Single Perturbation Load Approach Research Articles

The use of initial imperfection approach in design process and buckling failure evaluation of axially compressed composite cylindrical shells

Thin-walled cylindrical shells are susceptible to buckling failures caused by the axial compressive loading. During the design process or the buckling failure evaluation of axially-compressed cylindrical shells, initial geometric and loading imperfections are of important parameters for the analyses. Therefore, the engineers/designers are expected to well understand the physical behaviours of shell buckling to prevent unexpected serious failure in structures. In particular, it is widely reported that no efficient guidelines for modelling imperfections in composite structures are available. Knowledge obtained from the relevant works is open for updates and highly sought. In this work, we study the influence of imperfections on the critical buckling of axially compressed cylindrical shells for different geometries and composite materials (Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP), Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)) and aluminium using the finite element (FE) analysis. Two different imperfection techniques called eigenmode-affine method and single perturbation load approach (SPLA) were adopted. Validations of the present results with the published experimental data were presented. The use of the SPLA for introducing an imperfection in axially compressed composite cylindrical shells seemed to be desirable in a preliminary design process and an investigation of a buckling failure. The knockdown factors produced by the SPLA were becoming attractive to account for uncertainties in the structure.

Hybrid Framework for Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Imperfect Stiffened Shells

Variations of manufacturing process parameters, environment aspects, and imperfections may significantly affect the quality and performance of stiffened shells. The reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) of stiffened shells, considering all these uncertainty factors simultaneously, is extremely time-consuming, even if the surrogate-based technology is used. Therefore, a hybrid bi-stage framework for RBDO of stiffened shells is presented to release the computational burden, where two main sources of uncertainties are considered: variations of material properties and geometric dimensions are described as random variables, while various forms of imperfections of stiffened shells are covered by the single perturbation load approach. The basic idea of the proposed method is to combine the efficiency of smeared stiffener method with the accuracy of finite element method, and then narrow the design window efficiently with little accuracy sacrifice. The adaptive chaos control method is used to ensure the robustness of the search process of the most probable target point. The numerical example illustrates the advantage of the proposed method over other RBDO approaches from the point of view of computational cost, accuracy and robustness of the result.

The Influence of Geometrical Parameters on the Buckling Behavior of Conical Shell by the Single Perturbation Load Approach

Since the development of the first theories to predict the buckling induced by axial compression in shells sensitive to imperfections, a significant discrepancy between theoretical and experimental results has been observed. Donnell and Koiter are among the first authors demonstrating, for these structures, the relevant influence of the geometrical imperfections on the reduction of the buckling load. Currently, the preliminary design of imperfections sensitive shell structures used in space applications is carried out according to the NASA SP-8007guideline. However, several studies have proven that this guideline leads to over-conservative design configurations when considering the geometrical and material imperfections existing in real cones. Since the pioneer work of Arbocz, alternative methods have been investigated to overcome this issue. Among the different approaches, in this paper, the Single Perturbation Load Approach (SPLA), originally developed byHuhne as a deterministic way to calculate the knock-down factor of imperfection sensitive shells, is further studied. Indeed, a numerical investigation about the application of the SPLA to the simulation of the mechanical behavior of imperfection sensitive composite conical structures under axial compression is presented. This study is related to part of the work performed in the frame of the European Union (EU) project DESICOS.

The single perturbation load approach applied to imperfection sensitive conical composite structures

The importance of taking into account geometric imperfections for cylindrical and conical thin-walled structures prone to buckling had been already recognized by the first authors dealing with new formulations. Nowadays, the analysts still use empirically based lower-bound methods such as the NASA SP-8007 guideline to calculate the required knock-down factors (KDFs), which does include important mechanical properties of laminated composite materials, such as the stacking sequence. New design approaches that allow taking full advantage of composite materials are required.The single perturbation load approach (SPLA), a new deterministic approach first proposed by Hühne, will be investigated with unstiffened composite conical structures varying the geometry, lamina and layup. The SPLA׳s capability for predicting KDF is compared with the NASA approach. The SPLA was applied to the geometrically perfect structures and to the structure with geometric imperfections of two types, mid-surface imperfections and thickness imperfections. The study contributes to the European Union (EU) project DESICOS, whose aim is to develop less conservative design guidelines for imperfection sensitive thin-walled structures.

Geometric imperfections and lower-bound methods used to calculate knock-down factors for axially compressed composite cylindrical shells

The important role of geometric imperfections on the decrease of the buckling load for thin-walled cylinders had been recognized already by the first authors investigating the theoretical approaches on this topic. However, there are currently no closed-form solutions to take imperfections into account already during the early design phases, forcing the analysts to use lower-bound methods to calculate the required knock-down factors (KDF). Lower-bound methods such as the empirical NASA SP-8007 guideline are commonly used in the aerospace and space industries, while the approaches based on the Reduced Stiffness Method (RSM) have been used mostly in the civil engineering field. Since 1970s a considerable number of experimental and numerical investigations have been conducted to develop new stochastic and deterministic methods for calculating less conservative KDFs. Among the deterministic approaches, the single perturbation load approach (SPLA), proposed by Hühne, will be further investigated for axially compressed fiber composite cylindrical shells and compared with four other methods commonly used to create geometric imperfections: linear buckling mode-shaped, geometric dimples, axisymmetric imperfections and measured geometric imperfections from test articles. The finite element method using static analysis with artificial damping is used to simulate the displacement controlled compression tests up to the post-buckled range of loading. The implementation of each method is explained in details and the different KDFs obtained are compared. The study is part of the European Union (EU) project DESICOS, whose aim is to combine stochastic and deterministic approaches to develop less conservative guidelines for the design of imperfection sensitive structures.

Numerical characterization of imperfection sensitive composite structures

Currently, imperfection sensitive shell structures prone to buckling are designed according to the NASA SP-8007 guideline, from 1968, using its conservative lower bound curve. In this guideline the structural behavior of composite materials is not appropriately considered, since the imperfection sensitivity and the buckling load of shells made of such materials depend on the lay-up design. In this context a numerical investigation about the different methodologies to characterize the behavior of imperfection sensitive composite structures subjected to compressive loads up to buckling is presented in this paper. A comparative study is addressed between a new methodology, called “Single Perturbation Load Approach”, adopted by the European project DESICOS, and some classical approaches such as non-linear analyses considering geometric and thickness imperfection obtained from real measurements. An extension of the Single Perturbation Load Approach called “Multiple Perturbation Load Approach” is also introduced in this paper to investigate if one perturbation load is enough to create the worst geometrical imperfection case.The aim of this work is to validate these numerical methodologies with experimental results and point out their limitation, advantage and disadvantage, to calculate less conservative knock-down factors than the obtained with the NASA SP-8007 guideline for unstiffened composite cylinders.

Exploring the constancy of the global buckling load after a critical geometric imperfection level in thin-walled cylindrical shells for less conservative knock-down factors

Some of the knock-down factors applied in design of rocket launcher structures are based on design recommendations which rely on lower-bound curves from experimental data. The best known example is the NASA guideline SP 8007, published in 1965 and revised in 1968, which is applied for cylindrical structures in the space industry. This guideline is based on test data, computational methods and resources from the 1930–1960's. At that time the application of less empirical methods for the design of actual cylindrical shells could not count with the current computational power, and the available methods led to quite large discrepancies between experiments and test observations. Significant improvement on the available analyses approaches and manufacturing techniques since 1960's have not been taken into account in design processes using the NASA SP-8007, and many authors have recognized that for the current standards this guideline is leading to conservative structures. Another aspect for attention regarding application of the NASA SP-8007 for composite shells is that it does not consider the laminate stacking sequence. Moreover, physical observations regarding how does the imperfection sensitivity of unstiffened cylindrical shells change with the presence of an induced geometric imperfection have also suggested that the current applied design rules are too conservative. This conservativeness is confirmed by many tests carried out recently. This study presents an overview of the problem and a detailed description of the physical observations regarding the buckling mechanism of the thin shells under consideration. It is discussed how these observations can be used for less conservative, laminate dependent, knock-down factors accounting for geometric imperfections. The single perturbation load approach is studied in detail and a physically based definition for the minimum perturbation load (P1) is given, paving the way for the development of semi-analytical methods to calculate this minimum perturbation load.