The article is devoted to the problems arising in connection with the possibility of classifying some actions as investigative in the criminal process. Current criminal procedure legislation sets mandatory list of investigative actions. However, in the theory of criminal procedure discussions continue about the attribution of some procedural actions to investigative. The author analyzes theorists’ opinions, judicial practice on controversial issues. The author comes to the conclusion based on the analysis of scientists' opinions, practices that the detention on suspicion of committing a crime of a person, seizure of property, implementation and destruction of evidence cannot be investigative actions and are procedural actions since these actions do not entail getting important and necessary information for the criminal case under investigation. The position is substantiated that actions such as exhumation, getting samples for comparative research may be recognized only as procedural actions since they are held as a rule before the start of some investigative actions, in particular, examination of the corpse and scheduling an expert examination, and a protocol of examination of the corpse and the expert's conclusion are subsequently used as the evidence in criminal cases. The author is convinced that the seizure of property also cannot be recognized as an investigative action because it affects the execution of the sentence made in relation to a particular person and the impossibility of using the property. The conclusion is justified about the need to make changes in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the addition of the norm on the «electronic evidence» as well as proper regulation of the site or computer networks inspection.