Riedel et al. (2011) discuss the processes of foraminifera transportation and colonization, and their implication to the Holocene history ofWestern Siberia and Aral Sea using work by Gusskov et al. (2008) and other papers (see below) as case studies. Upon acquaintance with the arguments presented and their evaluation, it is necessary to give comments and replies to Riedel et al. (2011) due to their views and misrepresentation of our work (see Gusskov et al., 2008). There are two main topics which deserve discussion: 1) transport of living foraminifera by birds and colonization of lacustrine environments; and 2) geological history of the Caspian and Aral seas in relation to the spread of benthic organisms, primarily foraminifera and mollusks. The major issue raised by Riedel et al. (2011) is the possibility of foraminifera transport by birds as concluded (Riedel et al., 2011:109). This is based on studies by different authors (Resig, 1974; Cann and De Deckker, 1981; Patterson, 1987; Almogi-Labin et al., 1992, 1995; Perthuisot, 1995; Boudreau et al., 2001; Abu-Zied et al., 2007; Wennrich et al., 2007; see Riedel et al., 2011:105). In our opinion, the migration of foraminifera by water birds is unproven. First, nobody has ever observed the transport of living foraminifera by waterfowl, to the best of our knowledge, and this is in accord with Riedel et al. (2011:109). Second, the examples of foraminifera existence in inland lakes and other reservoirs used by Riedel et al. (2011) are not convincing, and they can be sub-divided into two groups. As for the first group, in the references cited the transportation by birds of foraminifera is not discussed; these are Resig (1974), and Cann and De Deckker (1981). In the second group, the authors are convinced that birds transported foraminifera; however, they do not consider other ways of their appearance in lakes and other basins, and this should be briefly commented on. Information presented by Patterson (1987) shows that the foraminifera complex in Lake Tecopa (California, USA) does not represent a natural assemblage. This is supported by the distribution of foraminifera in the lake section; the majority of species are represented by single shells. The degree of shell preservation is quite poor, and is most