Single Surgery Anatomic Success Rate Research Articles

Outcomes after Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy for Retinal Detachment

To provide visual and anatomic outcomes for patients with retinal detachment (RD) in whom primary pneumatic retinopexy (PR) failed. Retrospective, single-center, consecutive case series. Eyes with RD that failed a primary PR. Anatomic and functional outcomes were evaluated for patients receiving treatment for failed PR. Three secondary procedures were compared, including repeat PR, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and combined scleral buckle (SB) plus PPV (SB+PPV). Anatomic reattachment and visual acuity (VA) at 1 year. Of a total of 423 primary PRs performed for RD, this study included 73 cases that failed. The overall single surgery anatomic success rate for the secondary procedure was 75%; the final success rate at 1 year was 100%. There was no statistically significant difference in success rates between repeat PR (63%), PPV (76%), and SB+PPV (88%). Improvement in VA was similar at 1 year between all 3 groups. Visual acuity at 1 year was similar between eyes undergoing PPV and SB+PPV (0.47 logMAR VA [Snellen equivalent, 20/59] for PPV and 0.52 logMAR VA [Snellen equivalent, 20/66] for SB+PPV; P= 0.75). Visual acuity at 1 year was better for those without macular involvement at the time of secondary procedure compared with eyes whose maculae detached (0.29 logMAR VA [Snellen equivalent, 20/39] vs. 0.73 logMAR VA [Snellen equivalent, 20/106]; P < 0.005). Fifty percent of PR failures underwent a secondary procedure within 1 week of primary PR; 80% occurred within 1 month. Anatomic success rates for secondary PR, PPV, and SB+PPV after failed PR were lower thanpublished success rates for their use in primary RD. This suggests that a failed primary PR selects for RDs that are inherently more difficult to reattach. There was a trend suggesting that anatomic success rates are greater with SB+PPV than PPV and, in turn, with PPV than repeat PR. However, these differences were not statistically significant and did not translate into better VA gains at 1 year for either procedure. The suitable procedure after failed PR thus depends on patient presentation, surgeon preference, and patient preference.

Combined pars plana vitrectomy–scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for proliferative vitreoretinopathy

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the surgical outcomes of combined pars plana vitrectomy-scleral buckle (PPV-SB) versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment complicated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). One thousand one hundred and seventy four patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery between January 2002 and December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with grade C PVR treated with either combined PPV-SB or PPV alone were included in the study. Study outcomes included single surgery anatomic success rate and postoperative visual outcome at 12months postoperatively. Seventy-seven patients with grade C PVR were identified for analysis. At the end of 12-month follow-up, 80.5% eyes (33/41) in the PPV-SB group and 58.3% eyes (21/36) in the PPV group achieved single surgery anatomical success. In a multiple logistic regression model, none of the baseline variables (age, gender, macula status, grade of PVR, extent of detachment, presence of vitreous hemorrhage, lens status, status of high myopia) nor types of retinal detachment surgery (use of scleral buckle, barrier endolaser, 360 degree endolaser, cryopexy, retinectomy, tamponade agent, phacoemulsification) had significant effect on single surgery anatomical success. The post-treatment mean logMAR visual acuity of the PPV-SB group was 1.58±0.58 and the PPV group was 1.57±0.61. There was no significant difference in the postoperative visual acuity between the two groups (P=0.849). For patients with grade C PVR, PPV-SB did not demonstrate a superiority over PPV alone in achieving single surgery anatomical success.

A Propensity Score Matching Application: Indications and Results of Adding Scleral Buckle to Vitrectomy: The Retina 1 Project: Report 3

To identify the indications and differences in outcomes for adding a scleral buckle (SB) to pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in a prospective series of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) by using propensity score matching (PSM) to analyze causal effects in observational studies. Data were collected from the Retina 1 Project, a prospective, interventional, nonrandomized study of consecutive RDs. Case selection was based upon treatment with PPV or PPV+SB. Surgeons followed personal criteria for the inclusion of SB in the PPV. Propensity score matching corrected for selection biases. Outcomes were assessed by anatomic and visual criteria and the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Of 523 patients analyzed, 251 had PPV and 272 had PPV+SB. Surgeons used PPV+SB more frequently in younger patients with RD, in those with posterior or unidentified breaks, in phakic eyes, in eyes with the posterior vitreous attached, and for more extended RDs. Overall single surgery anatomic success rate was 86.4%. Based on PSM, there were no difference in reattachment rates of the PPV group, 86.9%, and the PPV+SB group, 85.93%. The incidence of PVR was similar in both groups, with 8.5% in the PPV group and 10.5% in the PPV+SB group. Data from the Retina 1 Project established the indications for adding SB to PPV in treating primary RD in this series. No anatomic or visual differences between PPV and PPV+SB were found.

Comparison of Pars Plana Vitrectomy With and Without Scleral Buckle for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

To compare pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with combined PPV and scleral buckle (SB) for the repair of noncomplex primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Retrospective, nonrandomized, interventional case series. We reviewed 181 consecutive cases of vitrectomy for primary RRD at 2 major medical centers in Israel. The follow-up was at least 3 months. There were 96 eyes in the PPV group and 85 eyes in the PPV plus SB group. Main outcome measures were single-surgery anatomic success (SSAS) and final visual acuity (VA). SSAS was achieved in 81.3% and 87.1% in the PPV and PPV plus SB groups, respectively (P=.29). Final anatomic success rate was 98.9% and 98.8%, respectively (P=.61). Final VA was 0.41 (20/51) in the PPV group and 0.53 (20/68) in the PPV plus SB group (P=.13). The final VA was significantly better than the preoperative VA in both groups (P<.0001). In detachments caused by inferior tears, SSAS rates were 80.9% and 81.5% in the PPV and PPV plus SB groups, respectively (P=.74). In phakic eyes, SSAS rates were 92% and 87.5%, respectively, and in pseudophakic eyes, SSAS rates were 77.5% and 86.7%, respectively, in the PPV and PPV plus SB groups (P=.29). The reattachment rate and the final VA were similar in both groups. The addition of SB did not improve the results and was associated with slightly lower VA than with PPV alone. Tear location or lens status had no significant effect on success rates. It is likely that in eyes undergoing PPV for primary RRD, addition of a SB is not warranted.

ANATOMIC AND VISUAL OUTCOMES IN EARLY VERSUS LATE MACULA-ON PRIMARY RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR

The purpose of this study was to describe the single surgery anatomic success rates and visual outcomes of primary macula-on retinal detachment repaired within 24 hours compared with later than 24 hours. This is a retrospective, comparative, interventional, consecutive case series. All eyes underwent primary surgical repair of the macula-on retinal detachment with a scleral buckle, pars plana vitrectomy, or combination of both procedures. The duration from the initial examination to the time of surgical repair was categorized as early (<24 hours) versus late (>24 hours). Sixty-six eyes, 42 phakic and 24 preoperative pseudophakic, had retinal detachment repair with a median time to surgery of 1.0 ± 2.1 days (0.8 ± 0.4 days in early group versus 3.7 ± 2.2 days in late group, P < 0.005). The overall single surgery anatomic success rate was 59 of 66 eyes (89%). The single surgery anatomic success rate between the early (32 of 37 [87%]) versus late (27 of 39 [93%]) repair groups showed no statistical difference (P = 0.45). The mean time of follow-up was 13.1 months (range 0.9-39.2 months) with the mean final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity showing no statistical difference between the 2 groups (early [0.10 ± 0.02] versus late [0.12 ± 0.03], t-test; P = 0.52). The rates of postoperative glaucoma (P = 0.5) and hemorrhage (P = 0.19) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Delaying the repair of primary macula-on retinal detachment by more than 24 hours does not appear to cause worse visual or anatomic outcomes compared with early (<24 hours) surgical intervention. There was no significant difference in the complication rates between the two groups.

Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Combined Pars Plana Vitrectomy–Scleral Buckle for Primary Repair of Pseudophakic Retinal Detachment

To evaluate pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus a combined PPV and scleral buckle (PPV/SB) for repair of noncomplex, pseudophakic retinal detachment. Retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative interventional study. One hundred fifty-two eyes of 152 patients followed up for a mean of 10 months. The case series included 68 consecutive patients who underwent PPV and 84 consecutive patients who underwent a PPV/SB for primary repair of primary pseudophakic retinal detachment at Wills Eye Hospital between 2002 and 2004. All primary PPV cases were performed by 2 surgeons who perform primary vitrectomy without regard to location of detachment, number and location of break(s), refractive error, or macula status. All primary PPV/SB were performed by a group of surgeons who solely perform PPV/SB on pseudophakic retinal detachments. All eyes underwent a standard 3-port 20-gauge PPV under wide-field viewing and scleral depression. Endolaser photocoagulation was applied either around the retinal tears or 360 degrees to the vitreous base region followed by gas tamponade. Patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade C or worse were excluded from the study. (1) Single surgery anatomic success rates, (2) preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, and (3) complications. The single surgery anatomic success rate in the primary PPV group was 63 of 68 eyes (92.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 84%-98%) and in the primary PPV/SB group was 79 of 84 eyes (94.0%; 95% CI, 87%-98%). Both groups obtained 100% final reattachment rate. There was no statistically significant difference between the success rates (P = 0.75, Fisher exact test). The PPV group's best-corrected postoperative visual acuity demonstrated a +0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution improvement over the PPV/SB group (P = 0.07). The PPV group had a smaller incidence of postoperative complications (13/68 patients [19.1%] vs. 27/84 patients [32.1%]; P = 0.10, Fisher exact test). Primary PPV and PPV/SB seem to have similar efficacy in the repair of a matched group of patients with primary noncomplex pseudophakic retinal detachment. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rate between the 2 groups.