Nickel crystallite sizes calculated from H 2, CO, and O 2 chemisorption are compared to those determined from X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Good agreement is obtained among all techniques for typical Ni SiO 2 and Ni Al 2 O 3 catalysts, whereas sizes calculated from H 2 and CO chemisorption are far too large for Ni TiO 2 catalysts. In contrast, oxygen chemisorption provides values in excellent agreement with those from XRD and TEM, and indicates that monolayer coverages of CO and H 2 are much lower on TiO 2-supported nickel. This agreement also implies that oxygen monolayer coverage on TiO 2-supported nickel does not exceed unity regardless of crystallite size, whereas coverages of two or higher are observed on SiO 2- and Al 2O 3-supported nickel, in agreement with previous studies. Isobars for CO and H 2 adsorption on Ni TiO 2 clearly show that activated adsorption is not responsible for the low CO and H 2 uptakes at 300 K. Low-contrast nickel crystallites on titania are observed in the TEM micrographs, indicating that nickel may exist with a raft-like morphology on this support. These results provide evidence that strong metal-support interaction behavior exists in the Ni TiO 2 system.