IntroductionCognitive neuroscience research over the past decade has produced increasingly fascinating insights into how the human brain processes music, while also enhancing our understanding of brain processes related to many mental health disorders. With these advances, music therapists have turned to cognitive neuroscience to gain understanding in neural processes that are relevant to our field. Much of the neuroscience research in music therapy has focused upon cognitive function and training in recovery from brain injury (see, for example, Leins, Spintge, &Thaut, 2009). This knowledge base continues to grow, even daily, as new research emerges.As neuroscience also delves into the causes, manifestations, and treatments of mental illness, great potential arises for research utilizing neuroimaging techniques in order to understand the effectiveness and mechanisms for music therapy interventions for this population. In this hope, we will summarize available neuroimaging methods and research designs for these purposes and will discuss existing and potential research questions relevant to music therapy and mental health. We will also discuss the limitations of such investigation, as well as ways music therapists can enter this arena through collaboration with neuroscientists. Our aim is to spark interest in this research among clinicians and highlight the potential for increased collaboration between music therapists and neuroscientists for the purpose of understanding and improving the lives of clients coping with a mental illness.imaging MethodsWe begin by describing the most commonly used imaging methods in behavioral health research: electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), single positron emission computed tomography (SPECT), and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), as well as the potential for combining more than one approach simultaneously. In describing these methods, we discuss relevant research, particularly music therapy research, where possible. We also highlight the strengths and limitations of each method, as well as potential research questions given the capabilities of each method and what is known about mental health through these methods. A summary table (Table 1 ) compares each imaging method according to several practical criteria. Figure 1 shows sample images of data and equipment for these different techniques. The accompanying Glossary provides definitions of terminology used throughout the article, and the figure in Legge (this issue) shows relevant regions of the brain discussed throughout.Electroencephalography (EEC)EEG is a widely used neurophysiological recording technique that measures electrical activity at the surface of the scalp using a standardized array of electrodes. Although it does not result in any high-resolution visual representation of neuroanatomicai structures, a typical EEG readout provides valuable information about neuron-based electrical activity in real time. Medical professionals often use EEG to diagnose and monitor pathologies such as epilepsy, encephalopathy, and sleep disorders. A standard EEG setup includes 21 electrodes (19 scalp electrodes plus two additional reference electrodes), although some variations include more or less. Any EEG recording can be represented as several different types of readouts-called montages. Different montages actually represent different ways of viewing voltage differences between the various electrodes, so selection of an appropriate montage can have important implications. For instance, the exact location of a seizure's onset may be most apparent in a particular montage.Electromagnetic waves detected by EEG occur at different frequencies, just as sound waves do. These waves are usually divided into five major bands based on frequency: delta (up to 4 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8-15 Hz), beta (16-31 Hz), and gamma (32 Hz and higher). …