You have accessJournal of UrologyGeneral & Epidemiological Trends & Socioeconomics: Evidence-Based Medicine & Outcomes (II)1 Apr 201371 PILOT STUDY OF THE SURGICAL CAHPS SURVEY IN UROLOGIC SURGERY Sara M. Lenherr, Allen N. Haraway, Anne P. Cameron, Ann L. Oldendorf, John T. Stoffel, Edward M. Karls, Barry R. De Cicco, and J. Quentin Clemens Sara M. LenherrSara M. Lenherr Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author , Allen N. HarawayAllen N. Haraway Jackson, MS More articles by this author , Anne P. CameronAnne P. Cameron Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author , Ann L. OldendorfAnn L. Oldendorf Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author , John T. StoffelJohn T. Stoffel Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author , Edward M. KarlsEdward M. Karls Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author , Barry R. De CiccoBarry R. De Cicco Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author , and J. Quentin ClemensJ. Quentin Clemens Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.1449AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys are a family of surveys that can be used to measure the patient care experience in a variety of settings. A surgical care survey (Surgical CAHPS) was recently developed as a 45-question standardized tool that asks patients to report on their experience and satisfaction with care. Our aim was to describe the initial implementation results using the Surgical CAHPS in a subspecialty urology group. METHODS This was a prospective, IRB-approved observational study at a tertiary care academic medical center. Adult patients who underwent elective outpatient or 23-hour observation surgery over an 18-month period were mailed the Surgical CAHPS survey 1-3 weeks post-operatively along with an introductory letter and pre-addressed, stamped envelope. No additional contacts were attempted. Mean values were calculated for each question. The survey content was separated into 5 constructs: 1) Preoperative information, 2) Preoperative communication, 3) Post-operative information, 4) Post-operative office visit communication, 5) Reception staff interactions. Summary scores for each construct were then correlated with responses to a single summary item about “overall surgeon satisfaction”. RESULTS Between April 2011 and October 2012, 528 surveys were mailed and 174 were returned (33% response rate). Respondents were statistically older than non-responders (59.4 ± 14.4 vs. 54.6 ± 17.5 years, P<0.01) and replied an average of 27.5 ± 14.4 days after the date of their surgery. Patient satisfaction with the surgeons was very high with a mean score of 9.5 ± 0.9 (scale 0 worst-10 best). Overall satisfaction with the surgeon correlated most highly with the questions pertaining to post-operative office visit communication (construct 4, tau= 0.59, P<0.0001), followed by questions regarding immediate post-operative information (construct 3, tau=0.40, P<0.0001). Conversely, there was lower correlation with the questions regarding preoperative communication (construct 2, tau=0.25, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The response rate of approximately 33% is consistent with other CAHPS studies which have utilized similar survey methods. Survey results suggest that patients' satisfaction with their surgeon is more influenced by post-operative communications than by preoperative counseling and decision-making processes. This underscores the importance of attention to continued post-operative care and utilization of good communication skills. We are now exploring different methods of survey administration to attempt to improve the response rate. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e29-e30 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Sara M. Lenherr Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author Allen N. Haraway Jackson, MS More articles by this author Anne P. Cameron Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author Ann L. Oldendorf Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author John T. Stoffel Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author Edward M. Karls Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author Barry R. De Cicco Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author J. Quentin Clemens Ann Arbor, MI More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract