Reviewed by: Enslaved Leadership in Early Christianity by Katherine A. Shaner Mary Ann Beavis katherine a. shaner, Enslaved Leadership in Early Christianity (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018). Pp. xxviii + 207. $99. This volume is a revision of the author's doctoral dissertation (Harvard Divinity School, 2012; supervised by Laura S. Nasrallah). Although the topic of slavery in early Christianity has been studied from a variety of angles, Shaner's contribution is distinctive in focusing on the role of slaves as religious actors in and around Ephesos. S. uses archaeological and textual evidence to make her case that enslaved persons were "at the center of first- and second-century struggles to define power and authority in both Roman and early Christian communities" (p. 111). In endeavoring to reconstruct the religious involvement of early Christian slaves, S. has affinities with recent trends in the study of ancient slavery that attempt to discern the experience of the enslaved (e.g., Keith Bradley, Slavery and Rebellion in the Roman World, 140 BC–70 BC [Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989]; Stephen Hodkinson and Dick Geary, eds., Slaves and Religions in Graeco-Roman Antiquity and Modern Brazil [Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2012]; Sandra R. Joshel, Slavery in The Roman World [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000]; Sandra R. Joshel and Lauren Hack-worth Petersen, The Material World of Roman Slaves [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014]). S. is also indebted to feminist rhetorical criticism, which has uncovered the ways in which the rhetorical perspective of ancient texts and materials "often constructs (rather than describes) gender, slave/free status, economic means, and social status along traditional kyriarchal lines" (p. xv). Thus, although slaves were ubiquitous in antiquity, they are hidden by material that is dominated by the perspectives of slaveholders, which have often been accepted uncritically by scholars. The five main chapters in the book alternate between examinations of evidence that portrays slaves as religious actors in non-Christian and Christian settings in Roman Ephesos. In chap. 1, "Power in Perspectives: Interpreting Enslaved Presence in Archaeological Materials," S. examines how slave presence is marked by spaces, images, texts, and other archaeological remains in the harbor, the agora, and a luxury housing complex. In chap. 2, [End Page 344] "Power Plays: Roman Policies, Public Slaves, and Social Status," S. interrogates the implications of an imperial decree by Paullus Fabius Persicus regulating the role of slaves in the cult of the civic goddess Artemis, which implies that public slaves were buying priesthoods, a practice that Persicus wanted to stop. S. investigates in chap. 3, "Voices of Power: Onesimos, Paul, and the Ambiguity of the Enslaved 'in Christ,'" the ambiguous status of the slave Onesimos, who seems to have held a position of honor in the ekklēsia, perhaps as a deacon (Phlm 1:13). Chapter 4, "Shifting Power: Ambiguous Status, Visual Rhetoric, and the Enslaved in Imperial Sacrificial Practices," contrasts the Parthian Reliefs, which "idealize images of sacrifice, reinforce imperial authority, and erase the role of slaves" (p. xxvi) with inscriptional evidence that enslaved ritual specialists taught elite men holding honorific priesthoods how to perform sacrifices. In chap. 5, "Power in the Ekklēsia: Contesting Enslaved Leadership in 1 Timothy and Ignatius," S. questions these documents' guidelines for various functionaries (bishops, deacons, widows) that attempt to circumscribe the ability of the enslaved, especially, to fill such roles. S. suggests that, in view of the evidence of slave participation in Christian and non-Christian ritual activity uncovered in the previous chapters, slave involvement in these functions likely figured in their contestation by Pseudo-Paul and Ignatius. Shaner's slave-centered approach steers between two viewpoints that have dominated the study of early Christian slavery: the argument that, since slavery could serve as a metaphor for salvation, slavery must have stood for more than abjection—even as a means of upward mobility (e.g., Dale B. Martin, Slavery as Salvation: The Metaphor of Slavery in Pauline Christianity [New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990]); or, conversely, that slavery was a degrading and exploitive institution that allowed the enslaved limited ability to participate in the ekklēsia (e.g., Jennifer A. Glancy, Slavery in Early Christianity [Minneapolis: Fortress, 2005] 50-52, 111). S...
Read full abstract