrEF). The pathophysiology of CSA-CSR relies on several mechanisms leading to hyperventilation, breathing cessation and periodic breathing. Pharyngeal collapse may result at least in part from fluid accumulation in the neck, owing to daytime fluid retention and overnight rostral fluid shift from the legs. Although both OSA and CSA-CSR occur in heart failure, the symptoms are less suggestive than in typical (non-heart failure-related) OSA. Overnight monitoring is mandatory for a proper diagnosis, with accurate measurement and scoring of central and obstructive events, since the management will be different depending on whether the sleep apnoea in heart failure is predominantly OSA or CSA-CSR. SDB in heart failure is associated with worse prognosis, including higher mortality, than in patients with heart failure but without SDB. However, there is currently no evidence that treating SDB improves clinically important outcomes in patients with heart failure, such as cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Monitoring for sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is extremely common in heart failure (HF) and it carries with it adverse symptoms and impaired survival. Sleep-disordered breathing has two main types; obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and central sleep apnoea (CSA), which can overlap. The differentiation between CSA and OSA is important and is recommended in recent HF guidelines, by recommending a formal sleep study. The reason is that for OSA the main therapy is a positive pressure airway mask, whereas for patients with HFrEF and CSA this mask therapy actually increases cardiovascular mortality, and therefore alternative therapies are required, such as implantable phrenic nerve stimulation to improve sleep and related daytime symptoms attributable to the CSA. This article discusses the detection, screening, and monitoring of SDB in HF patients.

Sleep-disordered Breathing in Heart Failure: A Complex Bidirectional Pathophysiology

Sleep-disordered Breathing in Heart Failure: A Complex Bidirectional Pathophysiology

Management of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Heart Failure

Over the past few decades, sleep-disordered breathing (SBD) was recognized as major comorbid condition affecting the general population with notable increased prevalence in patients with heart failure (HF). The relationship between SDB and HF is multilayered and despite extensive research in this area, the cause-and-effect relationship is not clearly understood. SDB is well known to cause accelerated progression of HF stages and is associated with increased HF morbidity and poor survival. In contrast, worsening heart failure can lead to the development of SBD and parallel increase in its severity. Despite recent breakthrough in SDB treatment and presence of effective therapies that can improve exercise capacity and quality of life, a large portion of HF patients with SDB remain untreated due to the lack of appropriate screening algorithms and practical therapeutic pathways. It is unfortunate that the management of SDB is still missing from routine HF evaluation, while clinical guidelines have not provided clear insight on the management of this prevalent comorbidity. In this review, we will provide overview of SDB and propose practical therapeutic approaches aimed to simplify screening and provide treatment recommendations.

Treatment of sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure impacts cardiac remodeling: Insights from the CAT-HF Trial

BackgroundSleep-disordered breathing (SDB), including central and obstructive sleep apnea, is a marker of poor prognosis in heart failure (HF) and may worsen cardiac dysfunction over time. Treatment of SDB with adaptive servoventilation (ASV) may reverse pathologic cardiac remodeling in HF patients. MethodsThe Cardiovascular Improvements with Minute Ventilation-targeted Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Therapy in Heart Failure (CAT-HF) trial randomized patients with acute decompensated HF and confirmed SDB to either optimal medical therapy (OMT) or treatment with ASV and OMT. Patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or preserved EF (HFpEF) were included. Echocardiograms, performed at baseline and 6 months, assessed cardiac size and function and evaluated cardiac remodeling over time. The CAT-HF trial was stopped early in response to the SERVE-HF trial, which found increased mortality among HFrEF patients with central sleep apnea treated with ASV. ResultsOf the 126 patients enrolled prior to trial cessation, 95 had both baseline and 6-month echocardiograms (77 HFrEF and 18 HFpEF). Among HFrEF patients, both treatment arms demonstrated a significant increase in EF: +4.3% in the ASV group (.0004) and +4.6% in OMT alone (P = .007) and a significant decrease in LV end-systolic volume index: −9.4 mL/m2 in the ASV group (P = .01) and −8.6 mL/m2 in OMT alone (P = .003). Reductions in left atrial (LA) volume and E/e’ were greater in the ASV arm, whereas patients receiving OMT alone demonstrated more improvement in right ventricular function. HFpEF patients treated with ASV also had a decrease in LA size that was greater than those receiving OMT alone. Although there were significant intragroup changes within the ASV + OMT and OMT-alone groups, there were no significant intergroup differences at 6 months. ConclusionsSignificant reverse LV remodeling was seen among HFrEF patients with SDB regardless of treatment allocation. Substantial reductions in LA volume among HFrEF and HFpEF patients receiving ASV suggest that ASV treatment may also improve diastolic function and warrant further investigation.

Biomarkers in Sleep Apnea and Heart Failure.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in heart failure (HF) and may confer significant stress to the cardiovascular system and increases the risk for future cardiovascular events. The present review will provide updates on the current understanding of the relationship of SDB and common HF biomarkers and the effect of positive airway pressure therapy on these biomarkers, with particular emphasis in patients with coexisting SDB and HF. Prior studies have examined the relationship between HF biomarkers and SDB, and the effect of SDB treatment on these biomarkers, with less data available in the context of coexisting SDB and HF. Overall, however, the association of SDB and circulating biomarkers has been inconsistent. Further research is needed to elucidate the relationship between biomarkers and SDB in HF, to evaluate the clinical utility of biomarkers over standard methods in large, prospective studies and also to assess the impact of treatment of SDB on these biomarkers in HF via interventional studies.

A Practical Approach to the Identification and Management of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Heart Failure Patients.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a major health problem affecting much of the general population. Although SDB is responsible for rapid progression of heart failure (HF) and the worsening morbidity and mortality, advanced HF state is associated with accelerated development of SDB. In the face of recent developments in SDB treatment and availability of effective therapeutic options known to improve quality of life, exercise tolerance, and heart function, most HF patients with SDB are left unrecognized and untreated. This article provides an overview of SDB in HF with focus on practical approaches intended to facilitate screening and treatment.

Predictor factors of sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure

BackgroundHeart failure (HF) is characterized by its high mortality, frequent hospitalizations, and reduced quality of life. Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), one of the common comorbidities, accelerates the progression of HF.ObjectivesThe objectives of the study were (a) to investigate the prevalence and type of SDB in HF patients and (b) to determine the predictors of SDB.Materials and methodsIn a cross-sectional analytic study, all eligible patients of Assiut Chest and Cardiology Department admitted (100 patients) during the period from August 2015 to March 2016 were included in this study. Clinical assessment, full-night attended polysomnography, and echocardiography were recorded and compared between patients with (SDB) (85 patients) and those without SDB (15 patients).ResultsSDB was found in 85% of patients [53% had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and 32% had central sleep apnea (CSA)]. OSA patients are characterized by higher BMI and neck and waist circumference. There was a higher prevalence of hypertension, as well as mean blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, in OSA patients. Loud snoring was the only clinical symptom associated with OSA as compared with CSA. CSA patients had a significant reduction in PaCO2. OSA patients showed a significant increase in desaturation index and time spent with oxygen saturation less than 90%. Maximum heart rate and brady/tachy index were significantly increased in OSA. Cycle length was significantly increased in CSA.ConclusionThe prevalence of sleep apnea was high in patients with stable HF (85%). OSA was the predominant type (53%). The predictors of SDB were BMI (≥30), systemic hypertension, neck circumference more than 40 cm, waist circumference more than 110 cm, and ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction) (≤45%).

Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Heart Failure - A Therapeutic Dilemma.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) occurs in approximately 50% of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction receiving contemporary heart failure (HF) therapies. Obstructive (OSA) and central sleep apneas (CSA) interrupt breathing by different mechanisms but impose qualitatively similar autonomic, chemical, mechanical, and inflammatory burdens on the heart and circulation. Because contemporary evidence-based drug and device HF therapies have little or no mitigating effect on the acute or long-term consequences of such stimuli, there is a sound mechanistic rationale for targeting SDB to reduce cardiovascular event rates and prolong life. However, the promise of observational studies and randomized trials of small size and duration describing a beneficial effect of treating SDB in HF via positive airway pressure was not realized in 2 recent randomized outcome-driven trials: SAVE, which evaluated the cardiovascular effect of treating OSA in a cohort without HF, and SERVE-HF, which reported the results of a strategy of random allocation of minute-ventilation-triggered adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) for HF patients with CSA. Whether effective treatment of either OSA or CSA improves the HF trajectory by reducing cardiovascular morbidity or mortality has yet to be definitively established. ADVENT-HF, designed to determine the effect of treating both CSA and non-sleepy OSA HF patients with a peak-airflow triggered ASV algorithm, could resolve this present clinical equipoise concerning the treatment of SDB.

Sleep-Disordered Breathing During Congestive Heart Failure: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?

Sleep-disordered breathing is common in heart failure patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Central sleep apnea occurs more commonly in heart failure-reduced ejection fraction, and obstructive sleep apnea occurs more frequently in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Although the two types of sleep-disordered breathing have distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms, both contribute to abnormal cardiovascular consequences. Treatment with continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea in heart failure has been well defined, whereas treatment strategies for central sleep apnea in heart failure continue to evolve. Unilateral transvenous neurostimulation has shown promise for the treatment of central sleep apnea. In this paper, we examine the current state of knowledge of treatment options for sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure.

Prevalence and Predictors of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Patients With Stable Chronic Heart Failure: The SchlaHF Registry

ObjectivesThis prospective study investigated the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and its predictors in patients with stable chronic heart failure (HF). BackgroundSDB is increasingly recognized as being important in patients with HF. MethodsThe multicenter SchlaHF (Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Heart Failure) registry provides demographic and clinical data on chronic, stable, symptomatic patients with HF (New York Heart Association functional class ≥II; left ventricular rejection fraction ≤45%). Moderate-to-severe SDB (apnea-hypopnea index ≥15/h) was determined by a 2-channel screening device (ApneaLink, ResMed, Sydney, Australia). ResultsData from 6,876 patients were analyzed. The prevalence of moderate-to-severe SDB was 46%, with a significant sex difference: 36% in women (n = 1,448) versus 49% in men (n = 5,428). Prevalence of SDB rose with increasing age (31%, 39%, 45%, 52%, and 59% in those age ≤50, >50 to 60, >60 to 70, >70 to 80, and >80 years, respectively). Risk factors for SDB were body mass index (per 5 units; odds ratio [OR]: 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22 to 1.36), left ventricular rejection fraction (per 5% decrement from 45%; OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.14), age (per 10-year difference to 60 years; OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.49), atrial fibrillation (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.34), and male sex (OR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.67 to 2.17). ConclusionsSchlaHF registry data demonstrate a high prevalence of SDB in a representative population of stable patients with chronic HF receiving contemporary medical management. Male sex, age, body mass index, and the severity of both symptoms and left ventricular dysfunction were clinical predictors for prevalent SDB. (Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics and Type of Sleep-disordered Breathing in Patients With Chronic, Symptomatic, Systolic Heart Failure; NCT01500759)

Sleep-disordered Breathing in Heart Failure.

Sleep-disordered breathing affects over half of patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with a poor prognosis. It is an under-diagnosed condition and may be a missed therapeutic target. Obstructive sleep apnoea is caused by collapse of the pharynx, exacerbated by rostral fluid shift during sleep. The consequent negative intrathoracic pressure, hypoxaemia, sympathetic nervous system activation and arousals have deleterious cardiovascular effects. Treatment with continuous positive airway pressure may confer symptomatic and prognostic benefit in this group. In central sleep apnoea, the abnormality is with regulation of breathing in the brainstem, often causing a waxing-waning Cheyne Stokes respiration pattern. Non-invasive ventilation has not been shown to improve prognosis in these patients and the recently published SERVE-HF trial found increased mortality in those treated with adaptive servoventilation. The management of sleep-disordered breathing in patients with HF is evolving rapidly with significant implications for clinicians involved in their care.

Sleep-disordered Breathing in Heart Failure - Current State of the Art.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), either obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) or central sleep apnoea (CSA)/Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) and often a combination of the two, is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), is associated with reduced functional capacity and quality of life, and has a negative prognostic impact. European HF guidelines identify that sleep apnoea is of concern in patients with HF. Continuous positive airway pressure is the treatment of choice for OSA, and adaptive servoventilation (ASV) appears to be the most consistently effective therapy for CSA/CSR while also being able to treat concomitant obstructive events. There is a growing body of evidence that treating SDB in patients with HF, particularly using ASV for CSA/CSR, improves functional outcomes such as HF symptoms, cardiac function, cardiac disease markers, exercise tolerance and quality of life. However, conflicting results have been reported on 'hard' outcomes such as mortality and healthcare utilisation, and the influence of effectively treating SDB, including CSA/CSR, remains to be determined in randomised clinical trials. Two such trials (SERVE-HF and ADVENT-HF) in chronic stable HF and another in post-acute decompensated HF (CAT-HF) are currently underway.

Adaptive Servoventilation for Treatment of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Adaptive servoventilation (ASV) has demonstrated efficacy in treating sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with heart failure (HF), but large randomized trials are lacking. We, therefore, sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing data. A systematic search of the PubMed database was undertaken in March 2012. Publications were independently assessed by two investigators to identify studies of ≥ 1-week duration that compared ASV to a control condition (ie, subtherapeutic ASV, continuous or bilevel pressure ventilation, oxygen therapy, or no treatment) in adult patients with SDB and HF. Mean, variability,and sample size data were extracted independently for the following outcomes: apneahypopnea index (AHI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), quality of life (SF-36 Health Survey; Medical Outcomes Trust), 6-min walk distance, peak oxygen consumption ( VO 2 ) % predicted, and ventilatory equivalent ratio for CO 2 ( VE / Vco 2 ) slope measured during exercise. Random effects meta-analysis models were applied. Fourteen studies were identified (N = 538). Comparing ASV to control conditions, the weighted mean difference in AHI ( -14.64 events/h; 95% CI, -21.03 to - 8.25) and LVEF (0.40;95% CI, 0.08-0.71) both significantly favored ASV. ASV also improved the 6-min walk distance,but not peak O 2 % predicted, VE / VCO 2 slope, or quality of life, compared with control conditions. In patients with HF and SDB, ASV was more effective than control conditions in reducing the AHI and improving cardiac function and exercise capacity. These data provide a compelling rationale for large-scale randomized controlled trials to assess the clinical impact of ASV on hard outcomes in these patients.

Treatment of sleep‐disordered breathing in heart failure: reduction of high ventricular wall stress should be a diagnostic and therapeutic target

Treatment of sleep‐disordered breathing in heart failure: reduction of high ventricular wall stress should be a diagnostic and therapeutic target

Sleep Disordered Breathing in Patients with Heart Failure: Pathophysiology and Management

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is common in heart failure patients across the range of ejection fractions and is associated with adverse prognosis. Although effective pharmacologic and device-based treatment of heart failure may reduce the frequency or severity of SDB, heart failure treatment alone may not be adequate to restore normal breathing during sleep. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the major treatment for SDB in heart failure, especially if obstructive rather than central sleep apnea (CSA) predominates. Adequate suppression of CSA by PAP is associated with a heart transplant-free survival benefit, although randomized trials are ongoing. Bilevel PAP (BPAP) may be as effective as CPAP in treating SDB and may be preferable over CPAP in patients who experience expiratory pressure discomfort. Adaptive (or auto) servo-ventilation (ASV), which adjusts the PAP depending on the patient's airflow or tidal volume, may be useful in congestive heart failure patients if CPAP is ineffective. Other therapies that have been proposed for SDB in congestive heart failure include nocturnal oxygen, CO(2) administration (by adding dead space), theophylline, and acetazolamide; most of which have not been systematically studied in outcome-based prospective randomized trials.

1. Linking heart failure and sleep medicine: An integrative team for the management of sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure

It is increasingly recognized that sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and is common in patients with heart failure (HF) yet it remains largely unrecognized and untreated. The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the general population is about 8-24% whereas in systolic heart failure it approaches 60%. Central sleep apnea (CSA) affects about 4% of the general population and 20-40% of heart failure patients. OSA can worsen hypertension, coronary disease, and arrhythmias which can cause acute decompensated heart failure while research shows early treatment of OSA can improve the ejection fraction (EF).

2. Sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure; developing an evidence-based screening protocol

Over six million individuals in the United States are diagnosed with Heart Failure (HF). Recent data indicates at least 50% and up to 80% of HF patients have sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and are largely undiagnosed. HF and SDB have similar symptoms such as nocturnal dyspnea, daytime sleepiness, and fatigue, which make subjective reporting instruments such as the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) less reliable. Untreated sleep apnea creates a perpetual cycle of stress on the cardiovascular system and predisposes HF patients to an increased risk for disease progression. The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, as well as the Heart Failure Society of America recommend screening for SDB. Although, the gold standard of diagnosing SDB is polysomnography no consensus on the best screening tool exists. Recent evidence has shown overnight pulse oximetry is a sensitive and specific tool for screening SDB in patients with HF. It is also economical, given that the Center for Medicare Services rate for overnight pulse oximetry is $29.57.