A number of techniques (I) are available for the elimination of an unwanted signal (usually the ‘H signal from water) from a spectrum. Unless the unwanted signal is removed before the preamplifier and ADC are encountered in the signal detection pathway, difficulties are experienced in the observation of very weak signals because of dynamic range problems. O f the available techniques the most efficient appears to be the 1331 method developed by Hore (I, 2); however, as Hore points out, this technique is only of limited value if the water resonance is broad. This is the situation often encountered in vivo where very broad water signals are observed, the broadness usually being the result of magnetic field inhomogeneity. In general, for signal elimination the most successful methods have in the past relied on overall nonexcitation of the unwanted resonance, the aim being to leave the unwanted spin coherence along the z axis and away from the detection plane. The alternative procedure would be to destroy selectively the unwanted spin coherence and it is this strategy which has led to the application of reverse polarization transfer methods (3) as probably the most efficient water signal elimination method yet devised. In this paper we develop a method for selectively destroying the water signal, applicable to in vivo NMR studies where broad water signals are often encountered. We call the technique SUBMERGE. The method eliminates transverse water spin coherence over a wide but controllable frequency band. The significant point is that the water spin coherence is destroyed, thus eliminating the signal from the preamplifier and ADC, allowing the efficient detection of weak signals. As a test, we attempt to observe the methyl signal from lactic acid at a concentration of 10 mM in neat HzO. The water signal is thus about 3700 times more intense than the signal of interest. A 250 ml round-bottom flask was used as the sample container. A water signal having a half-height width of 10 Hz was typically detected in a single pulse experiment. In Fig. 1 is shown the experimentally determined excitation profile from a 10 ms 7r/2 sine pulse. The excitation profile from a 10 ms 7r/2 gaussian pulse is also shown for comparison. At a ‘H resonance frequency of 100 MHz (field strength 2.4 T) the chemical-shift separation between the two resonances of interest is about 345 Hz. Thus, by use of such shaped pulses, it is possible to excite the water signal but not the
Read full abstract