大型底栖动物在河流生态系统中发挥着重要作用, 2009 年3月至2010 年3月间对长江中游支流巴河流域的胜利河大型底栖动物群落进行1 周年的调查研究。结果表明, 主要蜉蝣优势种扁蜉一种、等蜉一种和红斑蜉的生活史为3代/a、3代/a和 2代/a。现存量呈现出1-3级河流增加、4级又较3级有所下降的趋势。采用体长频率法( 实则 size-frequency method) 测算的周年生产量分别为:扁蜉, 200.13 g·m<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup>, <em>P/B</em>为23.69; 等蜉, 82.06 g·m<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup>, <em>P/B</em>为18.12;红斑蜉, 12.30 g·m<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup>, <em>P/B</em>为8.78。3种蜉蝣生产量时间动态与现存量较一致,但彼此各不相同;扁蜉日均产量于2009年3月在二级河流中达到最大(363.56 mg·m<sup>-2</sup>·d<sup>-1</sup>),等蜉于2010年3月在三级河流中到达最大(282.76 mg·m<sup>-2</sup>·d<sup>-1</sup>),而红斑蜉于2009年3月在一级河流中到达最大(33.36 mg·m<sup>-2</sup>·d<sup>-1</sup>)。生产量的营养基础分析结果表明,3种蜉蝣前肠内含物中无形态碎屑均占最大比例(41.14%-74.37%),其对生产量的贡献率也最大(46.67%-77.15%),其它食物类型均相对较小,且总体上与作者在黑竹冲和叹气沟的研究结果存在一定差异,可能与这些溪流自身环境和地区分布有关。;The macrozoobenthos community plays an important role in material cycling and energy flow in riverine ecosystems. During the period of March 2009 to March 2010, an investigation was conducted on the life cycle, production dynamics and trophic relationships of the dominant mayfly species in first-order to fourth-order rivers-a continuum of Shenglihe Stream in the upper reaches of the Bahe River, a main branch of the Yangtze River. According to the diversity of micro-habitats, from the upper to the lower reaches of Shenglihe Stream, 12 types of habitats were chosen for quantitative sample collection. At each station, two samples were taken with a 250 μm, D-frame kick net or a Surber net, and the samples were sieved with a 250 μm net and sorted in a porcelain dish without magnification. The specimens were kept in 10% formalin for later processing. The life cycles of the three dominant mayflies, <em>Heptagenia</em> sp., <em>Isonychia</em> sp., <em>Ephemera rufomaculata</em> Zhou & Zheng, 2003, were analyzed by their monthly size-class frequency distribution and their cohort and annual production were estimated by the size-frequency method. The results showed that <em>Heptagenia</em> sp<em>.</em> and <em>Isonychia</em> sp. appeared to develop in 3 generations per year, while <em>E. rufomaculata</em> had 2 generations a year. Their standing stocks exhibited a rough trend of increase from the first- to third-order rivers, then a little decrease in the fourth-order river. The estimated mean annual production of <em>Heptagenia</em> sp. was 200.13 g·m<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup> and the mean annual <em>P/B</em> was 23.69; those of <em>Isonychia</em> sp<em>.</em> were 82.06 g·m<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup> and 18.12; while those of <em>E. rufomaculata</em> were 12.30 g·m<sup>-2</sup>·a<sup>-1</sup> and 8.78, respectively. Production dynamics of the three mayflies were in rough agreement with those of their biomasses, but differed significantly from each other. The daily production rate of <em>Heptagenia</em> sp. reached its peak (363.56 mg·m<sup>-2</sup>·d<sup>-1</sup> ) in the second-order river in March, 2009, that of <em>Isonychia</em> sp. had its maximum value of 282.76 mg/m<sup>2</sup>·d in the third-order river in March, 2010, while the maximal daily production rate (33.36 mg·m<sup>-2</sup>·d<sup>-1</sup>) of <em>E. rufomaculata</em> appeared in the first-order river in March, 2009. By analyzing their foregut contents, the proportions of six type of diet (amorphous detritus, animal materials, vascular plant detritus, filamentous algae and diatoms) for <em>Heptagenia</em> sp. were 74.37%, 4.19%, 17.11%, 4.29%, 0.04%, respectively, and the contribution rates to the secondary production were 77.15%, 11.27%, 6.57%, 4.95%, 0.04%; for <em>Isonychia</em> sp., the proportions of its diets were 65.64%, 6.17%, 23.04%, 0.54%, 4.53%, 0.09%, respectively, and their contribution rates were 68.16%, 16.61%, 8.86%, 1.03%, 5.23% and 0.10%; while for <em>E. rufomaculata</em>, the proportions were 41.14%, 5.96%, 38.04%, 1.34%, 11.21%, 2.31%, respectively, and their contribution rates were 46.67%, 17.52%, 15.98%, 2.81%, 14.13% and 2.91%. The above results were different to some extent from our previous reports in Hezhuchong Stream, a second-order river of Hangjiang River and in Tanqigou Stream, a second-order river in upper reach of Changjiang River. The probable reasons resulted from the different environments and distribution regions.